Canada’s Deputy PM explains to a graduating class that the time of “capitalist Democracy” is over

Remember, when a communist tells you anything true, it is to hide, or lubricate a bigger lie. In this case some of the lies she is trying to grease past you, are the problems that this new socialism/communism is going to fix. Global warming is simply a lie. Like Nuclear Winter was, and so many other scams, global warming is the lie being used to justify removing any individual rights or chances at happiness through natural means, or prosperity through your own efforts. In other words, she promises nothing less than the end of rational systems of distribution of wealth. And this has consequences far far beyond just how much money you get to make. This is the stuff of Nazis and North Koreans. Soviets and the Communist Chinese. These people are using the formula of thesis, counter-thesis, synthesis to create problems for which they can then apply what they want, claiming it to be a solution. It is why Trudeau is bringing in millions upon millions of third world unskilled migrants and not openly doing anything about feeding and housing them. They want the problem. When Trudeau says to premiers and mayors that these are local problems, it isn’t like he doesn’t know, and they don’t know he has created this problem. The fact that Ford and various mayors don’t bother to explain any of this to us is one of the many things that should freaking horrify us.

I could write a detailed essay with a lot of predictive value about what she had to say. Clyde’s analysis is solid as far as it goes. Frankly though, this entire blog is an essay about what she just said.

Anyone looking to have a greater understanding of what is taking place is well advised to read this Stephen Coughlin essay, and watch the interview with him below.

This appears to be the speech she gave. note the observation by the Twitterer:

 

And this is another anti-free market speech of hers from eight years ago

Video data point on the nature of Canada’s move towards regulating supplements

Still no clarity on this. But remember who the government of Canada is. They impose pseudo-realities on all of us, and criminalize any attempt to return to reality in multiple ways, although predominantly via “hate speech” laws. Hopefully more will be known soon, and hopefully this woman is wrong and the issue and proposed bills are strictly about properly regulating supplements so you know what you are getting and its quality, the same as food and medicines.

This woman also refers to the Zoom we posted a link for, Thursday evening. If anyone was able to attend that Zoom, please post your thoughts on its contents.

Many years ago, there was a news item about a Chinese medicine store in Ottawa I think it was, who got busted for selling a herb to help men get an erection. It was discovered it was some ordinary spice mixed with powdered viagra. That sort of thing was already a crime though. No additional laws needed.

The Canadian Government and Vitamin D

This post will be half baked. We don’t know enough about what the Canadian government is planning yet to be concise about it just yet. But at first blush it appears to be about regulating all micronutrients such that they may become much harder to get. Put another way, the same governments which suddenly denied the use of ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine during what was thought to be a major pandemic, two of the safest drugs in the history of Western medicine, will now be regulating vitamin D and C and so on in a way that may cause you to need a prescription for them, along with a host of other micronutrients, and even disinfectants. The same government that appointed a fully incompetent minister of health who’s training was as a graphic designer and no background in health or medicine, will be looking at what conditions have to be met before you can get disinfectant products. The same government who’s health minister, Patty Hajdu, claimed Vitamin D is “fake news”, will decide what are and are not the necessary conditions for taking vitamin D.

Note the early use of the application of scientistm in the above video. The careful crafting of the word science to mean something new. The acceptance of authority as being ‘science’ rather than the process which is science for determining the falsity of a proposition. To see how that looks in terms of vitamin D, I ask all my readers who have not already done so, to please watch this video of a chiropractor and member of the Canadian Parliament for fifteen years, James Lunney. Not just for the sake of this article, but for the sake of all our health, especially if you live in the Northern Hemisphere, and doubly so if you are dark skinned. So one can watch this video both for the information in it as it pertains to our own well being, but also to hear the process of reasoning and science as it actually is under its original meaning.

So we have the then health minister above, who’s argument against vitamin D is in its essence: “trust us, this is what we say so it’s true” Vs. Dr. Lunney, who explains what the studies show and what the results are. What we used to call science. Imperfect, always changing, but classical thought and the foundations of our civilization. Also note that Hajdu’s approach is very much in sync with Anthony Fauci’s declaration that he is science, and if you do not agree with him, you do not agree with science. This is a near perfect example of scientism. The usurpation of the language of reason to serve an authoritarian purpose driven by diktats.

Here is a link to how scientism is applied to what is best thought of as, Critical sex theory, or by its dialectical name, queer theory or gender theory.

As a brief aside, when YouTube and similar platforms started banning all videos revealing that HCQ and other treatments for Covid worked, we frequently did a search on these platforms for snake oil salesmen trying to convince people that all kinds of wierdness would work for cancers and other serious diseases. Treatments which did not have close to the amount of evidence to support them as ivermectin and HCQ for Covid did, as real. They were not interfered with, showing that the reasons for banning the Covid related treatment videos were transparent lies. YouTube merrily allowed all kinds of heally-feely hopium to stay on the platform.

So item 5 of the new regulations at least define what we are looking at here. And at first blush, the overall theme of this new regulations feel reasonable. But that is how the Trudeau government slides fascist measures in to all aspects of our lives. Freedom of speech was killed by a number of bills, all which seems perfectly reasonable when you hear them explained by their own MPs but all of which grant the state powers no free nation should ever grant the government.

5. What types of natural health products are affected by the Natural Health Products Regulations

Natural health products (NHPs) are defined in the Regulations as vitamins and minerals, herbal remedies, homeopathic medicines, traditional medicines (like Traditional Chinese Medicines), probiotics, and other products like amino acids and essential fatty acids.

Under the Regulations, a natural health product must be safe to be used as an over-the-counter product. Natural health products are available for self care and self selection, and do not require a prescription to be sold. Products requiring a prescription will continue to be regulated under the Food and Drug Regulations.

7. Why are vitamins and minerals regulated as a sub-set of drugs?

Vitamins and minerals are regulated as a sub-set of drugs because they are considered to be natural health products, which are governed by the Natural Health Products Regulations.

Previously, vitamins and minerals, in dosage form, were regulated as drugs under the Food and Drug Regulations. However, because they are intended to be used for health benefits, they need to have instructions for use on their label.

As recommended by the Standing Committee on Health, regulating vitamins and minerals as a sub-set of drugs brings the treatment of these products into line with that of other products that fall within the definition of a natural health product (like homeopathic medicines and herbal remedies).

To be clear, this post, as we said, is half baked. We don’t know much about this yet. It could actually be a good thing in that testing for purity will be done to various health products so we can be assured we are getting what we think we are. In decades past, this might even be a really good bit of legislation. But given the dialectical nature of this government, and by that I mean instead of truth driven for the public good, narrative driven to force the culture and the continent ever leftwards, ever more under state control and ever away from individualism and classical liberalism, and considering how the government uses carbon and nitrogen as dialectical weapons against freedom, and nothing needs to be said about the various Covid injections for the point to be made, one should examine this legislation with the appropriate amount of dread and skepticism as everything else the Trudeau government has done.

For anyone who has not seen it, OBGYN James Thorp also discusses the value of nutrients as health measures in an interview we did with him not that long ago, as part of an interview on the effects of the vaxx especially on women. It is very worth seeing for anyone who has not.

Trudeau and Canada

1. Top 5 reasons not to move to Canada | Why Canada is broken

2. RCMP confirms it is investigating obstruction of SNC-Lavalin prosecution by Trudeau and Cabinet officials

OTTAWA – Today, Democracy Watch released the response it received recently to its Access to Information Act (ATIA) filed with the RCMP on July 27, 2022. The RCMP’s response letter, dated May 25, 2023, confirms it is investigating the allegation that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, former Finance Minister Bill Morneau, some members of their staff, and former Clerk of the Privy Council Michael Wernick, obstructed justice by pressuring then-Attorney General Jody Wilson-Raybould to stop the prosecution of SNC-Lavalin in 2018.

Attached to the response letter is a 96-page document with 86 pages fully redacted because “this matter is currently under investigation.” Only Democracy Watch’s 5-page February 2021 letter to the RCMP is unredacted, and four pages are fully redacted because they are “not relevant” and one page because it is “redundant”.

This is the first public statement the RCMP has made about the situation since August 14, 2019 when it stated that it was examining the situation carefully. On September 10, 2019, the Globe and Mail reported that Ian Shugart, then-Clerk of the Privy Council, had refused to waive Cabinet confidence to allow government witnesses to provide full information to the RCMP, and that sources within the RCMP said it was putting its examination on hold through the fall 2019 federal election campaign period. The next day former Attorney General Jody Wilson-Raybould stated publicly that she had been interviewed by the RCMP about the actions of the Prime Minister and others, as reported by the Globe and Mail.

3. Justin Trudeau gushes over photos of his father with Chairman Mao

More truly worthy testimony from the NCI. Here is how true and deeply held religious beliefs were treated during vaxx mandates, even when the person had a contract exempting them from vaccines of any kind.

Please read the write up at RAIR Foundation

Two Canadian women present on Trudeau’s various plans for firearms confiscations and what it means to Canada

The following presentation was given to a local liberty minded group at an Ottawa venue last week. One of the two women presenting, actually sued the federal government in a federal court over some of Trudeau’s fiat gun laws made during lockdowns when Parliament wasn’t allowed to sit, and Justin dictated law with the privy council. That case has yet to be decided. Please watch this presentation and send it to anyone with an interest in liberty and firearms ownership.

One of the stats that really stuck in my mind was that I believe she said, four times as many Canadians are killed by moose than by firearms. But one not mentioned in the US was in the popular book, Freakanomics, which cited swimming pool deaths at ten times the number of fatalities as gun violence. No special regulations exist for pools or moose though.

RAIR article here

Derek Sloan speaks to the NCI about politics and Pharma in Canada

The last three days has been the end of the cross-Canada tour of the National Citizen’s Inquiry into Covid policies. It has been absolutely critical in understanding the state of the totalitarian revolution that took place and is still underway in Canada. We have posted a lot of videos from the inquiry and have many more to post from the last three days alone. Because it was the last days of the inquiry, many more people applied to speak than there was time allotted in the main room. So a second room was opened for people who dropped in or called after the main room was booked full.

One of the people who drove up to Ottawa to speak in the second room, was former MP, Derek Sloan who wanted to state for the record his experience in Parliament during the first couple of years of the alleged emergency. It should be noted that the ONLY member of Parliament that made any attempt to get solid authoritative scientists and doctors who wished to warn people about the various injections being pimped by the governments in front of the cameras was Derek Sloan. That press conference he did with three doctors, one of which was Bryam Bridle, the vaccinologist, became the most watched video in CPAC history. It is below Derek’s statement, which is nearly an interview in many ways, of Derek Sloan.

The press conference:

The story at RAIR Foundation

 

Interview with trucker who was arrested over 16 months after the Freedom Convoy

Interview with Harold Jonker after he left court on the morning of May 10th, where he had to appear to be finger printed and given a court date on charges detailed in the interview.

Story at RAIR Foundation

Canadian Lawyer, Bruce Pardy exposes the logical fallacies and destruction of democratic process during Covid

First, here is what Queen’s University says about Bruce Pardy:

Professor Pardy is a classically liberal legal academic for whom equal application of the law, negative rights, private property, limited government, and separation of powers are foundational to the Canadian and Western legal tradition. A critic of legal progressivism, social justice, and the discretionary administrative state, he has written on a range of pressing legal subjects at the front lines of the culture war inside the law, including environmental governance, climate change, energy policy, human rights and freedoms, professional and university governance, property and tort theory, free markets, and the rule of law. He has taught at law schools in Canada, the United States and New Zealand, practiced civil litigation at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP in Toronto, served as adjudicator and mediator on the Ontario Environmental Review Tribunal, and has published and commented widely in traditional and online media. He serves as senior fellow at the Fraser Institute, and helped to birth the Runnymede Society, a branch of the Canadian Constitution Foundation. He spearheaded resistance to and ultimate repeal of the Law Society of Ontario’s statement of principles (SOP) policy that required Ontario lawyers to attest to their ideological purity to maintain their licence to practice. He is one of the co-creators of the Free North Declaration, a public petition and movement to protect civil liberties in Canada from COVID-19 irrationality and overreach.

Professor Pardy is presently on leave from Queen’s Law to serve as the Executive Director of Rights Probe, a division of the Energy Probe Research Foundation, one of Canada’s leading public policy and governance thinktanks. The work of Rights Probe can be found on its website at https://www.rightsprobe.org/.

Just the fact that he is described as a “classical liberal” right away means he knows wha’t going on.

In his testimony at the National Citizens Inquiry last month, he breaks down what happened to government during Covid in a nice tidy package, showing both how the government restructured itself in an undemocratic way, and the series of logiocal fallacies it used to justify its massively ultra-vires actions against the Canadian public.

The only open question is, did the government restructure itself as an authoritarian and undemocratic organ due to Covid, or did it along with other governments, use Covid to do precisely that.

We think its the latter.

National Citizens Inquiry: Daniel Bulford, ex sniper on Trudeau’s RCMP security detail

Trudeau, and other tyrants, now claiming they did not force the shots (or how to lie like a child)

In previous posts, we have discussed what we call, “The Sandbox Lies” of our current crop of Western governments. What I mean by that is that we hear a steady stream of the kind of lies children might use in a sandbox to explain why a thing is or isn’t, which is an interpretation of the truth, or the correct words for the truth with a different meaning, in order to sell a lie, or evade responsibility. In this case, Trudeau might claim he never forced anyone to be vaccinated because in his cavernous head, he thinks to himself that at no point did he go up to someone and personally put a gun to his head, or in keeping with Trudeau’s real faith, put a knife to his or her throat and make them inject the vaxx. Instead, he did the following things:

Let’s see what he really did and said:

Make sure the English captions are on for the one above. A screen grab from it is below:

The US is even more blatantly sandboxing:

New Government Line of Defense on Covid Shots: We Said It, But We Didn’t MEAN It

Back at the end of January, a coalition of medical professionals asked the FDA to change the labels on the mRNA injections for Covid-19. Among other things, the Coalition Advocating for Adequately Labeled Medicines wanted the “vaccines” to be labeled with a warning that they don’t prevent infection or transmission. Here, as a PDF file, is the complete (and very long) April 18 response to that petition from Dr. Peter Marks, the director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research — the office at the FDA that regulates vaccines:

If you don’t want to read all of that, the remarkably clear heart of the response is on page 12:

The vaccines are not licensed or authorized for prevention of infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus or for prevention of transmission of the virus, nor were the clinical trials supporting the approvals and authorizations designed to assess whether the vaccines prevent infection or transmission of the virus.

Now, the Coalition Advocating for Adequately Labeled Medicines based their request in good part on public claims from senior government officials like Dr. Anthony “L’État, c’est moi” Fauci and Dr. Rochelle Walensky — who said many times that the vaccines do prevent infection and transmission. You’ll find this paragraph on pg. 10 of the FDA letter:

Definitely go read the article at source.

Retired Police Officer Vincent Gircys Testimony | Toronto Day 3 | National Citizens Inquiry

This veteran police officer details the events leading up to the Freedom Convoy and what happened to him, including a fine of ten thousand dollars for attending a Church Service. Watch this to understand the real nature of the Canadian state as an authoritarian polity. This is also and important video.