Austrian Muslim Network explains how they should be able to do anything they want and any questioning of it is Islamophobic.
Elisabeth Sabaditsch Wolff explains the Austrian law:
Category Archives: Islam
Viktor Orbán: Every Thirty Years We Hit the Mainstream
An original translation by CrossWare and written by Viktor Orban
From this Hungarian website:
With a forward from gates of Vienna:
The polls just opened in Hungary for today’s referendum on whether or not Hungarians will accept mandatory migrant quotas from the European Union. The following op-ed was published by Prime Minister Viktor Orbán in advance of the vote by the news portal Magyar Id?k. Many thanks to CrossWare for the translation.
Every Thirty Years We Hit the Mainstream
by Viktor Orbán
October 1, 2016
On Sunday October 2nd a lot of people will be watching Hungary. We are calling for the Hungarians to take part in an historic referendum.
It is a beautiful tradition of free Hungary, to use referendums before decisions of historical weight, to determine the points of agreement and to act with a unified will.
This is what happened when at the regime change we had a referendum to determine our EU and NATO membership, which was based on our common will. the referendum about unifying our nation with the Hungarians who happened to live outside of our borders was a much harder case. We had more YES than NO, but we could not have cloudless happiness because the leftist Liberals attacked our nation. They denied the rights of Hungarians living outside of our borders, scaring people with the vision of 23 million Romanian migrants.
Déjà vu. Now the same leftist Liberals are advocating against our national interests again.
They sing from the music sheets of Brussels and prepare the field for the settlement of unlimited numbers of migrants without our permission, in the same way as their European colleagues who openly represent it in Brussels.
On Sunday we have a seemingly simple question to answer. But it is like a drop of the sea: everything is in it what could change the fate of the European Union, and in it Hungary. It is a fact worth mentioning that Hungary is the only EU member state that allowed its citizens to express their opinions about the migration.
It is a general European feeling that the elites in Brussels make decisions over the people’s heads, and some of those decisions are against the interests of Europe.
We want this practice to end. Are the Hungarians strong enough alone? Knowing the balance of powers, obviously we are not, but if we want change, someone has to take the first step and that does not depend on size. Today someone who does not believe in miracles is not a realist.
On Sunday we must veto the Brussels elites’ inhuman decision. The forced settlement brings back the worst of our memories: the forced movement of masses of people against their will. The human smugglers and politicians misleading thousands of unfortunate people. They lure them for a thousands-of-kilometers-long journey. They promise them things which are not possible and cannot be fulfilled. And now in facing reality the Brusselites want to make us to pay the price for their faulty political decisions.
They want to push the millions who arrive into places they do not want to live, and force them on communities that do not want this burden.
In politics there are mistakes which can be corrected. But the clock can’t be turned back, and we cannot afford to make such errors. We cannot risk the future of Hungary. Uncontrolled migration means real danger. Our usual peaceful European life and safety are at risk. So the discussion about the migration cannot be kept inside the plastic world of political correctness. We cannot accept the Liberal euro-blah-blah. It is not working; it is ineffective, because reality is escaping from its prison. That is why nobody can keep this discussion within a tight circle of the elites, either. Once the European people have a voice in this argument, there is no doubt about the outcome.
From the proper point of view we can see this is not about a refugee crisis but general migration. This process has been happening for years now, quietly behind the scenes. The only thing that has happened now is that it has become faster and more visible. We can now clearly see the details, the intentions, the dangers and the consequences. This is only the beginning, the scouts — the real pressure will come when millions stop waiting in Africa and start coming here.
This new age of migration will create a situation in Europe which will be bad for everyone and good for nobody.
It will be equally bad for the people living here and for the newcomers, too. We will cease to have peace, order, safety and good life, and there will be chaos, tensions, conflicts, violence and impoverishment. This is not a misty prediction, because we can say with absolute certainty that if we pour two liters of water into a one-liter pot, half of it will flow out. It is also not a prophecy that if someone lets the foxes into the henhouse, it will be bad for everybody, as the foxes will eat chickens and the farmer will shoot the foxes. Everybody ends up losing, and we can’t act surprised about this. Then who wants this? Whose interest does all of this serve? European citizens await answers to these questions.
The thought is not just created in the migrants mind that contrary to Australia, the USA, Israel and all the Arab countries in the Middle East where they refuse to accept refugees, there is a place where they let them in and accept their rights to a better life. They have enough common sense, so there is no reason to be angry with them. It is not their fault. Then what happened?
The politics represented by Brussels brought this trouble upon our heads and invited the unfortunate masses into Europe for a better life.
European leaders must answer these uncomfortable questions from their people: Why did they do this? And why did they tolerate it?
It is very obvious the migrants are not refugees, but are going for economic reasons to Germany, Austria and Sweden. To get to Germany they have pass through five safe countries!
We are not stony-hearted, and it is not easy to say no. But sometimes this is the right thing to do.
This is how to be both fair and smart. We Christians must clarify our relationships to the migrants. We look at them as victims. They are victims of local conflicts and liberal politics that made them believe they can come here because this is Canaan. But nothing dictates that we must sacrifice ourselves, our families, our lifestyle and customs for this.
Every Hungarian knows these lines: “Goodwill is not enough, we also need intelligence.” Intelligence, and without common sense the good intentions will cause more trouble, even much more than they tried to resolve.
As Széchenyi taught us: the mind and heart must live in harmony. Common sense and mercy must be applied together.
This means if we really want to help, then bring the assistance there rather than bring the trouble here. That is the gold standard, that is what our Christian principles dictate. It comes from our Christian responsibilities to undertake only as much as would make the situation better and not worse. Common sense looks at the facts, and not ideologies. Our present facts and experiences are disheartening. The formula is simple. Where they allow the migrants in, they will overwhelm the locals; they are more fertile than the native population. As their numbers grow, they feel less and less need to integrate — why would they do that, when in their eyes they look stronger than the others?
We only need to do some simple calculations to see that this silent battle will be won by them if we allow it!
The economic consequences of the migration are very clear; no man with a half a brain could dispute them. The tragic reality is — as opposed to the false illusions — we cannot use any of the newly-arrived as workforce. Maybe Germany will attempt to sort out the best and hand over the useless leftovers to the others. In the meantime, the defense against terrorism consumes huge resources, and I am not even sure it is possible. The degradation of public safety is unstoppable, and we have not even talked about the social, medical and cultural consequences yet.
Without any theatricality, with quiet honesty we can say: the European Union is at a crossroads. It will either continue in the direction of reformation, or it will fall apart. Hypocritical moralisation, double standards and the increasing arrogance of the liberal elite and endless ideological arguments will bring down the EU. If we can get rid of this disease in European politics, that will be the renewal itself.
We Hungarians were not looking for arguments or the role of the European alarm clock. We just wanted to defend ourselves. We want nobody else to have the right to decide who we want to live with. Based on its sensitive geographical location, it seems that every thirty years Hungary ends up in the eye of a political hurricane. In 1956, when the Soviet Union left Austria we wanted to push the Iron Curtain over our eastern borders and get rid of the world of “homo sovieticus”. In 1989 we opened the borders so as to be part of the German reunification.
Now in 2015-2016 we were the ones who stopped the dangerous migration at the borders of Europe. We did not ask for this task; history gave it to us. We did not run away; we have not backed down.
We will not back down. Even now, those who are firing at our backs we are protecting with high costs, sparing no effort. Unfair? Yes, but not unusual. In 1956 they first encouraged us, but then left to ourselves. After 1990 they did not let us join the EU for fourteen years, and now, instead of saying thanks or giving us some recognition, they insult us.
Was it worth it? It was worth it in ’56, in 1990, and today, too. We are the type of people who do not wait for praise, tolerate well the unfairness of others, and are satisfied with having a clear conscience. This is the secret of our survival and key to future successes. We love unity and friendship, alliances, but if needed we can stand alone, too.
On October 2nd, with the Hungarian referendum, we send a message to every European citizen. We send the message that we European citizens have the power to shake the EU from its destructive path, or let them destroy themselves. Sunday our task is to create an even larger unity. The referendum will decide how strong the country will stand against the battles of interests that lies ahead of us. A strong referendum, a strong Hungary; a weak referendum, a weak country.
Who asks us to abstain from voting, weakens the country, ruins our chances, risks our independence, our safety and everything we Hungarians worked so hard for.
In the next couple of months we must block Brussels from pushing through the laws they want to use to force us to accept migrants. Our comrades in fate, the Visegrad countries, will play a huge role in this. Next year we will see how the elections in large European countries turn out, and what direction the European Union takes.
It will be a long road, but it is worth making the trip, if on October 2nd enough of us say NO in unison.
We need everybody who loves Hungary, and loves it as it is, with its strengths and weaknesses, and who do not want it changed with force and violence.
We need those who cling to the original idea of the European Union, the colorful group of European nations with their strengths and weaknesses. We European citizens must prevent the noble original ideas of the Roman charter from sinking in the swamp of nihilism.
That is what we the Hungarians vote about on October 2nd. Let’s meet there!
— Viktor Orbán
The Vatican at OSCE advocates for the secular state (in accordance with scripture)
OSCE: Clare Lopez on apostasy and Islam Vs. freedom of conscience
This is Clare’s second presentation that session at the OSCE. Her first one was equally excellent and can be seen here:
OSCE presentation by Debbie Anderson, ACT for America Minnesota Chapter
In an earlier post, the OSCE was somewhat explained and other videos from the event are presented. The Rebel has a write up on the event here.
So how much damage did the Obama-Clinton administration do so far exactly?
As often stated on this site, there is a policy of not getting too much involved in “insider baseball” of any country’s politics in order not to alienate any readers who agree with the main issue of this site, namely Islam and communism. Even so, its difficult not to cross my own boundaries from time to time with things like global warming. Because frankly, global warming is a commie plot. But that kinda talk tends to frighten off a lot of otherwise really good people that would like to support the effort to protect Western civilization from Islamic influence but really believe in Global Warming.
But actually, global warming as a theory is a commie plot. Recent revelations about George Soros funding Al Gore to bang that drum is damn close to proof of that. Still, lets stick with the program.
Very sharp people post materials about the crisis of corruption and systemic senility in US government institutions daily however, and an election looms large on the horizon. One which seems to offer the slim chance of getting the Ikhwan (Muslim Brotherhood) influence out of the executive branch, which has enjoyed stunning influence in the white house for the last eight years and, if rumours are to be believed, will be controlling the secretary of State if Clinton is elected in the form of Huma Abedin.
So it is difficult to not plow over that line from time to time.
Here is hoping the people that recognize Islam is a serious problem but still believe in anthropogenic Global Warming can forgive me. For those that want to read about that, this site has a dedicated page.
1, US signed secret deal with Iran to lift sanctions eight years AHEAD of the terms of the nuclear deal.
2. Wikileaks exposes Clinton’s weapon sales to the Islamic State.
As an aside, that proves the Gates of Vienna theory from pretty much the day it happened.
Now, he’s announcing that Hillary Clinton and her State Department were actively arming Islamic jihadists, which includes the Islamic State (ISIS) in Syria.
Clinton has repeatedly denied these claims, including during multiple statements while under oath in front of the United States Senate. […]
Frankly, I am still not 100% sure on this story. I suspect it may be, premature. Waiting for the Wikileak to be directly linked. So far all links appear to be copies of one source.
But this on the other hand, is certifiable:
Yes, the Internet will likely be governed by a supranational organization heavily influenced by sharia countries, China and North Korea. This means that its utility as a vector of information will be over. It will be pure directed propaganda, or certainly it will move in that direction.
4. On an Obama admin official communique, the word “Israel” was struck off after the word Jerusalem. So that it would read that Obama gave his remarks in Jerusalem, but not in Israel. Obama has again played to a fictional narrative of Islamic supremacy in his government’s attempts to erase the Jewish fact of the genesis of Jerusalem as a city, and now as its role as the capitol of Israel.
5. US ammunition found in Al Nusra occupied Syria
(Yes something was really and truly wrong there.)
7. Iran builds attack drone similar to captured US model, local media say
Iran’s Revolutionary Guards have built a new attack drone which is similar to a US unmanned aerial vehicle that was captured five years ago, Iranian media reported on Saturday.
The semi-official Tasnim news agency said the “Saegheh” (“Thunderbolt”) drone was similar to the RQ-170 Sentinel spy drone. The country’s state-run Press TV said the long-range drone could carry four precision-guided bombs. Neither report gave figures for the drone’s range.
“This long-range drone is capable of hitting four targets with smart precision-guided bombs with high accuracy,” state news agency IRNA quoted the head of the Revolutionary Guards’ aerospace arm, Amir Ali Hajizadeh, as saying.
Thank you very much Ilona Szilágyi, Johnny U., Richard, M. Wrath of Khan and really many people over the past few days.
For more of the same, please check the daily links post for the past few days.
Muslim vandalizes Italian church
Communist, anti-liberal media already spinning up against Hungary in stunningly dishonest ways
Let’s begin with one of my favorite examples of media which falsify facts to fit the international communist and Islamic narrative, Euronews:
Let’s ask a few obvious questions:
Why wasn’t the mosque always open to outsiders? Islam is not a Hungarian thing. But what is Hungarian, is centuries of fighting off Islamic invasion and moving and forming communities to escape Muslim slave raiders and takers of children for janissaries and looting of Hungarian treasure by Muslim invaders. The only difference now is they use female children as sex slaves, rob the treasure by lining up at the Welfare office and invade in rubber dinghies.
The Euronews voice over claims that its overtly against migrants and covertly against Islam. In fact Orban seems to be saying the opposite. It is overtly against Islamic illegal invasion of Hungary and the EU forced resettlement of them within Hungarian cities. But I am pretty confident that if Christian, Jewish, Buddhist, Hindu, Sokh, Atheists applied for citizenship legally and had a skill set to offer, the Hungarians would welcome them in. So its not against migrants. It is in fact against Islam. Orban has actually said said so. There is no dishonesty there.
Muslims are clearly not feeling rejected enough or they would go to one of the 50 odd countries which are Muslim and increasingly so by the day. So the claim that they feel rejected might be more honestly stated as they feel an attempt at Islamic manifest destiny is being resisted. We had better get with that program as well.
The less obvious material Euronews missed was the imam himself. He had a rather intense “zebiba”. The ugly bruise that the conspicuously devout Muslim men have on the forehead from deliberately banging their heads hard on the ground when they do their 5X daily rituals. This serves only one purpose. To let other people know they slam their heads into the ground hard enough to cause this damage to the skull and brain. It means they have a singularly intense religiosity and are pretty much 100% guaranteed to be supporters of terrorism and any and all means to subvert a nation into an Islamic one and all the consequences to the natives that go along with that. This is no ‘cultural-Muslim’.
To see one these guys not being chased by someone in a hazmat suit shows how suicidal we are a culture.
To get a good idea of Euronews’ spin on things please see this post. It is not the only one we have busted but it is my favorite one.
Moving on to CNN. Or as many like to call it, the Clinton News Network.
This is straightforward denigration of Hungarian autonomy by a media determined to see the end of the nation state in any meaningful sense at all. They include all kinds of totally irrelevant material, like the reporter who tripped an invader crashing the border 2 years ago, to make Orban’s initiative at self preservation to look evil.
Back in the days of reason, if a female reporter actually stopped a large man from committing a crime she would get an award from the state. Instead, leftist media and the EU destroyed her. The man who crashed several borders to get the best situation even though he was not Syrian, not a refugee and was not obeying any of the EU laws on migration, was rewarded with a high paying job on a Spanish soccer team.
As is the new normal, a total moral inversion. Just like Islam itself.
Now the CBC:
Analysis Hungarian voters appear set to deliver a blow to EU migrant quotas
For months, the Hungarian government has blitzed the country’s public spaces with alarmist messages designed to whip up fears of immigrants ahead of Sunday’s referendum on the European Union’s plan to resettle refugees across the bloc.
“Did you know the Paris terror attacks were carried out by immigrants?” reads one.
“Did you know that nearly one million immigrants want to come to Europe from Libya alone?” reads another.
It goes on like that for quite a while. A hole page of invective disguised as reason to make Hungary look evil for having a sense of self preservation.
This CBC article doesn’t even bother with a veneer of reason and goes straight for contempt.
Rancid small-state nationalism surges in Europe: Don Murray
Ah, there’s nothing like a referendum or two to set the emotions swirling and stir up political havoc.
Add a nasty election to the mix, and you have a savoury stew of rancid, small-state nationalism along Europe’s southern flank.
The word “nasty” comes up four times in this one article. Each time to create scorn and contempt for Hungarian democracy. In fact the article actually says:
There are common themes linking the two referendums and the vote in Croatia. The first is the return in force of nasty nationalism, one that defines nations and states by ethnic purity and furiously rejects outsiders.
All nations for all of history have defined themselves by the values of the people inside, and have, from time to time, had to defend themselves from the values of outsiders. Recently of course, the Nazis, the communists when they were indeed on the outside of Canada before the universities became communist unit manufacturing centers where any deviation from Marxist thought is as close to a criminal offense as you can get without it being on the books. Because then you could get a lawyer.
Most commonly in history, nations have had to defend themselves from Islamic invasion. Because the consequences of that are literally too horrifying for the imagination of most comfortable, elite Western socialists. For just a partial look at that, check out the horror film, Dracula Untold. They get a lot of the facts right about living in Dhimmitude. How families had to give up male children to the Muslims to be used as soldiers to fight against their own people after training. And female children? People pretty much get it now.
Read the CBC articles in full. And Canadians, remember, they take 1.1 Carl Sagan’s every year from our tax money PLUS what they get in commercial revenue.
If I were the Hungarian ambassador to Canada, I would be launching a formal protest to the Canadian government for the manner in which the CBC mischaracterized that fine freedom loving country. Perhaps a Hungarian reader can contact the embassy in Ottawa and make the suggestion.
After Sunday’s shooting in Malmo, the Malmo police force are now begging the rest of Sweden for help. “We are stretched to the max” says the Police Chief.
An original translation by Tania Groth with much thanks.
From this Danish news site:
After Sunday’s shooting in Malmö, the Malmö police force are now begging the rest of Sweden for help. “We are stretched to the max” says the Police Chief.
After the shooting in Malmö last Sunday, in which a 19-year-old man was shot and killed and another three wounded, local police currently have so many big homicide cases that they are now asking for help from police forces in other parts of Sweden.
Malmö police now have six different homicide investigations from this year alone, at least twenty gunfire episodes since June, and an avalanche of car burnings throughout the summer.
“We simply can’t handle any more. We are quite simply tapped out,” says Malmö’s Police Chief Stefan Sintéus to the paper Sydsvenskan.
According to the paper, the Malmö police already have around twenty people on each of the five earlier homicides, and they have now asked other police jurisdictions for assistance, and that they take over the investigation for the shooting this past Sunday.
One killed, three wounded in car
Sunday’s violent shooting targeted four men in a car, who were shot at by two men with automatic rifles. Around twenty rounds were fired, some of which hit the four men plus nearby apartment.
Some of the cases in Malmö intersect with each other where it would appear to be violent retaliation. One of the three wounded from Sunday’s shooting was arrested the following day for his role in one of the city’s other homicides that cost a 22-year-old man his life in March.
All resources used up
Malmö Police have already re-prioritized so that all efforts are used on the homicides and the approximately 25 attempted homicides registered after the many shootings. The Police Chief doesn’t see any other option but to ask for outside help.
“I expect to get help. Otherwise we will have to do some very tight prioritizing” says Stefan Sintéus to Sydsvenskan.
Monday morning side event at the OSCE in Warsaw. Criminalize Islamophobia, but don’t define it
We posted a video of Stephen Coughlin the other day here at Vlad, doing an intervention at the OSCE event in Warsaw last weekend, where he referred to another event which took place on Monday morning at a side event.
The clip of Maj. Coughlin at the OSCE putting on record the danger of the demand to criminalize “Islamophobia” without even defining it is here again for those that missed it:
And here as well:
Below, the event to which Maj. Coughlin was referring:
A fun 5 minutes with Hamad Abdel Samad
Beware of commies bearing gifts
Now both Angela Merkel and a senior member of the European Union have made noises about deporting criminal migrants and stopping the influx. But the timing is curious. Merkel made her statement right after it was clear that democracy wasn’t going to help her complete her project to destroy, well democracy. And for that matter, Germany.
After a series of shock defeats to the anti-mass migration AfD party, German Chancellor Angela Merkel has promised to “stop illegal immigration” and send failed asylum seekers back to their home nations. […] Two days after that result, the Chancellor finally admitted her policies during the migrant crisis were wrong, insisting that she wished to “go back in time to be better prepared”.
I’m pretty sure I know what she meant by “better prepared”.
It is highly unlikely that she changed her mind about anything. What is likely is that she wishes she had been more deceptive about her choice of language. Stopping illegal immigration for her likely means to change the laws so that it isn’t illegal.
As it was, she gave her opponents like Viktor Orban a weapon to use, as he repeatedly stated he was trying to obey EU laws on immigration while Merkel and her EU and leftist cronies are in fact breaking them.
As for “deporting failed asylum seekers”, that’s easy too. All you have to do is make sure none of them fail. “No migrant left behind” will be her next slogan. That way she gets carried on the Obama-Bush wagon and it sure sounds better than, “we can do it”.
In another staggering coincidence, one of the unknown number of presidents, chairmen and other senior staffers of the opaque European Union has made this statement in the immediate leading edge of the Hungarian referendum on accepting mandatory quotas on migrant resettlement in various EU nations.
(This article is in Polish but we have a reasonable hope that a proper human translation will be available later today.)
Hungarian media believe that the way to the demobilization of the electorate was the recent statement of the head of the European Commission Jean-Claude Juncker. He stated that Brussels withdraws its plans to fight the crisis, immigration , including EU countries to impose mandatory quotas. If it turned out to be true – according to some Hungarian journalists – a referendum would be pointless. Others say that one dignitary of the Brussels declaration does not mean the final abandonment of earlier plans, but may make some voters remain in their homes.
If this author understands the machine translation correctly, this Polish site has it right on the money. The EU is not above a little deception to maintain power. By one person making a baseless claim that they abandon their ambitions to force migrants on the peoples of the EU, they are likely hoping a lot of the voters who reject the forced resettlement of masses of African and Afghan and Pakistani muslims, pretending to be Syrian refugees, will stay home and not vote. Crisis averted.
This may be a good time to revisit the European Union’s modus operandi a little bit.
Let’s start with the jailing of a former Soviet dissident in England. Not for his criticism of the totalitarian communist state, but for the odd and unsubstantiated, no-lawyer permitted charges of having child pornography on his computer. Oh yes and he was a very vocal critic of the nascent totalitarian state of the European Union, which he argues quite convincingly is the Soviet Union West.
When Bukovsky, 72, who lives in Cambridge, UK, began his hunger strike on April 20, there was an initial flurry in the British press. It tapered off, and especially after the draconian measure taken on May 3 by the British High Court. The court went to the unusual and unusually totalitarian length of imposing a “reporting ban” on recent developments in Bukovsky’s libel suit against the Crown Prosecution Service, as explained here.
Another greatly disturbing development is that should Bukovsky be medically unfit for his separate criminal trial on May 16, the court has reportedly threatened to try him in absentia.
What is going on?
It all started on April 27, 2015, when the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) announced in an unusual manner — no, a unique manner, as I will show below — that it would be prosecuting Bukovsky for “making” and “possessing” child pornography, five charges each, plus one charge of possessing a “forbidden image.”
I have to pause for a moment to ask, incredulously: Is there a sentient person, naturally revolted by the thought of child pornography, even five or six images’ worth, going to believe for one minute that the British state, for decades having turned the blindest and hardest and most craven of eyes against the sexual despoilment and prostitution of generations of little British girls at risk at the hands of criminal Islamic “grooming” gangs, has suddenly developed some compelling interest in protecting the welfare of children, and thus turned its avenging sword on … Vladimir Bukovsky? The context, at least, is all wrong from the get-go.
…It certainly is. Please read the rest at Diana West’s site linked above.
And then this, also from Diana’s site:
A British court has ruled against Vladimir Bukovsky’s libel suit against the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).
In brief (background here, verdict here, Bukovsky statement below), Bukovsky sued the CPS for libel over its public announcement in May 2015 that he was to be prosecuted for “making” five images of child pornography. This term of legal art, Bukovsky argued logically, implies to the average person that he was to be prosecuted as a child pornographer for “making” five images of child pornography. In fact, the state’s criminal case against Bukovsky, which will come to court in December, will turn on whether Bukovsky possesed five mages of child pornography on his laptop — which was very mysteriously seized by British authorities in October 2014.
Bukovsky denies all charges, and, further, sees his public torment as the latest phases in his 57-year-battle against the Russian intelligence behemoth.
A burning question remains as to why British authorities suddenly decided in October 2014 to seize the laptop of one of Britain’s leading citizens, a man of unsurpassed moral standing, living quietly, peacefully, lawfully in Cambridge. Who or what tipped them off?
What sot of message does Mr. Bukovsky have for the European public these days?
The movie, Brexit, was quite revealing in terms of the nature of the EU:
One Irish MEP, yes and actual member of the European Parliament, made his own video criticizing the EU, as he was stunned at the level of opacity of the European Union, even to him, an elected representative there.
So having one senior member of the EU bureaucracy make a claim they have no intention of keeping in order to circumnavigate the people’s will, first in Hungary but really everywhere in Europe, is an easy claim to make in the wake of this understanding.
Clearly the one thing the Eurocrats fear, is the people recognizing their own right to their own cultures and national autonomies. The plan was to erode it slowly at first, then once people started to figure it out, to move as quickly as possible. Maybe bring in a few million people as foreign and hostile as possible to wipe out the differences between a Spaniard and a Portuguese. After all, next to a hundred thousand Afghan Muslims in Burkas, Fado and Flamenco are both equally forbidden.
Remember, the person making the claim that suddenly the EU will not enforce the migrant resettlement a few days before the referendum in Hungary, is the same person, or certainly the same governing body, that secretly made deals with the cities in Hungary to take migrants against the will of the national government.
Chances are that if the Hungarian referendum vote is sufficiently against the EU’s forced resettlement/population replacement program, it will be seen as a mandate even if the results are not legally binding on Orban. But more importantly, it will be seen by the rest of Europe as permission to voice and launch their own opposition to the program. And that is what really frightens them.
Kirralie Smith: “Islam is weak”
Al Nusra front leaders not happy with the level of US support
OSCE: Order of St. Andrew on Turk treatment of Christians