Category Archives: Mark Carney

A couple of data points on Carney and his Marxist beliefs and intentions as well as thoughts about the nature of this election

Posted on by

A great deal of support in Canada for Carney comes from middle class people who think they know what communism is, and simply have zero clue about it in reality. The typical response when you suggest Carney isn’t playing on team freedom is something like, “You can’t be serious! How can a central banker be communist!!”

The fact that this central banker is anxiously working on CBDCs might suggest a slight authoritarian trend though. Please keep in mind, Carney is a senior executive and policy setter for the COMINTERN org, the World Economic Forum. He even went as far as to travel to Europe to get Canada to join the EU. Another major branch office of the COMINTERN.

Then there is the Peter Foster article from the National Post published in June of 2021! Talk abut being ahead of the curve! Carney, who blames Capitalism for all our troubles and who cites Marx, Engles and Lenin, LENIN! as his influences.

The following is Ezra Levant discussing the debate last night.

It is a lesson in how a system can be rigged at any level of that system, and the more levels a system has, the more ways it can be hacked. In this example, Ezra went to court to legally assert his right as a journalist to attend the debate and ask questions. This was already a counter-hack as the Liberal Gov’t had previously attempted to ban Rebel news, which turned out to be not something they could do at that level of the total system.

So the next two levels of the system was hacked. Jagmeet refused to answer a question which was well worded and factually correct by using Alinsky rule 13. Attack the questioner, not the question, and refused to speak to someone he claimed is as odious as a Rebel reporter. As an amusing aside, the Rebel reporter was a dark skinned woman asking about the selective approach to racist policy enforcement.

When Jagmeet’s tactic of shutting down a question that speaks to the dialectical attacks on Canada by the NDP and Liberals failed because the entire room voiced displeasure, albeit too quietly for the mics to pick up, they went to hack it at another level. Suddenly a security threat meant they had to shut down the entire Q&A. Yet they did not act as if there was a threat. No attempt to remove the party leaders was made. But no more questions at all could be asked. I guess the formula is, 1 truthful question is a serious threat to the carefully staged theatrics of a debate than are 100 pre written state-paid media questions to their benefit. So better not to have any questions than one which pulls back at least one curtain, even if it’s just part way.

This tactic is at least adjacent to the one of confusing levels of abstraction. Looking at one level of a system while manipulating another. Which is also similar to making ludicrous comparisons by swapping levels of abstraction. “Muslims can’t be antisemitic because Muslims are also semites and therefore it would make them be against themselves”. As a classic example of the fallacy of shifting levels of abstraction. In fact antisemitism means hatred of Jewish people. Islamic antisemitism is because Islam makes it as clear as possible in all scripture, history, sermons and eschatology that the killing of Jewish people because they are Jewish people is central dogma for Islam. (Probably because they were the second people to reject Islam after the Meccans, who the Muslims already made extinct.)

In the case of the election, the voting machines are a constant irritant. I don’t know if Canada will use them this time in the federal election. But the thing they do best is make sure we cannot possibly know if the result they give is the one based on the number of votes cast for anyone. They are a black box, both figuratively and literally. Even if they count the ballots perfectly, it is still massively undemocratic, as there is NO WAY for people to actually know if it was fair. To paraphrase a famous Canadian judge, “Elections must not only be fair, they must seem to be fair”. The voting machines do not use open-source software, which is both more secure and allows for scrutiny of the machine’s workings. They are closed source, which means only the programmers and people who hold the code can know what the machines actually do. So the real threat of the machines is two-fold.

One: No one really can know what the election results based on votes really is. Only what we are told they are. This removes the process of selecting a government entirely from the public. We can comfort ourselves by going out and voting, and convincing ourselves with the comfortable thought that the announced winner is who was the person who got the most votes according to whatever system that region has. But we cannot know, who really got the most votes. So we have to trust the bureaucracy and the declared winner that it was a fair and secure process. A bureaucracy and winner who of course, have an enormous stake in the outcome. And if you have to take their word for it, it wasn’t an election at all, even if the machines are 100% accurate. We have removed the process of the people selecting trusted individuals using scrutineers from the people to check and count each vote, and just accept what the machines say for fear of billion dollar law suits by the companies that make them.

Two: Because of the process outlined in One: the focus tends to be on the machines. We saw this in the 2020 election that was clearly stolen from President Trump. Several investigations were launched into hacks of the machines, which all failed to find convincing evidence. But fifteen million new voters appeared out of thin air to vote for a senile and corrupt pervert who stayed in his basement for the whole campaign. So every way of looking at the election was examined, except the ways in which is was actually stolen. One might also notice that since the introduction of machines, it takes weeks and even months before final election results are made known.

In the last Federal election in Canada, for weeks after the actual election date, new Liberal seats would be announced from mail-in ballots. Mail in votes is a way of hacking elections that I think was first tried out in Austria. It was so obvious then they actually held a re-do and overturned the initial results. The process has been well refined since then however.

Still, the best thing to do is go out and vote your principles and values. If for no other reason than you have a psychological and emotional stake in the outcome. If you don’t make the effort because you feel it’s hopeless, then it is hopeless. If at least we all make the effort, then at least we get mad instead of fatalistic. We might later act to protect the effort we made in voting.

 

 

 

Mark Carney’s brilliant dialectical negation of Canadian patriotism

Posted on by

After one of my very regular and long morning conversations with a good friend about the abstracts of all the things which plague the West, we landed on a couple of points of solidity in terms of the attributes of each side of the great conflict. To get to that point, examples were needed.

The poles of the conflict can be said to look like this:

On one side, the ultimate system for human organization that allows for the maximum possibility for development, creativity, fairness as its properly understood in the West, and individual liberties. And that would be the US constitution. Frankly, the first two amendments of the Bill of Rights in some ways is all one needs to understand. The right to speak freely, and the right to defend the first right by opposing with force of arms, a tyrannical state which would remove the first right.

(Not that this should be needed to be added, but freedom of speech only has one purpose. The right to criticize political and religious authority in order to keep its power in check. And that is its only purpose. All other freedoms stem from those. And when you no longer have those rights, you have none. Not even the right to stop the state from castrating and sexually and chemically mutilating your children.)

The other pole is the never ending destruction of all systems of societal organization via the Hegelian dialectic. In its abstract, it is the use of the principles of Hegel however much affected by Marx, to perpetually destroy any and all power structures. Which would perhaps explain why we see anarchists protesting with the communists in the streets of so many cities so often. In reality though, the communists end up creating a state which is God like in its power. The book 1984 explains it rather brilliantly in the chapters after Winston Smith is arrested and taken to the Ministry of Love and eventually to room 101. An easier way though, is talk to anyone you know who is an East European expat that fled during communism. Perhaps every bit as instructive as what they say, is how reticent they will be to talk about it, as their fear of speaking the truth is both a consequence of their ‘lived experience’ as well as their recognition that Canada is in many ways well on the way to being a dialectically operated, totalitarian and oppressive polity.

And this brings me to the example. And this will likely only ring bells with Canadians, and especially in Ontario.

As of the date of the Freedom Convoy in early 2022, symbols were created with a great deal of meaning for many Canadians. The Canadian flag was flown along with symbols of Donald Trump in a non ironic way, because both were being used to demand personal liberty from tyrannical covid measures. Ones which Mark Carney had not just a small part in.

Tucker is quoting an op ed from the Globe and Mail.

Since the Freedom Convoy, people with Canadian flags on their cars or trucks were signalling resistance to the communist state and patriotism to the individualist nation most believe that Canada had been up until 2020. Many vehicles were less subtle about the messaging. The photo below is of a truck that was at the Tamara Lich talk yesterday in Ottawa. But for most, a single or dual Canadian flag on a car or especially a truck, meant loyalty to the right to bodily autonomy and an end to the WEF instructed destruction of the individual.

(Tamara is one of the people now convicted for “Mischief” for her role in the demonstration against mandatory mRNA gene therapy. More on that soon as well as a video of her talk)

And until recently, when patriots in the usual sense saw a vehicle with Canadian flags drive by we knew they were about. There would often be an exchange of waves or perhaps a friendly honk-honk. A genuine subculture was born of samisdat style messaging of those oriented towards a proper individualist and freedom oriented state, and in opposition to Trudeau’s collectivist and destructive one.

Then the old switcheroo happened. The front man for the WEF, Justin Trudeau, was sent back to being a full time wealthy elitist surfer party boy and was craftily replaced with the actual WEF/COMINTERN manager, Mark Carney. It is quite likely that Carney was the man directing the govt’s policies all along with Trudeau acting as one might say, in the same role as Joe Biden fronting for Obama, or whoever directed him.

Then the dialectic negation of the Canadian flag as a symbol for freedom happened.

Which is perhaps a little ironic since the current Canadian flag created and made official by communist PM, Lester Pearson, is itself a dialectic negation of the Red Ensign, which was a meaningful Canadian flag in terms of Canadian identity and history as a nation.

Carney managed to make Donald Trump the enemy for most CBC CTV and Global viewers. He did so by using distortions of Trump’s tariff policies and other propaganda techniques. But the clever thing was taking the rubric of patriotism away from actual patriots, and getting leftists and Liberal Party supporters to hang Canadian flags as a symbol of opposition to Donald trump. Exactly the opposite as the actual patriots, by framing Trump as an enemy of Canadian sovereignty. This from a man whose organization is dedicated to the idea of the total destruction of the nation-state altogether. Trudeau even stated out loud to the NYT that he expected to be the last leader of the nation state of Canada.

Supporters of Carney, or those who at least agree with his position on Trump, began hanging flags in their windows at home, and on vehicles. And now, when one goes by, there is uncertainty. The sense of connection to those sporting the Maple Leaf is gone. The sense of community with people you hadn’t met but you knew had your back is gone.

This is dialectic negation at its most subtle and effective.

And like all dialectics, once you control the symbol, you control the idea it represents. 

And now, once again, the Canadian flag is what it was meant to be when Pearson introduced it in 1965. The business card of the Liberal Party of Canada, and of the constant move to collectivization and an all powerful state.

A couple of things to consider when the tablets containing the Canadian election results come down from Mount Sinai

Posted on by

1. Mike Benz Tweet with a few names

2. Stephen Coughlin in a recent interview argued that the communist revolution was at the stage of moving from covert to overt. Would Klaus say what he did below, if he thought there was any danger it would make a difference?

3. Convicting the Saints, While Predators Continue to Devour Canada

Trudeau and His Appointed PM, Mark Carney, Continue as Agents of Carnage, While Tamara Lich and Chris Barber Get Convicted of the Crime of “Mischief.” Canada as Brian Peckford Sees It Today.

Justin Trudeau and his appointee for Prime Minister, Mark “Carnage,” have both made careers by bulldozing aside the inherited and codified liberties of average people. They have done so to serve the high-level criminals and thugs who have imposed themselves as our de facto dictators. The money junkies, power-mongering thugs and child traffickers work out of the WEF, the UN, the BIS, “the Central Bank of Central Banks.” Also in their sphere is the murderous and, quite literally, rapacious World Health Organization. This list is far from complete. Plagiarist Mark Carnage is a deep inductee in many globalist institutions and secret societies, including the Epstein Island crew, who have build themselves and their peers up with impunity at the expense of the remaining liberties, rights, freedom and assets of average hard working people.

[Please read the rest at the substack address linked above. There may be some details we didn’t know in there. Like the following:]

https://theccf.ca/government-is-still-fighting-against-civil-liberties/

Two of the accused in the Lethbridge court house were found NOT guilty by a jury of their peers. In spite of this finding, the two were then sentenced to six and a half years each of prison time after having been refused bail and kept in jail for over two years without having been found guilty of anything.

The dubious deal to extend the two men’s imprisonment after being found NOT guilty of the main crime was negotiated in a highly dubious deal, cooked up between the overzealous Crown Prosecutor, Stephen Johnston, and Justice David Labrenz. Judge Labrenz decided to hold back from the court proceedings a controversial sealed envelop which probably held evidence that might very well have called the Crown Prosecutor’s relationship to the Coutts Four court proceedings into question.

This whole campaign to discredit the Truckers’ Freedom Convoy movement after it gained worldwide respect and recognition as a prototype for action against onslaughts of many-faceted government repressions globally, deserves a thoroughgoing investigation. That investigation, however, will probably never happen in Canada as long as guilty parties running the government, the CBC, law enforcement agencies and especially the courts, remain in power.

The Epstein Island thing seems redundant to me. For other people caught in this web, and of whom we shall never know till some kid hacker with a quantum computer in 2092 manages to get the files. Assuming that they aren’t smart enough to keep them on paper in a vault instead of on a networked drive of course. But it’s redundant as they don’t need to blackmail Carney. He would be the guy holding the videos. Not the one caught on one. So if he did partake, it’s cause he really, really wanted to. Not because he was ensnared to for reasons of achieving power. That he already has. Which goes to the idea that he would never run for a stupid job with far less power and money (corruption and graft aside) like Canadian PM. At least compared to what he had without any real scrutiny or public attention unless he was pretty damn sure the election was in the bag. Anonymity after all, is likely the true sign of ultimate power in an Orwellian State. Only inner party members can turn off the tele-screens. And only at the top can they direct the software that determines what gets looked at.

What seems more likely might be…

In the last Canadian ‘election’, counting the ballots went on for quite a while. I don’t remember exactly how long and I’m not sure I trust any search results. But every few days to a week or two, we would hear that another liberal had won a seat. So Trudeau’s ‘win’ grew till he had a minority he could use to form a government with the NDP, who stood in his way of the Liberals about absolutely nothing. In fact, the NDP used the same dialectical device the CBC, CTV and Global does. They make demands as if it was the people’s voice opposing Trudeau, but asking exactly what the COMINTERN in the body of Trudeau wants in the first place. Then, Trudeau appears to be both a man of destiny and a man of the people.

We have written a number of posts during the Covid-revolution about how they mimic the Soviet system of appointing a panel of experts and then use the experts to represent the people opposing the govt. and then submit to the govt. experts, let’s call them “the Science Table”, and then the state gets to run roughshod over all our rights and laws cause that’s what is good for the people. Variations on a theme here.

The only question I have is, does the COMINTERN feel that Canada still requires plausible deniability for a solution like that? Or will they go full overt with a massive Carney win that no one will truly in their heart of hearts believe was the outcome.

ADDENDUM:

This is not suggesting people don’t vote. It is critical that everyone goes out and votes in this election in Canada. If you don’t invest in the outcome, even from a strictly psychological-game theory sense, then the likelihood of people partaking in any kind of effective action will be zip.

Why would you, for instance join the kinds of massive and lengthy protests like the Egyptians did twice recently to depose dictators, if you were not trying to at least protect the investment you made, walking half a mile in probably crap weather to mark a ballot. So yes, we have to vote.

And then there is always the possibility that we here at Vlad are wrong, the ballots are counted fairly, and a counter-revolutionary will win and fix things and we have a political solution to our problems. And we desperately hope this is the case.

Mark Carney to INCREASE funding for enemy propaganda outlet, CBC and make the funding mandatory

Posted on by

The first sentence in this video is correct. Devil his due and all. China, the WEF, Mark carney who is himself foreign interference, and the COMINTERN overall set the messaging for the CBC. So credit goes where it’s due, the first sentence is correct.

In case it disappears

The Twitter thread under this one makes for some interesting reading.

Mostly Carney but it looks like concrete evidence of a prediction by this site has now appeared – The US govt was likely funding the invasion(s) we believe disguised with the outrageous claims of teaching math to gay turtles

Posted on by

Today and the last few days have been crazy busy doing behind the scenes work on several of our issues, both in terms of informing people about things or creating documents which are informative, or assisting in activism which may actually have an impact in stopping components of the invasion and conquest of the US by Muslims.

So not as much posting here as I would like if I had the time.

But Mark Carney must be exposed. If for no other reason than at least people who are aware can wonder how he will get elected as PM. Each new revelation about him seems to make it more certain that he has it in the bag. I think the huge amount of data showinging that the polls putting him ahead are fake and paid for, are not to get people to think he will win. I don’t think that has much real utility. It is to make people think he really won when the election is, how can I put it, adjusted for him. I think the term is “plausible deniability”. The polls had him ahead, so, maybe yeah, Canadians are stupid and they voted for him. Sort of thing.

The last Trudeau election, the counting went on for many weeks after election day and every so often you would hear about another seat going to the Liberals. I figure they just cheated it enough to get the NDP-Liberal coalition in power. Jagmeet has no integrity. He would have swallowed that deal well before the election.

Meanwhile, In Carnada:

1. Carney on China

2. Carney on billions for things useless or destructive to Canada

Full text:

I don’t think people truly understand how dangerous Mark Carney is to the Canadian economy. He’s quite bright and speaks with authority, but let’s break down what he’s actually saying. In this short 2021 Bloomberg clip he suggests that billions of public dollars should be provided as guarantees to public companies (like Brookfield) so that they can borrow TRILLIONS of dollars to build clean energy infrastructure in the third world. These private companies would earn massive profits from infrastructure projects in foreign countries financed by public dollars from G20 countries. Third world countries will not be able to pay for the infrastructure meaning it’s the citizens of G20 countries who would lose billions or more on the transaction. Canada’s national debt would explode. It’s a massive wealth transfer with no tangible benefit to the citizens footing the bill. Carney’s priorities are clearly net zero, followed by corporate profits, followed by third world development. The needs of the taxpayer doesn’t fit into the equation. Canada simply can’t afford Carney.

3. A week or three ago, we suggested on this site that the outrageous claims about where the trillions of US dollars have been going was a lie. That in reality it was funding the invasion of Western countries by hostile aliens.

4. CHINA’S MAN: Hong Kong human rights organization files letter with RCMP over Carney’s Chinese candidate

(Where exactly is Manchuria?)

Hong Kong Watch, a prominent human rights organization, has urged the RCMP to investigate Liberal candidate Paul Chiang over remarks the group alleges may constitute foreign interference in Canada’s federal election, set for April 28.

In an open letter to RCMP Commissioner Mike Duheme, dated Monday, the group pointed to comments Chiang reportedly made at a Chinese-language news conference in January.

According to media reports, the Markham-Unionville incumbent encouraged attendees to turn Conservative candidate Joe Tay over to the Chinese consulate in Toronto to claim a $1-million bounty placed on Tay by the People’s Republic of China (PRC).

“To everyone here, you can claim the one million dollar bounty if you bring (Joe Tay) to Toronto’s Chinese Consulate,” Chiang is quoted as saying. He has not denied the statement.

Hong Kong Watch called the remarks a “concerning development,” arguing they suggest a parliamentarian incited the abduction of a political rival for delivery to a foreign government with a history of detaining Canadians unjustly.

5. Speaking of “foreign interference”, the Privy Council, (British people probably understand the word ‘privy’ in the context I write it) had a big press conference this morning on foreign interference. I gotta say, it was like being on an Air Canada flight while listening to CBC. It started with a flipping land claim acknowledgement and then said nothing in English and repeated the nothing in French for long enough to be irritating to everyone, then went back to saying some nothing in English again. It was so awful there wasn’t even a part worth clipping and posting. I have no idea why they held it, except maybe to appear concerned about foreign interference, when the man established by a pick and place process appears to be more an agent of China than anywhere else. But for those who want to see the presser, it is below.

It is 39 minutes of suffocating official canadiana, preceded by a land claims acknowledgement however. But, should someone with more attention span than I have care to listen to it, and if there is any substance whatsoever, please post it in the comments.

Thank you all for checking out this site.

One more Carney video here on FB but I cannot access it on this machine. 

Carney again: The worse it looks, the more likely he’ll be elected?

Posted on by

1. Ezra Levant interviews an expert, Marc Morano on the topic of Mark Carney

2. Separation talk in Alberta is very serious. Either joining the US or forming its own polity. It appears to be contingent on Carney being declared the PM after the election.

3. It has been our contention that Trudeau was in fact a party boy hedonist and all the actual decisions and policies were set by Mark Carney during Trudeau’s terms. The following video is a solid data point in that direction. Also it points out that Carney had the harshest words for the protestors during the Freedom Convoy. It was to say the least, a tyrannical response to a peaceful protest.

4. Here is Tucker Carlson from when he was still with FOX discussing and accurately predicting Mark carney’s leadership and his approach to the Freedom Convoy

Thank you all for your kind attention. I would ask people to read the post from yesterday. There may be enough of the model in that post of how things might actually work, to offer predictive value going forward.

Gotta say, it’s hard not to appreciate Donald J. Trump

Screenshot

Mark Carney and the Century Initiative – The NGO determined to deracinate Canadian identity in every way and for all time

Posted on by

For those not familiar with the Century Initiative, the Illegally funded NGO by the Canadian Government to increase Canada’s population to 100 million people strictly from immigration by the end of the century, please become familiar with it, especially if you are Canadian, and before the election on April 28th.

There are a few things people need to understand to make sense of any of the following information. One of which is the actual nature of communism. A thing which people imagine they understand, but generally do not. Much like how people think the National Socialist German Worker’s Party, or, The Nazis are right wing, communism is not just a more equitable economic system. It is in fact an earlier iteration of Nazism except it kills way more people. And both want the total destruction of whatever preceded it.

Communism requires the destruction of Identity. It wants the loss of a sense of individual rights, and much more than that, the loss of the sense of the individual as a concept, even in the minds of the individual. ‘The state’ you see, ‘will be unto like a God that Bestrides the Land’, Hegel is quoted as saying. And the individual is nothing at all.

The book 1984 explains it so well, one is nearly tempted to jump on board with the explanation till you remember that the explanation comes to a man who has been tortured endlessly for months in The Ministry of Love because he dared hang on to a scrap of truth that the party found inconvenient. Inconvenient  to a state narrative in fact. Much like any doctor or authority that challenged, or still challenges the mRNA injections. At least in Canada.

In 1984, the explanation given to Winston Smith that the institutions that people serve are all that matter. People are born, serve the party and die. But the party they explain, is eternal. Therefore, the individual person is as inconsequential as a grain of sand on the beach. It is, after all, the beach that matters. At least in communist thought as explained by Orwell.

In order to destroy a people so thoroughly that they forget their nation, collective history, and identity as a nation, their ethnicity, their collective mythos and value set as a people, and even their sense of individual rights, a multi-pronged attack is required.

Hypothetically, one of those prongs might be to make sure everyone abandons their sense of their ownership of their own bodies by making them take a dangerous experimental never before used gene therapy injection for the collective good. You are you see, a very bad person if you do your own research and determine these are not good for you. You must, you see, take the shots for the safety of the general public. The collective above the self. The collective Über Alles one might say. The injections may not be good for you. But that is a risk the government is willing to take for the glory of the state after all.

The state would also have to establish ownership of the children, such that should an agent of the state convince your child that they should become sterilized at a young age and transform themselves into a monster (in a certain technical sense of the word) or change their physiology permanently but with far far less functionality and requiring much higher maintenance than in their natural bodies, it would be an actual imprisonable crime to try and talk them out of it. Put more bluntly, you could go to jail and have the state remove your children from your home if you attempt to defy a state narrative on the nature of human sexuality with the children who buy into it at any age.

(A lot of people take great umbrage at my use of the term, “Turning people into monsters” as the intended output of the trans-intersectional attack on sexual identity. Please watch the following video for a rather excellent explanation please. The term “monster” is not from me, it is from the creator of the Trans dialectic-attack)

And that is especially true when the reasoning for doing this surgery or taking these chemicals and medications at unprecedented doses is as irrational and unsubstantiated as taking an experimental gene therapy where all indications are it will be bad for you on top of no evidence that they are fit for purpose.

After all, getting the public to accept a state narrative which is true doesn’t really give more power to the state and remove it from you. Only when the state demands the absurd and dangerous and you comply, does it achieve the true objective.

Another way to destroy and deracinate a nation is with mass immigration by people who are ideologically opposed to your nation, its values, its organizing principles and its laws at a level so core that even we are not aware of the aspects we live in and that they seek to destroy. Much like no one can hear their own accents, we look at our values as being the values of the world.

Enter mass Islamic immigration.

Islam is so far removed from a Western understanding of rights that they celebrate it when a man murders a woman for what we could consider trivial reasons. They, on the other hand, see it much like communists would. The most important thing is the authority of Islam in that case, or the communist state in the other. If a woman is even accused of failing to submit to Sharia principles, let alone actually guilty of it, she will be killed by a father or a brother, often with the mother’s help. Even sometimes by a jilted lover if he is angry enough to make up a claim about blasphemy instead of just throwing acid in her face. A now common crime in Pakistani countries like the UK.

This means the entire foundation of our laws are rotten.

You can kill people if they are a threat to the social order’s absolute authority in Islam. So it’s only months away or maybe a couple of years till the charge of “Mischief”, (now a communist equivalent to one or another Islamic charge) which is already being over used against people who protested the experimental gene therapy mandates in Canadian courts carry a very very serious consequence. Maybe have a look at Tommy Robinson’s current conditions as a guest of the state in the UK as an example. Or Tamara Lich or Chris Barber’s Mischief trials in Ottawa lasting years and costing 7 figures.

The Century Initiative is an NGO, which as stated in the title, means it cannot legally be funded by the government, and yet it is. For those not familiar with the Century Initiative, here are three videos which should put it into perspective. The first is a talk by Madeline Weld who has been on top of this issue for many years and knows the ins and out of it cold. The next two are from the 2024 Century Initiative meeting held in Toronto where they describe their progress and how they are already creating 15 minute cities in Toronto by deliberately making driving extremely inconvenient. Apparently, so they say, it is so people can feel the joy of standing on a sidewalk and looking in the window of the dry cleaner. Something we all yearn to do as I am led to believe.

2024 Century Initiative meeting with invited guest speaker, Mark carney:

Century initiative meeting same day with the architect of the 15 minute cities:

And to the point.

In the past 5 years there was only one member of the Conservative Party of Canada that had the sand to stand up to Trudeau’s authoritarian policies publicly. And that was Dr. Leslyn Lewis. Please read her Tweet as of this morning:

Full text:

Mark Carney’s club raises red flags. Mark Wiseman founded the Century Initiative, a lobbying group that wants to spike Canada’s population to 100 million. Mark Carney has been friends with Wiseman for years, and once becoming Prime Minister, Carney hired Wiseman immediately. The Globe and Mail has been giving the 100 million population radicals a platform for years, even acting as their official media partner. Wiseman’s Century Initiative, Carney and the Globe, one club pushing a dangerous idea that will have real costs for Canadians.

Lewis doesn’t go nearly far enough.

In Carney’s own book, Values, he explains that his role models are Marx, Engles and Lenin. Lenin’s actual Motto was, “Kill the Kulaks”. Depending on context, a Kulak was anyone who owned more than a 1/4 acre of land. But in essence, it means private property owners, and especially ones who benefit from that ownership. It is also the likely motivation for the Holomodor, the genocide of Ukrainian farmers in the millions because they wouldn’t collectivize their farms. The Holomodor was a project the New York Times had a major hand in just FYI.

Carney also explains that the problems we have are caused by “capitalism”. So connecting him to communism is not a stretch. And once you understand communism, then the Century Initiative is NOT about “growth” but about total deracination of Canada in much the way that mass migration is rapidly deracinating Europe. England is already putting Shakespeare into the memory hole.

From the National Post article linked above:

In his book Value(s): Building a Better World for All, Mark Carney, former governor both of the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England, claims that western society is morally rotten, and that it has been corrupted by capitalism, which has brought about a “climate emergency” that threatens life on earth. This, he claims, requires rigid controls on personal freedom, industry and corporate funding.

If Carney wanted growth for economic benefit, he would take the Viktor Orban approach. He would reduce taxes, especially for couples having children. He would encourage industry and guarantee an energy supply that was affordable. Instead, Carney talks about achieving the impossible and more importantly, unnecessary goal of achieving net zero. But in a public talk in Rockcliffe Park in Ottawa, he spoke about achieving negative net zero, Given that Canada’s trees already absorb more CO2 than Canadians produce, one can only guess that he means less people, or that the people he is bringing in through the century initiative will live in the world’s largest gulags, or perhaps digital panopticons.

Given that he was a central bank president in two Neo-communist countries, we can make a safe bet that he will introduce CBDCs. The fourth wall of said panopticon.

For those not yet familiar with CBDCs:

It isn’t all that clear who to vote for in Canada’s upcoming election. Or for that matter, if how people vote will be reflected in the results. The 2020 US election was most certainly stolen so that a very senile and frail, corrupt man could sit in a fake Oval Office and pretend to be president while we can only speculate who actually had that executive power. And the UK election was certainly rigged so the communists could take control if you listen to the interviews of one British MP who was polling at 66% right before the election and lost with a mere 3% of the vote. He was also the only politician that stood up in the British Parliament and dared speak truth about the vaccines. So factor that into the election math.

But it should be clear who not to vote for.

Eeyore for VTB.

Two videos on Carney

Posted on by

Redacted on Carney

Normally media has to work a lot harder than this to find things people will find objectional to a candidate. That is, unless you are the leftist press and you just make it up altogether like the Russia Collusion hoax or the Biden Laptop from the defensive end.

But wow Carney makes it really easy. Which makes one wonder how the election will be run.

Another parallel to the last 3 US elections, Pierre Poillievre’s talks and rallies are block busters where lines to get in are around large buildings. Carney’s seem closer to a Hillary Clinton rally in a coffee shop or a half a chapel.

 

Some minor peculiarities about Mark Carney’s selection process for Die Partei: Does it tell us anything about how the federal election will be run?

Posted on by

A couple of data points suggesting various processes to get Mark Carney into position were fixed in advance and had nothing to do with the process they presented to the public

FULL TEXT:

Think about this… days after the leadership “race”

@MarkJCarney

announces an election. How is it that the planes, buses & print material for a federal election campaign were prepared so quickly ? It is becoming clearer every day that the establishment of the

@liberal_party

knew from day one that

@MarkJCarney

would be selected. That’s why he had inside access to Ministers. It’s clear there was never a race. It was always a sham & rigged so that the elites could fundraise for the party from hardworking Canadians. 350K * 5 = 1,750,000 Million raised. My donors and I want the 350K returned ASAP. Dont play us hardworking Canadians for fools. #refundthe350k

Wait a second, who is Ruby Dhalla?

Screenshot

OH RIGHT! She was running to be Liberal Party leader! For which she had to pay $350,000.00 I guess out of pocket to assist in the illusion that it was an election and not a selection/inauguration. They also after taking her third of a million, removed her from the leadership debate. So… take the money and gagged her.

Full text:

Think about this – The

@liberal_party

elites knew with me on the debate stage there would have been serious questions & real opinions – not a family group chat. They were scared for me to debate

@MarkJCarney

So 2 days before the debates & AFTER they took the 350K- they removed me & now

@MarkJCarney

is scared for to debate

@PierrePoilievre
@yfblanchet
@theJagmeetSingh

This is an election campaign not a coronation like the liberal leadership. Turning down the

@tvanouvelles

debate is an insult to Quebecers & all Canadians. P.s. for the elites complaining about the 75K fee for the TVA debate – the liberal party forced candidates to pay 350,000 dollars .

Here is another curious data point. They have injected Carney to run in a riding in Ottawa. His connection to it, is he was there once for a wedding. The riding itself comes and goes and was first established in 1988. It appears to be an artifact of ‘gerrymandering’ if I got that term right but in any case it is hardly a safe riding in terms of how people vote. Ottawa Vanier is where he actually lives when he is in Canada at all, and it’s one of the, if not the safest Liberal riding in all of Canada. So no idea why they picked the riding he is running in, unless they have special access to voting procedure or results for that riding somehow.

A little post-script.

If I knew I could cheat an election to win it, the most important thing would be to create plausible deniability so that people may suspect something wrong, but there would be a mental path available to believe it was legit.

One way I might do that, would be to create fake polls showing I was way ahead in the polls so that when I won, it was believable. The problem with a secret ballot is you don’t really know how anyone else voted except yourself. So as long as there is even one vote for your candidate in your riding, you can’t know if you were not the only one to vote for your candidate of choice.

Here is one of the polling companies, EKOS polls. 

Here is what the head of EKOS polling had to say about Pierre Poilievre:

Then there is Liaison Strategies. Who are they exactly?

These guys “get millions in taxpayer grants” and all of a sudden drop polls showing Carney as ahead

 

One mechanism by which the Canadian election could be stolen for Carney

Posted on by

It is our firm conviction that all rules, regulations, procedures and processes in Canada and across most of the West has been replaced from ones which work on Socratic principles to ones which work dialectically.

This means that instead of a process operating to create the outcome based on the evidence and reality uncovered by the process, such as a trial for example, the outcome desired is determined in advance of the process and the process is tuned to give that politically expedient result.

The procedures we use in the West exist mostly as vestigial remnants of a republic/Democratic nation state and have been returned as described but are already being replaced in Canada and Great Britain as a couple of examples, with new more blatant dialectical or communist procedures.

The placement of mark Carney as PM without his being elected to anything is one example. We predicted he would be years ago, without any idea how. It was enough to know this is what the PTB (Powers that be) wanted, and this is what they would get. Then there was the unprecedented prorogation of parliament, unprecedented both in terms of its length and more importantly, the reasons. In this case so the Liberal Party could complete the transformation of its leadership using a lightly bearded coronation process to replace Carney’s proxy, Trudeau, for Carney himself.

So now the question is, how will the election be taken by the Carney Liberals in a way that gives some kind of plausible deniability to a steal.

In other words, it doesn’t really matter to them if we know they cheated. Just like the US election in 2020, it only matters that there is enough doubt to stop people from taking effective action. The usual voices of people who think they are on top of things will say, “Yes it is very unusual, but according to rule XX00 and in 1745,,,” and the irony there is, none of those rules and precedents apply anymore. They are just used to beard the dialectical methods used to actually disguise things.

A reader of Vlad sent in the following article from La Press (auto-translated from French)

The meaty part is here:

let’s explore the different scenarios…

First scenario: the liberals come out winners without obtaining an absolute majority. They must then make alliances to lead the country.

But at the moment, we need’a solid leader to face the American president who likes to exploit the flaws of his vis-a-vis.

We need’a prime minister who has all the’agility required to negotiate with Donald Trump.

And we need’a captain who holds the public finances of’a firm hand, without having to make costly compromises with the’ opposition to keep the government afloat.

172 Number of seats required to obtain an absolute majority (50 % + 1) of the 343 seats in the federal Parliament

Second scenario: the Conservatives elect more members of parliament without obtaining an absolute majority. In this situation, the rules are clear: the outgoing prime minister has the right to’ be the first to attempt to form the government1.

The article is a propaganda piece utilizing Anti-Trump sentiments to push for Carney.

But the part that matters is the last line: “ In this situation, the rules are clear: the outgoing prime minister has the right to’ be the first to attempt to form the government1.”

And there you have it. Even if I is admitted that Poilievre has more seats than any other party, without a total majority, Carney can form a government with the odious NDP leader Jagmeet Sing and we are from the frying pan into the fire.

 

 

Carney, China, Coal power and intersectional lines of attack on all aspects of Western identity

Posted on by

1. The point has been made here before that it seems quite likely that Trudeau was the idiot boy-wonder behind policies that were actually moved into place by a COMINTERN cabal quasi-behind the scenes. I say quasi because the WEF has openly bragged about its penetration of the Canadian Cabinet.

YouTube took it down. Here it is again.

Now, the COMINTERN with some sleazy maneuvers has managed to place a sophisticated actor into the role of Canadian PM. One Mark Carney. Think of it like the same process as the US used, when they placed a senile and highly corrupt and corruptible man in the White House while running it from behind in the person of Brack Obama, but in this case, the useful idiot was out front for 9 years using Hanlon’s Razor as his defence for highly sophisticated intersectional attacks on every one of our liberties and aspects of our identities as Canadians and as citizens of a Western republic/democracy, and now the main agent has stepped into place.

2. Mark Carney appears to have a lot of financial interests in US coal mines but is failing to cover miners with Black Lung.

3. Again, I have heard with my own ears as have others I know, Carney saying he actually wants NEGATIVE net zero. This is code for oppression, as it’s simply impossible to do that. Its outside of the realm of any kind of physics or chemistry.

Peterson gets this pretty much totally correct.

4. This one I can’t help but like as this guy has just taken the National Post article we have posted about 25 times in the past couple of years, and condensed out the most stunning and important parts in a Twitter video.

Here is the article again. Please send the link to everyone you know who can vote in Canada or knows someone who can vote in Canada, so long as we are pretending voting makes a difference.

5. And at last, a NEW National Post article on Carney’s climate policy.

For those that don’t get this, the Climate thing is an intersectional attack against Western and only Western industry and the middle class. For an explanation of that, see the Stephen Coughlin video below.

Terry Newman: Mark Carney’s climate obsessions will put Trudeau to shame

Don’t trust his pledge to turn Canada into an energy superpower

For all of Carney’s supposed superior knowledge of the world and markets, the art of provincial negotiations and incentives for private investment in natural resources appears to have already escaped his grasp. There’s evidence to suggest this is because, at heart, Carney is likely to be a fully fledged ESG prime minister (ESG being short for environmental, social, and governance principles being imposed on business).

In his speech after winning the Liberal leadership, Carney said he had a plan: “A plan, a plan, a plan … that makes us an energy superpower in both clean and conventional energy … a plan that creates one Canadian economy, not 13, because in Canada, we are stronger when we are united.”

Unfortunately, everything Carney’s said and done up until this point suggests not only that he’d fail to unite Canadian provinces to create this energy super-economy, but that’s he’s not actually interested in doing so in the first place.

The Liberal party may have a new face, but Carney’s insistence on keeping an emissions cap and industrial carbon tax in place — both products of Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government — doesn’t invoke much confidence in his energy superpower plan.

We view articles like the above as colour commentary. Like listening to someone describe the action on the field at a sporting event with maybe some light background on his views of the players or the refs but little to no actual information about the nature of the game at the strategic level.

The strategic level looks like this:

Politicians and other communist revolutionary actors create fictional narratives which have as their focus, a component of Western civilization and the identity of all who live in it which must be destroyed. These are called “Intersectional lines of attack”. The Global Warming thing is so obviously an attack on Western industry it should feel embarrassing to explain it out loud. But most still buy into it, even though China is not just immune from criticism for not living up to the various low carbon policies, but is actively building 5000 coal powered power production facilities a year, and they buy the coal from people like Mark Carney. Then there is the actual science which doesn’t support the Global warming from man-made CO2 claims whatsoever. Then there are the people who claim CO2 from engine exhaust is an existential threat to the entire planet, then take separate jumbo jets from Washington to LA for an afternoon. Michelle to go shopping, and Barack for a meeting. Then take separate jets to go home. Of course, Trudeau and Carney are no different.

If it was an existential threat you would see some evidence of it in their behaviour. The way they would say, jump out of the way of an oncoming truck. That is how you know they believe the truck is real, and it could really hurt them. Because they jump out of the way. (take any veiled reference you want to the Freedom Convoy and it’s threat to Trudeau’s power during covid you want, although I didn’t pick that example for that reason)

Below is a recentish interview with Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin on the intersectional lines of attack which is used to crush so many aspects of our identity. Think “Trans-affirming care” for the state’s ‘right’ to convince a child it is somehow in the wrong body, and needs to be surgically and chemically sterilized and mutilated to feel comfortable with itself. Ok then. Once you start to see it, examples are numerous and obvious.

Mark Carney handles questions badly – again – and blames the tariffs for Canada’s economy claiming things where great right till then

Posted on by

Reality:

 

Premiere investigative journalist, Sam Cooper, does 1 hour interview on the curious parallel policies of the CCP and Mark Carney

Posted on by

This is worth the watch.

New flag and message on Parliament hill protestors, but the exact same fears and worse

Posted on by

This weekend, we went to the Hill to see if all the protestors had swapped out their F**K Trudeau flags for *FucK Carney ones. In fact, some had.

We ran into a gentleman who was quite up to date on the real nature of things in Canadian politics, had made what he calls “A family friendly version of the Trudeau flag” and informed me that Carney was attempting to bring Canada into the (COMINTERN) European Union formally. This feels like his way of pushing back against Trump’s suggestion that Canada become the 51st state. An idea which I would hope all Canadians would think about carefully and in cold blood. If nation states change over time, and if we look back at the origins of our nation as generally being good, then in 100 years from now, joining the US will be a well celebrated national holiday. Whereas joining the EU, in 40 years from now, there will be no remembrance of Canada as it actually was at all.

In any case, this interview is a decent primer on who mark Carney is, and what his intentions are. But as per, those who go protest him and his new dictatorial powers and actions will be marginalized as crazy or stupid for now. Criminal most likely a little later. As my friend said who was with me, “Really, there should be tens of thousands of people here today protesting Carney”.

RAIR has some details about the speaker.

 

EU to launch CBDC soon, Vaxxed under 60s dying at DOUBLE the rate of the unvaxxed, TWO no THREE items on Mark Carney with solid indicators of who he is and what he plans: Links 1 for March 17, 2025

Posted on by

First, this post, like all posts, won’t make sense if you just see it in the email that the site sends out automatically. It contains important videos and tweets which do not show up, or even the links, in the email.

1. The EU plans to launch the digital Euro AKA CBDC this year. This is AT THE CONSUMER LEVEL, not just high level bank to bank transfers. And Mark Carney is apparently trying to bring Canada into the EU. Please understand just how totalitarian this is.

For those not yet sure what CBDCs are and what they mean, please watch the excellent video below:

2. Vaccinated English adults under 60 are dying at twice the rate of unvaccinated people the same age

And have been for six months. This chart may seem unbelievable or impossible, but it’s correct, based on weekly data from the British government

The brown line represents weekly deaths from all causes of vaccinated people aged 10-59, per 100,000 people.

The blue line represents weekly deaths from all causes of unvaccinated people per 100,000 in the same age range.

I have checked the underlying dataset myself and this graph is correct. Vaccinated people under 60 are twice as likely to die as unvaccinated people. And overall deaths in Britain are running well above normal.

3. Men who claim to be women, like women who claim to be men, seem to be competing with Muslims for most egregious acts of terrorism. Muslims are winning 10 genocides Vs a few outrageous and deadly actions. But still…

I wonder. Could there be a connection between the flag behind this person and the look and messaging of their Tweet?

4. Natasha in Montreal is asking the important question, Why is Mark Carney pushing for the Chinese RMB to replace the US dollar as the world reserve currency. The answer is probably related to why he wants to get Canada in the Soviet Politburo West European Union

Carney is planning some useless new kind of NATO without the US but with Europe? I guess we all will have to compete to see who pays the least and fails to live up to its obligations the most.

5. This is Carney bare naked in front of the whole of Canada. He has revealed his nature in a couple of minutes failing to answer a simple question by a Globe & Mail reporter about any conflicts of interests he may have as a massively wealthy person in terms of fossil fuels and other assets, and PM of Canada. Watch him avoid the question, condescend to the reporter, attempt to make it about Pierre Poilievre’s security clearance, which as I understand it he refused because it meant he could see the files on which MPs were Chinese assets but then was legally bound not to say anything about them, and finally Carney appears to be dry lipped with suppressed rage at the reporter at the end.

Full text:

Tense exchange between Carney and the Globe’s Stephanie Levitz over his blind trust “We understand that you have now placed your assets in a blind trust. So you don’t know what’s happening to them going forward, but you knew what they were going into that blind trust. So what are they?”

Laughs nervously Tries to twist to slam Poilievre again for his unwillingness to get his security clearance to limit his ability to speak to foreign interference

“The rules say that those assets should be publicly disclosed within 120 days, which means you’ll campaign in a coming federal election, most likely within the next 120 days, and are serving as prime Minister now with Canadians not being aware of what potential conflicts of interest, what possible conflict would you have?” Snaps back “What possible conflict could I have?”

Goes on with Rosemary Barton and accuses her of “a prior of conflict and ill will”

@markJcarney
@StephanieLevitz

Thank you all for your kind patronage of this site and its perspectives.