Category Archives: Galloping statism

Viktor Orbán: the Next Battle is About: Who Will Protect the Borders of Hungary

Posted on by

An original translation by CrossWare with much thanks!

From The Hungarian Daily: Magyar Id?k

September 14, 2018

The prime minister spoke on Kossuth Radio: the new Brussels plan is that if we can not get Hungary to allow in migrants, then we have to get the right to border protection. “They want to take away the gate keys from us,” he said.

They Would Take Away the Border Control From Us!

He also talked about the fact that the next battle is about who defends the boundaries of Hungary, who decides who enters the country.

“Now we’re looking at the cat that has to come out of the bag,” and the “cat” is that Angela Merkel has sent an ultimatum to Europe via French President Macron. The Chancellor said that the European peripheries outside the Schengen area should reassign part of their border protection to Brussels, he recalled.

“The plan is this: if Hungary cannot be tempted to allow in migrants, then it must have its right of border protection take away. They do not want anything less than to send mercenaries here from Brussels, to replace our Hungarian sons: police and soldiers, who are defending the border, and for whom their home country is important. And we should not have illusions: they [the Brussels mercenaries] will let the migrants!” he said, adding that they want to stamp out Hungary, want to weaken Hungarian resistance.

“They simply want to take away our keys to the gates,” the head of government said. The Sargentini report [text here http://www.europarl.europa.eu/resources/library/media/20180411RES01553/20180411RES01553.pdf], however, is now being removed from the agenda or its priority scaled back, and the significance of the matter will decrease from day to day, he predicted.

Hundreds of Millions to Fake Civilians

He pointed out that, in addition to immigration, there is another serious stake in the next European Union election. It is clear from the EU budget statistics that the EU supports the Soros NGOs with hundreds of millions of euros.

If the next European Parliament and the European Commission have a different composition, these hundreds of millions will not be given to them.

He added that the European Commission gives money to organizations that operate anti-Semitic campaigns in Israel against Israel.

“The fact is that today’s center of modern anti-Semitism, funded by the anti-Israeli counterpart against Prime Minister Netanyahu, is in Brussels,” he stated.

He believed that this could not continue, and if it is up to Hungary, they will change this situation in May. He stressed that Hungary’s action against anti-Semitism is a matter of humanity and honor.

 

 

 

Another Canadian prof. fired for insufficient Marxism

Posted on by

Read the story here:

A small excerpt:

Acadia University psychology professor Rick Mehta has been fired six months after the school launched an investigation over allegedly “racist and transphobic” comments. The school said it was legally obligated to investigate in order to provide an environment free from harassment and discrimination.

 

A brief statement from Acadia University confirmed Mehta’s dismissal this week.

 

“We can confirm that Dr. Rick Mehta, a professor in Acadia University’s Department of Psychology, has been dismissed by the University. As this is a personnel matter, the University will provide no additional comments or respond to requests for further details,” an unnamed school spokesperson said in a Facebook message.

 

According to Mehta, the firing came from Acadia president Peter Ricketts, citing issues that “were wide ranging and include failure to fulfill academic responsibilities, unprofessional conduct, breach of privacy, and harassment and intimidation of students and other members of the University community.”

If you want to decide for yourself what sort of a character he is, watch this segment of a panel chat he gave on freedom of speech in Canadian universities in Ottawa this May.

His part start at around 13:50

 

Paul Weston asks some very important questions concerning the Govt. treatment of Tommy Robinson

Posted on by

No matter who Tommy is, and no matter what he has or has not done, his treatment by the state in terms of the procedure which jailed him recently, and his treatment in prison, violated the letter and spirit of democratic law, worldwide. Like Kevin Krehan before him, who it would appear the state had murdered in prison for the crime of littering near a mosque, the British government forced conditions on Tommy far worse than any murderer or terrorist within the penal system in the UK I would bet.

Also the state has been caught actually lying about it to try and cover up their mistreatment of Tommy R. Tommy has published video of the letter they sent him detailing the exact treatment they did to him, which they recently denied.

At this time there is no excuse for lack of solidarity behind Tommy Robinson. Leftist media would be chanting in the streets if an actual criminal had been treated this way. He would be a cause célèbre for sure.

Here is Vice Chairman of the Conservative party of Great Britain referring to Tommy Robinson as “vile” in a bullying session of an employee of Google’s Youtube, demanding he condemn videos he has not seen and was unaware of.

In the comments under this video, here and here, we were made aware of what this committee is, who the people are, and most importantly, the lie that Tommy’s videos “radicalized” a British man into a minor attack at the Finsbury Mosque, the mosque where the hook handed preacher, Abu Hamza made home.

In fact, what did anger this citizen into action against a seditious and hate spewing mosque which should not exist at all according to the EU and UK’s own “hate speech” laws, was a BBC drama-documentary called Three Girls.

It is in three parts, but you can see parts 1, and Part 2 here. Part three will likely be added sometime soon.

UPDATE: Paul Weston made a correction to one error in the top video:

Paul Weston
4 days ago
I made a glaring error unfortunately, courtesy of Wikipedia….. Darren Hughes is no longer Governer of HMP Onley, the new Governer is a Mr Matthew Tilt.

Thank you Oz-Rita for your help on this.

 

British government bullies witness from Youtube over Tommy Robinson videos

Posted on by

Does anyone else think that an official from the British government should not be trying to force a witness to pass judgement on video he has never seen and is totally unaware of? Is this what democracy has devolved into?

March 13, 2018. Hearings on extremist and radicalizing videos on Youtube. UK

H/T Oz-Rita

UPDATE:

Simon Platt left this critical information in the comments:

Some minor points of correction: this isn’t Her Majesty’s Government, but the Home Affairs Select Committee. That’s a committee of members of parliament, not government ministers, whose principal role is to hold the Home Office (a government department) to account.

The Pakistani bully was Rehman Chishti, who, believe it or not, is not just any old “Conservative” MP but a Vice Chairman of the “Conservative” Party.

In respect of that, it might interest readers to know that an article written by Boris Johnson, favourite to succeed Theresa May as Conservative leader and Prime Minister, an article that appeared yesterday in a Conservative-supporting newspaper, the Daily Telegraph, has led to demands for an apology from the Islamophobic Conservative Party Chairman, Brandon Lewis. Johnson’s crime: he wrote that he thought Denmark had gone too far with its recent “burka ban”, and that the UK shouldn’t follow suit, much as Johnson disliked the niqab (common on our streets) and burka (almost never seen). If I remember correctly, the offending word Johnson used was “weird”.

The other point of correction I wanted to make has already been made but is worth repeating: it wasn’t Tommy Robinson who “radicalised” Darren Osbourne. It was the BBC.

Thank you Simon.

DJ Added this comment:

Darren Osbourne stated at his trial that the BBC miniseries 3 Girls about Muslim rape gangs in Rochdale was what made him attack.

It did the same for many of us, we just haven’t reached his stage yet.
Travelling to work on the Tube on 7/7 with my wife thinking I was dead for an hour did the same for me,even though I didn’t even hear a bomb explode.

Daniel Hannah made the point recently that we English are quiet snorkelling for a very long time until suddenly we flip into a cold determination to do something. The best example is our passivity towards Germany in the 30s followed by our change in 1939 when we declared war.

Thank you DJ.

Does anyone know if 3 Girls is still available online? If not, I would attempt to put it on Bitchutte if there is an interest in seeing it.

 

What Breitbart UK did was so clever, it deserves its own post

Posted on by

This gives a pretty good idea of how dire things are in May’s England when Breitbart has to do something like this. And we all know that even this will likely be punished in some way because the reason 10 Downing St. set these gag orders has nothing to do with the reasons they exist as a tool for government, It is for fascistic police state reasons they implemented them. So its unlikely they will let even this stand.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/05/26/redacted-arrested-for-redacted-outside-redacted-leeds-crown-court-issues-media-ban/

[Redacted] Arrested for [Redacted] Outside [Redacted]: Leeds Crown Court Issues Media Ban

The Leeds Crown Court has issued a UK media ban following the arrest of well-known activist and citizen journalist [redacted] outside [redacted].
The reporting restriction, which requires on all publications within the United Kingdom to cease any mention of the details of the arrest or court proceedings of [redacted], was issued Friday afternoon:

Please continue at BBUK.

Thank you Xanthippa, M., Wrath of Khan, Richard, and many many people including some new ones who are watching the UK today due to what happened to Tommy and are posting links to this site in the Reader’s Links post.

Thank you all, stay safe, and keep posting.

 

 

A decent explanation of what happened to Tommy Robinson yesterday

Posted on by

Here is a decent thread from Twitter explaining what happened with the arrest of Tommy Robinson yesterday.

As Tommy is a well known person, and as there is a tendency to gossip, speculate, then do analysis on speculation on the internet, it is very hard to get a proper understanding of important events quite often.

As this is a British legal matter, I asked a British lawyer, Gavin Boby, who was, if memory serves, a Crown Attorney for a while as well.

This is what he had to say:

“… it does look like overuse of excessive restriction in this case, probably based on his identity. Ie bad law misapplied, to get an individual.”

And…

“The issue appears to be not so much about breach of the peace as about contempt of court and preventing prejudice to trials. That’s something the courts are hard on and probably should be, but from what I can tell so far the law on that looks excessive, and over applied in this case, to get someone they find troublesome.”

The thread to which he refers is this one. Please take your time and crawl down this information stream from Twitter:

First post on it:

The UK as police state becomes undeniable

Posted on by

H/T Tania Groth, Oz-Rita, many others.

Related: Selective enforcement in the UK. The same everywhere. No religion, except islam.

Got plans to visit the UK? Go to Hungary or the US instead

Posted on by

Remember the woman with the sense to point out to the police that they were in fact being selective and deceptive in the way they did not enforce the anti-religious behaviour act against muslims in a public park in London? And she showed them the park regulations and then they admitted they let them break the laws even after denying it?

Here is the video of that event:

Watch this stunning and disgusting video of her subsequent arrest by what can only be described as droogs from A Clockwork Orange scenario.

The UK is a sh*thole now

PerfectChild sent in the following information:

In the UK:

“The police arrest procedure
If you’re arrested the police must:

identify themselves as the police
tell you that you’re being arrested
tell you what crime they think you’ve committed
explain why it’s necessary to arrest you
explain to you that you’re not free to leave”
https://www.gov.uk/police-powers-of-arrest-your-rights

She explains why there is an investigation.

There is more in the comments.