“…and selective enforcement be the whole of the law.” Men pay more, Muslims chase critics out of mall

‘BY WOMEN, FOR WOMEN’ Vegan cafe charges male customers 18 percent ‘man tax’ and seats women first in bid to address gender pay gap.

The left has brought the West full circle. Back in the day, the Democrats were the party of slavery and sexism and Jim Crowe in the US, and of course, the should-be-famous eugenics program of planned parenthood. After a lot of work and a lot of time by libertarians, and some left leaning individuals and groups tilted towards applying the constitution fairly for all, things changed with generally good results, not just in the US but across the Christian-Western world. Although one could argue that all people have a right to discriminate and that might even be a central right, the quality and nature of that discrimination determining the success of the venture.

Well now, if you are male, you can pay more at this vegan restaurant. Of course few if any real men are vegan so I doubt they will see even a 1% drop in sales. The men who do go, no doubt will be female lesbians who identify as men the way, on occasion, my 100 Lbs. retriever tries to identify as a cat just long enough to get close to one.

But surely this is against the law. Perhaps someone up to date on Australian law can explain how this can be OK. But I fear its a very public example of what we have feared is the case for some years now.

Rule of law is over. What we have now is a system of selective enforcement, where whatever advances the interests of postmodernism/Marxism, and or Islamic interests. That the rule of law is waived where it does not, and applied only where it does, and not applied where it conflicts with those interests.

For example:

You go to a mall. You have permission to distribute flyers and discuss the threat of Islam to classical civilization at that mall. Two muslims show up and start making threatening noises and disruptions and warn that they will continue to disrupt and cause problems as long as you are there. The police and mall security show up. They escort you away.

A muslim goes to a mall to do dawa. He passes out Korans (I love how autocorrect always tries to turn that into Koreans. It would be great if they passed out Koreans instead of Korans) and you go and disrupt and do exactly what the muslims did in the first example. We all know what would happen. They would be allowed to stay, probably paid compensation, you would be arrested for violating their 1st amendment rights and probably also for hate crimes charges. They would be invited to Obama’s White House and given a full ride at MIT.

Identical events, opposite effects.

This is why there must never be thought crimes and speech crimes charges. They are always a tool to be selectively used by tyrants to further their agenda, and consolidate their power.

So it is in communist regimes and all muslim ones.

A CAFE is making waves after it began charging blokes more money in a bid to close the gender pay gap.

 

The feminist vegan owner of Handsome Her eatery in Melbourne, Australia, is making them pay an 18 per cent “man tax” as well as giving women priority over seating.

The owner of Handsome Her in Melbourne wants to address the gender pay gap

The owner of Handsome Her in Melbourne wants to address the gender pay gap

Owner Alex O’Brien told Broadsheet website: “I do want people to think about it, because we’ve had this (pay discrepancy) for decades and decades and we’re bringing it to the forefront of people’s minds.

 

“I like that it is making men stop and question their privilege a little bit.”

 

Ms O’Brien says the response from her customers has been positive, with one man even donating $50 (£30) to the cause.

 

She said: “There’s been nothing but positivity from everyone, males and females.”

People also think Jews have more money than non-Jews. It can only be a matter of months till someone applies this logic to any Jewish patrons. You have to pay a Jew-tax of 22% to compensate for this unfairness.

“Equity not equality.” That, is what it really says over the gates of Hell.

Eeyore for VladTepesBlog.

 

Facebook removes popular counter-jihad group without explanation or appeal

Jihad Watch post here:

Which leads to the question by the Clarion Project, “Does Facebook support terrorism?

Interview with founder and operator of the Counter-Jihad coalition:

Kanadische Luegenpresse

Canadians need to know how major media outlets deliberately misinform them.

One simply cannot make decisions for oneself with predictable outcomes with bad information. So it matters a great deal when you are being lied to, in this case by the Toronto Star.

A Buddhist lecturer I knew, once explained to his class, that there are three ways of lying. My misinformation, omission, and another kind I never can remember.

But intention matters in all, and all are attempts to deceive. The Toronto Star, like the CBC and BBC and most mass media, and especially government-media complexes like the CBC and Euronews, practice all of them, with a preference for omission.

Lets look at some coverage of the Muslim woman who went on a jihad in Toronto last week against the unbeliever at an area mall.

City News Toronto:

Even Global News did a rational and informative report on what took place and most importantly, why:

Now read the Toronto Star report, remembering that all information was equally available to all news services at the time these were released.

Some of it is below in screen captures. But the article continues to sort of say what happened while avoiding any real conclusive indication as to motive.

For example:

When asked to identify herself for the record, she instead made reference in Arabic to “the leader of the believers,” according to the court’s translator.

This could mean anything at all from the point of view of one of our detractors. We all know what it means, but it is not a genuine data point in the game set of what the hell is going on here, generally speaking. And of course, that was the point.

Remember this video from yesterday? Well this is what happened to the journalist who filmed it

And in a near perfect example of the true nature of contemporary Marxist/Post modern society in defiance of reason, truth and rule of law, the editor of the school paper was fired for recording and publishing this very video.

Please read the reasoning used to fire the editor at the link above. Note that the kind of reasoning and the terms used are near pure Soviet. And based on the growing number of stories I hear from people around me, this reasoning and actions derived from it, is increasing in its influence and areas of operation. The truth, is illegal in the practical sense. The excuses to make it so of course, are velvety cushions of reasonable sounding nonsense.

Thank you Richard for catching this one.

 

Centrist European party breaks ranks with the far left, endorses Le Pen

Thank you Ava Lon for this one.

Normally a video speaks for itself. But in this case there is more importance and meaning than one may notice right away. To quote Baron Bodissey: “this is the first break in the cordon sanitaire I’ve seen.” Also the ‘journalist’ is clearly appalled by the announcement and tries to strafe his guest.

 

 

So WHY is CNN fake news?

Comment:

I heard this nervous caller call in to a Mike Cernovich open live feed once who said the exact same thing. CNN, MSNBC, CBS are all taking bribes from theocratic dictators in the middle east. There are big payouts to this corporate bosses. These theocracies own European media, lock stock and press. There are financial proxy companies like George Soros who take billions, and set up organizations to do the bidding of these same dictators. The steady flow of petro-dollars ensures the destruction of the west, and the media is fully corrupted by this flow of money. Thanks Amber Lyon for being brave and doing the right thing.

Deranged sent in some great old CNN theatre as well:

this one how the sky seems to have a shadow on it. Or what is that blue background?

Sebastian Gorka. the corporate media’s new bogey man

It seems that the CNN and other manufacturers of illusions designed to disenfranchise Donald Trump, have chosen Sebastian Gorka as their newest target, possibly to try and draw attention from Trump-Tap, which they are rapidly discovering was perhaps the largest scandal and abuse of power by a sitting president since maybe ever in the USA.

Pajamas Media seems to frame the issue here.

The most outrageous tissue of lies I have seen in my forty-five years as a journalist appeared yesterday on the website of The Forward, a once-great Jewish publication long since absorbed into the echo chamber of liberal propaganda.

The Forward trumpeted an exclusive: It claimed to have found a 2007 Hungarian television interview with Dr. Sebastian Gorka, now a national security adviser to President Trump, in which Gorka endorsed a militia then proposed by anti-Semitic political parties. Embedded in the “exclusive” story is a clip of Dr. Gorka speaking on Hungarian television full of jarring cuts and jumps, and ending strangely in mid-sentence. The Forward may style itself Jewish, but it learned its journalism from classic anti-Semitism.

In fact, as David Reaboi shows at RedState, the Forward’s clip edits out Gorka’s denunciation of the anti-Semitic parties for exploiting popular fears in order to advance their own agenda. Gorka explicitly says that it is the ultra-right parties that are behind the proposal, and that his party, the New Democratic Coalition, is not behind it.

Well. Lets have a look at that actual interview itself, which thanks to the efforts of many good and hard working people, CrossWare especially who did the actual translation and Gates of Vienna who did the edit and prepared the file for subtitling.

Catching Corporate media lying, fabricating evidence, and selectively editing to create a false impression of the truth is now so common it no longer carries the kind of horror and disgust that it rightly should. Much like Muslim migrants raping European Christian girls or beating up Jewish children also has lost its shock.

But all these cases are a sign of the moral slide that leftism and Islam have brought as their principle import to classical civilization. It does not mean that the effects of these actions are any less serious than we always knew they were.