Category Archives: Islam

Several news stories and flippant to serious analysis of them to clarify the nature of the state of The United Socialist Provinces of Canada: Links 1 for June 19, 2026

Posted on by

1. More proof of the use of dialectics to determine the results of the actions of agents of state, use of force, and the replacement of rule of law.

Not just that this article constantly refers to “a man” who was stalking children a Munster community centre. He has already been arrested and charges are pending. But there is no name, which might be lawful if there are no formal charges yet, but there is certainly no description or anything else that might help keep other kids safe while he awaits trial somewhere. But it seems OK to assume gender when it’s a man.

Or am I overthinking this one?

Man arrested after children approached near Munster Community Centre

Four kids under age 12 were approached by an unknown man driving a sport utility vehicle near the community centre on June 17.

The Ottawa Police Service says charges are pending against a man who was arrested following an investigation into “a suspicious incident involving children” near the Munster Community Centre.

On June 17, a news release said a day later, Ottawa police received a report that four children under age 12 were approached by an unknown man driving a sport utility vehicle near the community centre. The man reportedly made inappropriate sexual comments toward the children before leaving the area.

Further down at the bottom of the article there is an illustration of a white middle aged man with white har and glasses, which, if you read quickly you might think was a court house sketch, but is actually apparently part of an advert for some kind of retirement savings thing.

But if you connect the next item to it, it takes more shape:

2. A 3 year old boy thrown into an alligator pit

Not an absolute truth but 100% consistent with modern reality across Western Europe and in particular, the Commonwealth, which at this point is better referred to as the COMINTERN.

I asked Grok about this case:

This X post is about a completely separate (and horrific) incident on June 18, 2026, at Johnsons of Old Hurst zoo in Cambridgeshire, UK. A 3-year-old boy was thrown into a crocodile enclosure and suffered serious injuries. A 30-year-old man from Norfolk was arrested on suspicion of attempted murder. He has since been released on bail (until September 18) because he was deemed unfit to be interviewed (likely mental health-related).
bbc.co.uk

Police and all news outlets (BBC, Guardian, Telegraph, etc.) are still only referring to him as “a 30-year-old man from Norfolk” with no name, photo, or further identifying details released.
theguardian.com

Our guess is the ONLY part of the description that is true is ‘man’. We would think he is not from ‘Norfolk’, not 30 and not mentally ill unless Islam is a mental illness. And books could be and should be written about that. People should feel safe though, that an unnamed person is walking around free who pushes kids into alligator pits.

3. In case you think we have posted too much on Bill C-22, it looks more and more like no amount is enough. Gotta say though, Canadians at this point deserve what they are getting. They are demoralized to the point that Yuri Bezmenov claimed people would be. You can show them all the evidence to the point of walking them to the Gulags and they won’t believe what is happening till they are being interrogated by one of the Organs.

The article he discusses is here to be sure Mario is not misrepresenting the situation. 

An excerpt:

The government is planning to shut down hearings into Bill C-22, the lawful access bill, with no further debate or discussion on potential amendments to the bill. It has just placed a motion on the Order Paper that would limit today’s committee meeting to only 30 minutes for standard clause-by-clause review. After that, it plans to cancel all further debate or discussion on any other amendments. The committee will instead be required to vote on all remaining amendments with no further debate, discussions or questions to officials. In fact, the substance of the amendments will remain secret and will not even be disclosed to the public. The government’s intent is clearly to complete clause-by-clause review tonight to ensure that the bill passes through the House of Commons by the end of the week

Yesterday, the government introduced privacy reforms that shuts down the Privacy Commissioner of Canada’s role in private sector privacy regulation. Today, it is shutting down hearings into one of the biggest privacy threats in years. Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree had committed to amendments during the lawful access hearings, but this move means that only secret government amendments that will not be made public during the hearing will pass. Opposition parties have submitted many amendments based on testimony from the Privacy Commissioner, bar associations, security companies, and privacy experts. These include potential changes to the rules on mandatory metadata retention, risks to security and encryption, and privacy safeguards. None of these amendments will even be made public, let alone open to debate and discussion. Weeks of hearings and public concern tossed aside by the government in a rush to shut down debate and consideration of amendments to a deeply flawed, risky legislative plan.

The police are officially lobbying for bill C-22. One wonders why. Is it to “keep us safe”?

I think we posted something on this yesterday but it dovetails to well here not to post it again.

Just to tie these bills together:

The full text of the Tweet:

The Carney government is preparing internet censorship on the British model (oh surprise!).

Four bills are currently advancing in Ottawa with four different justifications, but forming a single architecture

1. C-8 allows a minister to order your internet cut off without a judge and with a prohibition on talking about it;

2. C-9 expands speech offenses and removes the attorney general’s filter on prosecutions;

3. C-22 requires providers to retain one year of metadata and location data for everyone. Not just suspects but for the entire population;

4. C-34 is sold as a ban on social media for those under 16. In practice, verifying the age of minors requires identifying all adults.

Taken in isolation, each bill has a defensible justification: cybersecurity, hate, crime, children.

Assembled, they form a closed loop:

Identify everyone (C-34) and log everyone (C-22), then redefine acceptable speech (C-9) and finally disconnect the recalcitrants (C-8).

Under Carney, Canada will sink into progressive authoritarianism and the repression of ideological dissidents.

4. Andrew Bostom did an interview today about the Iran war. In part, he lays the blame on the Iranian people. They blew an opportunity. As he said, they DID manage to take to the streets and overthrow the Shaw, which led almost immediately to the reinstatement of a theocratic Shiia totalitarian regime. So why didn’t they take the opportunity to overthrow the Mullahs and create a Republic? Or even the new Kingdom they seem to want? Maybe because not enough of them wanted it enough to hit the pavement. Apparently a recent poll said 85% of the Iranians want sharia law. You can hear Andrew’s interview at the 10 minute mark at this link.

5. Now and again when one tries to explain the communist nature of Carney’s actions and intentions, one gets pushback. Carney is rich, carney is a banker etc. etc.

Here is a photo of Lenin’s country cottage and retreat. Yes, it was state owned officially. But was for his private use for life, and any attack or breach of it would be treated as if it was an attack or breach of Lenin’s private property.

Very similar to the Governor General’s palace in Ottawa actually.

Thank you all for checking out this site

Canada’s collapse into a state of official scarcity: Links post 1 for June 18, 2026

Posted on by

1. Let’s take a teleological look at the cow burps are a threat to all life on earth narrative attack.

First, you invent a problem out of whole cloth. Let’s say, well there are so many to choose from, but for the moment, the natural digestive system of cattle is an existential threat to planet earth. Then, you force a solution based on the severity of the imagined problem that will in fact have very destructive consequences.

Then you must know that the very destructive consequences to the forced solution to the imaginary problem, was in fact what was desired by the architects of this anti-reason, anti-civilizational revolution in the first place.

2. Canada’s Defence Policy Architect Was Fired After Warning That Anti-American Rhetoric Serves Beijing. Her Lawyer Wants to Know Who Gave the Order.

(Her lawyer imagines that Canada is governed by Rule of Law. They will never find out who gave the order, or it will be untrue, or it will serve the state purpose to tell them)

Ottawa bureaucrats are “horrified that someone like her can get terminated, given her record, her standing in the government,” lawyer for Raquel Garbers says.

OTTAWA — A chill is roiling Ottawa’s bureaucracy after the woman who crafted Canada’s policy to defend the North with American allies was fired, she alleges, after criticizing the government’s anti-American rhetoric — and shortly after Mark Carney’s government declared Beijing a strategic partner, The Bureau has been informed.

Raquel Garbers spent 28 years in Canada’s public service and helped write the country’s current defence policy. On October 15, 2025, she published an opinion piece warning that Ottawa’s growing anti-American rhetoric was splitting the Western alliance and handing a gift to the country’s real adversaries, Beijing and Moscow. Two days later, according to the statement of claim in her wrongful-dismissal suit, Canada’s foreign minister stood in Beijing and signaled a shift toward a “strategic partnership” with China — a sharp reversal of Ottawa’s own recent posture toward Beijing. Weeks after that, she was fired.

Garbers, 57, filed her claim this month in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Ottawa, seeking about $2 million from the federal government. She is not a junior official, and her stature, and questions about whether Mark Carney’s government is trying to enforce a silence over the public service as Ottawa pivots closer to Beijing, are topics of conversation in Ottawa, Garbers’s legal team told The Bureau today.

Anyone who has followed the Helen Grus case would find this story to be situ-normal. This is how the state works now. We are a dialectically driven country. Not based on Truth, reason, the rule of law or the interests of the people who built this country or inherited it from the builders. The Helen Grus case, which is a years-long and seemingly inconsequential hearing of a single police officer who actually did the obviously right thing by checking to see if a sudden increase in dead infants had anything to do with the state mandated roll-out of experimental mRNA injections, which it turns out, the same state that mandated them already knew they didn’t work and probably were dangerous. But what makes the Helen Grus hearings, which had yet another session today so interesting, was that as a consequence of her actions, the police adopted a new, never before contemplated policy, where police have to AK PERMISSION to investigate a crime if the results might have political consequences. Specifically consequences to making state policy look bad, or politicians look bad that implemented those policies.

I think we can find a word for a state that operates like that without a lot of effort.

This interview is 34 minutes long, but the point above is addressed right at the start.

3. US Homeland Security speaks to CSIS

Maybe it would help Homeland Security if they saw the CSIS.CSE HQ in Ottawa. June 2026

4. Five minutes of Rupert Lowe’s report.

One wonders if it isn’t a crime for British citizens NOT to rise up and deal with this properly. I believe some states in the US have good Samaritan laws. To rise up nationally and really mean it should probably be understood to be a kind of natural-law national ‘Good Samaritan action.

I think we have posted this before. Actually the whole video.  But… this excerpt is easily worth seeing again.

Glenn Beck on Canada

5. One of the true benchmarks of a communist polity is criminalizing the victims of actual crime, and the other is speaking truth in opposition to state narratives.

Thank you all for checking out this site. Maybe you can thank me for all this work by waking up a member of your family, a neighbour or a colleague. The hour is getting late.

As it happens, I ran into someone that owns a significant business. One most or all of you have heard of. He told me that he had decided to move all his businesses and holdings to the US from Canada. One of his observations was that a luxury grocery store in the state he moved to, was cheaper for everything than Food Basics, the discount grocer here in Ontario.

Don’t let anyone tell you there isn’t a firehose of money and talent leaving Canada for anywhere else. There is. And it is because Canada is so obviously becoming a nation where the state creates only one product well, and that is scarcity. Even where people cannot see the machinery behind the effects which make it communist in philosophy, increasingly the practical facts of existence in Canada is making people know it is time to leave whether they call the reasons, communism or not.

Communism, its agents and tactics and methods of enforcement: Links 1 for June 17, 2026

Posted on by

1. Communism always seems to start as an extortion racket. Before it just pivots to brute force.

“You will all have to take this dangerous gene therapy injection to protect you from the deadly disease we made”

2. Answer: The COMINTERN

Those who have Twitter are well advised to search for Bill C-22. There is a lot of news and none of it good. And be advised, this applies to the entire Anglosphere. The ONLY reason it does not, as far as I know, apply to the USA is Donald Trump. Which is why they tried to attack him repeatedly at the white house including a massive attempt to get him on his Birthday at the UFC event.

But the rest of the Anglosphere, the commonwealth in particular, appears to be all moving in (operation) lockstep towards a very classical Marxist system. And Carney has been quasi open about it since day 1 knowing that people wouldn’t believe it but having the advantage of saying he told us he would do the exact things he is doing.

More on the attempted attack on the White House UFC event:

3. Many groups, perhaps most annoyingly, Jewish groups and in particular, B’Nai Brith, are pushing for communist hate speech laws that Carney is rushing through Parliament.

This site objects to hate speech laws on principle. All of them,But even if it wasn’t a matter of principle, the reason they must not be passed, is because they will not be enforced against the people who are doing the most damage to Western Civilization. But they will be enforced against people critical of them.

Proof that this is already the case is very common. But most recently in Montreal they passed laws against Public demonstrations of Prayer. Another stupid and communist law. And here is how it is going:

4. Speaking of ramming through communist bills…

5. There have been more ‘mic drop’ reveals about the dangers of the mRNA shots and the corruption in terms of the ‘Pandemic’ itself than I can remember. As a line of Operation, it’s mostly over. But as Dinesh D’Souza said in his excellent documentary, “Hillary’s America”, the left knows to “Never, never drop the con”. And they will not.

But when a mic drop event happens we still must make ourselves aware of it. They do come in handy when trying to deal with the somnambulists

Here is Alex Berenson’s newest on who knew what and when, and what they didn’t do about it.

Why was Pfizer’s head global lobbyist on a crucial call about Covid boosters with federal scientists as Pfizer’s mRNA jabs were failing?

 

Was Pfizer serving the United States in 2021?

Or the other way around?

On July 12, 2021, top Biden Administration scientists held an urgent call to discuss a surge in Covid infections in people who had gotten mRNA jabs not long before. The new cases raised a medically and politically loaded question: would Americans need “booster” jabs only months after receiving a two-shot mRNA regimen the White House had promised would save them from Covid?

But the scientists were not alone as they discussed what to do next.

Executives at Pfizer, the leading mRNA manufacturer, joined the call, according to emails released last week by Senator Rand Paul as part of his investigation into Covid’s origins. At the time, Pfizer was making tens of billions of dollars selling mRNA Covid vaccine jabs to the United States and other governments worldwide.

Pfizer’s participation baffled Dr. Francis Collins, the then-director of the National Institutes of Health. “I am totally confused now about the booster meetings,” Collins wrote to his deputies a few hours before the call. “[The] proposed agenda… includes Pfizer senior staff.”

Indeed, the Pfizer officials on the call weren’t only scientists.

The emails show that Jonathan Selib — who was neither a physician nor a scientist, but a lawyer and Pfizer’s top lobbyist worldwide — was also invited to participate.

The emails do not explain why Selib, whose official title at Pfizer at the time was “senior vice president of global policy and public affairs,” was participating in a call with government scientists to discuss vaccine efficacy and the potential pros and cons of booster shots. Nor do they show if any other NIH scientists addressed the concerns Collins had raised.

Yet the call came at a delicate moment.

Less than two months before, Dr. Anthony Fauci had promised the risk of a resurgence of Covid was “extraordinarily low.” If enough people took mRNA shots the United States might “essentially eliminate the presence” of the virus, he told the Washington Post.

Read the rest at Alex’s Substack please, linked above.

If you never read the posts on this site, read this one: 5 Items each of which holds profound implications of the changes in Canada and the US over the past 15 years and going forwards

Posted on by

1. Still looking in to exactly what this means in practical terms, but in terms of messaging, it is unquestionably a step towards the full criminalization of counter-narrative thinking. From Blacklock’s Reporter:

Vote To Outlaw “Denialism”

The Senate human rights committee last night voted 7 to 1 to criminalize Indian Residential School “denialism.”

Public statements intended to promote hatred by downplaying the impacts of Residential Schools would be outlawed under threat of two years in jail:

“It can involve denying, minimizing or justifying the documented abuses, deaths, forced assimilation and intergenerational harms.”

It is VERY hard to find substantial news on this issue. but here is what we can find that is authoritative.

https://www.ipolitics.ca/2026/06/01/senate-committee-amends-c-9-to-criminalize-residential-school-denialism/

2. RFK Jr. explicitly explains the deceptions used during Covid and VERY similarly to Stephen Coughlin’s explanation of what took place.

Stephen has always stated that modern communism dates back to Plato. The Noble Lie is right outa The Republic, Book 3, 414b–415d.

Well waddaya know about that.

From Grok:

Plato’s “Noble Lie” explained in two lines:The Noble Lie is the idea that rulers are sometimes justified in telling a “noble” or “useful” myth to the population in order to promote social harmony, patriotism, and moral behaviour — even if the myth is not literally true. It is a “noble” falsehood told for the greater good of the city-state.

3. But the Media-state industrial complex would never try and direct how you think

4. Former Pfizer Chief Toxicologist Exposes Failures in mRNA “Vaccine” Safety Oversight

Please watch and read this video carefully. Maybe even stop and consider each title. Who this man is, who he worked for, and what he says under oath.

5. Canada backdated the lease for the very expensive and equally phoney “Space Post” by over a year.

This site has maintained for several years now that all these absurd woke programs, fifty billion dollars for productions of Hamlet for gay and trans turtles in Turkmenistan, or whatever equivalent, has really been about Cloward Piven, (printing endless money to destroy the savings and economies of the target populations in the West) and about creating the money to bring in massive amounts of illegal (by any rational definition) and hostile or non-productive aliens into the West and supporting them to do anything from nothing, to the rape and pillage of our countries. Literally. The naming of these programs, that used to dominate the news, especially when Elon headed the department of Gov’t efficiency, was an attempt to create outrage at the wrong things. Woke programs that likely didn’t exist, or maybe were created to be recipients of 1% of the money or less while the rest went into more destructive programs. Of course, a certain amount went to politicians and allies, but that had the effect of allowing people to think this was about corruption, and not the total collapsing of the West. A version of Hanlon’s Razor in fact. Corruption is bad, and is a problem. But it is not existential in small scale. It is typically, in a healthy society, like a manageable small cancer that can be kept at bay with the immune system of a proper police and intelligence force.

But this is much bigger. And now, in Canada, the state is at the point where it is creating programs so ludicrous in nature that is overtly contemptuous of the Canadian people.

6. If this is true for a California city, how many cities is this true for in Canada? Toronto? Only CSIS knows for sure.

Female California mayor admits to being secret spy for CHINA… and she looks very different to her photoshopped original images

The mayor of a wealthy Southern California city has resigned after admitting she secretly acted as an agent for the Chinese government, according to a federal plea agreement unsealed on Monday.

Former Arcadia Mayor Eileen Wang, 58, agreed to plead guilty to a felony charge of acting as an illegal foreign agent for the People’s Republic of China and helping push pro-Beijing propaganda inside the US.

The crime carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in federal prison. 

The stunning case prompted immediate fallout in Arcadia, where city officials confirmed Wang stepped down from both the City Council and the mayor’s office on Monday.

Federal prosecutors allege Wang spent years working under the direction of Chinese government officials before rising into elected office in Los Angeles County. 

They also claimed she used a Chinese-language news website to distribute propaganda favorable to Beijing while secretly coordinating with officials tied to the Chinese Communist Party.

Authorities have described the website as a fake news platform targeting Chinese Americans.

The case has also triggered intense scrutiny of Wang’s carefully crafted public image.

Campaign photos and promotional images used during her political rise depicted Wang in heavily polished and retouched portraits that projected a glamorous and approachable persona to voters.

Thank you all for checking out this site and considering our understanding of the meaning behind these monuments events.

 

Bataclan, More Ackbarists stabbing people in Europe, UK police accessories after the fact? Stinging dialectics and more: Links 1 for May, 31 2026

Posted on by

1. After only 10 years in prison, and in Belgium for some reason, the architect of the Bataclan attack is being prepped for release. They do this with a series of 36 hour freedom sessions outside of Prison, then just release.

The Bataclan attack was the Oct. 7th attack on Israel in miniature. It had many of the same hallmarks. There is an article with a lot of videos at RAIR Foundation, but there is one strong point that needs repetition and so it is repeated below:

One thing needs to be said out loud and forcefully about how the West deals with Islamic terrorism:

Treating a military-scale Islamic terror operation as a routine law-and-order police matter had deadly consequences.

The attacks across the world by one or another Islamic group are military in nature. They are not crimes. They are not for personal gain of the individual or individuals making the attacks.

They need to be met with military force and rules of engagement. To treat these attacks under the rubric of Law and Order, to use police against trained jihadis whose intention is mass casualty on the largest scale they can create, is so clearly a route to failure that one wonders if that was not the intention.

It would be as if the US sent police to the beaches of Normandy in 1944 and read the Nazis their miranda rights before leaving the boats for the shore.

2. Also at RAIR: Another Ackbarist stabs people at a Swiss train station.

More videos of the actual attack at the RAIR Link

3. Concerning the British gentleman who was stabbed by a Sikh and then held in handcuffs by the British constabulary till he bled out, are there any readers to this site, assuming anyone can possibly even read this site anymore, I am losing all hope, who can tell me if the following definition of “Accessory After the Fact” as it is written in Canada, and the UK would apply to the police?

Canada Definition (Criminal Code, s. 23(1)):
An accessory after the fact to an offence is one who, knowing that a person has been a party to the offence, receives, comforts or assists that person for the purpose of enabling that person to escape. Key elements the Crown must prove:

  • The principal offence was actually committed.
  • You knew the person had committed (or been a party to) it.
  • You actively received, comforted, or assisted them.
  • Your assistance was specifically to help them escape justice (arrest, trial, punishment).

Penalty: Treated similarly to an attempt of the original offence (s. 463). For serious crimes (e.g., murder), it can carry up to 14 years or life in extreme cases (s. 240 for accessory after murder). United Kingdom (England & Wales)The classic common-law definition still applies, though modern charging often uses broader statutes.Definition:
A person who, knowing a felony has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts, or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent their apprehension, trial, or punishment. It is now often charged under the Accessories and Abettors Act 1861 (ss. 3–4) or as “encouraging or assisting an offence” under the Serious Crime Act 2007. The accessory can be tried and convicted even if the principal offender has not been caught or convicted.Penalty: Historically up to 2 years, but in practice it is now sentenced based on the seriousness of the underlying offence (can be very substantial for serious crimes like murder).

Screenshot

Grok agrees that this is the case with the police, although the more likely charge if there ever will be one, would be:
  • Gross Negligence Manslaughter (if their failure to provide medical aid or improper handcuffing was so reckless that it contributed to death).

Personally I think it is something closer to murder.

If a person was to force another person into a situation where police would shoot him, or run him over in a car, then no charge for the police but extra charges for whoever created the trap.

This was where the attacker made a claim that was so stupid that even if it where true it is not something that allows the perp to stab the victim. And then not getting him medical help feels like murder. I would really, really like to know the names of the police officers involved.

Grok adds:

the names of the police officers involved have not been released.Current Status (as of May 31, 2026):

  • The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) is investigating the officers’ actions (handcuffing the dying victim, delay in providing medical aid, etc.).
  • The officers are currently being treated as witnesses, not suspects.
  • Hampshire Police (including Temporary Deputy Chief Constable Robert France, who issued the public apology) have not named any of the frontline officers.
  • There are reports that three female officers were directly involved at the scene, but no names have been made public.
  • Bodycam footage exists but has not been released to the public, despite strong calls for transparency.

This is standard procedure in the UK while an IOPC investigation is ongoing — officer names are usually withheld until (or unless) disciplinary action, suspension, or criminal charges result.

4. Listen to the answer this MP gets from the Ruling Communist Liberal Party about how it is more important to cater to every need of a rapist and murderer and disease spreader because of his group identity as a “vulnerable refugee” than protect the Canadians he victrmizes by jailing or deporting him. This is crucial. This is exactly why we are losing.

It has been over 10 years since the mini-Oct 7th at the Bataclan club in France. Eventually, the club re opened and had celebrities play at it.

Watch the song that Sting played. Did he commemorate the victims? France? Promote the idea that music and freedom must persist?

His song was pretty much EXACTLY what that [expletive deleted] Liberal MP had to say.

The full lyrics:

Sleeping child, on my shoulder

Those around us, curse the sea

Anxious mother turning fearful

Who can blame her, blaming me? Inshallah, Inshallah

If it be your will, it shall come to pass

Inshallah, Inshallah

If it be your will… As the wind blows, growing colder

Against the sad boats, as we flee

Anxious eyes, search in darkness

With the rising of the sea Inshallah, Inshallah

If it be your will, it shall come to pass

Inshallah, Inshallah

If it be your will… Sea of worries, sea of fears

In our country, only tears

In our future there’s no past

If it be your will, it shall come to pass Inshallah, Inshallah

If it be your will, it shall come to pass

Inshallah, Inshallah

If it be your will…

Dialectics all around.

5. I have heard a few people say that ANTIFA is no longer an issue.

Thank you all for checking out this site.

Hopefully today or tomorrow I will have a post ready about the future of this site.

Meanwhile, it is recommended to download or save anything that is here that you value.

Thank you again for your kind and regular attention.

Reader’s Links for May 31st, 2026

Posted on by

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

It is NOT selective enforcement – it is the dialectic negation of Western Civ by repurposing the law and the instruments of state to a different agenda

Posted on by

1. This is an excellent example of the topic

2. Sask. Doctor still practicing after conviction for assaulting a child with a weapon and

Compare the college’s treatment of this doctor with ones who in good faith advised against taking the mRNA shots. Clearly, a communist state can be defined as criminalizing any opposition to a state narrative. Initially from a position of authority, but eventually anyone from anywhere. Which may explain bill C-22

3. Illegal rapist in Canada gets luxury health benefits

4. In this story about an anti-‘Israel’ protest in Montreal at RAIR Foundation, anyone who is honest with themselves knows what would happen if you substituted leftist leaders and generic Muslims for the effigies hung and beaten in this particular display over the weekend.

5. How REJECTED immigrants get massively better services from Canada than Canadians

Thank you all for checking out this site. Hopefully some of you are finding it easier to access these days.

Viva Frei did a comprehensive video on the man kidnapped by the state into a mental hospital because he spoke truth about Chinese influence and communist Canada laws are to legacy Canada.

If the cop thought he had a bomb on him, HE WOULD NEVER EVER HAVE GOTTEN THAT CLOSE. Slam dunk. case closed.

On the MAC Convention in Toronto and massive state funding for Islamic antisemitism

Posted on by

Please read this post over at RAIR about the MAC Convention in Toronto and know two additional things.

Melissa Lantsman and others) repeatedly mention that last year (for the previous convention or MAC programs), Canadian Heritage gave MAC $20,000 through the Anti-Racism Program (or Multiculturalism and Anti-Racism Program).

MAC as an organization receives ongoing federal funding (hundreds of thousands to millions over the years, including a larger $349k grant in 2021 for anti-racism work)

Secondly, that the Ottawa Government went to great pains to shut down a film a few years ago at the Ottawa Public Library which was a factual documentary about the consequences of mass Islamic importation into Europe. The movie was called, Killing Europe. And various state agents within the municipal government of Ottawa went to great efforts to shut it down.

Killing Europe is below:

After various agents associated with both the Ottawa council and one or another “Human Rights Commission” (clearly not considering freedom of speech to be a human right) the same film maker made another documentary about how his first one had been shut down, where he exposed the various agents involved, we have tactfully not named in this article.

This post is a microcosm of how things now work across the West — especially in the Commonwealth, Germany, France, and much of Western Europe.
Add in the definition of dialectics from the daily Reader’s Links, and the picture becomes complete. It is a big ask to watch two films, but when you consider when they were made (killing Europe: 2017 and Killing Canada: 2018) and read the RAIR piece, the jigsaw feels complete. What we are living through is the culmination of decades of deliberate effort by leftist agencies: the systematic disempowerment of the individual and the elevation of the State to near-God status — a State that decides what is true, what may be said, and what must be punished.

It is a big ask to watch two films. But when you think about when they were made, and look at the post at RAIR it forms a pretty well completed jigsaw. There have been things at work for decades culminating in what is here and what will grow, shaped mostly via empowering small minded people by making certain thoughts either outright criminal, or worthy of social ostracism.

All moves take society to the left.

All dialectic attacks move society to the left.

All new laws take society to the left.

Taking things to the left means the disempowering of the individual and creating a near God-like state that can determine what is true and not true and enforce those narratives as suits their agenda at any given moment.

Islam is one of their primary cudgels. And in a few years from now, what legacy Canadians remain might look at the last 20 years with a great deal of sympathy for Harp Seal pups. We shall know what it is to be clubbed.

A few film and TV items that might help steer the cultural titanic before it rams the iceberg head on

Posted on by

1. I just got this email. Make of it what you will. But it feels like a bad omen when a state will not accept its own money.

I had to renew my passport. Last week I went to Service Canada — they no longer take cash. The girl said they stopped taking cash approximately 6 months ago. Surprise, surprise, bit by bit we are moving to a cashless, controlled society.

2. I may have posted this before, but there are some insights/jokes in it that are worth seeing twice

3. I guess this is going to be a pop-culture post in a sense. Below is a scene from the movie, The Remains of the Day. It seems relevant now because of the way the Nazis presented themselves at a table of naive European diplomats in order to gain tactical advantage before they attacked them. The speech by the American diplomat is legendary and the best part of the movie. However the whole scene is worth seeing. If I can find it I will post it.

4. This film was made in 1939 and stars Gary Cooper among others. It was made about how the US in 1906 helped the Philippines defend itself from raping, slave taking, murdering Muslims acting in accordance with islamic scripture. It was also made before communist dialectics saw to it that you could not actually name a threat accurately without fear of punishment, and even more weirdly, without self flagellation as if speaking the truth had somehow been made a taboo even in our own heads.

We post this movie every year or two, but most people have still not seen it. Take the time. Its refreshing.

General Pershing is not named or portrayed in the film The Real Glory, but the pig-skin tactic shown in the movie is often popularly attributed to him. Pershing was indeed in the Philippines (he served as governor of the Moro Province from 1909–1913). and mentioned the Pig blood bullets and pig skin tactics in his memoirs.

5. Two scenes from South Park from back when it was relevant and funny. This one is pretty much a descriptor of how Western people deal with Islam as a whole:

It is a scene from a 2 episode series called, “Cartoon Wars” and is excellent from start to finish. I believe both episodes have been banned. But search around for them, maybe on Tor or something. They are out there to watch for sure. Or possibly still available to buy.

The next one is a great scene from where the kid’s teacher gets a ‘sex change’. I have to put that in scare quotes as there is no such thing as a sex change. But they call the weird sexual medical experimentation on Children that so…

Anyway in this scene, they sarcastically explain that if people actually saw what the surgery looks like to make one sex into a kind of coarse imitation of the other, more people would do it. Which of course isn’t true, and wasn’t the real intent. They do show real scenes from these surgeries. SO BE ADVISED.

Thats it for this post. I think pop culture can be a valuable tool to get people up to speed. Which is likely why the left forced everything to go the other way. Like, as has become nearly cliche, ‘when is the last time you saw a straight white couple in a TV commercial?’

It isn’t the mixed couple that is infuriating. It is the social engineering. The deracination of ourselves as a people, a culture or even cultures, a history and a set of laws. And most of all, a set of laws applied equally to all, and based on rational and measurable evidences.

Maybe I’ll just add this old Procol Harum song for pure nostalgia.

Funny thing is, I bet they ban A Whiter Shade of Pale before they ban that one.

Thank you all for checking out this site.

Jeff Evely interview and presentation at his May 5th de-transition event in Ottawa

Posted on by

RAIR Foundation has the article.

(To increase your viewing experience, please click the gear at the bottom right of the video window once it starts playing and wind it up to the best quality available)

Of all the mass line narrative attacks created by the State for the destruction of our identity, individualism and rights, perhaps the Trans-issue is the most ludicrous, and therefore destructive. The idea that a man who claims he is a women, is a real woman and must be treated as such, is perhaps the greatest single attack on reality in modern times. But Bill C-4, which empowers the state to talk children into going to spay and neuter clinics to become a sexually amorphous medical experiment, and then punishes parents with 5 years in jail and massive fines if they just suggest the child wait till they are old enough to vote to begin these destructive and irreversible processes, is the perfect end game for the left. And by the left, I include the dialectically named, “Conservative Party of Canada” who danced in the isles after the bill passed, and after they had requested not to bother debating it and consider all the protocols in advance of the bill to have been completed.

Jeff Evely, the man who walked in the woods of Nova Scotia in defiance of a massively Ultra-vires order not to do so, unless you where attending a gay wedding or an anti-European play by Amer-Indians, held a conference in Ottawa on May 5th to try and raise awareness of the horrors of the trans-issue. And horrors it is. Forgive me the comparison, but frankly I don’t think it is much of an exaggeration to say the doctors who do this sit somewhere between Jospeh Mengele and Dr. Victor Frankenstein.

The prime differences being that the suffering these people endure come for the rest of their lives but not during the surgeries, unlike Mengele, and Frankenstein had the decency to only operate on corpses and not school children, tricked into accepting the insanely metaphysical position that whatever is bothering them at the moment is because they were ‘born in the wrong body’.

We interviewed Jeff the evening before his conference took place on parliament Hill, and then at Biker’s Church in Vanier

His story is well worth the watch.

There was also a full press conference with all the people he brought in for this conference at West block Parliament hill. But as expected, they didnt allow many journalists in, and the ones they did allow in, few came. The Western Standard was the one exception and they did make it into the presser.

Here is the CPAC video of the event at the West Block:

Jeff’s own presentation at his event that evening. Jeff went to the philosophical level of this issue. This is what has to happen if we want to educate enough people to develop tactics needed to defeat this steady onslaught of narrative attacks.

The Q&A Panel with a question from yours truly

Below are some of the other videos and testimonies from people who spoke at this event.

Athena Davis:

High School Teacher, Amy McKay: Fighting in court to keep her teachers licence after stating factually correct biology)

Barry Neufeld: (Fined 750,000.00$ for saying something true but counter narrative about human sexual dimorphism)

Interview with Rose: Detransitioner

Faith and Kelly interview part 1:

Part II:

Scott Newgent:

If anyone is still in doubt that the Trans-issue as is is today is a vector of attack on Western Civilization, maybe this MC from the Trans-pride march in Ottawa a couple of years ago will help inform:

Chris Fluery: Men in women’s prisons

There is a documentary about the whole day coming out soon which will contain other experts not covered here yet such as Dr. Ann Gillies, Mia Hughes and many others well worth hearing from.

 

Comrade Carney and the real state of law in Great Britain: Links 1 for May 21, 2026

Posted on by

1. This is a video about several people offering evidence of massive voter fraud in recent Canadian elections.

I would only add this.

In any discussion I have about mark Carney, my calculous always includes the following observation.

Mark Carney is not a person who would ever leave anything important to him to chance. Nothing. Ever,

2. It was always about removing private property

3. It would be good to know what is behind this. Hell it would be good to know what is behind all the massive lapses in civilizational normalcy that has somehow evaporated. But then again, maybe it wouldn’t. Because maybe we know.

4. About interference with the Alberta independence referendum

I would really like to see other interviews with Mr. Rath from the same location. I can’t help but be suspicious that CBC altered his audio to make him hard to listen to and unpleasant to focus on his voice. I know for a fact that if he really did have audio that bad, it could have been improved. I may grab it and do it myself to prove the point and I am just a guy with a computer, not a multi-billion  corporation with all the expertise and equipment anyone could fantasize about having. I caught CBC using some tech at a demo on parliament hill to block out crowd noise back in 2020 I think it was, in order to prevent their audience from hearing what the speakers on Parliament Hill were actually saying, because they had invented an entire narrative around it. In fact the rally was to march to the US. Embassy and demand Trump cut Canada from the new trade deal because Trudeau had already violated the terms of that agreement. But the CBC made it about bitter far right extremists angry about not being able to have a Canada Day party because of the fascist Covid measures the Trudeau state had imposed. So we know for a fact the CBC is not above anything like using technical means to diminish their ideological adversaries. Itself a major problem as a TV network isn’t supposed to have any.

CBC has been busted in many major frauds now, always with a political bent in a certain way. Probably the best one one may remember is when they talked about how hospitals were jammed way past capacity during Covid (in fact they were so empty the parking lots were just a few cop cars and most of the lights were actually out) and once they even showed a clothing mannequin with a tube over its wooden lips in a gurney being wheeled into an ICU.

More recently the RCMP is ‘investigating’ the recent sting they did on counter-narrative people over their views on the alleged graves at Residential Schools.

5. Two opinion/analysis pieces on Comrade Carney

6. We need to investigate this farther. But at the moment, this looks very much like something that belongs in the Kevin Krehan files. A migrant, dunno yet if it was a Muslim, stabbed a British person. The migrant told the police that the British stab victim had said hurty words to the migrant. The police arrested the British person. The British person died bleeding out in custody. If Tommy does another march, this should be the poster everyone carries and they should stand silently around 10 Downing and other government centres until something is done.

 

An 18-year-old kid gets stabbed in the street. He’s running for his life, begging for help, and instead of saving him, the police handcuff him while he bleeds out because the attacker claimed “racism.”

They let him choke on his own blood. No urgency. No humanity. Just cold, ideological policing.

Months later? Still no names. Still no suspensions. Still no accountability.

Meanwhile, the same UK police have arrested over 12,000 people for social media posts.

They move at lightning speed to jail citizens for tweets and online comments, yet they can’t even name or discipline the officers who allegedly let a stabbing victim die in handcuffs on the street.

This is the definition of two-tier policing: aggressive against ordinary people speaking online, but protective when it comes to their own failures and protecting the narrative.

The British people deserve real justice, not another cover-up.

Justice for Henry Nowak.

The implication is Henrty died. But let’s state it plainly. Henry Nowak DIED bleeding out under arrest under allegations of saying hurty words.

Vickrum Digwa (23) was arrested and charged with murder shortly after the incident. But not arrested till after Henry Nowak died.

As of May 2026, no public disciplinary action, suspensions, firings, or criminal charges have been reported against the specific police officers involved.
They should be charged with accessory to murder.
As should the prosecution and judge in the case of Kevn Krehan.
Thank you all for checking out this site.

Cancellation of a Progressive High School teacher as she comes to realize the narrative lies on The ‘Trans’ issue

Posted on by

This is the first time this Ottawa high school teacher has spoken out since her struggle sessions with the state educational organs began.

In essence, she was more or less a progressive. But her studies allowed her to access medical records at a level not available to the general public. She discovered two things. The people who oppose the surgical and chemical mutilation of children under the rubric of “trans-affirming-Care” were both not hateful, and not lying.

Now she has had to retain a major Canadian Civil Rights law firm to keep her teaching licence.

The full write up is at RAIR. 

The Gulag Archipelago, moral relativism and explaining why communist nations are so destructive

Posted on by

Occasionally in conversations with the willing about the nature of Communism, and how Western leaders are doing these things to us, and ultimately WHY they are doing these things to us, simply answering with teh word dialectics, is punishing the victim. Interestingly, that is actually not just the right answer, but why in fact these things are being done to the people of the formerly free west.

Below is a short excerpt from the Gulag Archipelago, where the reasoning of the torturers themselves is explained. By now it should appear familiar to all. Not just the sophisticated in the methods of the left, but all in the West who have observed what is being done to them with great bewilderment and horror, and shouted about as hypocrisy or corruption. It is of course neither. Corruption is a means to an ends. A way in which the temple can be torn down by destroying the systems that keep it up. But the goal, the telos, is the destruction of the temple. How is merely tactics.

The segment from the Gulag Archipelago:

It would also be incorrect to ascribe to 1937 the “discovery”
that the personal confession of an accused person was more im-
portant than any other kind of proof or facts. This concept had
already been formulated in the twenties. And 1937 was just
the year when the brilliant teaching of Vyshinsky came into its
own. Incidentally, even at that time, his teaching was transmitted
only to interrogators and prosecutors-for the sake of their
morale and steadfastness. The rest of us only learned about it
twenty years later-when it had already come into disfavor-
through subordinate clauses and minor paragraphs of newspaper
articles, which treated the subject as if it had long been widely
known to all.

It turns out that in that terrible year Andrei Yanuaryevich
(one longs to blurt out, “Jaguaryevich”) Vyshinsky, availing
himself of the most flexible dialectics (of a sort nowadays not
permitted either Soviet citizens or electronic calculators, since to
them yes is yes and no is no), pointed out in a report which
became famous in certain circles that it is never possible for
The Interrogation 101 mortal men to establish absolute truth, but relative truth only.

He then proceeded to a further step, which jurists of the last two
thousand years had not been willing to take: that the truth estab-
lished by interrogation and trial could not be absolute, but only,
so to speak, relative.

Therefore, when we sign a sentence ordering
someone to be shot we can never be absolutely certain, but only
approximately, in view of certain hypotheses, and in a certain
sense, that we are punishing a guilty person.

Thence arose the
most practical conclusion: that it was useless to seek absolute
evidence–for evidence is always relative-or unchallengeable
witnesses-for they can say different things at different times.
The proofs of guilt were relative, approximate, and the interro-
gator could find them, even when there was no evidence and no
witness, without leaving his office, “basing his conclusions not
only on his own intellect but also on his Party sensitivity,

his moral forces” (in other words, the superiority of someone who
has slept well, has been well fed, and has not been beaten up)
“and on his character” (Le., his willingness to apply cruelty!).
Of course, this formulation was much more elegant than
Latsis’ instructions. But the essence of both was the same.
In only one respect did Vyshinsky fail to be consistent and
retreat from dialectical logic: for some reason, the executioner’s
bullet which he allowed was not relative but absolute . …

Thus it was that the conclusions of advanced Soviet jurispru-
dence, proceeding in a spiral, returned to barbaric or medieval
standards. Like medieval torturers, our interrogators, prosecutors,
and judges agreed to accept the confession of the accused as the
chief proof of guilt.

However, the simple-minded Middle Ages used dramatic and picturesque methods to squeeze out the desired confessions: the
rack, the wheel, the bed of nails, impalement, hot coals, etc. In
the twentieth century, taking advantage of our more highly de-
veloped medical knowledge and extensive prison experience (and
someone seriously defended a doctoral dissertation on this
theme), people came to realize that the accumulation of such
impressive apparatus was superfluous and that, on a mass scale,
it was also cumbersome. And in addition . . .

In addition, there was evidently one other circumstance. As
always, Stalin did not pronounce that final word, and his sub-
ordinates had to guess what he wanted. Thus, like a jackal, he left
himself an escape hole, so that he could, if he wanted, beat a
retreat and write about “dizziness from success.” After all, for
the first time in human history the calculated torture of millions
was being undertaken, and, even with all his strength and power,
Stalin could not be absolutely sure of success.

In dealing with such an enormous mass of material, the effects of the experiment
might differ from those obtained from a smaller sample. An un-
foreseen explosion might take place, a slippage in a geological
fault, or even world-wide disclosure. In any case, Stalin had to
remain innocent, his sacred vestments angelically pure.
We are therefore forced to conclude that no list of tortures
and torments existed in printed form for the guidance of interro-
gators! Instead, all that was required was for every Interrogation
Department to supply the tribunal within a specified period with
a stipulated number of rabbits who had confessed everything.
And it was simply stated, orally but often, that any measures and
means employed were good, since they were being used for a
.lofty purpose; that no interrogator would be made to answer for
the death of an accused; and that the prison doctor should inter-
fere as little as possible with the course of the investigation.

So from all this it becomes clear that moral and cultural relativism was a dialectic we can all see was launched on the West to destroy our sacred beliefs and the value of ourselves as a people and a culture. We also see how doctors where made to follow state narratives on Covid, the vaxx, and now MAiD in an ends justifies the means moral relativistic framework which cedes massive amounts of power to the state which it should never, ever have.

And continues to agglomerate by the month across Western Europe and Canada.

The “Christian Nationalist” element in information warfare explained

Posted on by

Rep. Mike Belcher is one of the most interesting out there in the counter-revolution. We link to his Substack quite often and recommend his videos a lot.

Today he posted this little Tweet which twigged a memory of congressional hearings in February where this exact trope was used to try and undermine the testimony of Robert Spencer and others on the factual and historical dangers of Islam and its adherents to Western Civilization, and in particular, the United States.

Link to article:

Excerpt:

There are many people who want you to fear the idea that America’s founding metaphysics are Christian. They promote the dialectical political warfare operation known as “Christian Nationalism.”

The term “Christian Nationalism” is generally undefined and utilized as a “floating signifier.” This is a political warfare concept where a label with a nebulous definition is slandered and coded as evil—placed outside the Overton Window as taboo—in order to apply it to any variety of political opponents at opportune times to negate their political will. They have done the same thing with the word “racist,” where they changed the understood, reasonable definition of color-based hatreds into something only definable, and therefore only operational, by and for Leftist “experts.” The mechanism is identical: create a term sufficiently vague that it can be affixed to anyone who threatens the revolution, sufficiently terrifying that the accusation alone produces social death, and sufficiently undefined that no defense against it is possible because the goalposts are never fixed. 

Well we certainly post about these efforts on a near constant basis. In fact the definition of dialectics, well a sort of narrow operational one anyway, is posted in the Reader’s Links every day for now.

But this caught our attention because of Congressional hearings by the Sharia Free America Caucus that took place in February, where the entire effort to explain Islam as a threat doctrine was undermined by a Democrat who attempted to use the Christian Nationalist trope as a deflection from the real dangers of Islam.

She was well and properly refuted: