Category Archives: United Nations

If you had any doubts about the UN-WHO Pandemic Treaty, you can put them to rest now – it is about control

Posted on by

An astonishing thing happened a few days ago in Slovakia. Well astonishing only in so much as the head of the WHO, the Marxist revolutionary Tedros, called the PM of Slovakia, Robert Fico, and asked him to bypass all parliamentary procedure and Slovakian law and just pass the Pandemic Treaty, granting all sovereignty to the UN-WHO in the event the WHO decides to call a pandemic. And of course, they can anytime whether there is one or not, and for that matter, there always is one, the question is how much does it matter?

There is a seasonal flu from the East every year. Which is why there is a different useless and dangerous flu shot every year. But in any case, and even if it is a real and serious pandemic, do we want to cede all national sovereignty, actually much much worse, bodily autonomy, in as much as the right to refuse a treatment or other means such as flu gulags or whatever else they did during Covid and whatever else they have planned for us next.

Here is the article at RAIR with a lot of the details.

From Slovakia News:

R. FICO: PHONE CALL WITH THE LEADERSHIP OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION

A few minutes ago, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus phoned me and asked me to change the position of the Slovak government and not to demand a vote on the pandemic agreement, which is due to take place this evening.

I reiterated that the Slovak delegation is obliged by the instructions of the Slovak government to demand a vote on the pandemic treaty.

The Prime Minister of the Slovak Republic expresses surprise that there are efforts to avoid the basic democratic institution-voting. If the vote takes place, the Slovak delegation is instructed not to support the pandemic agreement, as it undermines the principle of sovereignty of the member states and disproportionately interferes with the sphere of human rights.

The WHO Pandemic treaty passed anyway like a Quebec riding going Liberal. 

No one of course should have had any doubt it wouldn’t pass. That isn’t how things are now. There is no people’s franchise in terms of self governance or any kind of individual rights. If memory serves, at one point they pretended to take the most authoritarian parts of the Pandemic Treaty out of it, and then quietly put it back in. This is basically the COMINTERN methodology. When the EU held a ‘referendum’ on a totally illegal and unwanted ‘EU Constitution” they first held it in one member state who rejected it. France, which 54.7% rejected the document, The Netherlands where 61.54% rejected it, and Spain, where they say 81.8 % approved it. The EU changed it slightly and removed some of the more authoritarian bits and renamed it the Lisbon Treaty. Then Ireland held TWO referendums, because the EU wasn’t happy with the initial rejection, so they held another one till they got the results they wanted.

If memory serves, they then just put the nasty parts back in.

On or before May, 2023, we did an interview with one of the bravest physicians out there. Dr. Kat Lindley who toured the world during the Covid years to try and warn people about the dangers of the mRNA shots. In this interview, we discussed the Pandemic Treaty of the WHO:

The cynicism and evil of COMINTERN orgs. such as the EU, UN, Canadian and German Governments etc. are if nothing else, consistent.

In fairness to them though, a lot of this is because most people living in the formerly free Western more or less Republics, wouldn’t give up a single diet Coke to preserve their own freedoms, let alone the freedoms of others. And now the Panopticon is nearly complete.

 

Hillel Neuer talk in Montreal, Friday December 6th 2024: Exposing the mass narrative attack against Israel and Jews

Posted on by

On Friday, Hillel Neuer of UN Watch came to speak to a small, but interesting group of academics and students in Montreal about the facts on the ground concerning the UN, Mass line narrative attacks against Israel, and a detailed expose of some of the UN principle people along with organizations who are clearly operating by Marxist beliefs and intentions, as well as in method. They are operating dialectically instead of any kind of procedures Westerners would consider an attempt at truth or understanding.

RAIR Foundation has an excellent write up. And for those who wish to send this talk to their associates, who may not be ready for how this site sees things, I recommend sending the RAIR link to them.

In terms of how we do see things, and how they dovetail with Hillel’s talk, there are two main points he raised which nearly rocked me back out of my chair.

  1. Hillel’s pointing out intersectional lines of action, using Genocide accusations against Israel to negate the value of the Holocaust as a deterrent for antisemitism and specifically to allow it to become mainstream again
  2. That the anti Israel messaging by media and in the streets by Muslims and leftists, is every bit as much of a mass line narrative attack as is global warming and the vaxx and covid, the religion of peace. etc. etc.

First, the presentation:

Here is the bit that caught my attention especially:

Below is one of the slides from Stephen’s presentation with us a few weeks ago. It is one of the most impactful from my particular understanding.

At the simplest level, you have the method of attack, or the ‘oppressed group’ to be used as an attack vector on the bottom half of the wheel, and the thing being attacked, an attribute of Western civilization at the top half. These are called, “Intersectional lines of attack.” And after watching Hillel’s presentation, we could add accuse Israel of Genocide on the bottom of the wheel with a new line to the top which says taboo on antisemitism.

Stephen’s recent interview/briefing below:

So the punch line is that the accusations of an Israeli genocide against the Palestinians is exactly the same tactic derived from the same strategy as: Global Warming, The Vaxx, Covid lockdowns, and every other mass line narrative attack we face all the time now. All meant to be destructive, and all being very effective at it.

Anyone interested in seeing Hillel’s Herculean efforts at the United nations should search YouTube for UN Watch, or Hillel Neuer.

Frank Gaffney with Alex Newman on the communist origins and intentions of the UN

Posted on by

Another curious form of dialectical project naming by the UN

Posted on by

Those of you who may be old enough might recall a book called “The Limits to Growth,” published in 1972. A clearly leftist org with a mission to cause the west to destroy itself with false predictions about how much stuff was left in the world to mine.

Pierre Trudeau was a member if that tells us anything. And if it doesn’t you’re reading the wrong site.

The fun thing about the Club of Rome report, was that it was entirely predicated on the notion of over population of humans on the Earth. It was for all intents and purposes save entertainment, a distopian future novel where humans are reduced to squalor for having mined out the earth for materials and energy.

Having read it when I was a teenager, I can’t remember a great deal of it. But after literally arguing with Chat GPT for a bit I managed to coax an answer to some of the specifics in terms of what the planet Earth will run out of, and when it will run out of it.

(As an aside one might say that Chat GPT is a genuine intelligence by the purposeful way it lies, all the time, and to a single purpose. Confirming contemporary narratives)

CHAT GPT:

In The Limits to Growth (1972), the authors projected that under the assumption of continued exponential population and economic growth without significant technological advancements, the world would run out of oil by around 1992

Similarly, they predicted that copper could be depleted by around 2000 under the same conditions.

Depopulation became a craze as a result of the Club of Rome and its communist origins and intentions. It became the culture that people in the West would show their moral superiority by having very few children.

China did take this one to the next level, but China’s use of materials and fuels grew a great deal since then, so lack of population growth doesn’t factor in to the whopping pack of lies the Limits to Growth represents, since China’s industrialization represents a significant increase in the use of all of the materials the Limits to Growth concerned itself with.

Next, I asked Chat GPT the question that will bring me to the point of this article:

How did the Limits to Growth effect the UN’s population strategies?

It offered me two answers:

Response 1

The Limits to Growth (1972) had a significant influence on global discussions regarding population growth and sustainable development, including shaping the United Nations’ population strategies. The book highlighted the potential consequences of unchecked population growth, such as resource depletion, environmental degradation, and economic collapse, which resonated strongly with international policymakers.

Key Impacts on UN Population Strategies:

  1. Focus on Sustainability: The Limits to Growth emphasized the idea that continuous population growth in a world of finite resources was unsustainable. This reinforced the UN’s agenda to incorporate sustainability into its population programs. The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), created in 1969, increasingly incorporated sustainable development concepts into its policies, particularly in the 1970s and 1980s.
  2. 1974 World Population Conference (Bucharest): In response to the growing global concerns about overpopulation and resource scarcity, reflected in The Limits to Growth, the UN organized the 1974 World Population Conference in Bucharest. The conference debated population control measures and emphasized the need for family planning programs, but also recognized the importance of addressing poverty and economic inequality. The work of the Club of Rome indirectly bolstered the urgency of these discussions.
  3. Integration with Development Policies: Following the publication of The Limits to Growth, the UN and other international organizations began to stress the interconnection between population growth, resource consumption, and environmental sustainability. This led to the promotion of integrated policies focusing on both population control and sustainable economic development, which were further institutionalized in programs like the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) in 1994.
  4. Shift Towards Family Planning: One of the tangible results of The Limits to Growth was the emphasis on family planning programs as a tool to manage population growth. The UN worked closely with governments around the world to promote family planning as a way to mitigate the environmental and economic pressures highlighted in the book.
  5. Global Environment and Development Discussions: The book’s emphasis on the environmental consequences of population growth helped influence the UN’s later focus on the intersection of population, environment, and development. This is seen in the Brundtland Commission Report (1987), titled Our Common Future, which called for sustainable development strategies and influenced subsequent UN conferences like the 1992 Earth Summit.

In summary, The Limits to Growth contributed to shaping the UN’s focus on sustainability, resource management, and the integration of population policies with environmental and economic development efforts. It helped popularize the idea that population control and sustainable resource use must go hand-in-hand to avoid global ecological crises?(

I prefer this response
ChatGPT
Response 2

The Limits to Growth significantly influenced global discourse on sustainability and population control, including the strategies and policies of the United Nations (UN). Although the book itself did not directly shape UN policies, its emphasis on the consequences of unchecked population growth and resource depletion contributed to a growing awareness that influenced population strategies within the UN and other international organizations.

Key Impacts on the UN’s Population Strategies:

  1. Sustainable Development Framework: The Limits to Growth underscored the interconnectedness of population growth, resource use, and environmental sustainability. This fed into the broader discussions within the UN about how unchecked population growth could exacerbate environmental degradation and resource scarcity. This thinking contributed to the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD), where the focus shifted to sustainable development, highlighting the need for controlling population growth in conjunction with promoting environmental sustainability.
  2. Emphasis on Population Control: The UN began integrating population control more actively into its strategies in the 1970s and 1980s, driven by concerns over the limits of Earth’s resources, as pointed out by The Limits to Growth. The UN Fund for Population Activities (now UNFPA) placed increasing emphasis on family planning, reproductive health, and the reduction of fertility rates in developing countries, partly influenced by the data and warnings provided by reports like The Limits to Growth.
  3. Global Collaboration on Population Issues: The message of The Limits to Growth reinforced the need for international collaboration to address population growth’s implications on global resources. This resulted in the UN organizing high-level discussions and conferences, such as the World Population Conferences in 1974 and 1984, to address these issues. These conferences aimed to find balanced solutions that would promote both human welfare and ecological preservation.
  4. Incorporation of Ecological Limits: In subsequent years, particularly with the UN’s Agenda 21 in 1992, the idea of ecological limits (central to The Limits to Growth) was integrated into population strategies, where population dynamics were viewed not just in terms of economic development but also in terms of their environmental impact.

While The Limits to Growth did not directly dictate specific UN population policies, its ideas contributed to a broader shift in international thinking. Population control became a part of a larger strategy to manage global resources responsibly, leading to the development of policies that promote family planning, reproductive rights, and sustainable development.

The book’s long-term influence is visible in how the UN approached population and sustainability from the 1970s onwards, emphasizing the interrelationship between population growth, economic development, and environmental sustainability?.

It almost kinda sorta looks like the Limits to Growth was a book foisted upon the public to justify a depopulation agenda by the UN. The fact that every prediction was wrong, and I mean wrong on the enormous scale of the ‘Global Warming’ line of effort against the West, is secondary to the point but not entirely irrelevant.

The United Nations, headed by a life-long communist in the form of António Guterres, has created a new phrase which is a 180 turn about from its previous position.

Identical in the ways that matter from its reversal of its Nuclear Winter stance pivoting deftly to Global Warming without even acknowledging its previous position, the United Nations has now coined the phrase, “Population Alarmism”.

Do not read further if drinking anything just at this moment. You will get coffee coming out of your nose.

Here is what Chat GPT had to say about the phrase:

Vlad: The UN refers to a phrase it created called Population Alarmism. what does it mean

Population Alarmism is a term used by the United Nations and other organizations to refer to exaggerated or overly pessimistic claims about the impacts of population growth. It often describes concerns or policies that focus on the perceived threats of overpopulation—such as resource scarcity, environmental degradation, and economic collapse—without fully considering other factors like technological advances, resource management, and demographic transitions.

The UN coined this term to caution against alarmist rhetoric, which can sometimes lead to counterproductive or overly aggressive population control policies. Population alarmism typically emerges from predictions or studies (such as those inspired by works like The Limits to Growth or Malthusian theory) that emphasize dire consequences without accounting for potential adaptive measures or changes in human behavior, such as advancements in agriculture, renewable energy, or improvements in family planning and health care.

Key Aspects of Population Alarmism:

  1. Exaggerated Risks: It emphasizes doomsday-like scenarios, where unchecked population growth is portrayed as leading inevitably to environmental and economic collapse.
  2. Oversimplified View: Often, alarmist views neglect complex factors, such as advancements in technology, shifts in birth rates due to education and access to contraception, and changes in resource management.
  3. Policy Consequences: The term is used to warn against policies or actions that stem from fear rather than evidence-based planning. In some historical cases, alarmist views on population growth led to extreme policies, such as forced sterilizations or strict family planning measures, which were later criticized for violating human rights.

The UN promotes a more nuanced approach, focusing on sustainable development, education, and voluntary family planning rather than drastic measures driven by fear of population growth.

For example, the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) held in Cairo in 1994 shifted global thinking from population control strategies toward broader goals like women’s empowerment, reproductive health, and sustainable development as solutions to population concerns. This approach directly counters the overly simplistic view associated with population alarmism?

So the UN actually created a phrase to try and dialectically negate its own policies on population via the Limits to Growth, even citing it as a problem.

Making sense of it is easy though.

Communism is about destruction through informational warfare. Nuclear Winter and Limits to Growth were not sufficiently destructive. So the pivot to global warming and “population alarmism” (I still can’t type that without twisting my lips all out of shape) was the next attempt. No contradiction there because the purpose was the same. The destruction of the West primarily.

As a Post Script, it has proven to be impossible for me to find any of the thousands of hours of people warning us about nuclear winter. David Suzuki, one of the people who somehow got a lot of the population to get those God-Awful compact fluorescent bulbs, was the best Canadian example of constant TV appearances about Nuclear Winter and then suddenly it was all Global Warming.

But good news! You can get a copy of Limits to Growth maybe from Amazon.

Screenshot

I should emphasize at this point that the purpose of this post is not to argue population or resource management. We are examining all these things from the point of view of an analysis of information warfare, primarily of the West but against all human modes of organization. To argue the rightness or wrongness of population and resource use is a perfectly legitimate discussion.
But it is our contention that this discussion, like nearly every other subject that matters, has been turned into weapons against the public. And to argue the specifics of what is not the point, is to give the information-warfare attack energy and mass.

This applies to all dialectic lines of operation.

Counterspell: Political warfare, how to counter it, recognizing a traitor through dialectic phrases and heuristics and your enemy and mine, the United Nations

Posted on by

Here are a couple of tweets from The Counterspell Group.

There is a lot to unpack in them, but a couple of things jumped out at me first pass.

First, the Tweets:

Full text:

If we reinterpret Plato’s “Republic” through the lens of an esoteric strategy for oligarchic control:

Class Division as a Control Mechanism: In Plato’s ideal state, society is structured into three classes: the producers (workers), the auxiliaries (soldiers), and the guardians (philosopher-kings). If this is an esoteric message, it could be suggesting that by organizing society into clearly defined groups, an oligarchy could control the narrative and identity of each group. The producers, preoccupied with material needs, would be too busy or uneducated to challenge the system, while the auxiliaries, trained in obedience and bravery, would enforce the status quo. The guardians, or the oligarchs themselves, would maintain their power through intellectual and supposed moral superiority, thus legitimizing their rule.

Democracy as a Controlled Chaos: Plato’s critique of democracy in the “Republic” might be read as an instruction manual on how to manage or manipulate a democratic system. By allowing a semblance of freedom and choice, the populace feels empowered, but true power remains with those who understand and control the system’s underlying mechanics. Democracy, in this view, becomes a facade where citizens believe they have power through voting, but the real control lies in who frames the debates, controls the information, and educates or misleads the populace.

Identity and Information Control: Plato’s emphasis on education and the type of stories allowed in his state could be interpreted as a blueprint for controlling information. By deciding what narratives are culturally acceptable or beneficial, oligarchs could shape the identity of different classes. For instance, certain myths or stories might be promoted to keep the lower classes content with their status, believing in a just world where their position is natural or divinely ordained. Meanwhile, the elite would possess the ‘true’ knowledge, manipulating public perception through controlled information dissemination.

Esoteric vs. Exoteric Teachings: The idea that Plato wrote esoterically means there’s a hidden message for the initiated (the oligarchs) and an apparent message for the uninitiated (the masses).

Democracy, according to this interpretation, might be described as inherently flawed not because it gives too much freedom, but because it can be easily manipulated. The esoteric message could be that by promoting divisive identities (class, profession, even personal virtues like courage or wisdom), the oligarchy ensures the populace remains fragmented, too busy with internal squabbles to unite against the ruling class.
Manipulation Through Philosophy and Education: The philosopher-kings, who are supposed to be the wisest, could represent the oligarchs themselves. Their education in the “forms” or true reality could be Plato’s way of suggesting that those in power should always hold a monopoly on knowledge and truth. By defining what is “good” or “just,” they control the moral landscape, ensuring their actions are always justified by higher knowledge that the common person can’t grasp or challenge.
The Ship of State Analogy: Plato’s analogy of the ship, where the owner (the state) is ignorant, and the sailors (democracy) argue over control, could be seen as a cautionary tale but also a guide. It suggests that in a democracy, the real power lies in convincing the owner (the populace) to let the “knowledgeable” (oligarchs) captain the ship, thereby legitimizing their rule under the guise of expertise or wisdom.

In this reinterpretation, Plato’s “Republic” might not advocate for a just state but could be read as a guide on how to maintain power through subtle manipulations of societal structure, education, and information, under the guise of establishing an ideal state. This perspective would see Plato’s work not as a straightforward political treatise but as a layered text where democracy is a tool for control, not empowerment.

Ok so about that one sentence. Esoteric Vs. Exoteric teachings. When one thinks of Kamala Harris, we may have the quintessential example of esoteric messaging. What sounds like word-salad to most thinking people, can be interpreted by the masses as being some nicety which people can allow themselves to think they understand in their own terms. Strength through joy might be an example, but also, something like imagine a future unencumbered by what has been, is clearly esoteric messaging. Sophisticates in communist double speak know exactly what both these phrases mean.

Moving on to the video:

Please do watch this with a focus.

How do we recognize the enemy in political warfare.

By the time we got a third of the way in, a couple of things jumped out at us.

Once, when we had the opportunity to ask Jordan Peterson a question at his talk at the Ottawa Library about cultural appropriation as a trick of the left to deliberately disenfranchise Western culture in several ways, and pointed out the example of a white woman who taught Yoga for free at Ottawa U and was made, after several years of doing so to the benefit of students, the handicapped and the mentally stressed, to leave because she was “culturally appropriating Hindu Culture,” Peterson responded with that exact quote. Although that was several years ago, it has bothered me steadily since. Likely it was a throw-away answer in place of any real thought as opposed to a dialectic to negate the point. But how interesting is it that in fact, from a heuristic point of view, that is what it is meant to do.

By half way, the concept of heuristics, where we judge the purpose of a thing by its results, reminds us of a Canadian lawyer that constantly raises money from people damaged by the Canadian vaxx mandates, or even the vaxx damaged themselves, and then launches law suits that are quite literally written to fail. Then go forward to claim publicly that these losses, major ones, sone of which are dismissed with prejudice (Chat GPT describes that term thusly: the claim is permanently dismissed and cannot be brought back to court. This decision prevents the plaintiff from refiling the case on the same grounds. The dismissal serves as a final judgment against the plaintiff on that claim, effectively concluding the legal dispute over those specific issues) and then claims to his donators that these are in fact victories, and goes on to raise funds for new claims, or appeals where possible. If one examines this lawyer’s history, we may find in the past he acted on behalf of drug companies and always took left leaning positions in the cases he took. Therefore, using a heuristic approach, we might come to the conclusion that this lawyer is indeed controlled opposition.

Looking at the UN, or as we should know it, the COMINTERN as the enemy:

UN General Assembly passes resolution calling for Jerusalem Old City to be Jew-free

The Palestinian-fronted resolution passed by wide margin, demanding that the Israeli army and Jewish residents evacuate to pre-1949 line within a year.

(Sep. 18, 2024 / JNS)

Jerusalem’s Old City, in addition to Judea and Samaria, must be Judenrein within a year, according to a Palestinian-drafted resolution, which the U.N. General Assembly passed on Wednesday.

The resolution, which passed by a 124-14 margin with 43 abstentions, is meant to give force to a July advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice, which declared Israeli presence to be illegal in any area over the 1949 armistice line.

More than 40 countries sponsored the resolution, which was the first that Palestinians filed after being granted unprecedented privileges, for a non-U.N. member, earlier this year.

The resolution calls on the Israel Defense Forces to withdraw completely from Judea and Samaria, eastern Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip within 12 months, which means evacuating all Jewish communities beyond the armistice line, including Jerusalem’s Old City.

If the UN can declare that no Jewish people may live in the old city of Jerusalem, then they can declare that any people can lose the right to live anywhere at all. Penguins must vacate the Antarctic. If you can conjure a logic that demands a total and unrestricted migration for all the peoples of the world to freely move to any nation they want, meaning Western nations, and that the media must write favourably on this plan, while simultaneously claiming that Jewish people have no right to the old city of Jerusalem, then they can conjure up an entire grimoire on why you cannot remain wherever it is you are.

And of course, the UN plan to use hate-speech as a way of censoring the people of the world who oppose communist and authoritarian narratives and diktats.

As an afterthought, there are a lot of local laws being put into place in Western nations now to make them subservient to the UN resolutions and compacts etc. As well as from their sub-departments like the WHO. Canada is currently working on passing at least three laws that we know of, each of which signals a total deconstruction of a fundamental of individualism and liberty, and most Canadians haven’t got a clue. We have written on all of these extensively here.

But what the hell:

Bills C-63 and C-637

Bill C-4

Bill C-293. A bill which would make Canada subservient to the new EU-UN-WHO Pandemic diktat. For those who have not watched the Dutch TV show segment on this issue, please do so

Important addendum thanks to Zorost

 

Wall drops on the new Global full-control Panopticon via UN-WHO VAXX PASSPORT

Posted on by

This is one of the most disturbing videos I have worked on for some time. Watch carefully please.

Even this panel of experts in The Netherlands who clearly get it, are reluctant to say where this is going.

Although it is billed as a “Vaccine Passport” the impression that it is about travel is probably the least of the concerns. Clearly national borders are being dramatically redefined, if not obliterated altogether, Millions of 3rd workers are being brought in to Western countries, obviously at this point, to replace the people who built them. So this won’t be about travel.

It will be about whatever they need it to be about. Buying food. Leaving your 15 minute zone. Fuel of any kind. Anything.

Please spread this around.

Details at RAIR

New election, new Pandemic: WHO declares Monkey Pox the new election strategy of choice

Posted on by

Basically, they renamed Monkey Pox Mpox so they could declare it an emergency in Africa without sounding racist, then declared it a global pandemic a day after that.

Africa CDC Declares Mpox Outbreak A Public Health Emergency – Just In Time For Today’s WHO Emergency Committee Meeting To Possibly Declare Mpox A PHEIC Global Emergency

ALERT! Today’s WHO Director-General’s Opening Remarks At The IHR Emergency Committee Meeting Regarding The Purported Upsurge Of Mpox Found By PCR Fraud 2024 – 14 August 2024

Just in time for mail in voting and a new dangerous experimental gene therapy. The only known cure for whatever it is.

Closer to the US election they will probably add bird flu to the mix when people who aren’t male homosexuals fail to be afraid of “Mpox”. That is of course, unless they have done gain of function on Mpox to make it more inclusive. Which they probably did. Start looking for candid camera videos of people dropping like flies right next to off camera ambulances in Africa I guess.

Interesting coincidence: Mao closed all grade schools for 2 years during his cultural revolution to give time to struggle session and cancel-culture all the teachers who weren’t already commies. Universities I think for 4 years.

 

The COMINTERN central, a couple of items about the UN and its current leader’s love affair with Islamic terror

Posted on by

We have posted this video a few times before, but it does add context to the Tweets below it.

Is it my imagination, or in the top photo, was Arafat more Mao than Muslim? Also note the classic antisemitic libel of Jews as Christ killers. Quite an ironic symbol for those who are also so vehemently anti-Christian.

 

Lawyer Peter Krusse explains the tyranny being imposed on the world by the UN WHO

Posted on by

14 minutes.

The UN is the COMINTERN: Three kinds of attacks on the West by the UN

Posted on by

The problem with being too far ahead of the curve is that you sound crazy. The fact is, the UN has been nothing but a communist plot against the world for a long time now. To be frank, I think someone needs to rewrite the whole Chicken Little story from a much more sympathetic angle. Except that by the time people realized he was right, its too late to fix it by easy means, isn’t it?

From a few days ago: On UNDRIP:

I need to go through some of the material above in greater detail to be sure this is the case. But at one point the claim is made that this will allow any Amer-Indian band to lay claim to any land that they claim to have ever used. This is eerily similar to the Islamic central dogma that any land ever conquered by Islam and ruled under sharia law, is permanently Islamic territory, and it is justified to take it from any non-Muslim who may live there not under Islamic rule.

The following is from several years ago: Pay special attention to this one. It points out the Secretary General of the UN is a life long leader of communist organizations. In this speech he explains how he intends to end freedom of speech.

2018: The following two videos are about how the UN intends to both end the nation state as a system of organizing humanity though the cultural, historical and regional interests of the people in them, but also how the UN has passed a “compact” which if not made into laws in the member states, has clearly been obeyed through other forms of pressure to only report on mass migration as a good thing, if reported at all.

Here, rebellious members of the EU, a more local branch office of the COMINTERN discuss the 2018 UN migration compact and its meaning and implications:

Only one reporter bothered to report on the compact in an honest way that we could find:

This is very important. So here in this one post, you see the UN attack on: Free Speech, property ownership and the nation state through mass migration, even if they use the now familiar language of victimhood to sell these attacks.

Communism and total state control through the vector of the medical system, especially in Canada: Links 1 for December 7th, 2023

Posted on by

1. Why now?

2. Michael Yeadon speech intended for the UK parliament (Who knows if and who saw it however)

3. so… the next big thing: Fresh warning over ‘highly-contagious’ cough that ‘lasts 100 days’ and ‘fractures ribs’ as cases soar 250%

BRITS are falling sick with a “highly contagious” cough that can last up to 100 days, experts have warned.

Whooping cough has seen a 250 per cent increase in cases compared to last year, as vaccine rates have plummeted to a seven-year low.

As many as 716 could have been infected in England and Wales between July and November 26 – more than treble the 217 cases reported during the same period in 2022, government data reveals.

Prof Beate Kampmann, of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, told The Sun: “The rise in cases might be because of missed vaccination appointments, possibly during the pandemic.

“Severe disease is almost entirely preventable if the mother is vaccinated in pregnancy and her protective antibody reach the baby through the placenta and protect until the baby gets its own vaccines.

“It is therefore important that everyone looks at their vaccination records to check if they might have missed this vaccine, which is given with the routine childhood immunisations and in pregnancy.”

Vaccination rates have fallen in the UK since the Covid pandemic.

The latest UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) data on the maternal whooping cough vaccine programme shows that uptake of the jab has dropped to its lowest level in seven years.

Figures for 2022 show an average uptake across England of 61.5 per cent, a decrease of 3.9 per cent since 2021 and 7.6 per cent from 2020.

4. Gad Saad on communism as applied to the medical systems in Canada

5. 16 minutes from the ICS4 Day 2 conference on Covid why the world must not allow the WHO to take any authority whatsoever

Thank you all for checking out this site. 

This week alone I have at least 3 new anecdotal evidences of the serious harm the vaxx has done. It will likely be next week when I am able to write them up. But as far as anecdotal evidence goes, all three are rather convincing.

PS: I had to come back and add this in:

One in four who had Moderna or Pfizer Covid jabs experienced unintended immune response

More than a quarter of people injected with mRNA Covid jabs suffered an unintended immune response created by a glitch in the way the vaccine was read by the body, a study has found.

No adverse effects were created by the error, data show, but Cambridge scientists found such vaccines were not perfect and sometimes led to nonsense proteins being made instead of the desired Covid “spike”, which mimics infection and leads to antibody production.

mRNA jabs, such as the ones created by Moderna and Pfizer, use a string of genetic material to tell the body to create a specific protein that safely imitates an infection.

Research in the field, spanning decades, had been slow work. It often stalled because RNA itself is often attacked by the body as a foreign invader.

But in 2023, the Nobel Prize for Medicine went to the pair of scientists who had spent years working to fix the problem. It was done by taking one of the RNA bases, uridine, and swapping in a very similar synthetic alternative.

The article from The Telegraph should be read in this context:

ALERT: Another bomb dropped on the jabs yesterday, and it could be the fatal blow

Dr. McCullough’s Speech at the European Parliament

Posted on by

This just in: Ontario College of Family Physicians sent out the following to doctors:

DEW and active measures and disinformation

Posted on by

Not knowing what is causing these fires around the world exactly, should lead one to look at what you do and don’t know before you speculate.

The first thing we can say we know, is it is not from Global warming. We can know this from many obvious and less obvious reasons. For example, most of the Earth’s history has been much warmer than it is now. So if global warming is the cause, then there should be no forests left on Earth. Secondly, in all places where there was massive forest fires, there has also been many arrests for Arson. I think Greece has the record for arrests, but Canada and other countries experiencing this round of fires have made multiple arrests of arsonists that appear to be involved with, what has to be a coordinated effort to create these disasters. In California years ago, it was ANTIFA activists who were caught setting fires in that state.

Another thing we can say about why the fires happened, is due to a policy change that has to have been in order to create the conditions to create and sustain large fires.This site documented the major fires in Australia a few years ago, which were the result of a curious change in law that forbade people from cutting back the underbrush that was well known to be what prevented major fires in Australia and elsewhere. Probably especially Hawaii. I don’t know if that same law was applied there, but it would be meaningful to know. In Australia, many were arrested for Arson as a result of those enormous fires, which happened a year to after people were no longer allowed to cut back the undergrowth that had always been the custom in order to avoid fires. At that time, the Islamic State magazine, I think it was called, Dabiq, called for a fire jihad. We did an interview with Brad Johnson on that at the time. (Cannot find it at the moment though) Here is a Tweet showing one of those arrested for arson in the massive fires in Australia.

We also know that we are fed a steady diet of BS from the MSM, and a different kind from social media. The social media flavour of disinformation appears to be on our side, but adds untruths or out of context truths enough to thwart our goals or actions, divide us further within groups who have common counter-revolutionary purposes, and or leave us in a state of confusion. The following video may have that purpose. After all, it is on YouTube. But that doesn’t mean it is by necessity false, it just raises concerns considering how fast they remove counter-narrative materials that are solid. Dr. Peter McCullough’s early videos for example. I think it took an afternoon till they disappeared, and that was peer reviewed solid science showing the dangers of the vaxx.

There is a lot of truth in that video, but as Stephen Coughlin once said, if you want a sniper to miss his target, you just need to have a guy he thinks is his friend next to him who nudges the barrel 1MM and the shot will miss the target by yards when it’s far enough away.

As noted last week, the fires all began a short time after what we think was a COMINTERN dogwhistle by the UN chair, stating that “we have moved to a point of Global Boiling.” This felt like calling the next move in the revolution to us. So why the DEW as a possible active measure? The more confusion around the cause of the fires the better. Like the vaxx, there were many people injecting ludicrous adverse effects of the vaxx in order to throw shade on people with genuine concerns. Claims about the vaxx setting up a home network inside people by building circuit boards in the blood, or claims that you can get a bluetooth signal from graves of people who have died and were vaccinated, presumably prior to that. (Although one can never be sure these days.) These injected narrative attacks serve several purposes. One of which is to make people unwilling or unable to look at each claim, dismiss all claims of adverse events as fiction or conspiracy theories.

This works very well. disinformation campaign against Ivermectin was a spectacular success. Just last week someone referred to it as taking cow medication in a conversation with me. Pointing out that it won the Nobel prize in medicine for human purposes may or may not have made a difference. But the slight buzz the person got from launching that disinformation narrative attack on me is more satisfying to them than hearing what was my calm, carefully worded response.

Then there is an article which I can no longer find. How annoying is that, right? Sorry. But it explained how you don’t need DEWs to create these firestorms. That conditions can be created that cause what they referred to as, The Bellows Effect. That you could through more mundane means, cause strong winds to feed oxygen to fires they set that would do the devastation we saw all over the world in July.

That doesn’t mean that DEWs do not exist, or even that they were not used. But like the vaxx, its important that we stick to what matters and not the details that cause division and ridicule.

The fires were deliberately set.

Government and government agencies acted in ways that were the enemies of the people in the affected areas. They made the problems worse. (Water turned off in Hawaii for reasons of equity)

How seems less important.