Toronto anti-Israel protest: Who was arrested and who not and more importantly what effect that has on Civilization and rule of law

At one of the constant anti-Israel, anti-civilization protests in Toronto by Communists and Muslims, (COMSLIMS? MUSUNISTS?) the only person to be arrested was an Iranian expat carrying a Canadian flag and a sign saying “Hamas is a terrorist organization”. Lets see who was, and was not arrested at the same demonstration to understand the true state of the revolution in Canada, and for that matter, the Anglosphere and probably all of the West today.

So to be clear: This ex-pat Iranian, who knows exactly the game, was arrested for a sign which is a statement of fact, and wearing a Canadian flag.

Beth Baisch interviews him below

He was in fact, a political prisoner in Iran

The following photo is of a person said to be at the same demonstration, but who was not arrested.

It is our contention that police for the last decade at least across the West no longer enforce the law, which means there is no rule-of-law per se. But there is no anarchy or increased freedom either. What police do now, is manage the collapse of civilization in a controlled manner. A controlled demolition of the towers of civilization if you like, in order to make sure the transition to the authoritarian collectivist system now in place will not be too violent or face too much resistance.

The dialectical use of force by state agencies like the police has a clear outcome. Extrapolating from existing data makes it very easy to determine. Those who message in favour of Western values and religion will be persecuted at first, and eventually prosecuted. Christians caught praying in a way that is blasphemous of the new religion of the state will be arrested for thought crimes, and if not punished legally, punished extra legally. Thought crimes such as silent praying near an abortuarium in the UK. A police actually asker he what she was doing standing silently, and then asked her what she was praying about. The first overt arrest for a thought crime perhaps in the Western world. At least since feudal kings.

“…but also names prayer and counselling as forms of protesting.”

This is all clearly the retooling of language to serve the revolution. Rule of law, in terms of the protection of individual rights, is dead. All outcomes must be the state’s desired outcomes, and those are fungible at any time and without notice. This means that entire segments of society suddenly become criminals. Also, laws increasingly are becoming retroactive, both de jure and de facto. A politically incorrect statement made decades ago by someone currently a threat to the revolution will be punished, even if it was fully within the culture of the day. But also, actual laws are starting to include the notion of being retroactive. We have seen this in Quebec and federally in Canada concerning criticism of Islam. An example of De facto punishment would be the ginning up of hatred of Donald Trump for an off hand remark he made in a locker room a decade before he went into politics. He didn’t drown a woman in his car or anything. He just mentioned that rich famous men were able to have extraordinary reproductive access to women. A fact no one denies. He said it in a humorous way, but he was not wrong. For this he was soundly punished.

The police argument for their actions, at least in terms of protests, will be that they make these arrests to protect the person they are arresting from an obviously hostile mob. However true this may be, it does not take away from the absolute fact that it means the police, in Canada especially where police have the sole monopoly on use of force, have taken on the role of guaranteeing supremacy of mob rule. The group most likely to behave violently will set the laws for that time and space and police will make sure no one does anything the mob finds objectionable. The result, intentionally or not, is the large hostile group owns the territory with police in on the assist.

This is not rule of law.