Category Archives: Sneaking Sharia
Steve Emerson on Coren. Hollywood will not do anything about Islamic terror
Reality continues to be warped by what was once a sort of prism of political correctness but now is closer to a kaleidoscope.
Egyptian PM explains how important it is that the West surrender all our basic freedoms and rights
He gave a subtly different message in Arabic which is being translated for us right now. As I understand it, there are different accusations and threats in the Arabic version of this interview as well.
ACT! Founder Brigitte Gabriel Stands Up To Rep. Ellison / Slams Sharia Law in US – Fox & Friends
Wife of self-styled Muslim ‘lord’, 60, says husband had been ‘cheating on her for 35 years’ as she seeks divorce over live-in pregnant mistress, 33
- Mr Jafari – who calls himself a ‘tycoon’ – has got his mistress pregnant a second time
- He was jailed in 2010 after throwing chicken bones at ‘disturbing’ helicopter
PUBLISHED: 06:02 EST, 4 September 2012 | UPDATED: 21:11 EST, 4 September 2012
Daily Mail:
She had put up with his womanising for 35 years – but when a Muslim millionaire made his young mistress pregnant for the second time, Aghdas Bidaki knew it was time for a divorce.
Houshang Jafari, a self-styled lord, had moved his 33-year-old lover into his £1.2million flat saying he was allowed a second wife under Sharia law.
The couple had married in Iran in 1978 and in all that time Mr Jafari, 60, had never told his wife that he loved her.
Aghdas Bidaki (left) the wife of Lord Houshang Jafari, arrives at court, along with her husband’s mistress Katrina – who has dubbed herself Lady Jafari (right)
Instead he would leave her and their three children for days at a time while he had relationships with other women, Bristol County Court was told.
The court heard that the property developer had now moved out of the family home in Downleaze, Bristol, to be with his mistress, Katrina, in his luxury apartment in the city’s historic Dower House.
It was claimed his lover now uses the title ‘Lady Jafari’, but is not legally married to him.
Ezra Levant: Who is Huma Abedin
Bacon, parks, first amendment and Muslims changing the law, for them
Thanks SDAMATT
I wonder if I built a park and called it, ‘Bacon Park’ would it keep Muslims away? Would they have me arrested for a hate crime?
Answer is clearly no and yes
…and Sharia comes to Ontario anyway.
Blazing Cat Fur has this story on how a man was arrested for walking his dog near Muslims yesterday at Queens Park (Ontario’s Provincial Parliament) and when Muslims assaulted him and beat him for offending them with the presence of his dog, of course the offender was arrested.
Click here for the whole thing:
Outrage as Birmingham play centre bans dads
More sneaking of sharia into the UK.
From Birmingham Mail:
- By Paul Suart & Chris Henwood
- Aug 7 2012
Kids Go Wild
A BIRMINGHAM children’s centre has been plunged into a sexism row after openly telling dads: “You’re banned.”
Kids Go Wild recently opened in Sparkhill and boasts it is the first soft play venue in the country for just mums and their kids.
Staff have told dads they are not allowed in for ‘‘cultural’’ reasons – but the Equality and Human Rights Commission is now looking into the ban.
Kids Go Wild advertises itself as “the UK’s first ladies and children’s only soft play centre.”
Staff openly tell men they are not allowed in and a flyer posted to homes in the city reads: “Ladies and children only. No boys over nine allowed.”
They claim the ban is for “cultural” reasons and in the interests of the “predominantly Asian” local community.
But a Tyseley dad-of-one, who was handed a flyer, said: “It’s completely disgusting – it’s sexist. To turn me away because I’m a man is against the Equality Act.”
The Equality and Human Rights Commission is now set to look into the ban at the venue in Fernley Road.
When the Birmingham Mail rang the play centre a woman who claimed to be the manageress, but who refused to give her name, defended the policy.
She said: “It’s a predominantly Asian community around here and we’re catering for that. It’s a cultural thing.
White House strangely silent on sharia question
24/7
Mohamed Magid, president of the Islamic Society of North America, attended a meeting with U.S. Justice Department officials in October 2011 at George Washington University in Washington. The ISNA was an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding trial in 2008 and reportedly functions as a front for the Muslim Brotherhood. Photo Credit:Facebook
The most terrifying danger Americans face from a second Barack Obama term isn’t the economy, which is scary enough. The most harrowing prospect is the Obama Administration’s passivity in the face of attempts to introduce aspects of sharia law into our legal system. …
Last October, at George Washington University, there was a meeting between [Department of Justice] officials, including [Assistant Attorney General of the DOJ Thomas] Perez, and Islamist advocates against free speech. At the meeting, the Islamists lobbied for: Cutbacks in U.S. anti-terror training, limits on the power of terrorism investigators, changes in agent training manuals, [and] a legal declaration that criticism of Islam in the United States should be considered racial discrimination. …
And what was the response from Perez and the DOJ officials? Nothing. That’s right: no objection, no defense of our First Amendment right to free speech.
An important article and page on stealth-feeding the public halal foods
Please click over to the originating page for this one. They have a lot of good articles and videos on this very very important aspect of the forcing of Islam on the world at the expense of another set of values.
Boycott Halal
Throughout the world the halal Industry is gaining ground and profiting through sales to non-muslims by concealment… for with hindsight, we now know that non-muslim shoppers have been buying halal products for many years without realising it.
Over the past three years there has been a steep increase in halal products and services in many Non-Islamic countries.
This is causing particular concern, especially in the Food Industry, because halal products are masquerading as the well known brands that we know and love… yet many have been changed to meet the halal standard; or the process by which they are made has been altered to comply with Shariah Law involving Halal services.
The fact is (and this has been well documented in the media) Halal products are being sold in mainstream food chains to shoppers and consumers as if they are traditional products, but many are now halal certified; many more meat products or bi-products are now different… the animals they come from have been through the ?ab??ah(?????????) – meaning the animal was turned around to face Mecca, dedicated to Allah with the bismillah or shahada prayer by an imam or similar pious muslim and then Ritually Slaughtered with electro immobilisation(which is NOT proper stunning) or without any stun at all… and yet there is no clear indication that this is a Halal product that has been through an Islamic Ritual on the packaging.
Even if all meat that is certified halal was properly labelled there would still be a lot of meat that has been through the Halal Ritual Slaughter and cannot be labelled halal.
Why???
There seems to be several ways that Halal Ritually Slaughtered meat ends up becoming Haram… and even though this meat has been through the Ritual Slaughter it is discarded Unlabelled into the mainstream food chain, because meat that has been declared Haram, cannot Legally be labelled Halal!
For example:
- The meat on inspection after the kill is found to have a blemish… so is declared to be haram
- The meat may end up being processed in a Non-Halal Cutting Plant… this would make it haram!
Michael Coren at last, holds Imam Rauf to a real interview
This was fantastic. I have the video of Rauf on Hannity not to long ago, and while Hannity was not awful, he did fall for the classic Islamic dodges and general deceptions such as allowing Rauf to say: “I regret saying that” and taking it to mean he no longer meant it. Coren does not fall for that although I do think it would have been worth asking Rauf for his definition of what a civilian is. I bet, like most critical words in any language, Muslims and Rauf have a proprietary meaning for it that allows them to do whatever they want.
In any case, this is glorious. Mr. Coren clearly knows his subject much better than anyone else Rauf is used to being questioned by. Robert Spencer does a highly enjoyable analysis afterwards as well. It is worth noting that in Rauf’s own books and on may websites where he is quoted, Imam Rauf lets slip his veneer of miscibility with Western civilization and lets it be known that he sees himself as a front man for ‘civilizational jihad’.
More on that soon enough.
Hans Jansen on sharia law, human rights Vs. Islamic ones, and why it is critical that we fight.
Last weekend a truly historical conference took place in Belgium. A conference where some of the worlds most knowledgable people on this moment of history gathered to try and establish a bulwark against the Organization of Islamic Cooperation’s attempt to legislate Western nations’ established law enforcement agencies to swap out freedom of speech and genuine individual liberties, and replace them with, and enforce sharia based ones.
I will be posting some rather massive and clear evidence on this hopefully later on today or tonight. For the moment, I will post some of the speeches given by those who understand the threat and the methodology of the OIC, very possibly the defacto face of a resurfaced Caliphate, and its bed partner, the Ikhwan (Muslim Brotherhood.)
To start with, Prof. Hans Jansen. Those of you who followed the Geert Wilders trial may already be aware of him. He was one of the very few people that the Dutch Crown would allow to submit testimony (but not appear physically in court) for the defence.
That testimony, read by the judge as no actual witnesses were allowed to appear for Geert, is here.
4 of 4
His biography below:
Prof. Dr Johannes J.G. Jansen (Amsterdam 1942) was Houtsma professor for Contemporary Islamic Thought in the Department of Arabic, Persian and Turkish at the University of Utrecht (The Netherlands) from 2003 till his retirement in 2008.
Dr Jansen taught Arabic and Islamic Studies at Leiden University from 1982 till May 2005. From early 1979 till the summer of 1982 he was director of the Dutch research center in Cairo, the Nederlands Instituut voor Arabische Studiën en Egyptische Archeologie. He also taught at Groningen University (1975-1979) and at Amsterdam University (1982).
He studied in Amsterdam (1960-1964), Cairo (1966-1967) and Leiden (1964-1968). He received degrees from the Theological Faculty of Amsterdam University (Biblical Hebrew and the History of Philosophy, 1961), the Amsterdam University Faculty of Arts (BA, Hebrew, Aramaic and Arabic, 1964) and the Leiden Faculty of Arts (MA, Arabic, Turkish, and History of the Middle East). He received a doctorate at Leiden in 1974. In Dutch he writes as ‘Hans Jansen’. In 2010 and 2011 he was witness for the defense in the trial against Geert Wilders. See also: www.arabistjansen.nl
Police chaplains told not to invoke name of Jesus for fear of upsetting other religions
Daily Mail:
- Pastor Terry Sartain of Horizon Christian Fellowship said he was told not to by his superior major
- ‘I’m very sad about it,’ he said
By Jill Reilly
PUBLISHED: 07:05 EST, 21 June 2012 | UPDATED: 07:15 EST, 21 June 2012
Changes: Pastor Terry Sartain said he was upset by the new rules
Volunteer chaplains in North Carolina’s Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department have been told not to use Jesus’ name in prayers at public events held on government property.
Pastor Terry Sartain of Horizon Christian Fellowship told FOX News Radio he was informed of the change by his superior major just before he was about to give a invocation at a promotion ceremony.
‘I was told chaplains can no longer invoke the name of Jesus on government property,’ Mr Sartain said.
‘[He said] if I could refrain from that during the invocation he would appreciate that.’
Mr Sartain said he was upset by the new rules.
‘I’m very sad about it,’ he continued.
‘I’m a pastor and Jesus is the only thing I have to offer to bless people — his life and his person.’
He said that he had used the name of Jesus in the past at police events and not had run into any barriers then.
David Menzies at Sun does something I always wanted to do. Test the double standard directly.
There is one thing that bugs me about this clip however. Mr. Menzies says to the security guard that koran or Islamic law or whatever doesn’t actually require face veiling. I would answer:
“Who gives a shit”. What matters is Canadian law and nothing else. To even start considering sharia, even when you think it is on your side, is a well greased slippery slope to dhimmitude.