Of course the problem is, as we see it, that arguing the issue is a kind of controlled opposition. So long as one fails to see that the issues are never about the issue, you assist the state in taking more power, rights and the ability to use reality for any outcome. Still, part, a small part, of the fight is getting people to understand that the reality of a thing is not what we are told it is, and the narrative upon which, policy is set, is false. More than false, but let’s start there. Stephen Coughlin calls it, “An imposed Pseudo-reality” and that indeed is what it is.
But the problem is arguing either side of an issue tends to favour the enemy’s real agenda.
Ottawa’s Tom Harris does a truly excellent job of explaining the reality of climate and CO2’s role in keeping us all alive. And I think it does help in the micro. But as the people who fabricate these narratives know it’s a lie from the outset, arguing the truth is very unlikely to help at the policy level.
Here is Australian broadcaster, Alan Jones attempting to inject truth to narratives:
Great videos. Especially the first one that is, most surely, the only argument we can use to inform people.