The most dangerous story in Canada

Can’t say too much about it here I suspect. But Laura Lynn, who did the interview, had police at her home, and was brought to court for doing and airing an interview with this Vancouver father.

Please click through and read the summary of the story and see the banned videos here.

A little bit of auxiliary information.

The father is prohibited in talking about his daughter’s case. The government excuse for this draconian order is that it may identify his daughter.

However the daughter is perfectly open about this entire issue on her social media and school. There is less than no effort to keep it all secret. She has broadcast it. Further, her lawyer has specifically identified her in public as the subject of this issue.

This might lead one to believe that the father is legally gagged because he opposes this insane sterilization of children and permanent chemical and surgical alteration of children in the name of modern Neo-Marxist gender theory. Had he been supportive of it all, my guess is he would be paid by the Liberal government to tour his story across Canada.

 

America’s National Archives run by Orwell’s Winston Smith

ERRATUM: When I had first read this article I had mistakenly assumed this was about the Canadian archives, when in fact it was about the US archives. This helps explain why a member of Obama’s admin was part of the process of the decision to alter the record. But as it was Obama that got Trudeau re elected with his endorsement to undo the black face damage, it did not seem unusual that it could be Canada at the time of writing. Thank you DM for the correction. I will leave the post up because the main point is worthy even if the target is a few degrees farther south.

It turns out that Canada’s National “Archives” have as much to do with preserving truth in history as the CBC does in reporting truth in news.

From The Hill.com:

National Archives says it altered Trump signs, other messages in Women’s March photo

The National Archives acknowledged this week that it altered a photograph of the Women’s March, which took place the day after President Trump’s inauguration in 2017, to blur some signs held by marchers that were critical of the president.

 

Among the alterations are the blotting out of the word “Trump” in a placard that reads “God Hates Trump,” and the blurring of the same word in another sign that reads “Trump & GOP — Hands Off Women.” Words on other signs referencing female anatomy were also altered.

 

The Archives said the decision to obscure certain words was made as an exhibit featuring the march was being developed. It said the archivist, David Ferriero, who was appointed by former President Obama in 2009 and who was involved in the talks, supports the decision. 

 

“As a non-partisan, non-political federal agency, we blurred references to the President’s name on some posters, so as not to engage in current political controversy,” Archives spokeswoman Miriam Kleiman said in a statement to The Washington Post. 

 

“Our mission is to safeguard and provide access to the nation’s most important federal records, and our exhibits are one way in which we connect the American people to those records. Modifying the image was an attempt on our part to keep the focus on the records.” 

If there is an upside, it is that this action by the Archives is like a Cole’s Notes on the book, 1984.

Lets look at that last sentence:

“Modifying the image was an attempt on our part to keep the focus on the records.” 

So they preserved the record of the event by altering it. Something which the Obama government supported, because they are non-political. This is what Orwell referred to as “New-speak”. The total misrepresentation of a thing to explain the thing, A contradiction of the facts to justify the action. Or perhaps best stated as, ‘Thesis, counter-thesis, solution’.

“We killed the patient in order to keep the focus on his health”.

At least we are allowed to know for the moment, that Canadian government institutions are taking the Orwell approach to reality as does the CBC. The horror likely won’t start until anyone exposing these methods find themselves in “good health with total freedom” as the National Archives or CBC might put it.

 

Is this the woman that Trudeau effectively made PM?

Her job description 

Trudeau now

Shark Tank regular analyzes Trudeau’s economic performance

Correction: The guest is “Mr. Wonderful” from Shark Tank and The Lion’s Den. A successful entrepreneur who is being sued for wrongful death in a boating accident. Kevin O’Leary.

Thank you for the correction Charles Hawtrey

Update 2:

Listen at the end. He is pitching the globalist view .. trading with China as though everything will be great once the US acquiesces to China. He is totally out of touch.

Here is Gordon Chang on China
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/chang-china-trump-united-states/2019/11/08/id/940766/

It should probably be added that the arrest of the Huawei executive is one of the few good things Trudeau has done, and probably at the request of the USA.

Canada is holding her under house-arrest for extradition to the US although it is taking quite a while.

 

Trudeau admires, and imitates “basic Chinese dictatorship”

And now we have this:

Trudeau Government Election Law Crushes Free Speech, Mimics Legislation In Authoritarian States

How bad and dangerous is the Trudeau government’s election law?

Even CBC is ripping into it.

Yes, I was surprised to see that even CBC has been raising concerns about the law, with a report by Evan Dyer even making the comparison between the law to what we see in authoritarian states.

The law is the amended Section 91 of the Elections Act, and here’s what it says:

 

“Elections Act, 91 (1) No person or entity shall, with the intention of affecting the results of an election, make or publish, during the election period, (a) a false statement that a candidate, a prospective candidate, the leader of a political party or a public figure associated with a political party has committed an offence under an Act of Parliament or a regulation made under such an Act—or under an Act of the legislature of a province or a regulation made under such an Act—or has been charged with or is under investigation for such an offence; or (b) a false statement about the citizenship, place of birth, education, professional qualifications or membership in a group or association of a candidate, a prospective candidate, the leader of a political party or a public figure associated with a political party.”

And the penalty for violating the law?

Up to 5 YEARS IN JAIL, and/or a fine of $50,000.

This video of Steve King may explain Obama’s support of Trudeau

Some people have been asking via Twitter and elsewhere about Obama’s odd endorsement of Trudeau despite the black face nonsense. Of course the answer is communism. Black face crap is just to be used against conservatives as a rhetorical weapon. For socialists its nothing. Below though, this is an answer:

As an aside, it occurs to me that when Trudeau says he is a feminist, yet acts in the manner he does, it is because when he says he is a feminist, what he is really saying is, he is a socialist.

Feminism was created by the Suffragettes using chapter and verse Marxism. So for Trudeau, there is no contradiction when he claims to be a feminist yet disenfranchises honest women in his cabinet like Judge Jody Wilson-Raybould.

Anything which interferes with his ‘Globalist’ (Marxist) agenda is anti feminism no matter who it is from, and anything which works towards it, is progressivism as it progresses towards a Neo-Marxist nation and world.

This also could explain Obama’s endorsement of Trudeau despite the multiple black face episodes, when each and every one of us knows to the depths of our soles, how both Obama and Trudeau would have treated a non-leftist who did these costumed exhibitions.

BPS on Canada. Or whatever it is.

This is very good. The only thing that could have been added to his point, would be how our government at one point arbitrarily converted Canada to the Metric system, despite all our trade being with the USA, and everyone knowing the imperial system, and actually criminalizing use of the old system in commerce. Yes, you could go to jail for selling gas in gallons or milk in quarts until Joe Clark’s Freedom to Measure bill. But by then the damage had been done. Trudeau senior had managed to show us that our culture and history could be negated with the stroke of his commie pen. And that was the real purpose of imposing a foreign system of weights and measures that would cost us a fortune in term of dealing with US imports and exports.

Makes one think about bilingualism a little doesn’t it?

Is Canada detailing how it implements M-103 despite it not being a law?

This very much appears to be the Marxist approach to negating a culture and a people by using what Trudeau called, “A whole of government approach” to dealing with ‘hate crimes’, the secular or Marxist equivalent of Islamic blasphemy laws. Notice how many of the approaches Canada details are not government but are likely agencies like CAIR-Canada (Now NCCM) and other groups who get government money to enforce or create data sets to support this narrative.

Direct link:

https://d.tube/v/vladtepesblog/QmRnqFvDvrLL3fQTKENMmEwDdAEDvp4B3uSvwWBD6jU24e