UK and European ISPs Now Blocking Jihad Watch — How You Can Combat Online Censorship

This is a partial repost of a report from Free Speech Defence. Please read it at the source.

My post copied over from JihadWatch.org for those who were unable to read it, click through it you are able to, as the comments are also helpful…

This is not new. It has been ongoing for years: when fascists are unable to control the narrative, they shut down the discussion.

I am seeing now that most of the UK and many other European Internet service providers (ISPs) are blocking this as well as many other websites from being viewed.

Not content with shadow banning academics guilty of wrongspeak from social media, attempting to turn them into unpersons, they are using blocking methods originally developed but rarely used to block criminal enterprises on the web (think scammers and pedophiles) with far more alacrity than when they were ever used as originally intended.

They use a variety of methods to control what you are allowed to view online, much like how I had “guardian control” on our television to stop the kids from watching channels that were not suitable. Amusingly, I know of one home and office firewall company that is listing jihadwatch.org as “adult entertainment.” A provider in the UK, also listing Jihad Watch as adult, asks for credit card numbers to prove you are old enough to view the site.

Canada is introducing “measures,” specifically in Quebec, to block illegal gaming sites, which I would bet my last Loony on being leveraged in the same way, as soon as they criminalize “Islamophobia,” a.k.a. any criticism of jihad and the violence and crime that go hand-in-hand with Islam.

Please read the rest at Free Speech Defence

 

 

German propaganda Vs. German reality

First, check out this PSA made to make German people feel badly about themselves, and teaches them that they need a muslim to help them think:

But what is it like really to meet up with Muslims on a train?

An original translation by Egri Nok with much thanks..

From this German News site:

The Train Station in Bad Oldesloe

Two young women injured

Man (19) freaks out on train

March 14 2017 – 09:40 h
Kiel – Shock for two young women in the regional express Hamburg – Lübeck.

Tuesday morning, the two young women were harassed by a young man shortly before the station Bad Oldesloe. Despite repeatedly asking him to leave them alone, he became even more obtrusive.

Suddenly he beat one of the women in the face repeatedly with his fist, and kept kicking her. When the second woman rushed to help, he violently bit her finger.

The conductor could only defend himself by using pepper spray. He immediately sent an alarm to the state and Federal police.

As the 19 year old massively resisted, he had to be handcuffed. Still, he spat and kicked at the officers and insulted and threatened them.

The woman who had been beaten was aided on site by ambulance staff. The young woman who had been bitten was taken to a hospital for first aid.

The perpetrator was taken to a hospital for a blood test. But he did not calm down and injured a female doctor by a knock with his head. It is unclear at this point if alcohol or drugs were involved. Investigations are ongoing.

[As the article did not say the perp was an ethnic German, that is pretty much proof he was a muslim migrant based on the reverse engineering of Orwellian reporting we face today in the Islamophilic West]

Then we have: German axe attack on train: Isil claim Afghan refugee who injured four as one of its ‘fighters’

Egri offers this one:

From this German news site:

AZ, February 07 2017 – 12:38 h , updated on 13:22 h

After several cases of sexual harassment in the Munich metropolitan train, Federal Police are looking for victims. Photo: Federal Police

 

After several women have been sexually harassed on January 29 in the metropolitan train Munich, a perpatrator has now been arrested. Police are now looking for victims.

Munich – Munich Police have arrested a suspect who allegedly sexually harassed several women in the metropolitan train on January 29.

Thanks to CCTV he could be identified. For about two hours he allegedly tried to grope several victims. In doing so, he followed the women through the waggons. Two victims filed a police report against the unknown man at the police in Herrsching.

Another man was present the whole time. He did not participate, but did nothing to prevent the situation.

Both involved have been identified as Eritreans, living in an asylum accommodation in the district of Starnberg.

The main suspect was arrested when the institution was searched. Investigations showed that a similar incident already happened on January 22 in Munich.

Sabine Stein, head of the investigation service of the Federal Police station Munich said the fast result was thanks to the good cooperation and quick exchange of infomation.

Federal Police asks women affected by the sexual harassment to contact police under the phone number 089/515550-111

Here is a great list going right up to this week in Germany where a Muslim migrant attacked a pile of people at a mall. But it includes quite a few train attacks as well.

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.

In a Dusseldorf train station, Fatmir, a Muslim refugee from Kosovo, went on the attack with an axe. His victims included several adults and a 13-year-old girl.

The authorities are blaming his attack on that familiar standby; drug and psychological problems.

There have been quite a few Muslims in Germany boarding the crazy train and trying to ride it all the way to the 72 virgins, dazzling white camels and musk mountains of Islamic paradise.

In July, a Muslim refugee took an axe and assaulted passengers on a train in Würzburg while shouting, “Allahu Akbar”.

Muhammad Riyad, the unaccompanied Afghan minor, had come seeking asylum. He concluded his stay in Germany by slashing and stabbing a family from Hong Kong. His motive was hotly debated.

Bavarian Interior Minister Joachim Herrmann insisted that he wasn’t an ISIS Jihadist. He denied that ISIS had ordered the attack.  Then an ISIS flag was found in his room.

The Interior Minister vowed to follow every lead to determine his motive. To help him out, ISIS released a video of Muhammad brandishing a knife while vowing to “slaughter infidels”.

Meanwhile, in Dusseldorf,

At one point, as these events are too numerous to remember them all separately, I did a google search for: “muslim stabs people on train”

Below are the results I got:

 

A better example of Obama’s CVE I could not have asked for.

Any other articles about Muslims on a train in Germany or elsewhere welcomed in the comments. The German government propaganda piece is profoundly insulting. The only counter to it, is reality itself.

Comparing leftist views on immigration policies, the US Vs. the Islamic world

An original article by Vlad Tepes contributor, Grace.

No doubt the same critics that denounced President Trump’s initial executive order barring people from seven Muslim majority countries are set to oppose his second executive order barring people from six Muslim majority countries. 
People across the United States and Canada took to the streets in protest denouncing President Trump’s first order as racist and Islamophobic. Lawyers were on hand to help those in need. CAIR launched a federal suit challenging the constitutionality of President Trump’s executive order. People wept and carried placards.
Yet sixteen Muslim nations have barred and continue to ban Israelis from entering their nations. Algeria, Bangladesh, Brunei, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Malaysia, Oman, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Syria, the United Arab Emirates and Yemen forbid admission into their countries from Israeli passport holders. One doesn’t even need to be Jewish to be denied- proof of visiting Israel is enough to be denied entry.
And let’s not forget that non-Muslims are forbidden to enter the city of Mecca. 

What apartheid really looks like

I have yet to see Americans and Canadians along with their Muslim neighbours taking to the streets to denounce these 16 Muslim nations for their blatant discrimination against Jews and non-Muslims. Where are the placards? The demonstrations? The denunciations? The hypocrisy is astonishing.
Grace for Vlad Tepes Blog.
Sent from my iPad

 

watch CBC do damage control instead of reporting on potential Muslim false flag op for M103

Notice how they deftly sidestep the fact that the man who called in the anti-Muslim bomb threats is a muslim. Notice how they soften the whole issue until by the end, there is no concern for alarm and the whole thing will bring us all closer together.

Classic CBC.

“This is not news, but it takes you away from reality”.

The new CBC version of Peter Truman’s tag line.

The Rebel’s coverage:

CBC segment on M103

The CBC in its typical far left wing extremist purveyor of the narrative fashion, has seen fit to disable comments for this video at Youtube.

So please feel free to leave them here.

Allow me to start with my own.

I think the former MSA leader and MB sympathizer in the Trudeau government either wrote those comments and insults herself, or members of her various support groups did in order to add inertia to the Islamophobia bill she wants passed in Canada.

 

Could there possibly be another side to the story about the protest at Masjid Toronto?

Last night we posted an ‘article’ by Global News that would make a pretty good piece of evidence in a court of law, that Canada was no longer a democratic country, but one which ran by cultural-Marxism.

It claimed to show an event, when really it pilloried the people and sentiments of the event without letting any of the people involved express their own point of view.

It even tricked you into thinking you would see a video of an event with a poster frame of the protest in question, but never actually showed you the poster frame. A trick at the level of Youtube hucksters that make an image of a sexually receptive women the poster frame  of a video about buying electronics or watching a review or something unrelated.

This is the state of journalism in Canada. Pravda during the Cold War.

All of this was covered in last night’s post though. Just one question left.

Is there another side to the story about yesterday’s protest at the mosque?

Lets ask the women who was there, actually made demands of the imam at the mosque, and was never spoken to by any Canadian media who alleged to have covered the story:

For those who want them, here are the three videos of the imam at the Toronto Masjid inset in the video above. Please download them and save them yourselves. There will be an attempt to have them pulled down you can be certain.

Now there is news that the RCMP will be looking at this protest as a potential hate crime. Lets hope they do. Because then the mask will be off.

Please see this post for more on this important story. 

Global News fully disenfranchises all criticism of Islam

In this story about a protest at a mosque in Toronto, Global News has a misleading headline and misleading poster frame for the video.

HEADLINE: ‘Anti-Islamic’ protesters demonstrate outside Toronto mosque calling for ban on Islam

Also notice how they managed to make sure none of the signs are clear enough to read. I highly doubt the original sign is just a green rectangle with a smudge.

They make it appear that it is a story about a protest at a Toronto mosque. And the poster frame for the video shows a group of people with signs. But the article is pure, 100% condemnation of the protest and protestors and so is the video, with no footage of it, no interviews with them, and zero representation of their point of view.

Now maybe these were ugly thugs. Maybe they had a repugnant PoV. but we will never know because Global News robbed them of the chance to be seen as they are.

In the book, The Future of War, by Friedman, one of the founders of STRATFOR, the claim is made that wars happen not because people are different, but because different people are FORCED to mix.

Jordan Peterson, perhaps the most gentle and articulate man to speak on the issues of the day, predominately leftism and its full frontal assault on classical civilization, repeatedly says that when you deny people’s right to be heard, you in fact create the conditions under which violence becomes their only option.

I put it to Trudeau and Global News and all the other water carriers for the narrative that seem to have forgotten that multiculturalism also has to include our culture, and the natural right to defend it, and that diversity includes people other than muslims.

And that if violence takes place, it was a 100% predictable consequence of their policies and therefore, they bear a large degree of the responsibility for it.

 

It was Google that destroyed anonymous political dissent.

In the previous post is a video busting Facebook for its clearly Marxist ambitions as written in its manifesto. (please hear today’s Michael Savage where he discusses Zuckerberg in some detail)

However in today’s reading of Assange’s book, when Google met Wikileaks there was a disturbing revelation.

Yep. It was GOOGLE that actually came up with the totalitarian policy of all social media accounts MUST be under YOUR REAL NAME.

And this is why I was kicked off of Facebook. Because of the selective enforcement of contemporary leftist governments and supranational social media giants who have decided for the exact reasons that, at least in the US, the right to anonymous political commentary was considered essential.

From Washington’s Blog:

Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority. It thus exemplifies the purpose behind the bill of rights, and of the first amendment in particular: to protect unpopular individuals from retaliation– and their ideas from suppression– at the hand of an intolerant society.

***

Though often maligned (typically by those frustrated by an inability to engage in ad hominem attacks) anonymous speech has a long and storied history in the United States. Used by the likes of Mark Twain (aka Samuel Langhorne Clemens) [and the founding fathers in the Federalist Papers], we think ourselves in good company in using one or another nom de plume. Particularly in light of an emerging trend against vocalizing public dissent in the United States, we believe in the critical importance of anonymity and its role in dissident speech. like the Economist magazine, we also believe that keeping authorship anonymous moves the focus of discussion to the content of speech and away from the speaker- as it should be.

Selective enforcement meaning that Islamic supremacy will never be curtailed or condemned and is in fact, government subsidized and often fully funded as Trudeau spends tax dollars to build mosques across Canada.

But most certainly enforced against those who speak truthfully about Islam in a way that makes it look as it should look to all non-Muslims.

 

 

German State broadcaster, ZDF, made a video comparing Trump to Hitler 4 days after he took office

The only reason the CBC didn’t do one like this is there production values don’t come even remotely close to this. But they certainly broadcast this sentiment at every occasion.

PI News in Germany has written this article about the satire above:

ZDF looking at problems after Trump/Hitler comparison

On January 24th ZDF’s “Frontal 21” presented a typical lynch-media contribution regarding the newest bogeymen of all leftists: US president Donald Trump. But this wasn’t just one of the usual and daily hate-filled small-minded contributions that was after another hair in the soup, another wrong dance step, or another mismatched tie of the new man in the White House. No, this time the brainwash-training channel went one step further, and maybe they went one step too far. In their report “Messiah or Hitler”, which we are supposed to understand as satire, Donald Trump was put in direct comparison with Adolf Hitler.

by L.S. Gabriel

No one is laughing anymore, from the blackest of black-humored Brits to the most moronic fan of weak jokes, after an all-in-all dumb video contribution by the authors Werner Doyé and Andreas Wiemers. This irreverent piece just could not be surpassed. That’s exactly how the publisher of the Jewish Review (Jüdischer Rundschau), Dr. Rafael Korenzecher, sees it, and that’s why he not only wrote an open letter to the ZDF, but he also forwarded the report directly to the US authorities.

 Korenzecher wrote:

Open letter to Herr Kurt Beck, chairman of board of directors of the ZDF

Dear Herr Beck,

Allow us to forewarn you that we deem your contribution on ZDF’s “Frontal 21” from January 24th, 2017, about the newly elected US president Donald J. Trump as defamatory.

With suggestively trimmed video material and accompanying words the entire program about the President of our most important ally and the most important Western democracy was manipulated to produce a prima facie resemblance to Adolf Hitler.

This is not only against the law and extremely defamatory, but it also trivializes the historical assessment of the unprecedented crimes committed by this German war criminal and those responsible for the murder of six million Jews.

We are bringing this incident to your attention because we assume that you missed the broadcast of this deliberately false narration, and that therefore no action has been taken in the exercise of your political and ethical responsibility regarding to the content of broadcasts of this institution of the public broadcasting corporation.

With all due respect for the absolutely indispensable democratic bestowal of freedom of the press, we are of the conviction that the irresponsible propagation of historical falsehoods and defamatory content should not be part of the contributions of the public broadcasting corporation ZDF. We therefore await an appropriate and suitable initiation of a public rectification of this scandalous issue, and we expect a long-term guarantee that a repeat of such incidents in the future will be efficiently prevented.

As a matter of form, allow us to point out that we have forwarded the information about this outrageous behavior of the “Frontal 21” editors to the appropriate US authorities, and have therefore made it possible on their part to consider the potential for an initiation of criminal procedures against the responsible parties.

With greatest respect,

Dr. Rafael Korenzecher

Publisher, Jewish Review and Evrejskaja Panorama


My guess is they will take the CBC approach. Wait a few days till 99% of the impact of it is made, then take it down with a note from some kind of ombudsman which no one will see and fewer will understand as being meaningful.

 

Euronews, the KING of Fake news, does article about how if you don’t support the narrative, you could be punished

This website has busted Euronews several times for deliberately and knowingly falsifying news to suit the leftist EU (who funds it) agenda.

My favourite example is here below. But searching this site for Euronews will bring several more.