Author Archives: Eeyore

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

Reader’s Links for May 17th, 2026

Posted on by

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

Constitutional Lawyer, Chris Fleury fights to get men out of women’s prisons

Posted on by

This was part of Jeff Evely’s Outstanding De-trans event on May 5th.

One of the speakers was Constitutional Lawyer, Chris Fleury who is in litigation against the State in Canada to stop men from being admitted to Women’s prisons.

This story is convoluted. But needs to be understood as it is a perfectly fitted puzzle piece of the new dialectically operated Canada, as opposed to one that operated on the basis of actual empirical reality.

In other words, if a man claims he identifies as a women, somehow that qualifies him to be put into a woman’s correctional facility. Interestingly, as far as we know, no women who identifies as a man has chosen to be put into a men’s prison. Which tells you a lot already.

In any case, that is the dialectic. The destruction of our reality down to the roots. It is the twisting of concepts, backed up by social pressures such as critical theory and being cancelled for defending reality, that makes it a dialectical system as opposed to a reality based one. You know. Where men are men and women are women.

RAIR has the write up here. 

We interviewed Chris shortly before his actual presentation at the Vanier Biker’s Church which you can see below.

His presentation was very important and different information from the interview:

After all the invited speakers had their opportunity to present on their aspect of the issue, there was a panel discussion with all the speakers and a Q&A.

RAIR Foundation managed to get a question in which spoke more to Chris’s expertise than the rest.

Please read the story at RAIR Foundation. 

Rebel Report on CBC active measures Aktivnye meropriyatiya

Posted on by

The following editorial on the video below was written by Johnny U and posted unedited:

Here is a piece by Rebel News that does not quite grasp its own profundity. It reveals Rebel and the people it is trying to help are missing a few vital keys to fully grasping what is going on: namely an active measure.

One definition:

The term, which dates back to the 1920s, includes operations such as espionage, propaganda, sabotage, assassination, and the collection of kompromat for blackmail purposes based on the foreign policy objectives of the Soviet and Russian governments.

Usually we only see the end results of an active measure. This means we see the headline shaming the political target, but not the setup that created the shame. Another example was the placement of Nazi flags by state actors among the Truckers Freedom Convoy, which was intended to disgrace that whole movement in the eyes of the Canadian public.

This Rebel report gives us a rare glimpse into the actual machinery of an active measure. The language of dialectics, of which active measures is a vital component, is difficult and abstract and hard to learn. It becomes, however, an increasingly blunt instrument the more one learns it. Metaphorically, describing in detail a loaded hand gun to a blind person is an abstraction until the gun is fired and the bullet hits them, whereupon the “Aha!” moment instantly erases all abstraction, along with the implied cleverness of the words used to describe the gun.

The full comment can be read here. 

Cancellation of a Progressive High School teacher as she comes to realize the narrative lies on The ‘Trans’ issue

Posted on by

This is the first time this Ottawa high school teacher has spoken out since her struggle sessions with the state educational organs began.

In essence, she was more or less a progressive. But her studies allowed her to access medical records at a level not available to the general public. She discovered two things. The people who oppose the surgical and chemical mutilation of children under the rubric of “trans-affirming-Care” were both not hateful, and not lying.

Now she has had to retain a major Canadian Civil Rights law firm to keep her teaching licence.

The full write up is at RAIR. 

Reader’s Links for May 16, 2026

Posted on by

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

China has made Canada, Mexico

Posted on by

Alexander Dugin Tweets, Bill C-22 is really, really serious and more: Links 1 for May 15, 2026

Posted on by

1. When a politician lies, it is of course, your fault for believing them and you are “obtuse” if you did.

Well worth watching.

2. Moose on the Loose does a very good analysis of the use of Amer-Indian ‘leaders’ to negate any counter-state operations.

Very little to add here except early on when he mentions that Indian votes or opinions are worth more than white or other Canadians, of course that is a miss of the point. Whatever group that can be portrayed as oppressed will be brought forward if it advances the state narratives and agglomeration of power. This is not a small thing. This goes to the heart of the strategy being used to dismantle Canada and the West in General. The UK does it as well. Just the other day, UK PM Keir Starmer said he was going to stop anyone coming in to the UK to join Tommy Robinson’s Demo “to protect British Diversity”. A wonderfully Orwellian phrase, but strategically the same thing, albeit more generic than this.

Canadians should remember when Liberal Party proxy army ANTIFA joined forces with an obscure Amer-Indian tribe’s “hereditary Chief” of the Wetsuweeten (sp) to block railways and highways early in Le Petit Dauphin’s revolutionary reign. That particular tribe it turns out, elected their leaders. The Liberal Party/ANTIFA stole moral authority by likely paying off a hereditary chief to appear to speak to the interests of his tribe. You can guess which angle CBC CTV and Global took. Not one of them to the best of my recollection went and spoke to the elected leader. Possibly the Rebel did though. In any case, understanding this gives a minor course correction for the otherwise excellent video below.

3. Victor Davis Hanson on the Hamas Hizb’allah marches in Jewish neighbourhoods

The host reads an email from Councilwoman Vickie Paladino who actually tells the simple truth better than anywhere else in this video.

4. A few interesting Tweets from Alexander Dugin:

5. The UK Today, Canada tomorrow, and very possibly the USA after the midterms. Seriously.

Thank you all for checking out this site and its particular perspective. 

 

Reader’s Links for May 15th, 2026

Posted on by

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

Addendum post to the one on The Gulag Archipelago’s explanation for why the state acts seemingly irrationally towards the population

Posted on by

The post we are expanding on is here. best to read that first.

But thinking about it some more, there are other Solzhenitsyn quotes that make the point.

One of them, is actually much better stated by Orwell, albeit not in one sentence.

From Alexander:
“The permanent lie becomes the only safe form of existence.” -Gulag Archipelago.

“The permanent lie becomes the only safe form of existence, in the same way as betrayal.
Every wag of the tongue can be overheard by someone, every facial expression observed by someone.
Therefore every word, if it does not have to be a direct lie, is nonetheless obliged not to contradict the general, common lie.
There exists a collection of ready-made phrases, of labels, a selection of ready-made lies.”

Orwell’s scene in 1984 (O’Brien torturing Winston in the Ministry of Love) makes the same point even more viscerally and clearly.

“How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?”
…
“Four.”
“And if the Party says that it is not four but five, then how many?”
…
“Sometimes, Winston, sometimes they are five. Sometimes they are three. Sometimes they are all of them at once. You must try harder. It is not easy to become sane.”

[…]

“Reality exists in the human mind, and nowhere else. Not in the individual mind, which can make mistakes, and in any case soon perishes: only in the mind of the Party, which is collective and immortal. Whatever the Party holds to be truth is truth.”

Given all this, it is extremely important never to forget what the PM of New Zealand said during Covid. And one should also remember she was tight with Obama, as Mark Carney is now.

“We will continue to be your single source of truth.
Unless you hear it from us, it is not the truth.” -Jacinda Ardern March 19, 2020

It’s a strikingly blunt modern echo of the same idea:
The State (or the approved authority) claims a monopoly on truth.

This is why both Solzhenitsyn and Orwell remain so relevant. Once a society (or government) pivots from Socratic truth to a flexible, political, or “dialectical” rather than objective and discoverable, measurable set of axioms, more than that, shifting entirely from one system of thought to the other, it opens the door to the kind of repression and self-destruction both writers documented so well.

But this is difficult to comprehend. Painful even. Which is why the warnings both those writers offered amounted at best to the most unpleasant from of I told you so. Like yelling at your dog to not cross the street while watching it get hit by a car.

Communism as the Canadian modus is no longer an academic issue: All secure comms may pull out of Canada if C-22 passes

Posted on by

Bill C-22’s Groundhog Day: Why the Government’s Dismissal of Signal, Apple and the U.S. Congress Concerns Runs Back the Disastrous Online News Act Playbook

Secure messaging service Signal yesterday became the latest company to warn that Bill C-22, the lawful access bill, could force it to leave the Canadian market rather than comply with provisions it says would compromise its end-to-end encryption and create new cybersecurity risks. Signal vice-president Udbhav Tiwari told the Globe and Mail that the company “would rather pull out of the country than be compelled to compromise on the privacy promises we have made to our users.” The comments are part of a steady stream of similar warnings from Apple, Meta, the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, the Cybersecurity Advisors Network, and the chairs of the U.S. House Judiciary and Foreign Affairs Committees. Despite growing concern, the government’s response has been to launch a misleading social media campaign and repeatedly insist that the experts and companies are mistaken.

The pattern will be familiar for anyone who lived through the Online News Act. Supporters of then-Bill C-18 dismissed warnings from Meta and Google that the bill’s mandated payments for news links were unworkable and that they would comply by blocking the links in Canada. Witnesses confidently told Senate committees that the companies were bluffing and that, “when legislated to do so, they will come to the table.” But by the end of summer 2023, Meta had stripped news links from Facebook and Instagram, an approach that continues to this day.

The government’s defence of Bill C-22 follows much the same script. Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree has accused the U.S. tech giants of “misinterpreting” his bill and his department insists the legislation is “encryption-neutral.” When Apple released a statement warning that the bill “could allow the Canadian government to force companies to break encryption by inserting backdoors into their products, something Apple will never do,” officials replied that it “categorically rejected” the claims. When the U.S. House Judiciary and Foreign Affairs chairs wrote that providers of end-to-end encryption “will inevitably face directives to create backdoors and architectural changes that bypass or weaken encryption,” the minister’s spokesperson said the letter reflected “a misunderstanding of how Bill C-22 would function in practice.” When Signal said it would leave, it responded that the concerns regarding installing capabilities to enable surveillance are false. In other words, the government thinks everyone is wrong and the risk of market exits are overblown.

Read the rest at the link above please.

 

A few clips from the May 13th Sharia Free America Caucus

Posted on by

I will begin with Amy Mek’s testimony. It was stellar. So refreshing to see the issue plainly stated in Congress without weasel words. No, “Islamism”. No “Islamic extremism”. After all, as Sam Harris once said, “The problem with Islamic fundamentalism is the fundamentals of Islam”.

A truism as well as great rhetoric.
If you cannot name the enemy you cannot fight it. Another truism. Amy named it.

This fellow is 16. He busted a MSA effort at penetrating his rural high school. A plot to which the leftist administration was all to happy to assist with.

Rep. Glenn Grothman, Wisconsin’s 6th Congressional District discusses the Islamic element of America’s population and its reaction to the October 7th attacks in Israel.

And near the end, Congressman Chip Roy, a man who stood up against the various Covid measures and the vaxx like no one else in the Federal house had done, discusses the issue of Islam and sharia in the US both with Amy and a dhimmi useful idiot by the Muslim Brotherhood

The entire hearing can be seen here, where this is a lot of testimony not covered in these clips, some onside and a lot of classic leftist rhetorical devices by Democrats, who less than deftly deflect with a joiner-sentence and then blame everything on Donald Trump.

Typically this tactic is called “Whataboutism”. Previously known as the “Red Herring Fallacy”. I guess it could be a subset of Ignoratio Elenchi, the irrelevant conclusion fallacy but this new variant is so stupid that it is the people who fall for it that should be ashamed. 

The Gulag Archipelago, moral relativism and explaining why communist nations are so destructive

Posted on by

Occasionally in conversations with the willing about the nature of Communism, and how Western leaders are doing these things to us, and ultimately WHY they are doing these things to us, simply answering with teh word dialectics, is punishing the victim. Interestingly, that is actually not just the right answer, but why in fact these things are being done to the people of the formerly free west.

Below is a short excerpt from the Gulag Archipelago, where the reasoning of the torturers themselves is explained. By now it should appear familiar to all. Not just the sophisticated in the methods of the left, but all in the West who have observed what is being done to them with great bewilderment and horror, and shouted about as hypocrisy or corruption. It is of course neither. Corruption is a means to an ends. A way in which the temple can be torn down by destroying the systems that keep it up. But the goal, the telos, is the destruction of the temple. How is merely tactics.

The segment from the Gulag Archipelago:

It would also be incorrect to ascribe to 1937 the “discovery”
that the personal confession of an accused person was more im-
portant than any other kind of proof or facts. This concept had
already been formulated in the twenties. And 1937 was just
the year when the brilliant teaching of Vyshinsky came into its
own. Incidentally, even at that time, his teaching was transmitted
only to interrogators and prosecutors-for the sake of their
morale and steadfastness. The rest of us only learned about it
twenty years later-when it had already come into disfavor-
through subordinate clauses and minor paragraphs of newspaper
articles, which treated the subject as if it had long been widely
known to all.

It turns out that in that terrible year Andrei Yanuaryevich
(one longs to blurt out, “Jaguaryevich”) Vyshinsky, availing
himself of the most flexible dialectics (of a sort nowadays not
permitted either Soviet citizens or electronic calculators, since to
them yes is yes and no is no), pointed out in a report which
became famous in certain circles that it is never possible for
The Interrogation 101 mortal men to establish absolute truth, but relative truth only.

He then proceeded to a further step, which jurists of the last two
thousand years had not been willing to take: that the truth estab-
lished by interrogation and trial could not be absolute, but only,
so to speak, relative.

Therefore, when we sign a sentence ordering
someone to be shot we can never be absolutely certain, but only
approximately, in view of certain hypotheses, and in a certain
sense, that we are punishing a guilty person.

Thence arose the
most practical conclusion: that it was useless to seek absolute
evidence–for evidence is always relative-or unchallengeable
witnesses-for they can say different things at different times.
The proofs of guilt were relative, approximate, and the interro-
gator could find them, even when there was no evidence and no
witness, without leaving his office, “basing his conclusions not
only on his own intellect but also on his Party sensitivity,

his moral forces” (in other words, the superiority of someone who
has slept well, has been well fed, and has not been beaten up)
“and on his character” (Le., his willingness to apply cruelty!).
Of course, this formulation was much more elegant than
Latsis’ instructions. But the essence of both was the same.
In only one respect did Vyshinsky fail to be consistent and
retreat from dialectical logic: for some reason, the executioner’s
bullet which he allowed was not relative but absolute . …

Thus it was that the conclusions of advanced Soviet jurispru-
dence, proceeding in a spiral, returned to barbaric or medieval
standards. Like medieval torturers, our interrogators, prosecutors,
and judges agreed to accept the confession of the accused as the
chief proof of guilt.

However, the simple-minded Middle Ages used dramatic and picturesque methods to squeeze out the desired confessions: the
rack, the wheel, the bed of nails, impalement, hot coals, etc. In
the twentieth century, taking advantage of our more highly de-
veloped medical knowledge and extensive prison experience (and
someone seriously defended a doctoral dissertation on this
theme), people came to realize that the accumulation of such
impressive apparatus was superfluous and that, on a mass scale,
it was also cumbersome. And in addition . . .

In addition, there was evidently one other circumstance. As
always, Stalin did not pronounce that final word, and his sub-
ordinates had to guess what he wanted. Thus, like a jackal, he left
himself an escape hole, so that he could, if he wanted, beat a
retreat and write about “dizziness from success.” After all, for
the first time in human history the calculated torture of millions
was being undertaken, and, even with all his strength and power,
Stalin could not be absolutely sure of success.

In dealing with such an enormous mass of material, the effects of the experiment
might differ from those obtained from a smaller sample. An un-
foreseen explosion might take place, a slippage in a geological
fault, or even world-wide disclosure. In any case, Stalin had to
remain innocent, his sacred vestments angelically pure.
We are therefore forced to conclude that no list of tortures
and torments existed in printed form for the guidance of interro-
gators! Instead, all that was required was for every Interrogation
Department to supply the tribunal within a specified period with
a stipulated number of rabbits who had confessed everything.
And it was simply stated, orally but often, that any measures and
means employed were good, since they were being used for a
.lofty purpose; that no interrogator would be made to answer for
the death of an accused; and that the prison doctor should inter-
fere as little as possible with the course of the investigation.

So from all this it becomes clear that moral and cultural relativism was a dialectic we can all see was launched on the West to destroy our sacred beliefs and the value of ourselves as a people and a culture. We also see how doctors where made to follow state narratives on Covid, the vaxx, and now MAiD in an ends justifies the means moral relativistic framework which cedes massive amounts of power to the state which it should never, ever have.

And continues to agglomerate by the month across Western Europe and Canada.

Reader’s Links for May 14th, 2026

Posted on by

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

A curious piece of Russian propaganda

Posted on by

This photo was seen on an enormous 2 story banner on the front of the Russian Embassy in Ottawa,

I had Google Translate turn the text on the image into English

The Russian translates into Happy Victory Day, and below, you see it say Adolph Hitler but upside down.

Soviet victory day was May 8th officially. So it’s reasonable that the banner would grace the Russian Embassy still today on the 13th.

But as I listen through the audiobook version (Available free on YouTube) of The Gulag Archipelago, The Soviet Union Vs. The Nazis are a distinction without a difference. Russian defeat of the Nazis ok. But what is the Russian leadership signalling here?