The other day we did a post on the appointment of the head of the NDP, a former CBC talk show host and man who operates under communist systems of reasoning, at least in policy, beliefs, method of thinking etc. if not openly stated as such, Avi Lewis.
We got a comment rightfully admonishing us or at least correcting us for using the term, “Lived Experience” when he was attempting to negate Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s actual experience and hard knowledge about the nature of Islam, freedom, and the Islamic countries she actually lived in which Lewis likely has never even visited. as well as the freedom the United States and the West offered her.
Avi Lewis is a woke Leftist masquerading as a normal politician; as such, he is using “lived experience” as a dialectical term of art and trying to make us buy it as normal English.
So, as he means it, he is precisely correct. “Lived experience” would be for Ali to place her personal experience in the proper revolutionary framework. That would make it impossible for her to criticise a revolutionary ally such as “radical” Muslims for anything other than failing to act even more in support of the revolution. Since she’s not placing “radical” islam in the proper class context of fellow victim of multiple and intersecting types of oppression and who is awake to being a victim of these oppressions (and therefore at war with the oppressors) she is ipso facto not expressing “lived experience.”
We were in fact, mocking the entire concept by using the term, which is as Peter B points out, is indeed initiate language for dialectical purposes, but in the way in which people would normally understand it. But then we fail to actually consistently explain the nature of the attacks on reality via dialectical tactics.
Below is James Lindsay’s video on the term, “Lived Experience”. It is simply explained and directly on point.
While Lindsay’s explanation is on point, and very good. It might be simpler to reduce the concept of the dialectical use of language and concepts, and even naming things to destroy the thing itself.
The Human Rights Commissions in Canada are to destroy individual rights, and that is all they do.
The dialectical use of “lived experience” is to destroy real science and the lived experience of those who’s experience contradicts the Marxist revolutionary’s intentions.
Dialectical climatology is about rewriting the science to make it appear as if the world will be destroyed if we do not deconstruct Western Civilization immediately. Exactly as they did with “Nuclear Winter”. Some went as far as to claim it was a solar system wide event. (In a rare case of genuine irony, since the sunspot cycle was more active for a few decades it actually was a solar system wide phenomenon which itself destroys the concept of anthropogenic Global warming since no one was driving a Ford F 150 on Mars.)
“Trans-affirming care” is a dialectical term that actually means to spay or neuter children, or severely brainwashed or mentally unwell older children.
Multiculturalism is my favourite one. It actually means to use one culture against another until there are no cultures left. It works extremely well against tolerant cultures but it has never worked against Islam, because Islam knows what it believes and can’t be conned into believing something else equally ludicrous and destructive to themselves as a culture.
“Health-Canada”, say no more.
Black Lives Matters was a communist minstrel show.
“ANTIFA”, do I really need to explain that one?
Feminism: A war on women via dialectical lines of operation.
Even the concept of Racism as it is now is a dialectical term, even though most are not ready to hear that. But everywhere outside of the Western world, racism of one form or another is policy. Even law. Like only Muslims can go to Mecca or Medina, all others can’t even take that exit off the highway, and Muslim countries have concrete laws diminishing the legal status of non Muslims under Dhimmitude. In China, non-Han Chinese pay double or more for everything. In Africa you had better be the right tribe in certain areas. It is only in the West where racism is considered problematic. And the consequences of it, while initially classically liberal, meaning that all people of any race so long as they shared Western values were welcome, were great. I mean that really. But once they added multiculturalism, it means at BEST the total Balkanization of the Western world, and probably the replacement of governments with local war lords. For sure this is likely already happening in the UK.
But the term is dialectical because racism is used as a weapon against whatever target race they intend, which in theory will eventually be all of them. That is the communist way.
The list of dialectically named issues is too long to post them all or more to the point, even remember them all in one post. So those who think of others, please post them in the comments.
When Avi interviewed Hirsi Ali on her escape from Islam, he did not treat her as an equal.
He knew nothing of the feminine voice.
He a new possessed ‘masculinity’ born from Feminist anger. Created from her rib. Serving the Dyke. An intellectual copier of men, as much as male transwomen mimic women to put them under their total control by merely demonstrating that they can physically walk in her shoes. And outward gaze. While female transwomen, the elite, the mistresses and creators, the haters of all women, remain hidden in plain sight.
Muslims are submitting-males. Dhimmis. This is a fact that they themselves boast about. Therefore, this religion of male-submissions, advances Feminism. The beasts Hitler wanted to rampage without conscience for Germany.
They are both dealing with deaths of the soul. The child within. Crushing the masculine “I am who I am” for the “we are who we are”. Worshipping the female-form as Devil or as God. A complete universe. No man existing with it. Mohammad’s preoccupation with fiddling lady parts no matter how small, was the first Feminist.
And when Hirsi Ali is fighting this fight to make men and women back into real men and real women, Avi will not allow his Totem of Feminism to fall, lest his fear of his mother’s silence stare of “you won’t like my rejection when I’m outraged” return.
(Human’s are prone to act on subconscious fear by creating elaborate cultures of denial and justifications. No one told the children at their schools nor the Large Language Models built to train their adults).