A few items on Canada’s communist bill, C-22

Posted on by

1. We have seen more pushback on Bill C-22 than we have on what are arguably at least, more intrusive bills like C-4. C-4 was where the state has the right to talk your child into getting surgery and chemical regimens that would sterilize them and create medical experiments out of them, while potentially jailing parents for up to 5 years merely for attempting to talk them out of it. These procedures which are somewhat between Joseph mengele and Dr. Frankenstein. drastically raises the suicide rate and lowers the happiness rate of these children. That for us here at VTB was the most authoritarian and communist bill. Communist in that the children then belonged to the state. It should be added that Dr. Frankenstein at least had the decency to experiment on corpses. Not Children.

But the pushback against C-22 is really showing up on my various info-sources. Which is a great thing. Of course on people who don’t know about it or are not against it, they won’t see this material at all. So will logically pass over these objections as crazy conspiracy theories as they head down to the pharmacy for their 11th mRNA Covid gene therapy shot.

In the video below, he details some aspects of that bill that have been softened. These things were almost certainly trial balloons. Or perhaps more accurately, let’s call them context decoys. The way that works is, I want to pass a bill that lets me steal half your stuff and turn half your children into slaves. So my initial bill states that I can take all your stuff anytime I want and under any conditions, and your children can be herded into cattle cars for my purpose, and then after some light pushback from a few politicians, I get exactly what I wanted in the first place and maybe even a little more. Thinking about that as you listen to the video below may offer a little more clarity.

Bill C-22 Surveils Ordinary Canadians While Leaving Cartel Networks Untouched

 

OTTAWA — When The Bureau published its analysis of Bill C-2 last fall, the diagnosis was unsparing.

Ottawa had confused expansion of state power over ordinary Canadians with the enforcement tools Canada actually needs to confront the Chinese Triads, Mexican cartels, and hostile-state networks that have turned Canadian cities into operational platforms for the hemisphere’s most dangerous criminal organizations. The government has now repackaged that same flawed instinct under a new number. Bill C-22, the so-called Lawful Access Act, deserves the same verdict.

The critics arriving at that conclusion now span an extraordinary coalition. Signal, the secure messaging service used by millions of Canadians — including journalists and dissidents seeking to avoid scrutiny from hostile state spies — has warned it would rather withdraw from Canada than compromise the privacy promises it has made to its users.

Tobi Lütke, founder and chief executive of Shopify, Canada’s most important technology company, has called Bill C-22 “a huge mistake” that “may well end up dealing a death blow to Canadian tech viability,” and has publicly urged Ottawa’s Public Safety Minister to study expert opinion on the bill’s fatal flaws.

[…] That last point is not a partisan complaint. It is a warning from Canada’s most important security partner that Ottawa is about to create vulnerabilities that hostile states — the very states The Bureau has spent three years documenting as active threats on Canadian soil — will be positioned to exploit.

The above from Sam Cooper’s The Bureau. Please read the rest at the link above.

Dean of Law, Bruce Pardy discusses bull C-63 with Jordan Peterson. I think a great deal of what is said in this video can be applied to C-22 as the issues are the same. This is however, one hour and fifty minutes. So maybe it is for those who are deeply concerned with this issue. If so, again you can listen while doing other things. I will likely focus on the entire video as I do household chores because I am certain it is worth the time. This is a two year old video as well. But the actual issue, state overreach to create a totalitarian surveillance state, is as current as ever.

John Carpay on bill C-22. John Carpay is the head of the JCCF, a Canadian constitutional law firm and one of about 3 I know of that actually works towards preserving individual rights in Canada, as opposed to destroying them.

 

There were other bills that were of a similar nature, some of which included retroactive prosecution. In other words, if you had done something when it was not a crime after they passed this bill, the state could prosecute you after they passed the bill.

The videos on that are below and shot in Ottawa of John Carpay explaining the exact details. The bills died when they did not get passed by the Senate. But there have been indications that Carney intends to resurrect them, or likely draft new ones with the same intentions.

For those that like clear video, please click the little gear bottom right after you start playing the videos and select the highest option.

THIS POST may get updated with more materials on C-22 as they occur.

Trevor Loudon on the manifesto and motives of the recent mosque shooters in San Diego

Posted on by

Article and additional material including link to the ‘manifesto can be seen here at RAIR. As Canada becomes increasingly de lure communist, the less said the better. Trevor says a lot very well though.

For us, there does seem to be another potential element. There are photos circulating around that one or both of the people who did this terrorist attack had undergone a certain amount of ‘gender therapy’. There is clearly an extremely strong correlation between homicidal, suicidal and terroristic behaviour amongst those who have interfered with their natural hormonal balance in such a dramatic way. This does not negate any of the points made by Trevor. But if this is the case, it does add a layer to it. There can be no way those that are engaged in the ‘trans-affirming-care attack on human sexual dimorphism are not aware of the consequences. We have done many posts in May alone on the drastic results to those who have undergone the therapy, including interviews with its victims.

So like those who import millions of religious Muslims and pretend that the solution to the damage they do is to criminalize talking about it, prevent reporting on it, and occasionally endangering a few police with the task of standing in front of Jewish institutions, the Trans-scam is likely to, at least in part, be about the creation of these kinds of monsters.

However nothing is confirmed on that level other than a photo or two which at least crinkles a few eyebrows.

Screenshot

Reader’s Links for May 20th, 2026

Posted on by

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

The very odd Mosque shooting in San Diego

Posted on by

Amy Mek on one of the Chutbas (Friday sermons) from the mosque

One of the shooters:

Screenshot

Zerohedge article on this event.

We may have the first case of the Gender confused Vs. Islam here.

Also expect some excerpts from the Chutba that took place on Friday to show up soon. The Amy Mek Tweet shows the same imam delivering his after the Oct. 7 attack in Israel.

Reader’s Links for May 19th, 2026

Posted on by

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

Barry Neufeld interview and presentation: When a Canadian tells truths about the Gender narrative

Posted on by

The write up can be seen at RAIR Foundation 

Barry is an interesting man. We first encountered him when he went to the Supreme Court in 2022 on what was a very complicated Defamation suit, but is entirely tied to the new way of things in the People’s Democratic Provinces of Canada.

Specifically on the genderqueer narrative attack.

Below are some videos never before published, at least here, about that Supreme Court hearing. For those who want to take the deep dive on this man, these are worth the effort.

For those that do not know, the word Queer, which used to be a mildly pejorative common term for homosexuals, was dialectically redefined to mean anyone who supports and promotes any group who’s victim or ‘oppressed’ status could be weaponized as an instrument of destruction against Western Civilization. In other words, you could be a straight male with children and be “queer” if you support the trans-narrative, or any kind of kink or minority that is being specifically utilized to destroy in any way, the Socratic-Aristotelian foundations of the West.

The following links are from October 15th, 2022

Barry Neufeld speaks after his appearance at the Supreme Court of Canada

Barry’s Lawyer presents what took place inside the court

Jack Fonseca speaks in support of Barry Neufeld, again on the lawn of the Supreme Court.

Returning to the present day, Barry finds himself in a similar position and for a similar reason. Mr. Neufeld was fined three questers of a million dollars by one of the dialectic-enforcement branch of the state, the Human Rights Tribunal, for saying something true about human sexuality.

Below is an interview we did with him, as well as his presentation on the evening of May 5th, 2026 at Jeff Evely’s de-transition event in Ottawa:

The presentation:

Ottawa Teacher, Amy McKay interview: As soon as she questioned the narrative on Gender Queer Theory she had to defend her licence in court

Posted on by

Important prelude:

I am trying to catch up on the people and events from May 5th and it has gotten a little complicated to figure out what has already been published here and what has not.

As it turns out, I have already published this interview with Amy McKay not that long ago. But the article we just wrote is quite different and offers perspective that is more generally applicable. So I will post it again. But if you have already watched the interview, feel free to skip this particular post.

The story can be read at RAIR Foundation

This interview took place during the more public presser of Jeff Evely’s May 5th event as a first effort to try and stop the state from mutilating and sterilizing children under the “Gender Affirming Care’ narrative attack label. It is the classic story of cancelation of anyone who cannot keep up with the revolutionary dialectics.

The example this site loves to use commonly is J. K. Rowling. A famously leftist author who, the moment she deviated from the leftist attack on the West by objecting to the introduction of men into women’s sports, she was not even allowed in to the cast party for the Harry Potter movies that she had written. Her books are beloved. So she is a good example. Of course they do this to high profile people as a message. But they do it to everyone in the most minor positions of authority. Like a high school teacher or a country doctor that dares notice a truth which is contrary to narrative established by consensus.

This is one high school teacher that came to support Jeff’s efforts on the hill that day. And, as it turns out, has found herself in court now to defend her teaching licence due to her failure to hate the right people and values.

Those of you who have not read or listened to the audiobook of 1984 in the last few years really would do well to do so again now. This is precisely the play in Canada and across much of the West, and even the US under Obama and Biden. The technology has changed, and the tactics vary. But the strategy is the same. Like with Islam, the left insists you hate who they tell you to hate, and believe what they tell you is truth. Jacinda Ardern even stated it plainly. But by that time, most are so demoralized already that they ignored it, or contextualized it to make it into something that wouldn’t shake their comfort level.

Amy McKay is facing total cancellation, at least professionally now, because she failed to hate BillBoard Chris, and failed to believe 2+2=5 in terms of gender queer narrative, which they mislabel a ‘theory’. A theory is a hypothesis that has data to support it, Gender queer theory is a Marxist destructive narrative attack on humanity that has an extraordinary amount of data opposing it, but was arrived at by consensus.

The model we use to describe events as they are taking place now across most of the West has predictive value. This goes a long way to affirming its credibility. That doesn’t make it perfect. But it does make it worth understanding.

Habermas, a second generation Frankfurt School thinker came up with the idea of Consensus theory. A leftist think tank comes up with a destructive narrative attack, like Gender Queer theory or anthropogenic Global Warming, and imposes it claiming it was a consensus, in this case meaning a creation by said think tank, and then imposed on the rest of us by using critical theory, “racist-transphobe-bigot” etc against anyone who tries to tell the truth on these issues. Amy’s story is definitely a classic example. But anyone who happens across this post can surely think of many, many more. Both in public life as well as people they likely know in their own orbits.

Older posts and videos from the same May 5th event:

Interview with two detransitioners on their personal stories about the consequences of the drugs and surgeries connected to the Trans-gender dialectic.

Chris Fleury, constitutional Lawyer fights to get men out of women’s prisons

 

 

Reader’s Links for May 18th, 2026

Posted on by

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

Three items for the moment on the state of things” Links post 1 for May 17, 2026

Posted on by

1. Rebel News exposes the state-media collusion to deceive Canadians into taking multiple injections of a novel gene therapy injection which cost a lot of lives, and many more serious injuries.

This site makes an effort to use the word “state” instead of government. Rightly or wrongly, we view that Canada does not have a government, both in terms of how people think of the word, and the concept. We have a state. A layer of people who control the institutions and instruments of state to a purpose which has nothing to do with any intentions of the people who live in the affected region. No one, or practically no one would vote for the policies that have been implemented in the last X number of years had they been told both the truth about the policy and the real intentions behind it. And this is also why there are no existing polities on Earth that can be called free that isn’t a Constitutional Republic. And the one place which is that which we are aware of, is in a precarious position as well due to machinations like that which is exposed by the video below, and so many more this site attempts to present in its fuller context.

Additionally, a profound data point in terms of how effective these active measures were against the Canadian public is that those of us who already know the thesis of this video, if not the exact details, would consider this a mic drop moment. The smoking gun we need to try and let our friends, colleagues and family know that they should be far more cautious about government messaging. But the likely hood of this video, even with its court-worthy level of proof would likely have zero impact on any of those who took the shots and remain committed to the narrative. I would add, even to many of those who did get heart and cancer issues subsequent to getting the shots, and have decided these are unrelated events. And those, by the way, would be among the more intelligent of the population, as that kind of reasoning actually requires some serious mental horsepower, to de-personalize your own tragedy and assume other variables in play.

Having spoken directly to people who work at cardiology clinics, I can attest that there is awareness that the sharp rise in cardiac patients among young healthy males especially, after 2021 is a fact, and that there is awareness of the cause, even if it can only be spoken about in Samizdat terms.

What we can therefore determine from the likely lack of results of this video among the public among the narrative purchasers, is that Yuri Bezmenov could not be more right in terms of Demoralization.

2. After the Danish Cartoon phase of the War on the West by Islam and communism, a wonderful woman name Mollie Norris had the only idea that was the correct idea. At least in terms of a non-kinetic response. She suggested that the world enjoy an, “Everybody Draw Mohammad Day”. The thinking being that a threat to us all about what we can and cannot say, think and draw by savages should be met with defiance. She was of course correct. Instead, people chose plan B and Mollie had to go into an FBI Witness Security program.

Any comedian or comedienne who has the raw courage to mock Islam, needs to be promoted, protected and encouraged therefore.

An argument could be made that in fact, to mock Islam is in FACT to give it equal rights in the West. All religions and political systems, as well as religious leaders and political leaders must, must not be immune from ridicule. And when that argument does not fly, at least it solidifies in the mind of the observer that Islam does not want equal rights, but supreme rights at the expense of each and every one of us.

3. Speaking of Demoralization, this clip was first published my MEMRI in 2025

I have heard a few people give the advice that when the enemy tells you what they intend for you, you should listen to them. I have seen far far fewer people actually take that advice.

More to come later from the May 5th Detrans event. Thanks again for looking over here from time to time.

 

Reader’s Links for May 17th, 2026

Posted on by

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

Constitutional Lawyer, Chris Fleury fights to get men out of women’s prisons

Posted on by

This was part of Jeff Evely’s Outstanding De-trans event on May 5th.

One of the speakers was Constitutional Lawyer, Chris Fleury who is in litigation against the State in Canada to stop men from being admitted to Women’s prisons.

This story is convoluted. But needs to be understood as it is a perfectly fitted puzzle piece of the new dialectically operated Canada, as opposed to one that operated on the basis of actual empirical reality.

In other words, if a man claims he identifies as a women, somehow that qualifies him to be put into a woman’s correctional facility. Interestingly, as far as we know, no women who identifies as a man has chosen to be put into a men’s prison. Which tells you a lot already.

In any case, that is the dialectic. The destruction of our reality down to the roots. It is the twisting of concepts, backed up by social pressures such as critical theory and being cancelled for defending reality, that makes it a dialectical system as opposed to a reality based one. You know. Where men are men and women are women.

RAIR has the write up here. 

We interviewed Chris shortly before his actual presentation at the Vanier Biker’s Church which you can see below.

His presentation was very important and different information from the interview:

After all the invited speakers had their opportunity to present on their aspect of the issue, there was a panel discussion with all the speakers and a Q&A.

RAIR Foundation managed to get a question in which spoke more to Chris’s expertise than the rest.

Please read the story at RAIR Foundation. 

Rebel Report on CBC active measures Aktivnye meropriyatiya

Posted on by

The following editorial on the video below was written by Johnny U and posted unedited:

Here is a piece by Rebel News that does not quite grasp its own profundity. It reveals Rebel and the people it is trying to help are missing a few vital keys to fully grasping what is going on: namely an active measure.

One definition:

The term, which dates back to the 1920s, includes operations such as espionage, propaganda, sabotage, assassination, and the collection of kompromat for blackmail purposes based on the foreign policy objectives of the Soviet and Russian governments.

Usually we only see the end results of an active measure. This means we see the headline shaming the political target, but not the setup that created the shame. Another example was the placement of Nazi flags by state actors among the Truckers Freedom Convoy, which was intended to disgrace that whole movement in the eyes of the Canadian public.

This Rebel report gives us a rare glimpse into the actual machinery of an active measure. The language of dialectics, of which active measures is a vital component, is difficult and abstract and hard to learn. It becomes, however, an increasingly blunt instrument the more one learns it. Metaphorically, describing in detail a loaded hand gun to a blind person is an abstraction until the gun is fired and the bullet hits them, whereupon the “Aha!” moment instantly erases all abstraction, along with the implied cleverness of the words used to describe the gun.

The full comment can be read here. 

Cancellation of a Progressive High School teacher as she comes to realize the narrative lies on The ‘Trans’ issue

Posted on by

This is the first time this Ottawa high school teacher has spoken out since her struggle sessions with the state educational organs began.

In essence, she was more or less a progressive. But her studies allowed her to access medical records at a level not available to the general public. She discovered two things. The people who oppose the surgical and chemical mutilation of children under the rubric of “trans-affirming-Care” were both not hateful, and not lying.

Now she has had to retain a major Canadian Civil Rights law firm to keep her teaching licence.

The full write up is at RAIR.