Rules for journalists by the National Union of Journalists

This explains a great deal actually, about why the news doesn’t seem to be much in touch with actual reality on the ground. What a tragic shame. I might add, it would be an interesting contest to see who can find the most contradictions in this clearly socialist agenda driven yet, I am reliably informed, very influential organization.

Eeyore

NUJ guidelines on race reporting.

Guidelines ratified by the National Union of Journalists (UK and Ireland) for all its members to follow when dealing with race relations subjects.

Statement on race reporting
1. The NUJ believes that the development of racist attitudes and the growth of fascist parties pose a threat to democracy, the rights of trade union organisations, a free press and the development of social harmony and well-being.

2. The NUJ believes that its members cannot avoid a measure of responsibility in fighting the evil of racism as expressed through the mass media.

3. The NUJ reaffirms its total opposition to censorship but equally reaffirms its belief that press freedom must be conditioned by responsibility and an acknowledgement by all media workers of the need not to allow press freedom to be abused to slander a section of the community or to promote the evil of racism. Continue Reading →

Brainwashing in Norway. Seven aspects.

Here is a documentary on what appears to be political brainwashing in Norway in seven parts. I will post them here as each one becomes available.

For those of you with the ability to download, it might be a good idea to grab this while you can. It came to us through a series of people so I don’t know the back-story on it but as the whole thing is over 3 hours, I am guessing it was a series meant for TV. I have no idea if it was ever broadcast in Norway or not. And frankly, I have not seen all of it yet myself, just bits. But what I have seen I liked very much. Please watch, enjoy, comment.

Part I Gender Equality:

Part II The Parental Effect:

Part III ‘Gay/Straight’


Continue Reading →

Australia’s 60 minutes does stunningly deceptive, unsubstantiated piece on the EDL and Tommy Robinson

This ‘documentary’ shows Tommy, describes him as ‘far right wing’, as a ‘racist thug’ etc. without showing one iota of actual evidence of any of those claims. Then, somewhat to their credit, interview some Australian Muslims that do spout open hate and sedition but do not describe him as ‘far right wing’ or racist etc. even though he supplied all the necessary evidence for it.

What is wrong with the media now? In order to broadcast any footage of defense of classical and liberal civilization and democracy you have to demonize it? Tommy should sue.

Go to 9 minutes 15 seconds of this video and listen to the question. There is no way Tommy was asked this and responded the way he is portrayed here. Notice that the camera moves away from the interviewer during the question. This is what is called, ‘a re-ask’ in videography. You ask the question again after the fact and edit it in. But of course one is ethically bound to ask the same question. This needs investigation.

Trying to counter the official versions of events when the truth is clearly not what is presented.

The recent attack by a Muslim immigrant to Belgium where he deliberately targeted children and Christmas shoppers with illegal weapons in Belgium has been nicely swept clean of all potential for accusations of Islamic influence etc.

His face book page has nothing left on it except 19 ‘friends’, most of whom are female and no reference to Islam whatsoever, or for that matter, to anything at all.

This German site claims his FB page was entirely filled with Jihadist material and Islamic ‘extremist’ lectures and images. Yet it would appear that the powers-that-be in Belgium managed to scrub it clean before the act of terror was even done.

I wonder who does more damage to the people of a democratic society. A jihadi who shoots up people at a mall during Christmas shopping season or a government that works overtime to make sure it’s own citizens are lied to about the facts in order to maintain a narrative. A narrative that may in fact spell the undoing of Western liberal democracy altogether.

Here is a google-machine-translation of a German website that seems to have something that resembles actual information on this issue.

Any German speakers who wish to properly translate this page would be deeply appreciated.

Eeyore for Vlad.

UPDATE:

A reader of Vlad was kind enough (Thank you very much Rembrandt C) to properly translate the German article on the Belgian attack.

Rembrandt Clancy says:
December 17, 2011 at 12:42 am (Edit)
Here is the translation from the German of an article from “Die Achse des Guten” which you requested above: http://www.achgut.com/dadgdx/index.php/dadgd/article/der_diskrete_charme_der_berichterstattung/.

Rembrandt Clancy

From: Die Achse
Guest Author 14 December 2011
The Discrete Charm of News Reporting
Manfred Gillner

Whenever, on the occasion of a crime report, the comment areas of the leading online-media, after a brief and seemly interval, are closed or simply not even opened, then one knows that now something has happened again which for the guardians of political correctness is very much amiss. Just so did it also happen after the terror attack in Liège. For it must be declared as such, when someone in camouflage fatigues, armed with grenades, revolver and Kalashnikov gets into a car, drives to the Liège Christmas market, climbs to the roof of a bakery and cuts down anything he can catch sight of. The gunman knew exactly what he wanted, said a female Journalist, who, as witness, experienced the entire incident. He intended to hit as many people as possible. Continue Reading →

Michael Coren discusses the Holimodor

This is good and I am especially glad that it is being discussed more openly. Those university students that rave on about communism never seem to know about this and won’t listen if you tell them. Great to see this critical bit of history getting out there.

THere are a few really fantastic movies about this event, one I am familiar with is called, ‘The Soviet Story’ and is worth every second spent watching.

Meanwhile:

Saudi woman beheaded for practising ‘sorcery’

Any women’s rights groups want to take this on? (Queue sound of crickets)

H/T Tundra Tabloids

NDTV.COM 

Riyadh:  A Saudi woman was beheaded on Monday after being convicted of practising sorcery, which is banned in the ultra-conservative kingdom, the interior ministry said.

Amina bin Abdulhalim Nassar was executed in the northern province of Jawf for “practising witchcraft and sorcery,” the ministry said in a statement carried by SPA state news agency.

It is not clear how many women have been executed in the desert-kingdom, but another woman was beheaded in October for killing her husband by setting his house on fire.

The beheading took to 73 the number of executions in Saudi Arabia this year.

In September, Amnesty International called on the Muslim kingdom where 140 people were on death row to establish an “immediate moratorium on executions.”

The rights group said Saudi Arabia was one of a minority of states which voted against a UN General Assembly resolution last December calling for a worldwide moratorium on executions.

Rape, murder, apostasy, armed robbery and drug trafficking are all punishable by death under Saudi Arabia’s strict interpretation of Islamic sharia law.

Amnesty International says Saudi Arabia executed 27 convicts in 2010, compared to 67 executions announced the year before.

For NDTV Updates, follow us on Twitter or join us on Facebook

 

Story first published:
December 12, 2011 17:37 IST

 

‘Disgusting sentence sends wrong message about street violence,’ says devastated victim of race hate gang assault by Muslims freed because ‘they weren’t used to alcohol

The Daily Mail:  

By Lucy Buckland

Last updated at 12:48 PM on 10th December 2011

Victim: Rhea Page, 22, lost her job after being traumatised by the attack by a gang of Somalian girls

Victim: Rhea Page, 22, feels she has become a victim again after her attackers faced court -this time of soft justice

When Rhea Page watched CCTV in court of herself being beaten unconscious by a Muslim girl gang and saw one of her attackers laughing she felt disgusted.

The 22-year-old was determined to face her attackers and see justice done after she was viciously assaulted while waiting for a taxi with her boyfriend in Leicester city centre.

But the healthcare worker was bitterly disappointed as all four girls walked free from court for the random attack, which left Rhea with a bald patch where her hair was ripped out, because they were Somalian Muslims and not used to drinking alcohol.

Far from feeling a sense of relief after her attackers’ sentencing Rhea feels like she has become a victim all over again, this time of a soft justice system which let her attackers walk free. Continue Reading →

Emma West held in jail whilst moslem racists walk free

Angry yet?

This is part of the article from:

The British Resistance

Written by Green Arrow    Tuesday, 06 December 2011 16:43

emmawest_120_x_120News just in that Emma West pleaded Not guilty at a court hearing in Croydon just a few hours ago.  After an adjournment to discover why she had pleaded “Not Guilty” (because she is innocent and there was no crime) they have remanded her in custody for a further four weeks.

The case will now be heard on the 3rd of January. Merry Christmas Emma, hope your children are comfortable with social services.

Meanwhile, four moslem women who racially attacked a young white girl, ripping lumps of hair from her head before battering her unconscious have effectively walked free from court after scum bag, Judge Robert Brown told the unwanted enrichers from Somalia:

‘This was ugly and reflects very badly on all four of you.’Those who knock someone to the floor and kick them in the head can expect to go inside, but I’m going to suspend the sentence.’

Despite, the fact that the moslems screamed“Kill the White Slag”, the Dhimmi Judge, Robert Brown, who will one day answer for this judgement, refused to charge them with racial aggravation and although he could have sentenced them to five years imprisonment, because the moslem women had been drinking and claimed that because of their religion, they were not used to its effects he would show leniency. What sort of excuse is that?

(please click through for the rest)

REDUX: The video of the attack on the British girl by the Somalis with comentary

There is so much wrong here one can’t put it all in a video. But we can start with imagining what a society would be like where a large fraction of the population lost all faith in its judiciary to dispense rational justice, and if not rational justice, then at least irrational justice evenly meted out.

I would hope the crown prosecutor will appeal this case. The consequences to the established norms, the faith that the British have in their own bureaucrats, judiciary, authority overall will be shattered, if it is not already, as these kinds of cases of selective enforcement pile up.

We all know that had white people done this to black people or Muslims, it would be a hate crime. There would be no release from jail while awaiting trial as we saw from a young mother who merely expressed her opinion (as unfashionable as it may have been) on a subway car and there would not only be time spent in jail but added time because it was a hate crime.

This is a very, very bad thing.

Girl gang who kicked woman in the head while yelling ‘kill the white slag’ freed after judge hears ‘they weren’t used to drinking because they’re Muslims’

From The Daily Mail:

h/t Taffy in Canada

  • Yobs ripped lump of hair from Rhea Page’s head during High Street attack
  • Three sisters and cousin escape with six-month suspended sentences
  • Maximum term for assault occasioning actual bodily harm is five years’ jail
  • Judge: ‘Those who knock someone to the floor and kick them in the head can expect to go inside, but I’m going to suspend the sentence’

By Rob Cooper

Last updated at 1:58 PM on 6th December 2011

A gang of Muslim girls who repeatedly kicked a young woman in the head walked free from court after a judge heard they were ‘not used to being drunk’ because of their religion.

The group screamed ‘kill the white slag’ while kicks raining in on 22-year-old Rhea Page as she lay motionless on the ground, the court heard.

 

The attackers – three sisters and their cousin – were told by a judge that normally they would have been sent to jail.

However, he handed the girls – all Somalian Muslims – suspended sentences after hearing that they were not used to alcohol because their religion does not allow it.

Attack: Three of the attackers can be seen setting upon Rhea Page, 22, in the centre of Leicester. Despite leaving her traumatised, they were handed suspended sentencesAttack: Three of the young women can be seen setting upon Rhea Page, 22, in the centre of Leicester. Despite leaving her traumatised, they were handed suspended sentences

Thugs: Rhea Page is seen lying on the ground after being attacked. The four girls had screamed 'kill the white slag' as they kicked herThugs: Rhea Page is seen lying on the ground after being attacked. The four girls had screamed ‘kill the white slag’ as they kicked her

 

Victim: Rhea Page, 22, lost her job after being traumatised by the attack by a gang of Somalian girlsVictim: Rhea Page, 22, lost her job after being traumatised by the attack by a gang of Somalian girls

Their victim was left with a bald patch after they pulled a chunk out of her hair during the attack on the High Street, Leicester.

Ambaro and Hibo Maxamed, both 24, their sister Ayan, 28, and cousin Ifrah Nur, 28, attacked Rhea, a care worker, as she walked to a taxi rank with her boyfriend after a night out. Continue Reading →