Anti-Fascist, Trump protesters applaud speech comprised entirely of Hitler quotes

From the Youtube page:

Published on Jul 2, 2017

At the Impeach Trump March in Chicago 7/2/17. A group of protesters applaud a speech comprised almost entirely of Adolf Hitler quotes given by Shad Daley. This was 20 seconds after saying they need to fight fascism. After the speech, the organizing member of refusefascism.org was desperate to get Shad more involved. Another wonderful example of how the left doesn’t understand their own hypocrisy and ignorance.

Speech Transcript:
Ladies, Gentleman, and non-binary members of this congregation:
I would like to thank everyone for coming out today to support the constitutional rule of law, I stand here today, a veteran of these United States armed forces, and a proud 21st century patriot. I would like to take this opportunity to talk about this oppressive regime, and the repressive regime that constitutes capitalism as a whole.

We are Socialists, we are enemies of the capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with it’s unfair salaries, rights it’s unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions.

Benefit to the community precedes benefit to the individual… The state should retain supervision and each property owner should consider himself appointed by the state. It is his duty not to use his property against the interests of others among his own people. This is the crucial matter. This American Nation will always retain its right to control the owners of property… A policy of laissez faire in this sphere is not only cruelty to the individual guiltless victims but also to the nation as a whole.

For there is one thing we must never forget… the majority can never replace the man.

Life is like a mirror, if you frown at it, it frowns back, if you smile it returns the greeting.

Donald Trump seems to think that if you tell a big enough lie, and tell it frequently enough, that it will be believed. It’s not the truth that matters, but victory.

The doom of a nation can be averted only by a storm of flowing passion, but only those who are passionate themselves can arouse passion in others.

Sandra Solomon faces off with ANTIFA in Winnipeg

There is a pile of critically important news and Muslim attacks right now which will be posted shortly but for the moment, please check the comments in the daily reader’s links post to see the latest on the Islamic attack and mass shooting of expats in Manila Philippines near the airport, and the explosion and fire at the Vatican.

Sandra Solomon assaulted by ANTIFA in Winnipeg, arrests made

Details here:

A good friend of this site suggested using the title: “White men attack Muslim woman”, or, if that was too off the mark, “White men beat Arab women” and that would satisfy the full-on identity politics aspects of it.

Brilliant idea, and funny. But one is reluctant to go down that road even for the laugh. ANTIFA is nearly 100% white males with a smattering of women for the thugs to hide behind when they attack people they don’t like with bike locks etc. But the problem as we all know is not that they are white males. Its that they are various flavours of post-modernists ranging from classic Soviet commies to essentially Nazi brown shirts, and all the types of post-modernists that agree that violent revolution is what is needed to take down classical liberalism. The one true enemy they are certain of.

Sandra is an ex-Muslim and an Arab. But they attacked her because she stands against the narrative. She wants to blunt the best weapon the leftists have against us. Islam. And they won’t stand for that.

Even so, it was too funny an idea to leave alone entirely so I had to at least include it in the post. And we all do know by now, if the CBC was writing it up, they would most certainly do a spin like that if they thought they could get away with it.

Canada’s “people’s court” bans another song

Many Canadians still need proof that Canada is now a Marxist-Islamic nation as opposed to a liberal democracy based on rule of law. Or more accurately is rapidly transitioning from the latter to the former.

This story about banned songs on a university campus should give you a good idea of the direction and purpose. They are going to form committees to decide what songs are allowed according to the moment’s inclusivity laws. The fact that the song was actually promoting the thing its accused of being offensive against, is irrelevant just like the ban of the Sultan’s of Swing’s song, Money for Nothing, was actually mocking homophobic bigoted conservatives, but they forced an apology from Mark Knopfler anyway. Who stupidly gave it.

So, like the United Soviet Socialist Republic, everything has a committee and every committee has to prove its value to the core ideology by being more and more restrictive of the rights of others. Even when it comes to interpretation of pop songs. But that will represent a tiny fraction of what you can say, wear, believe or act on.

What’s that you say? Why care about what a voluntary committee on a campus or media group which has no real binding authority has to say?

From the article on the banning of the Dire Straights song linked above:

“Asked about whether the decision could be appealed through courts, Mr. Cohen mentioned the case of the Quebec radio station CHOI-FM, which he said left the voluntary Council in disputes over the use of abusive language.

What happened then, he said, was that the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, a government body analogous to America’s Federal Communications Commission, rejected the station’s bid to renew its license. As a legal case was winding its way through Canada’s courts, in the CRTC’s favor to that point, the license to use the frequency was sold and the case became moot.”

Dah comrade. Groups of cultural Marxists with years of cult-like indoctrination in post modernism, partially to mostly replacing reason and logic as foundations of decision making, and fully supplanting liberalism, decide what restrictions will bring about social utopia, and more importantly the death of free market economics and liberal thought, and if people offer them the middle finger, they will lose everything that hundreds of people over decades have worked for, from personal wealth to a means to employ people.

Yes. An actual government agency like the CRTC which probably shouldn’t exist in the first place and for the same reasons, will kill the entire business with the abuse of one regulation.

Notice how the student group apologized for the Lou Reed song:

“According to the student group, the song, by Lou Reed, was selected for the 1970s and 1980s playlist out of “ignorance” and was “an error in judgment.””

But wait! There’s more!

““While we acknowledge that the song was written with certain purpose and intention, we would also emphasize that media is not always consumed in the ways that it was intended,” the group added.””

No attempt was made to defend freedom of speech. But more interestingly, no attempt was made to explain that this song in fact was meant to force the general population to accept men who pass themselves off as women. They just meekly complied like anyone facing a Soviet People’s Court. And worse, they are banning it based on possible interpretations of the lyrics. Thinking for us, and protecting us from improper ideological exposure of our own devisings.

So now, we must obey the new ideological framework of things without even acknowledging what it is.

Now that, is real power.

Revisiting Jordan Peterson testimony to Canadian senate committee on C 16.

Yes, this item was posted a day or two ago as well. But it is a very important and content rich item rife with apparent irony.

The second half of the video deals with the base ideology of the proposed bill Vs. evolutionary biology. And as one listens, at least anyone over 35 or so, one may remember that the background noise of growing up, certainly in the 70s and maybe even the 80s and 90s, was the political left constantly hooting that right wing people are anti-science and too stupid to understand evolutionary biology.

The Scopes Monkey trial was sold as left wing pro reason and science people Vs. right wing knuckle dragging religious Christians that wanted to enforce a literalist Biblical view of the origins of humanity.

This was not true then, but even If it was, in the end it is the left that not only insists we abandon Darwin, but just as the left did in the Soviet Union, actually criminalize it. Or at least criminalize any actions or speech that would derive from operating under a scientific view of evolution, biology, and its specifics on sex and sexual reproduction.

As a child, a relative once told me that “stupidity is not the most common substance in the universe. Irony is.” But as ironic as this looks, the left has always been in essence a totalitarian religion. The left teaches that all reason or facts or history that shows leftist/post modern foundations to be unsound are not reasons to abandon that foundation, but in fact reasons to abandon reason and science.

1956 interview with the author of Brave New World, Aldous Huxley

A minor proof that he was right, is that you cannot show people on TV smoking anymore. In fact I suspect this was cropped to get rid of the cigarettes at least one of them was smoking during the interview.

A proof that the mask is coming off the Marxist basis of Canadian government agencies: Jordan Peterson loses grant

Jordan Peterson loses government grant for being politically incorrect on an unrelated issue.

(I cannot think of a better example of how communism works than that)

TORONTO — University of Toronto psychology professor Dr. Jordan Peterson has had a federal research grant application denied for the first time in his long and distinguished academic career.

And he’s certain that the rejection from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, the government agency that supports post-secondary research, is linked to the controversy surrounding his stand on gender-neutral pronouns such as “zie” and “zher,” and the modern notion of gender as being fluid.

That his application was also rated so poorly is telling, he said, meaning that if the proposal had just missed the mark, it might have been a credible critique, but the proposal failed abysmally.

Julia Gualtieri, spokeswoman for the council, said in an email Monday that grants are awarded through a merit review process, and that “past funding is not a guarantee of further funding.” Names of the peer review committee members will be publicly posted once all applicants have been fully notified, she said. […]

Well before Peterson erupted on to the public consciousness last fall with his YouTube videos questioning the current push for genderless pronouns and gender equity, he was recognized as a respected scientist.

He taught at Harvard University for six years.

His so-called “h-index,” for instance, is considered exceptional.

The h-index is the result of physicist Jorge Hirsch’s attempt to measure the quality of scientists, not just the number of times he or she was published.

In other words, both productivity and impact are measured.

According to Hirsch, after 20 years of research, an h-index of 20 is good, 40 outstanding; Peterson’s score is 49. His total citation count is almost 8,000.

For those not familiar with the brilliant Dr. Peterson, here is a video of a lecture he gave recently in Ottawa, which in today’s climate, thanks to the resurgent totalitarian left, is a brave position to have, but really really should’t be.

Can any reader of this site, find an example of leftist and even openly Marxist profs with 1/4 of the credentials but no problems getting grants?

H/T M.

Now is a good time to buy every book by Charles Murray you can, before the new Fascists ban them all

First, the video:

(Dr. Murray is introduced at just before 19:00)

The story:

Protesters shouted down and physically intimidated Charles Murray, the prominent conservative political scientist, at Middlebury College on Thursday evening.

The demonstrators attacked Murray and a professor, Allison Stanger, after disrupting the evening’s planned lecture and forcing a change of venue. One demonstrator yanked Stanger by the hair. The professor was taken to the emergency room as a result of the assault.

“One of the demonstrators pulled Prof. Stanger’s hair and twisted her neck,” Bill Burger, the college’s vice president of communications and marketing, told the Addison County Independent. “She was attended to at Porter Hospital later and (on Friday) is wearing a neck brace

Now seems like the right time to mention that Murray’s book, “Human Accomplishment” is brilliant, fascinating and informative. It is a magnificent look at the history of all innovation in art and elsewhere, with an excellent chapter on post-modernism as an artistic-political movement with all the destruction it has brought with it.

It has an amazing look at the history of technology in China, which shows the incredible achievements of that nation and people. One example of which, from memory, is that when Columbus sailed from Spain to the Caribbean, the Chinese were launching armadas of over 200 ships, the smallest of which was the size of Chris’s or larger and traveling for longer distances.

His methodology for determining greatness in art is also fascinating.

As for us, the masses.

We have to show these fascists in the audience who wish to decide what may and may not be said, itself bad enough to fight, but worse, based on a template of cultural Marxism and at the expense of truth and science, that we will make those they shut down famous and best sellers.

Here is a great chance to do just that.

Fjordman also wrote a series of articles on this book which are equally worthy of reading.