Multiculturalism and gender fluidity has always been a con

I have had this damn Youtube tab open 2 weeks while I avoided dealing with it but sooner or later my computer complains about it and I am forced to end procrastinating for technical reasons. Memory errors.

I don’t remember where I ‘found’ this clip. Possibly Perfect Child, but possibly through other searches. The reason I think its important is because it smacks of being part of a larger plan to take Ontario’s fully Soviet style law 89,which allows the state to remove your children if you object to any choices of lifestyle they may make, which are with the postmodern agenda, and make the law, federal or at least extend it to Quebec.

Before you see the clip it might help to revisit this one first:

As we point out here at VTB as often as we can, selective enforcement is the key instrument of the communist/muslim alliance. In this case it is used such that, should your male child be convinced that pretending to be a female is the way he wants to live his life, as the sales clip above is designed to do, you must allow it or have your children taken from you. But if he were to see a John Wayne movie and decide a life of rugged masculine individualism is for him, and maybe draw a gun in class, the state will also raid your home and take your children.

So once again, using the language of rights and freedoms is really is about imposing a narrative such that any choice but the postmodern one, the extreme left, or Islamic choice, will land you with a ruined life. And a severe case of cognitive dissonance if you don’t read sites like this one.

And now the main event. The definition of child exploitation.

The 1,2,3?

  1. it’s easy to convince a young child to do something like the boy above after a few days of conditioning like we see in New York libraries in the previous clip.
  2. If the boy is convinced that this looks like fun, not to mention its a way of getting quickly and easily the thing children want the most, power, he may try and do this for  as long as it seems fun with no real comprehension of what it is, only its effects.
  3. If you try and convince him otherwise you will be reminded that they are the states children, and not your own.

As an afterthought, I was searching for Thursday night’s Jordan Peterson lecture in Carleton Place near Ottawa; which is supposed to be up by now but so far no luck, and found this gem:

To the people vying for a women’s only gym hour on the grounds of accommodations for insecurities and Muslims’ beliefs, accommodations are something we give to people with physical or neurological disabilities not self imposed limitations. If you are so insecure you can’t be around the opposite sex, seek counseling. We’re in a secular society, with a chance for true equality, stop trying to regress it by imposing beliefs on others. Freedom to believe, not freedom to impose beliefs.

Canada passes law mandating compelled speech in the form of bill C-16

Canada is now a communist country, where speech supporting anti-scientific post-modern narratives is mandatory.

Using the language of human rights, a tactic which we have seen in the last few decades is in fact a con to remove real human rights like the right to freedom of speech and freedom of assembly, and many other genuine rights based on the liberal idea of the individual, the Canadian Senate passed the ludicrous freedom-crushing and full out post modernist (read communist) bill C16 as law in Canada on June 15, 2017.

The only peaceful option left, to borrow from the Bard, is that it be honoured in the breech more than in the observance.

Lets have a look at two arguments against the bill made by PhD.s in actual science, rather than in cultural Marxist thought, being the contemporary state of the Humanities in universities today.

Now that ‘human rights’ can compel you, not only be silent on things that are true like, “Islam is a political religious system of conquest and pillage which demands abuse and torture and dismemberment of unbelievers who fail to accept the absolute superiority of Muslims” but now can force you to say things which are not true in C16; who can possibly imagine it will stop there.

What will they compel us to say next?

The shahada perhaps?

A public high school has been accused of radical Islamic indoctrination by forcing children to profess the Muslim statement of faith, ordering them to memorize the Five Pillars of Islam and teaching that the faith of a Muslim is stronger than the average Christian, according to a federal lawsuit filed Wednesday. 

Thomas More Law Center filed the lawsuit on behalf of John and Melissa Wood. They accuse La Plata High School in Maryland of subjecting their teenage daughter to Islamic indoctrination and propaganda. And when Mr. Wood complained – the school banned him from campus.

Welcome to Canadgradstan.

Eeyore for VladTepesBlog

Repost of video interview with George Massaad, who was with a group, thrown out of an Ottawa Restaurant for wanting freedom of speech

George was sitting with a group of men, women and even young children at an Ottawa watering hole called the Riverside Pub, where their waiter came over, demanded to know what they were talking about, then threw them out when he learned they were against totalitarian motion M103.

They were not being loud or disruptive, as the waiter had to ask several times what exactly their position was.

This is pure Soviet Union, where every waiter, accountant, Gardner is a political officer for the state determined to make sure everyone has the ‘right’ views.

And now the ‘right views’ are actually totalitarian. You must not say things that rub against the narrative. M103. And worse, you must say things that fit the narrative. C-16