Multiculturalism and gender fluidity has always been a con

I have had this damn Youtube tab open 2 weeks while I avoided dealing with it but sooner or later my computer complains about it and I am forced to end procrastinating for technical reasons. Memory errors.

I don’t remember where I ‘found’ this clip. Possibly Perfect Child, but possibly through other searches. The reason I think its important is because it smacks of being part of a larger plan to take Ontario’s fully Soviet style law 89,which allows the state to remove your children if you object to any choices of lifestyle they may make, which are with the postmodern agenda, and make the law, federal or at least extend it to Quebec.

Before you see the clip it might help to revisit this one first:

As we point out here at VTB as often as we can, selective enforcement is the key instrument of the communist/muslim alliance. In this case it is used such that, should your male child be convinced that pretending to be a female is the way he wants to live his life, as the sales clip above is designed to do, you must allow it or have your children taken from you. But if he were to see a John Wayne movie and decide a life of rugged masculine individualism is for him, and maybe draw a gun in class, the state will also raid your home and take your children.

So once again, using the language of rights and freedoms is really is about imposing a narrative such that any choice but the postmodern one, the extreme left, or Islamic choice, will land you with a ruined life. And a severe case of cognitive dissonance if you don’t read sites like this one.

And now the main event. The definition of child exploitation.

The 1,2,3?

  1. it’s easy to convince a young child to do something like the boy above after a few days of conditioning like we see in New York libraries in the previous clip.
  2. If the boy is convinced that this looks like fun, not to mention its a way of getting quickly and easily the thing children want the most, power, he may try and do this for  as long as it seems fun with no real comprehension of what it is, only its effects.
  3. If you try and convince him otherwise you will be reminded that they are the states children, and not your own.

As an afterthought, I was searching for Thursday night’s Jordan Peterson lecture in Carleton Place near Ottawa; which is supposed to be up by now but so far no luck, and found this gem:

To the people vying for a women’s only gym hour on the grounds of accommodations for insecurities and Muslims’ beliefs, accommodations are something we give to people with physical or neurological disabilities not self imposed limitations. If you are so insecure you can’t be around the opposite sex, seek counseling. We’re in a secular society, with a chance for true equality, stop trying to regress it by imposing beliefs on others. Freedom to believe, not freedom to impose beliefs.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

10 Replies to “Multiculturalism and gender fluidity has always been a con”

  1. That’s actually SEXUAL child abuse ! I’m far from being a “prude”, but I find this straight out sickening!

    • Yes it is child abuse, actions like this are going to drive more and more people away from the mild left positions that htey have held for years. Threats to the children always bring about a very nasty reaction, one the left isn’t ready for.

    • “If the boy is convinced that this looks like fun, not to mention its a way of getting quickly and easily the thing children want the most, power” affection…

  2. The far left is trying to destroy Western civilization and our related cultures, part of this is done by destroying our traditions and our moral values. These are attacks on the our national security and should be treated as such.

  3. This is grooming. The fluid gender identity classes that i excuse my children from attending in public school is also grooming. There is no difference.

    • The fluid gender identity classes that i excuse my children from attending in public school is also grooming. There is no difference.

      Too right!!!