Category Archives: Explaining leftism

Tucker gets a couple of things wrong by key omissions on this critical piece about Biden admin targeting its own people

Posted on by

First, watch the clip. It’s very good, and very important. Then let’s add in some missing pieces and concepts:

First, let’s talk about Brennan. He is at the heart of much of the attacks on the Trump administration. If there was still functioning institutions of state in the USA one might expect him to be up on death penalty charges. He also is a convert to Islam. So it’s not that much of a surprise that he would say Americans who are armed and believe in their individual rights as guaranteed by the US constitution are more of a danger than Islamic terrorists.

Brad Johnson had a few things to say about Brennan:

Ok on to AOC.

Tucker repeats things that some of my more cynical flesh friends say. That AOC is just a corporate shill. “A tool of corporate power, posing as a truth teller”. Frankly I can’t even imagine her even posing as a truth teller. Language for her is merely a tool of dialectic destruction. Its no accident that her PR firm is a married couple, both avowed Marxists who’s company is called, “Seize the Means Productions”, after Marx’s notion of seizing the means of production from the people to make it all government.

Time to returning to the axiom of leftist tactics.

“With the left, the point is never the point. The revolution is always the point”.

This means that real leftists, Marxists who seek the destruction of the West and all its systems and thinking, will take whatever side of an issue is the most destructive to the West. Not because they care about the issue, but because they can weaponize the issue. One example of how this might look would be leftist howling about injustice to women, and rights to abortion, and yet are stone cold silent at best in terms of islamic treatment of women or sex-selective abortions of female babies by the Asian community abroad, as well as here in the West. Silent at best, or screaming “racism” if you bring it up in order that the issue is, to borrow a word from Trudeau’s bill M-103, “quelled”.

In this case, AOC has no problem calling out the hedge funds and is in agreement with Don Jr. Probably even with Donald Trump himself. But because howling about this will cause outrage amongst people who normally would not rage against that particular machinery. Me for instance, although not because of anything she says, but because of the facts of the matter. They are enraging and they do demand a solution in the interest of transparency and lawful equality. But wow, what an issue to polarize people to your side.

Watching the video below gives a glimpse into the real motives for AOC’s moves. They are fully Marxist in the most Orthodox fashion. So Tucker gets it wrong. While identity politics is a great ruse to get people to not look at croneyism, identity politics is meant to be a much more dangerous tool. And leftism has no weapons and not many people who really believe in it as it actually is. So they have to use a kind of intellectual judo against us all. Using the inertia of our own thoughts, desires, fears and beliefs against us, mostly by lies, but occasionally by marshalling real problems with our system to weaponize us against our own interests.

Here is another short video on the DSA. Please note that both these videos were made well before the Marxist group, BLM started their campaign against the West and its institutions. So when one city council member explains that the goal is the total destruction of all private property, you know that the events which followed, that we have all seen now, are part of a real, communist, plot.

Personal story of dentistry under Socialism in Czechoslovakia

Posted on by

By Xanthippa Socrates with much thanks

I was born and raised behind the Iron Curtain, the daughter of a political dissident.

Yeah, fun times.
I would like to talk to you about the socialized dentistry I grew up with.
As a kid, you were not entitled to just making a dental appointment:  in grade 3, a screener came to our school.  Those of us who needed dental work were given an appointment at a dental clinic.
On the appointed day and time, I showed up at the dental clinic.  My parents were going through a rough patch and did not come with me, but apart from a parent/chaperone, the big thing that I was missing was a ‘present’ for the dentist.
All the other kids and the adults accompanying them had packets of imported coffee beans, expensive boxes of chocolates, bottles of alcohol, or other rather expensive gifts.  I had nothing, but did not realize the significance of this.
While in the waiting room, I became rather afraid, because I heard howls of pain from the dentistry room.
Once it was my turn, I entered and there were 6 dental chairs, side-by-side, and I was shown into the second from left one.  A dentist came up to me, told me to open my mouth wide, and looked in.  Then, without any notice, I felt a horrible burning pain…
I screamed and, without consciously thinking of it, my jaws shut closed.
“We have a biter here!’ the dentist called out and everyone stared at me, shaming me…I wished I could have fallen through the floor, that is how ashamed I felt.
At this point, I would like to point out that in this type of dentistry, there was no freezing (thought a waste of resources) and, unlike in the West where a stream of cooling water is directed at the tooth – well this was never considered.  Plus, nobody ever warned me this might hurt, or when they were about to drill…
Shamed and shunned, I was moved to the rightmost chair where there was an assistant who had ‘the finger’ – a metal sleeve that went over her finger, with really sharp edges.  I suspect the sharp edges were a feature – to condition the patients against the need for their use.
She had stuck this between my jaws – again, no notice – and kept them apart while the dentist drilled away, no stopping or pausing for a breath or to relieve pain.  When she had smugly removed ‘the finger’, I did not know what was more painful – the four drilled teeth or the cut-up insides of my cheek.
By the way, all 4 of my cavities were in baby teeth – so no fillings were put in because that would be a waste of resources.  After all, they would fall out, eventually – so why fill them?
My next dental visit, they pulled 4 (different) teeth.
I had learned from my earlier mistake and brought presents, but they still thought using anaesthetics was a waste of resources.
Yeay for free dental care!!!  Yeay for socialism!!!

A solid explanation of what is a “Colour Revolution” and how it played out in the USA

Posted on by

(This is really good. It also seems like the time to add that during most of the ANTIFA/BLM riots, i often noticed a much higher than chance, occurrence of specific clothes. For example, for some weeks during various riots in Portland and other cities, I noticed that a lot of people who might be directing the violence, wore Rolling Stones T shirts with the tongue on it. It seemed to me that they were too young and there was too many of them to accidentally be wearing that symbol. Even at the time it looked like that was a secret uniform maybe showing rank of some kind. This would fit with the “colour” part of the Colour revolution in the following explanation.)

There are several other segments to the show of which part 1 is above. We will add them here as soon as they are found.

Below, is a video from October 29, where Rich Higgens discusses what might happen on November 4th. Now that we are at November 20th, its interesting to test their models against their predictions.

Guest spot on Laura Lynn Tyler Thompson

Posted on by

Yesterday I was privileged to be invited to come on as a guest on Canada’s Webcast live show, Laura Lynn. I don’t get much chance to do radio/podcasts as much as I used to, so it was fun and a little scary to do a live broadcast again.

Basically, we covered the events today as they are playing out from the perspective of a more or less Coughlin-esque view of the strategics of what we see manifested on the streets. For regular readers of this site, I hope it makes sense and is enjoyable for those that want to give it the time.

For all interested, Stephen’s analysis on the left from a strategical and historical point of view, can be read here. it is highly recommended reading.

It is also on Youtube as an Audio Book and some find that easier to process. A briefing with slides is in the works I believe, and that should be fantastic when it comes out. To give you an idea of what that would be like, check out The Red Pill Brief, which has its own page at Vlad.

What inspired Democrats to start killing centrist Americans?

Posted on by

Thank you ML., M.

Hydroxychloroquine and “consensus” medicine

Posted on by

I am currently in a small back and forth on Twitter with someone who objects to my statement that Social media owners should be arrested and indicted for their blocking of information about HCQ as a potentially effective treatment for Covid19. As well as politicians that made the unprecedented step of making it illegal to prescribe for that purpose.

The argument my interlocutor is using, is that there is no medical or scientific consensus on the efficacy of HCQ, and therefore, social media policies etc. are justified.

My arguments are multifold but for the purpose of this post, two things need reenforcing.

1. Social media is perfectly fine with any and all fully bulls**t and even dangerous medical advice on any number of subjects as they should well be, as freedom of speech is much more important than if the science is right. That is up to us to determine for ourselves.

2. His repeated use of the word “consensus” feels like a club and therefore, is likely being used in the manner described in the following video.

It is a little hard to follow, but I would ask all of our readers to make the effort to follow this explanation, even if it takes a few times through the video. It is very important to understand what “consensus” really means, as well as how we are to think of it. It is not agreement. It is an imposition of the will of leftist authorities.