Toronto: Why is the RCMP trying to recruit at a Muslim Brotherhood affiliated Mosque?

From The Post Millennial

Canadians need to have faith in the institutions designed to protect them, and at least one recent development will not help the RCMP’s credibility. On March 1st, 2019 the RCMP held a recruitment session at Masjid Toronto, a mosque that is a part of the Muslim Association of Canada (MAC), a group that openly affiliates itself as inspired by the Muslim Brotherhood.

 

Their mere presence at Masjid Toronto should raise eyebrows considering the mosque’s recent controversies.

This is where Aymen Elkasrawy was caught on video leading a prayer that incited violence and hatred against multiple groups.  Here is an excerpt.

The article continues to include some of the text from the following video:

Here is the announcement of theRCMP recruiting announcement from this exact mosque:

Here are the posts with the Toronto Star attempts to mitigate the effects of exposing this much Islamic antisemitism to daylight:

Toronto Star explains he didn’t really mean what he meant and we are horrible for noticing he said it

Toronto Star and imam double down on denial

 

The Chrislam Deception

A guest essay by Danielle T’arna, written for VladTepesBlog with much thanks

The growing darkness and emerging death of Christianity in the church

Abridged version

By Danielle T’arna

“I stand amongst you as one who is crying out
for you to wake up before what you have dies
and is taken from you, never to be seen again”

In recent years the merger of Christianity and islam “Chrislam” has now reached the level in the UK that it has become part of mainstream Christianity and culture. It is more well known as Inter Faith in the UK and fully embraced by the church and state. I truly believe that we celebrated our last traditional Christmas and Easter many years ago in the UK.

For many years evangelical Christians have been warning of a deceptive doctrine and growing movement that has been slowly emerging over the last two decades. Chrislam slowly emerged in the UK when we started to see a mass influx of immigrants and refugees. Where muslim immigrants and refugees settled and were housed in major cities we started to see multi faith events and organizations develop, along with church led community groups and charities, that tried to promote community cohesion amongst its growing muslim communities.

Chrislam has flourished because of the nations fear of islamic terror attacks, fatwas being issued under islamic blasphemy laws and a need to understand a very alien and exotic ideology and religion. We have seen these terrorist attacks and threats from islam used as a tool to enforce cultural changes in many Christian countries like Canada, Sweden, Germany and France. Chrislam infiltrated the church on many levels that included theology, community organisations and projects, the use of churches for islamic worship and prayers, charities, the inclusion of islam in church services, worship, prayers, sermons, music and arts festivals,[1] changing the names of Christian festivals such as Christmas and Easter to one that accommodates islam.

I personally have seen Christian schools promote the reading of the koran (quran) and take their pupils for regular visits to their local mosque. I have seen Christian schools cater halal meals for muslim pupils while enforcing halal food on the rest of its pupils. I have have seen the merger of both Christian and muslim festivals in schools and in community run projects.[2]

I have only just begun to scratch the surface of Chrislam in the UK with this article. I have only named just a few of the many government and non government organisations involved with Chrislam. It is a well funded and corrupt machine paid for by the church, government, islamic foundations, islamic countries and the European Union.

My immersion into the world of Chrislam

There is one question that I have been asking myself and that is“Why is the church inviting overseas missionaries to come and work in the UK ?” Surely it can’t be for the evangelism of a Christian nation ? I can answer this with my personal insight and involvement with one such missionary couple from 2014 – 2017

In late 2014 I was invited to a community peacemeal in the Winson Green area of Birmingham by an Australian couple who are overseas missionaries. Ash and Anji Barker had recently arrived in Birmingham from working as missionaries in the Klong Toey slums of Bangkok. Anji had been invited to work in Birmingham by the UK Christian charity Oasis Trust[3] and to coordinate community activities in two of the charities Christian run Oasis Academy schools in Winson Green. When Ash and Anji moved into a very large vicarage called Newbigin House they quickly got to work establishing a charity called Newbigin Community Trust [2] which I was a founding trustee of. Newbigin Community Trust is just a part of the many projects run from Newbigin House[4]

During my time getting alongside Ash and Anji, I would observe how they worked with different groups of people in the community and how they would link with churches, work with local authorities, businesses and ngos. Ash is a very laid back, loving and calm person. Anji is very very active, encouraging and enabling and didn’t stop talking and never thought about what she was saying. We were working with many muslim families who had come to the UK as refugees and migrants. We started to adapt our work around the physical and emotional needs of local muslims.

Continue Reading →

Geopolitics: Leftists in US Intel and more

1. October 10th, Paris: Antifa does major demonstration against the leftist leader, showing it doesn’t matter one bit who wins or loses elections. Their goal is the take down of the entire system.

2. This one seems a bit technical at first but read it through. “active and former US agents” blew an operation where Israel and the US worked together to neutralize a very serious Russian cyber-op against us all.

This Twitter feed seems worth following on this, and possibly other related issues.

*** Tommy Robinson’s account of the ambush yesterday ***

For a sense of the scale of the problem as it is known in England, please see the following video:

For anyone who would like to read a serious, properly sourced expose of the issue, please read one of the most important books in two decades Easy Meat by Peter Mcloughlin.

 

Prospective Canadian Interfaith Conversation “Our Whole Society” Conference Participants, Attendees, and Media Representatives,

The Lawfare Project (LP), a non-profit legal think-tank based in New York City, notes with dismay the apparent failure of ethical due diligence of the Canadian Interfaith Conversation (CIC) in the course of planning the CIC’s pending conference in Ottawa, Canada. Scheduled for Saint Paul University on May 8-9, 2017, and titled “Our Whole Society: Religion & Citizenship at Canada’s 150th,” the conference and its failings appear to be the shared responsibility of the CIC and its “Our Whole Society” partner organizations, the Canadian Race Relations Foundation, and Cardus, a Canadian Christian organization.
The LP’s concern stems from the announced presence, among conference presenters, of Dr. Ingrid Mattson, former head of the Islamic Society of North America, and Ms. Amira Elghawaby, a representative of the National Council of Canadian Muslims.  These individuals are, in the LP’s opinion, unsuitable candidates for prominent roles in an interfaith gathering purporting to emphasize solidarity and tolerance, and aspiring to achieve a more peaceful world.
Dr. Ingrid Mattson was a longtime leader of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) when it was designated an unindicted co-conspirator in the successful US Holy Land Foundation terror-fundraising prosecution.  Mattson’s current position at Huron University College was the result of an endowment built around money from radical-Islamic sources.  Any number of her associates have been problematic from the perspective of Islamist supremacism, as have some of her teachings and preferred theological sources.  For more information on Mattson, see the LP’s news release, “Collapse of Mattson Libel Suit Signals Victory for Free Speech and The Lawfare Project,” including its links to court papers.
The LP is unaware of any attempt by Dr. Mattson to repudiate, publicly and by name, the various troubling individuals and organizations with which she is, or has been, connected.
Ms. Amira Elghawaby has for years been communications chief for the Canadian Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR.CAN), now renamed – deceptively, according to some – the National Council of Canadian Muslims (NCCM). NCCM/CAIR.CAN was established as the Canadian chapter of the radical, US-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), a Saudi-funded organization that was also designated an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trial.  CAIR derived from the Islamic Association of Palestine (founded by Hamas operative Mousa Abu Marzook, who is now a US Specially Designated Global Terrorist), is said to be a Hamas-supporting organization, and has seen several of its officials and affiliates convicted of terrorism-related offenses.  Like CAIR, NCCM/CAIR.CAN is known for its exaggerated claims of “Islamophobia”, claims that have unnecessarily alarmed Canadian Muslims and thereby risked pushing young Muslims into radical hands.  For more about NCCM/CAIR.CAN, see the LP’s statement, “Lawfare Project Concerned about National Council of Canadian Muslims Participation in Global Affairs Canada event.” To the best of the LP’s knowledge, neither Ms. Elghawaby nor her organization have ever condemned, publicly and by name, CAIR and those CAIR officials and affiliates who have been convicted of terrorist offenses. Nor are they known to have publicly condemned Dr. Jamal Badawi, a former, long-serving official of NCCM/CAIR.CAN who recommends light physical punishment for “misbehaving” Muslim wives and has been a high-level Islamic Society of North America official – and a US unindicted co-conspirator in his own right.
In the United Against Terrorism handbook jointly produced by NCCM/CAIR.CAN and the closely connected, controversial Islamic Social Services Association, many people of good faith were shocked to find the handbook’s authors apparently attempting to mainstream Dr. Mattson and other questionable individuals by recommending them as scholars to whom Muslims and broader civil society could defer in matters of Islamic theological interpretation, particularly in counter-radicalization contexts.  To no one’s surprise, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police publicly withdrew its support for the handbook project. NCCM/CAIR.CAN, however, continues misleadingly to distribute the document, with the RCMP name and logo on it.
Was the inclusion of Mattson and Elghawaby in the “Our Whole Society” event the result of incompetence within CIC, its planning committee, and CIC partner organizations?  Was it reflective of one or more planning insiders’ conscious efforts to “launder” the two Islamists in Canada’s national capital, the better to facilitate their access to interfaith, media, government and other influential circles?
Perhaps it was a combination of these things. But incompetence cannot be ruled out, given the fact that a Canadian Interfaith Conversation webpage announcing that CIC executive committee members Mr. Zul Kassamali and Dr. Aileen van Ginkel would become the CIC co-chairs, featured what the Interfaith Conversation seemed to regard as a spiritually uplifting quotation of industrialist Henry Ford.  An accomplished anti-Semite, Mr. Ford produced a notorious hate-book, The International Jew, and his Nazi sympathies helped the auto-builder win Hitler’s 1st Class Grand Cross Order of the German Eagle in Gold with Star.
CIC might find a certain resonance in Mr. Ford’s ability to dupe Christian, Jewish and other well-meaning clerics and others about his true inclinations – and then to use such people for endorsements.
Following a review of the material herein provided and linked, CIC organizers and their Canadian Race Relations Foundation and Cardus partners will face a moral-ethical choice.  On the one hand, they could honestly and forthrightly admit that errors have been made. On the other, they might be too embarrassed to be honest, and might further condemn themselves by doubling down on their invitations to Dr. Mattson and Ms. Elghawaby.  The former, honorable course would avoid opening the CIC, its partners, presenters and sponsors to being used to legitimize individuals and organizations unworthy of the influence that involvement in a high-profile, spiritually oriented gathering could avail them. The latter course would dishonor all concerned and facilitate further penetration by undesirables into influential Canadian circles.
The choice made by the Canadian Interfaith Conversation and its associates will give a revealing indication of the true commitment of those involved, to morals, ethics and the integrity of Canada’s interfaith movement.
There is no shortage of moderate, mainstream Canadian Muslims, and Canada is fortunate to be the home of reputable organizations such as the Council for Muslims Facing Tomorrow. Seen in this light, the due diligence failure of the Canadian Interfaith Conversation, the Canadian Race Relations Foundation and Cardus, is all the more regrettable.
Sincerely,
Brooke Goldstein
[Published by third party request]

A great example of how not to deal with the issue of Islamic subversion

In the video of the tweet embedded below, there is a fine woman who well represents her case that there is no need in islam for muslims to do their various rituals and ablutions during the working day for which she gives cultural and scriptural reasons.

On many occasions I have argued that this must not be done. At least not in this manner.

Robert Spencer, Stephen Coughlin, Bill Warner and a small handful of other scholars are the rare exceptions as they fully get the implications of these kinds of debates but for the rest of us, the best we can hope for is winning a battle on the way to losing the war. And winning the battle is unlikely.

The fact is, the only variables that can be allowed to be considered when discussing work place behaviour, are the terms the employer set when the job was given to someone.

If foot washing and preying can be done invisibly to the business and its clients during break times then who’s to argue? But debating special cases using Islamic scripture or reasoning, such as it is, will always mean a victory for Islam, not just over the business or circumstance in question, but over all of society, as it will mean that Islamic reasoning and law, will increasingly be the deciding factor for how we make decisions.

This is not a small thing.

I made this same point when a woman was flying to the Middle East and a muslim passenger demanded the aircraft be turned to face the East so he could prey towards Mecca. Our friend loudly explained that Islamic law says when traveling, prayers can be deferred till one reaches one’s destination. She won the argument in a way, and the aircraft was not turned, more because the pilot simply refused to endanger the entire aircraft and change his flight plan so a tard can mumble incantations and arselift in Arabic.

The pilot had the right idea.

It doesn’t matter what sharia says. It doesn’t matter what Koran says is compulsory. It only matters what our law says, and what our values are. People who wish to participate in our society must also make reasonable accommodation to keep their own culture private and after hours and live up to the agreements they make when they apply for, and accept employment, or board an aircraft which doesn’t turn East at prayer time, or doesn’t stop non-muslims from eating during ramadan.

 

Trevor Loudon Q&A from Ottawa March 28

trevor Loudon, the noted expert on communist infiltration of Western governments, at present and up to now, was brought to speak in Ottawa and Montreal by ACT for Canada at the end of March.

Due to a series of freak technical issues, not all of the video was captured. But some was.

Below, is a segment of the Q&A after his initial talk. This post will be updated with more video of the actual lecture, if and when it can be recovered.

Mr. Loudon did deliver a rousing lecture, and reminded us of this critical vector of the current war on classical civilization, and that is the Marxist/communist aspect of it.

Ontario Progressive Conservative party, all “progressive”, and anti-conservative

This post is about a mutiny by the actual members of the riding association of King-Vaughn in the greater Toronto area.

This is a long but important story and its very important that its properly explained.

So it will take place across a number of posts.

To begin with, its important to understand that the leader of the Ontario PC party, Patrick Brown, has been violating the rules of the party and working via a series of irregularities seemingly to create an effect.

The effect is an Ontario government run by people he has hand picked over the actual riding nominees, who are disproportionately Muslim, and/or people with a track record of being far to the left.

In something like 20 ridings, the actual person picked by the riding association has been dumped by the party leader in favour of someone they parachuted in.

This is a lot like what now Prime Minister Trudeau did, using the excuse of a more balanced party, but really to pay off debts to the people who got him elected.

The far left and the Muslim Brotherhood.

In today’s story, the riding of King Vaughn fought back. When they heard that their candidate was to be discarded, one who it was clear to all in the riding association would have won the nomination in a landslide, in favour of someone none of the riding association board had even met before, they tried to cancel the nomination meeting.

But the party executive went ahead with it anyway.

The riding association people were not happy. The footage you are about to watch is some of the minutes inside the meeting.

Reporters were not allowed in. And most people do not know how to use their phone recorders well. So this footage is not spectacularly clear. But the message is.

I am told that David Menzies of The Rebel was outside the meeting doing interviews. Hopefully he will have much more soon on this.

Interviews with some who went to attend this meeting should follow this week as well.

Anyone reading this post in Ontario, Please look over the Freedom Party’s website. They seem to be the only people in politics in Ontario that still believe in Greek thought, Western values, rule of law, and classical civilization.