Interview with Luke Neilson of the JCCF on some of the legislation threatening Canadian liberties

Short discussion with lawyer from the JCCF on some of the more outrageous, (even though voted down ultimately) aspects of some of Canada’s most totalitarian legislation.

Article at RAIR Foundation

Interview with Luke Neilson

Reader’s Links for June 10th, 2026

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

Douglass Murray notices the dialectic at work in the UK and lots of examples of policies built on it: Links 1 for June 3, 2026

1. This is not a Kirpan, and Starmer clearly wants these kinds of events to happen.

2. The UK is screwed. There is so much wrong here it would take more time to detail it all than we have. But the one thing that MUST be mentioned, is that it doesn’t matter a tinker’s damn if the guy DID make a racist remark. Stabbing someone is attempted murder and in this case murder. Hurty words are hurty words and not a crime. This means that the UK has now officially become a dialectic state in every sense the daily Reader’s Links post details, but more. That the state can impute what you mean by things, punish you for it, and even more, take an accusation of you having said hurty words as grounds to arrest and bleed out a stabbing victim. ALL of the arguments and apologies by the police are insane. They have no bearing on reality whatsoever.

3. Nope. not idiotic. That is Hanlon’s razor.

4. On the communist revolution moving from covert to overt:

5. I guess the 15 year old rape victim should be grateful she wasn’t arrested and handcuffed by police for racism.

Thank you all for reading this site.

I have seen a lot of exploding antisemitism recently. Often coming from the elite on the left. Wealthy and influential people who literally said “I celebrated Oct. 7th” and more along that vein. Jewish people are leaving Canada now, and many on social media are celebrating it. But it should be noted that those Jewish people who are leaving are often the highly skilled and disciplined people who provided a major service to Canadians to all who needed it. Like this Surgeon for example. I hope those people celebrating the loss will enjoy their replacements. It will be a very different Canada.

And one where it won’t just be religious Jews who personally choose not to eat pork for example, but one where you discover that all of your choices have been altered to suit the replacement religious group. This in fact has already happened.

The proportion of food in Canada that is now halal is so large that no one but no one can go through their cupboards and fridges and not have it in there. And it will become more difficult to make any choices that are not in accordance with the sharia, on more than just food.

It is far less safe for unaccompanied women to walk the streets of many areas now in Canada. So the joy of those happy to see the last of the Jewish people may be short lived. Or maybe not. Maybe they want this kind of Islamic-communsit dystopia forming from the narratives that have directed our choices, votes and thinking for decades now. From the metric system to gay marriage instead of something like a civil union.. From the belief in debating ideas to the utter suppression of any counter-narrative view. To the promotion of any concept that is destructive to Western Civilization like MAiD or the consecration and sanctification of abortion, to the near and looming criminalization of any view that opposes or even questions a destructive narrative. Like the mass graves that aren’t at residential schools. Themselves a progressive idea at the time.

Interestingly, Douglass Murray appears to have caught up to Vlad Tepes and noticed the dialectic and Hanlon’s Razor

 

 

 

 

The body cam footage of the police assisted murder of a British citizen by a Sikh attacker has been released

Article here

But they apologized so it’s all OK. Right?

 

Tempted to write an article about this, but at this point one wonders if telling the truth about how prioritizing Sikh murderers over British victims would constitute hate speech against British police and be the greater crime.

Reader’s Links for June 3rd, 2026

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

If you never read the posts on this site, read this one: 5 Items each of which holds profound implications of the changes in Canada and the US over the past 15 years and going forwards

1. Still looking in to exactly what this means in practical terms, but in terms of messaging, it is unquestionably a step towards the full criminalization of counter-narrative thinking. From Blacklock’s Reporter:

Vote To Outlaw “Denialism”

The Senate human rights committee last night voted 7 to 1 to criminalize Indian Residential School “denialism.”

Public statements intended to promote hatred by downplaying the impacts of Residential Schools would be outlawed under threat of two years in jail:

“It can involve denying, minimizing or justifying the documented abuses, deaths, forced assimilation and intergenerational harms.”

It is VERY hard to find substantial news on this issue. but here is what we can find that is authoritative.

https://www.ipolitics.ca/2026/06/01/senate-committee-amends-c-9-to-criminalize-residential-school-denialism/

2. RFK Jr. explicitly explains the deceptions used during Covid and VERY similarly to Stephen Coughlin’s explanation of what took place.

Stephen has always stated that modern communism dates back to Plato. The Noble Lie is right outa The Republic, Book 3, 414b–415d.

Well waddaya know about that.

From Grok:

Plato’s “Noble Lie” explained in two lines:The Noble Lie is the idea that rulers are sometimes justified in telling a “noble” or “useful” myth to the population in order to promote social harmony, patriotism, and moral behaviour — even if the myth is not literally true. It is a “noble” falsehood told for the greater good of the city-state.

3. But the Media-state industrial complex would never try and direct how you think

4. Former Pfizer Chief Toxicologist Exposes Failures in mRNA “Vaccine” Safety Oversight

Please watch and read this video carefully. Maybe even stop and consider each title. Who this man is, who he worked for, and what he says under oath.

5. Canada backdated the lease for the very expensive and equally phoney “Space Post” by over a year.

This site has maintained for several years now that all these absurd woke programs, fifty billion dollars for productions of Hamlet for gay and trans turtles in Turkmenistan, or whatever equivalent, has really been about Cloward Piven, (printing endless money to destroy the savings and economies of the target populations in the West) and about creating the money to bring in massive amounts of illegal (by any rational definition) and hostile or non-productive aliens into the West and supporting them to do anything from nothing, to the rape and pillage of our countries. Literally. The naming of these programs, that used to dominate the news, especially when Elon headed the department of Gov’t efficiency, was an attempt to create outrage at the wrong things. Woke programs that likely didn’t exist, or maybe were created to be recipients of 1% of the money or less while the rest went into more destructive programs. Of course, a certain amount went to politicians and allies, but that had the effect of allowing people to think this was about corruption, and not the total collapsing of the West. A version of Hanlon’s Razor in fact. Corruption is bad, and is a problem. But it is not existential in small scale. It is typically, in a healthy society, like a manageable small cancer that can be kept at bay with the immune system of a proper police and intelligence force.

But this is much bigger. And now, in Canada, the state is at the point where it is creating programs so ludicrous in nature that is overtly contemptuous of the Canadian people.

6. If this is true for a California city, how many cities is this true for in Canada? Toronto? Only CSIS knows for sure.

Female California mayor admits to being secret spy for CHINA… and she looks very different to her photoshopped original images

The mayor of a wealthy Southern California city has resigned after admitting she secretly acted as an agent for the Chinese government, according to a federal plea agreement unsealed on Monday.

Former Arcadia Mayor Eileen Wang, 58, agreed to plead guilty to a felony charge of acting as an illegal foreign agent for the People’s Republic of China and helping push pro-Beijing propaganda inside the US.

The crime carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in federal prison. 

The stunning case prompted immediate fallout in Arcadia, where city officials confirmed Wang stepped down from both the City Council and the mayor’s office on Monday.

Federal prosecutors allege Wang spent years working under the direction of Chinese government officials before rising into elected office in Los Angeles County. 

They also claimed she used a Chinese-language news website to distribute propaganda favorable to Beijing while secretly coordinating with officials tied to the Chinese Communist Party.

Authorities have described the website as a fake news platform targeting Chinese Americans.

The case has also triggered intense scrutiny of Wang’s carefully crafted public image.

Campaign photos and promotional images used during her political rise depicted Wang in heavily polished and retouched portraits that projected a glamorous and approachable persona to voters.

Thank you all for checking out this site and considering our understanding of the meaning behind these monuments events.

 

Reader’s Links for June 2, 2026

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

Reader’s Links for June 1st, 2026

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

Bataclan, More Ackbarists stabbing people in Europe, UK police accessories after the fact? Stinging dialectics and more: Links 1 for May, 31 2026

1. After only 10 years in prison, and in Belgium for some reason, the architect of the Bataclan attack is being prepped for release. They do this with a series of 36 hour freedom sessions outside of Prison, then just release.

The Bataclan attack was the Oct. 7th attack on Israel in miniature. It had many of the same hallmarks. There is an article with a lot of videos at RAIR Foundation, but there is one strong point that needs repetition and so it is repeated below:

One thing needs to be said out loud and forcefully about how the West deals with Islamic terrorism:

Treating a military-scale Islamic terror operation as a routine law-and-order police matter had deadly consequences.

The attacks across the world by one or another Islamic group are military in nature. They are not crimes. They are not for personal gain of the individual or individuals making the attacks.

They need to be met with military force and rules of engagement. To treat these attacks under the rubric of Law and Order, to use police against trained jihadis whose intention is mass casualty on the largest scale they can create, is so clearly a route to failure that one wonders if that was not the intention.

It would be as if the US sent police to the beaches of Normandy in 1944 and read the Nazis their miranda rights before leaving the boats for the shore.

2. Also at RAIR: Another Ackbarist stabs people at a Swiss train station.

More videos of the actual attack at the RAIR Link

3. Concerning the British gentleman who was stabbed by a Sikh and then held in handcuffs by the British constabulary till he bled out, are there any readers to this site, assuming anyone can possibly even read this site anymore, I am losing all hope, who can tell me if the following definition of “Accessory After the Fact” as it is written in Canada, and the UK would apply to the police?

Canada Definition (Criminal Code, s. 23(1)):
An accessory after the fact to an offence is one who, knowing that a person has been a party to the offence, receives, comforts or assists that person for the purpose of enabling that person to escape.
Key elements the Crown must prove:

  • The principal offence was actually committed.
  • You knew the person had committed (or been a party to) it.
  • You actively received, comforted, or assisted them.
  • Your assistance was specifically to help them escape justice (arrest, trial, punishment).

Penalty: Treated similarly to an attempt of the original offence (s. 463). For serious crimes (e.g., murder), it can carry up to 14 years or life in extreme cases (s. 240 for accessory after murder). United Kingdom (England & Wales)The classic common-law definition still applies, though modern charging often uses broader statutes.Definition:
A person who, knowing a felony has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts, or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent their apprehension, trial, or punishment.
It is now often charged under the Accessories and Abettors Act 1861 (ss. 3–4) or as “encouraging or assisting an offence” under the Serious Crime Act 2007. The accessory can be tried and convicted even if the principal offender has not been caught or convicted.Penalty: Historically up to 2 years, but in practice it is now sentenced based on the seriousness of the underlying offence (can be very substantial for serious crimes like murder).

Screenshot

Grok agrees that this is the case with the police, although the more likely charge if there ever will be one, would be:
  • Gross Negligence Manslaughter (if their failure to provide medical aid or improper handcuffing was so reckless that it contributed to death).

Personally I think it is something closer to murder.

If a person was to force another person into a situation where police would shoot him, or run him over in a car, then no charge for the police but extra charges for whoever created the trap.

This was where the attacker made a claim that was so stupid that even if it where true it is not something that allows the perp to stab the victim. And then not getting him medical help feels like murder. I would really, really like to know the names of the police officers involved.

Grok adds:

the names of the police officers involved have not been released.Current Status (as of May 31, 2026):

  • The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) is investigating the officers’ actions (handcuffing the dying victim, delay in providing medical aid, etc.).
  • The officers are currently being treated as witnesses, not suspects.
  • Hampshire Police (including Temporary Deputy Chief Constable Robert France, who issued the public apology) have not named any of the frontline officers.
  • There are reports that three female officers were directly involved at the scene, but no names have been made public.
  • Bodycam footage exists but has not been released to the public, despite strong calls for transparency.

This is standard procedure in the UK while an IOPC investigation is ongoing — officer names are usually withheld until (or unless) disciplinary action, suspension, or criminal charges result.

4. Listen to the answer this MP gets from the Ruling Communist Liberal Party about how it is more important to cater to every need of a rapist and murderer and disease spreader because of his group identity as a “vulnerable refugee” than protect the Canadians he victrmizes by jailing or deporting him. This is crucial. This is exactly why we are losing.

It has been over 10 years since the mini-Oct 7th at the Bataclan club in France. Eventually, the club re opened and had celebrities play at it.

Watch the song that Sting played. Did he commemorate the victims? France? Promote the idea that music and freedom must persist?

His song was pretty much EXACTLY what that [expletive deleted] Liberal MP had to say.

The full lyrics:

Sleeping child, on my shoulder

Those around us, curse the sea

Anxious mother turning fearful

Who can blame her, blaming me? Inshallah, Inshallah

If it be your will, it shall come to pass

Inshallah, Inshallah

If it be your will… As the wind blows, growing colder

Against the sad boats, as we flee

Anxious eyes, search in darkness

With the rising of the sea Inshallah, Inshallah

If it be your will, it shall come to pass

Inshallah, Inshallah

If it be your will… Sea of worries, sea of fears

In our country, only tears

In our future there’s no past

If it be your will, it shall come to pass Inshallah, Inshallah

If it be your will, it shall come to pass

Inshallah, Inshallah

If it be your will…

Dialectics all around.

5. I have heard a few people say that ANTIFA is no longer an issue.

Thank you all for checking out this site.

Hopefully today or tomorrow I will have a post ready about the future of this site.

Meanwhile, it is recommended to download or save anything that is here that you value.

Thank you again for your kind and regular attention.

Reader’s Links for May 31st, 2026

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

Reader’s Links for May 30th, 2026

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

It is NOT selective enforcement – it is the dialectic negation of Western Civ by repurposing the law and the instruments of state to a different agenda

1. This is an excellent example of the topic

2. Sask. Doctor still practicing after conviction for assaulting a child with a weapon and

Compare the college’s treatment of this doctor with ones who in good faith advised against taking the mRNA shots. Clearly, a communist state can be defined as criminalizing any opposition to a state narrative. Initially from a position of authority, but eventually anyone from anywhere. Which may explain bill C-22

3. Illegal rapist in Canada gets luxury health benefits

4. In this story about an anti-‘Israel’ protest in Montreal at RAIR Foundation, anyone who is honest with themselves knows what would happen if you substituted leftist leaders and generic Muslims for the effigies hung and beaten in this particular display over the weekend.

5. How REJECTED immigrants get massively better services from Canada than Canadians

Thank you all for checking out this site. Hopefully some of you are finding it easier to access these days.

Viva Frei did a comprehensive video on the man kidnapped by the state into a mental hospital because he spoke truth about Chinese influence and communist Canada laws are to legacy Canada.

If the cop thought he had a bomb on him, HE WOULD NEVER EVER HAVE GOTTEN THAT CLOSE. Slam dunk. case closed.

UK, historical myth making and Chinese control of Canadian state agencies: Links 1 for May 29, 2026

1. In the UK the man who stabbed an unrelated British stranger, a Sikh I believe it was, has been now arrested and charged and found guilty of murdering Henry Nowak.

However it was the British state and the police working for it, who are at least in large part responsible for his death. They handcuffed him and let him bleed out instead of taking him to medical help. They did this because his stabber, told police he said naughty words about his race. Video evidence showed that was untrue later on as the killer, Vickrum Digwa, chased him and stabbed him from behind, with zero element of self defence of any kind.

Therefore, the state put its hand on the scale so heavily that they made the greater crime the mere allegation of a racial epithet, than the stabbing and ultimate death of a random person on the street.

If the UK was still anything like a republic, or had anything like rule of law, the police would be an accessory to murder.

So this looks like a victory. But is not in any way that restores the rule of law. He was stabbed by some person who very possibly should not have been in the UK at all. But he died because of state policy and police who more resemble the Clockwork Orange thugs than anything like enforcers of law.

2. Will fact check this video as much as possible. But so far this is the only thing I have seen on this worthy of posting. The underlying logic is fully believable though. Many people including Canada’s installed Dear Leader, Mark Carney, says that people “will eat less meat” makes one included to look into what the actual plan is to force people to submit to their will.

There is as far as I know, no name for a crime of this magnitude if indeed, the claims in this video are true.

I had to beat this out of Grok, as Grok defaults to heavily loaded language. (if there is any interest I’ll post the whole one or two pages of prompts and responses to get there) Grok initially used terms like “Conspiracy theory” etc. Was like reading Blue Sky almost. But pressed on what is factual:

Are any claims presented as facts in the video actually false?

Most core descriptive claims are true or directionally accurate, but a few are exaggerated or misleading:

Lone Star tick causes Alpha-gal syndrome (AGS): True.

Matthew Liao discussed using the Lone Star tick mechanism for “human engineering” to reduce meat consumption: True (he said it publicly at the World Science Festival ~10 years ago).

Western Michigan University bioethics paper arguing it is morally required to spread Alpha-gal via ticks: True (published 2025 in Bioethics).

Bill Gates / Gates Foundation funded genetically engineered ticks: True (but see below on details).

U.S. Army released large numbers of (radioactively labeled) ticks in the 1950s–60s: True (documented Cold War-era research).

Bill Gates invests in lab-grown meat: True.

3. Is the increase in Alpha-gal accurate as a percentage?

The 10,000% increase is technically true in some datasets but highly misleading without context:CDC data (2017–2021): Positive tests rose from ~13,371 to ~18,885 per year ? ~41% increase in that period.
Longer-term / different datasets (e.g., TriNetX large cohort studies): Incidence rose dramatically — one 2025 analysis showed over 5,500% increase in new diagnoses in recent years, with some periods approaching or exceeding 10,000% relative growth from a very low baseline.
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Overall: CDC estimates >110,000 suspected cases (2010–2022), with true numbers possibly ~450,000 due to underdiagnosis. The explosion is real and well-documented.

Grok went on to make counter claims though, that Gates used a different kind of tick for research, a cattle tick for ‘livestock disease control” and that he never released them.

I guess we would have to look at Gates’s history of truthfulness and efforts since, I dunno, maybe when he stole the first Graphical User Interface from two IBM scientists and released it as Microsoft Windows without attribution or credit. Then everything since, especially during Covid with the mRNA shots to decide how to take Grok’s counter claims. I’ll save the whole argument in a text file I guess if anyone feels they want to see it.

But given Gates’ belief in the need to reduce world population, (and there is a case to be made for that for sure, lots of people feel that way) and given Gates’ personal ethical system and willingness to advance his agendas with the tremendous powers he has, it is not unreasonable to consider if he is not being entirely truthful. There is an old adage that “The half truth is the damndest of lies”. So maybe he did admit to research on cattle related ticks but named some other one. I don’t know in any meaningful sense of the word, “know”. But as hypothesis go, this is worthy of investigation to the point of a court worthy theory.

But there is a really fundamental difference between the belief that global human population is too high, and acting in a way to reduce it that is a crime of biblical proportions. Advancing birth control in areas of the world where the birth rate is highest and has the least ability to actually produce materials for life in a way that doesn’t pummel the environment, like eating bush meat to extinction as an example, would be a way most people would be OK with. Not forcing our choices to go how oligarchs want. The consequence of widespread meat allergy means lowered production of meat overall as farms will find it increasingly unprofitable. Human health will go down the toilet as people are forced to eat vegetables, especially as most mass farming methods have depleted soil of nutrients such that many or most commercial food plants requires supplementation of micro nutrients in pill form.

Lastly, if Alpha gal syndrome manages to get so many people allergic to meat that the problem is amplified by farmers switching to plant foods, the ocean will be a much safer place to swim in a few years as all fish stock gets plated.

In any case, no matter if we are right or wrong on the science, it is a VERY secondary issue. The real issue is who gave them the right to force their choices on us and what do we do about it.

The guest doctor, Dr. Nicolas Hulscher, at around 4 minutes in points at the dialectical name for the effort: “Bioterrorism is masquerading as bioethics now”. That, is what we call, dialectical naming of a Line of Operation.

3.  Rupert Lowe MP refuses to apologize for a rational statement about the equivalence between industrial rape and tporture of British girls and the Holocaust.

Full text:

I want to be really clear in my response. I am not going to retract anything, I stand by every single word. Labour are calling for me to apologise. The answer is no.

Industrial rape across almost every town and city in Britain.

Sexual torture. Murder. Endless rape.

I sat there for two weeks, listening to these girls.

I heard how one girl was raped by a dog, as Muslim men bet on what the animal would do.

Girls drugged and locked in cages, like rats.

Another, raped by 700 men over three years.

Dozens and dozens of these stories through our inquiry, and we are barely scratching the surface.

This was allowed to happen EXACTLY because politicians were cowards, refusing to discuss it.

I will not make that same mistake. I said what I said, and I meant it.

The Labour Party have blood on their hands, yet they think they can demand an apology from me for highlighting the systemic evil they allowed to infect our entire country?

They can piss off.

I am angry about it. Furious. When you hear directly from these girls about what they have been through, it changes the way you see politics. Forever.

Our report will be out very soon.

When that happens, I don’t want any apologies from the Labour Party. I don’t care about that.

I want to see those politicians responsible for covering up this atrocity behind bars for what they have done to these girls.

One cannot possibly solve a problem if one cannot name the enemy, or properly describe an event for what it is.

Marine Le Pen’s father was destroyed for saying something like (roughly) the Holocaust in historical terms, was not a unique event” or something equivalent. He was correct. The Islamic slaughter of Hindus is thought to be 17 MILLION under Muslim general Tamerlane, (Timur) alone. And he wasn’t the only Muslim attacker to try and kill all the Hndus. Altogether the number is something like 60-80 MILLION.

More recently there is the Maoist mass murder of his own people to make communism work. That number is estimated at 40-80 MILLION.

The Soviet genocide attempt of Ukrainian farmers, was 13% of the total population at around 4.5 MILLION people.

So looking at the industrial destruction of British culture and mass rape and torture of British women and girls, I think it would fit the UN definition of Genocide before the UN itself started promoting it as ‘Replacement population” in official policy. 

On a related point, one of the great errors made by the West in the past 80 years or so, was turning the socialist leader, Adolf Hitler into a ‘far right wing’ god of evil. By doing so, you create worshippers, even if it starts as a cult, and much much more importantly, when you take a person and make him into a myth, you cannot spot it when it arrives again. There are other Hitlers in play today for all practical and rational definitions and descriptors, but no one can see them for what they are as we have made Hitler into a giant. A myth. A one off historical monster. There is a quite good German film that more or less addresses that actually. If yu can find it, it is well worth the watch. beyond any messaging, (and it is remarkably free of didacticism and preaching) it is very entertaining. The movie is called,Er ist wieder da (Look who’s Back) and makes this point very well. If you don’t know who and what he really was, you will be blindsided when he returns to do the same things all over again. And maybe even go along with it.

additional data point:

4. If a Canadian retweets or likes this short video on Chinese control of Canadian government, will we be kidnapped into a dialecticaly named, mental health facility and force fed brain destroying drugs?

5. Be interesting to know what truth there is behind this.

6. This tweet mistakenly claims that the British industrial rape of legacy girls by Muslim gangs has spread to Canada now. Actually it has been here for quite some time. We had a SUN TV video on a trial from many years ago in Ottawa where a number of unnamed men from a highly enriched neighbourhood had been charged with luring and drugging and raping girls. The trial, also in Ottawa, was closed to the public.

Thank you all for checking out this site.

Reader’s Lunks for May 29th, 2026

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

Nicholas Jordan Wagter 48 hour psychiatric hold has been extended indefinitely?

The other day we did an article about Nicholas Jordan Wagter, who was Soviet style kidnapped into a mental hospital, bypassing any form of due process because apparently he was passing out information about Chinese penetration of the Canadian political and industrial institutions, and waking people up to how much of a threat that is.

There is an update:

Press For Truth does a decent video above. But again, like during Covid and the Vaxx etc. the central question is missed. Probably because the Canadian spirit has been broken for generations now.

The question of course is: Why does the state have the power to do this? Why is there no due process? How can this be allowed to happen?

Sir William Blackstone (1723–1780), an English jurist, judge, and politician, once said when speaking about criminal law:

“It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer.”
The version we need is let ten crazy people walk the streets before you certify one and imprison them and force mind altering drugs on them. But the fact is, we clearly already have that. The cities are crawling with the mentally unwell and even violently so. Often from recreational drug abuse, but that is hardly the point. This arrest and detention is as much an egregious breach of all spirit of the law of a free country as was the detention of Dr. Mel bruchet, who was forced into a mental hospital, also in Vancouver, for standing in front of a hospital with the FACTS about how many babies died due to the mRNA Vaxx injections.
In Canada, if you have counter-narrative views, and worse, if you have PROOF of those views, then Caveat Orator. Let the speaker beware.
Gulag Archipelago (Volume 2, Part III)
During a hunger strike, a prosecutor asks an inmate ‘Why are you torturing yourself?’. Stunning the prosecutor with its ‘irrelevance’, the inmate replies: ‘Justice is more precious to me than life’. This individual is subsequently transferred to a psychiatric facility, where a doctor flatly affirms: ‘We suspect you may be a schizophrenic’.

Here is the interview that was done in the coffee shop that led to his state-kidnapping.

We cleaned up the audio as best as we could and subtitled it as accurately as the audio quality allowed.

Please leave your thoughts in the comments.

Discussing this case with Grok we have a few things to add. The story so far, and what the state is able to do to him, ‘legally’ under the form 4 they used to kidnap him.

  • The coffee shop “ambush”: Several weeks before his detention, Wagter was in a café (reportedly for a meet-and-greet with like-minded people). A psychiatrist (Dr. Christine Taylor) and another health worker approached him. They identified themselves and tried to do an on-the-spot “mental health check.” He told them to read his materials and leave him alone, then got up and left. He later described it as feeling like an orchestrated confrontation.
  • The pull-over and certification: On May 23, 2026, Vancouver Police pulled him over while driving. Officers told him he had already been certified under BC’s Mental Health Act (Form 4) based on the earlier café observation + input from his family. He was taken to Vancouver General Hospital for involuntary assessment.
  • Initial 48 hours ? ongoing: It started as a short-term hold (Form 4.1 allows up to 48 hours), but a second certificate was issued, extending it (up to 1 month initially, with possible renewals for longer periods). As of the latest posts (May 27–28), he is still being held at VGH and claims he has been cleared by other doctors but remains detained.

Why it feels very Soviet:

  • No immediate crime.
  • Certification based heavily on observation in a public place + family input, without a fresh full in-person evaluation at the time of apprehension.
  • He was filming police during the stop (his right), and officers asked him to stop.
  • He is an activist/researcher who posts about Chinese influence in Canada, government overreach, and other controversial topics. Supporters call it retaliation / “medical kidnapping” to silence him. Critics say his content shows signs of genuine mental health concerns (e.g., fringe ideas about wireless tech, energy fields, etc.).

This case has gone viral in alternative circles exactly because of how it looks: a seemingly functional, educated young man with no violence or immediate threat being detained after public political/activist activity.It’s a fresh and very raw example of how BC’s Mental Health Act can be applied — broad powers that critics say are ripe for abuse, especially when someone is outspoken.

Under the order that they have on him, can they force psychiatric drugs into him?
Yes — under BC’s Mental Health Act, once someone is certified as an involuntary patient, they can be forced to take psychiatric drugs against their will. How it works in practice:

  • Form 4 (the initial certification) allows detention for assessment.
  • Within 24 hours of admission, the facility must complete a Form 5 (Consent for Treatment – Involuntary Patient).
  • On the Form 5, if the patient refuses medication (or is deemed incapable of consenting), the facility director (or designate) can authorize treatment anyway. This includes psychiatric drugs (antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, etc.).
  • Once authorized, staff can use chemical restraint (forced injection) or other coercive measures if the patient physically resists.

This is standard under the Act. Involuntary patients explicitly cannot refuse psychiatric treatment, including medication. For Nicholas Jordan Wagter specifically:

He is currently held under this system at Vancouver General Hospital. If they have completed (or will complete) the Form 5 authorizing treatment, the hospital has legal power to medicate him against his wishes — even if he is conscious, competent in other areas, and objects.This is exactly why many people call these cases “Soviet-style” — the state can override bodily autonomy on psychiatric grounds with relatively little external oversight in the short term.Note: He (or his representatives) can request a Review Panel hearing to challenge the certification, and he has the right to a lawyer and a second medical opinion, but the treatment can still proceed while that’s happening.This is the legal reality in BC right now. Let me know if you want sources for the exact forms or how to support his case.
Comparing what a single psychiatrist can do Vs. the entire justice system to any person in Canada:
Criminal arrest (normal justice system):

  • Police arrest you ? You have the right to call a lawyer immediately.
  • You must be brought before a judge within 24 hours (bail hearing).
  • You are presumed innocent.
  • The state cannot force psychiatric drugs into you.
  • You have full Charter protections, evidence rules, right to silence, etc.

Mental Health Act certification (what happened to Wagter):

  • One doctor (often with family input or a single public sighting) signs a Form 4.
  • You can be picked up off the street (or pulled over) with no warrant.
  • No immediate right to a lawyer in practice.
  • No judge has to approve the initial detention.
  • They can and do force psychiatric drugs (including antipsychotics) into you against your will, even if you are competent and refusing.
  • The “due process” (Review Panel) comes days or weeks later — after you’ve already been medicated.