Explaining equity, and then showing how it results in brutal totalitarianism

1. New Counterspell video on the dialectics of equity. It is rare that there is a peril in not seeing a video. But don’t watch this one at your collective peril. This needs to be understood to at least some degree for us to fight back effectively.

2. Ireland: Please watch this and then consider the video in item 1.

3. Toronto: Islamic street prayers block major Toronto road and street car tracks.

And here we are.

Trevor Loudon on the communist clique running America

With a special emphasis on Commie Kamala. This starts a little slow and it is in the simplest terms. But its very good and may be worth sending to people who are just starting to ask questions about the nature of the Democrat party as it has been now since at least Obama, and Diana West would say since at least the New Deal.

 

Counterspell: Getting practical on the fight back against the Platonists

This is another great video by Counterspell Group. As usual, it simplifies and analogizes the complex or rather, alien thinking of the left. There is one thought I think is really interesting and even important in this video. And that is that we must not criticize people on the counter-revolution for “going to far”. The left simply does not do that and thusly they move the culture and institutions farther to the collectivist and authoritarian left every day. Yet we hobble ourselves when one of our own tries to push back to individualism and liberties.

Of course I do not mean allow people who are controlled ops to get away with painting us all with a false brush a la Alexander Dugin or Diagalon etc. But people questioning whether or not Gay marriage was a good idea instead of a form of civil union. Or reexamining Nixon as a truly great president and who was one of the first critical theory, Alinsky rule 13 victims in living memory. We must not take down our own for them as we have been doing, seems to be one of the central and more practical ideas in this video.

 

Rule of law in the UK pretty much now a museum exhibit you won’t be allowed to see

Katie Hopkins on the sentencing of some protestors, and the total ignoring of others

Katie seems to think this is all politics instead of a revolution. Frustrating in a way. The contrasting examples she gives are not, as she said, haphazard. They are perfectly consistent as they serve the revolution, and the dialectic obliteration of British people and their culture and laws and values and history from the UK forever and ever. That is the piece she doesn’t address in this video. I have a difficult time believing she doesn’t know that. She may be exercising a little bit of self preservation there. And fair enough.

From BBC:

Yuri Bezmenov on equality

Three brilliant and short videos by Counterspell Group which make clear the nature of the enemy’s thinking and effects

This is a post worth bookmarking. The Counterspell group do an astonishing job of explaining the complex simply, and in short form.

Dialectics: Its meaning and origins:

Then, watch this:

Lastly, on Plato’s Republic:

Three incidents of antisemitism which show that communism is implemented by the culture as much as by the state

The first one is a minor but meaningful incident in Australia. While it was resolved by the company and very well, it does not mean that it never happened, or that there is no meaning in it.

Here is a link to a story about how a girl working at a print shop in Australia refused to laminate something for a guy because it had Israeli or Jewish content.

Without doing too deep a dive into this, its likely this worker abused a company rule that allowed them to avoid pornographic material that would be offensive to them in order to justify refusing to laminate this gentlemen’s page. The company did exactly what it should have done, and more. But the question is, how did we get here. How did we get to a place where people can’t show a Jewish heritage or support of Israel, wear a trump hat, or show support for any counter-narrative position without people on the street or with whom they are working with, then feeling justified in whatever measure they may chose to take against you?

Communism it seems, has been implemented via the culture. A Jewish person may not feel comfortable ordering take out when the restaurant staff or delivery person has their name. What might they do rather than just refuse service? Or anyone famously conservative for that matter. We no longer have a trust based society. In fact, we clearly are moving from a de jure society to a de facto one in the sense that it doesn’t matter what the law says when calculating the consequences of expressing a view.  Or even belonging to a group to which others would impute your views onto you and then punish you for them.

The second: A mohel, or a Rabbi specifically trained in how to do circumcisions as Jewish ritual was arrested and jailed and denied bail in Ireland. Keep in mind, Muslims also do circumcision as religious ritual. Not aware of any arrests of their practitioners. And if one imagines that in Ireland they are not doing this also to women with relatively untrained people, they are living in a myopic dream state. This site is full of examples of this having been discovered, right up to where the media stopped reporting on it.

Man in court charged with circumcising child in Dublin

A 47-year-old man has appeared in court charged with circumcising a child at a house in Dublin two days ago without being a registered medical practitioner.

Jonathan Abraham, with an address in London, was remanded in custody.

The judge refused bail on the grounds of the seriousness of the charge, the potential flight risk and the nature of the offence.

Mr Abraham was brought by detectives from Blanchardstown before Dublin District Court.

He is accused of performing a surgical procedure – the circumcision of a male child – without being a medical practitioner.

The offence is contrary to section 37 of the Medical Practitioners Act 2007.

Detective Garda Megan Furey said that she arrested Mr Abraham at 10.15pm last night at Blanchardstown Garda Station and when the charge was put to him, he made no reply.

The court was told that gardaí went into a house in west Dublin on 30 July after 1pm with the consent of homeowners and Mr Abraham was there dressed in a white doctor’s style coat, wearing blue gloves, with medical implements nearby.

Det Gda Furey said that a very young child was naked on a changing pad and a circumcision had been carried out on another child.

She objected to bail. She said he had flown into Ireland at 12pm and had a return flight for 7pm.

Defence solicitor Tertius Van Eeden said that Mr Abraham was a rabbi and a member of the oldest Anglo-Jewish society that governs the practice and procedure for circumcision.

He said he was a mohel, a person trained and allowed to carry out the practice in line with the Jewish faith.

Read the rest at the link above. And whatever your views of this practice are, the issue is the selective enforcement against the Jewish community it in a way that has broader political implications. This kind of enforcement has a word, dia dia something.

Meanwhile in Canada: The hate crime arrests in numbers by a Toronto Police chief.

The concept of hate speech and hate crimes is anathema to a republic. Crime is crime. Motives is up to the trial to determine and punishment is up to the judge to determine based on those motives and the damage done. The notion of thought crimes gives ultimate power to the state and the state will use it in the interests of the state and at the expense of the people. It will be enforced dialectically. We already see that with gangs of communists, college LARPers and Muslims calling for Jewish blood on most Western city streets with a university, and no charges or even statistics recorded. But should anyone say anything that counters the revolutionary narratives, well watch the UK. Here is a link to PJ Watson with a few examples of how the same politicians spoke about violent minority riots in 2020 and the ones this weekend. If they can enforce on reality this diabolically, then what can they do with thought and speech crimes. Hell telling us all what we meant by what we say started as early as the 1960s when words started to be banned for some groups because of what they told us we meant as if we didn’t know why we used those words.

That started a trend in which the entire language became the patented property of the left. You then had to mean what they said, and you better not say it.

As the revolution is not quite complete, or because the above video serves it in some way that isn’t immediately obvious, we see that hate-crimes are still phenomenally more against the Jewish community than against any other group, on top of it being generally protected by the state. Ezra Levant did a great job of demonstrating that with the arson of a Jewish school and several school busses used to bring Jewish kids to school in Toronto. in the past month. The media and police denied the nature of those crimes and the police went so far to specifically deny arson of the Jewish school claiming it was just a homeless guy with a hobo-fire went awry. The Media managed to avoid any mention of the school busses being next to a Jewish school and having Hebrew signs all over them. They only mentioned, the two media that did mention it at all, CTV and City News, that the busses were parked next to a discount grocer.

Since we now know for a fact that this is how it was reported and recorded, at least initially till Rebel found the facts, we can then safely ask, how many attacks on Jewish people, Christians, white people by communists and Muslims are not reported? Once you know the state and the media lies to you, you actually know a great deal. But coming to accept that is difficult.

Demonstration Explainer video of dialectics in under 1 minute by Keir Starmer

Had to add this

ANTIFA launches 4 chord song video demanding violent action for 2024 election, alliance with HAMAS

This video needs a lot of breaking down.

First, its clearly AI generated from the images to the music, including the voice of the singer(s)

The song consists of 2 basic parts. A chorus and verse.

The verses are one note or chord music with a rap like singing on top of it. The Chorus is the 4 chord song that makes up all music today. Which, frankly is very depressing all on its own. Compare the Beatles’ creativity to everything you hear today.

Below is a funny and entertaining bust of the 4 chord song:

Now compare the chorus of this ANTIFA advocacy for political violence musically at least with the above.

(This video came from a Tweet that seemed to be from ANTIFA but I cannot find it at this time. So here is the video from another source)

So much for the artistic part of the critique. The images by now all of us will recognize as AI generated. But we can be content that the words are written by ANTIFA.

First thing to know is, if you think they are fighting for freedom or a better world, spend a month in Portland. Businesses there, the ones who are left, have to at least appear to support whatever woke policy of the day ANTIFA endorses or be attacked, broken into, burned down or otherwise destroyed. There is no freedom in Portland or anywhere ANTIFA have enough influence. They are political thugs and nothing else.

The fact that they appear to be being paid by US tax dollars via the DNC, well that deserves at least its own post. But as the claim is huge, for the moment this will have to suffice:

While she may not mention ANTIFA by name, listen to the views of the groups that got the funding and tell me they aren’t,. let us say, ANTIFA adjacent. Canada and Germany and likely France and the UK would have to be using the same scam. Appropriate, meaning print, a ton of money for ‘environmental’ reasons and use it to pay political thugs and grease the revolution. Germany finances ANTIFA directly and the Green Party in Germany openly demanded more money for them.

Back to ANTIFA and their song…

Nice of them to take credit for their actions under the rubric of BLM in 2020. Not that we didn’t know, but it’s nice to see in writing.

But now they have shifted their allegiance to Hamas. Which means the Muslim Brotherhood. ANTIFA, the communist/anarchist thugs, are now officially genocidally antisemitic as part of their anti-nation state positions. Israel just being the first domino of course. But a solid one to knock over. If they can destroy Israel, then using similar ‘reasoning’ its hard to see why they can’t claim England is a Colonial state that doesn’t deserve to exist.

Also nice of them to admit that they are the ones who instigated the violence in 2020 against police and that the police are guilty of fighting back. Classic leftist reasoning. “The fight started when they hit me back”.

In this piece they make it clear they intend to create more violence than ever, apparently in Portland. Can’t blame them for that. It is the safest place for violent communist revolutionaries to act out. If they did it in most of Texas they would get killed in the process at worst, and very very likely jailed for a long, long time. Portland is already communist territory with Soros picked judges and political leaders. Nothing will happen to them there unless people who believe in rule of law chose to stand up to them. Not very likely though as they would be branded as far right terrorists and arrested and jailed for years without even a trial most likely.

Rule of law is dead in many places now. It would be interesting to see if Soros or his companies are selling short various assets in Portland. If I didn’t hate derivatives so much I would be tempted to do it myself. That and not having any money of course.

The message of “Free Palestine” is now deeply embedded in the ANTIFA messaging. Like the protests themselves, extracting the communist from the anti-Israel activists is like trying to remove the flour from the cake after it’s baked.

The lyrics insist they are “fighting for freedom we’re fighting for the oppressed”.

This would be in keeping with the way the Ikwan (Muslim Brotherhood) use the terms, or more directly the way Lenin did.

Ikwan, (The Muslim Brotherhood) most recently in the form of the Freedom and Justice party of Egypt (which Obama helped install after the Arab Spring) used Freedom to mean Free from man made laws, and freedom to implement the sharia, and justice to mean implement sharia.

Lenin believes that capitalism oppresses everyone because they are too comfortable to know they are oppressed and so don’t fight back. Hence the need for ‘Liberating Tolerance vs. Oppressive Tolerance”.

The only true form of Democracy, Lenin believed, is communism, because only communism speaks for all the people. This would be how they have the temerity to use our key words against us. They redefine them so they can trick us into serfdom.

It is also refreshing to see them use the words, “Against the colonizers”. A nice clear indicator of their intentions to destroy the nation state as an organizing principle altogether. After all, in thier view, all nations or countries are colonies. And in fact they are. The fact that the people here before us also colonized the land from someone else doesn’t fit the narrative, so it doesn’t get mentioned. Exactly like China’s building thousands of coal burning power plants every year doesn’t get mentioned in terms of global warming and man made CO2.

“Against the Zionists” is another great tell.

At this point it has to be said out loud.

Zionism is to Israel, what Irishism is to Ireland. If people believe that the Irish have no right to the country of Ireland, that it can as easily be given over entirely to Somalis and the laws, customs and traditions be changed to Somali ones making the Irish effectively non citizens in their own lands, then OK. Be against Zionism. But they are identical. Zionism simply means the right of the Jewish people to live in, and determine the culture and laws of Israel in exactly the way Hungarians believe that of Hungary. I mention that because the guy who formalized the idea of Zionism, was Hungarian, and Jewish.

ANTIFA’s lyric, “Againast the Zionists” is both a brick thrown at the Nation state. But it is also playing into the narrative that Zionism is somehow a nefarious plot to create wokeism and take down the rest of the world. A concept that is ludicrous at every level. But for the sake of doubters, at least one reason for an intact non-Jewish civilization can be understood in an old joke. “Someone”, as the joke goes, “has to pay retail.”

Of course, when the song sings about free our people, they, like Islam, mean their right to oppress us. To ‘liberate’ our property and decide how it shall be used by their standards, and those standards will be a lot more cruel, destructive and arbitrary than merit or any Western notions or human organizing principles. At 2:12 is actually says specifically: “It’s time to get violent”. This is probably why it went missing on Twitter and likely will here as well.

Lastly, if any of you find it catchy and find yourself humming it, don’t beat yourselves up over it. The 4 Chord Song is the Orange and Teal of music. It is the McDonalds Hamburger of Music. Sadly, our science has developed to the point where the human aesthetic has become sufficiently understood that we know what combination of colours, flavours or sounds create the most pathos, the most willing suspension of disbelief, the most immediate triggering of our taste buds. In fact this video also uses the Orange and Teal colours so common in TV shows and movies now.

This isn’t them being creative to get a message out. This is them exploiting your basic human make-up to make you think their burgers are better than they are.

 

 

 

 

A brief examination of some of the scientism-literature encouraging a Marxist-Postmodern society via feminism

One of the more interesting books I have managed to read in the last several years was The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature by Montreal born social scientist, Steven Pinker.

Although in interviews with Pinker, he comes across as a soft-leftist, a Trudeau supporting (Pre-Covid anyway) kind of archetypal Canadian, his book The Blank Slate is pretty much an examination of three concepts he claims are the source material for an attempt to move the West from a science based Socratic model to a Marxist based scientism one. And frankly it’s an awesome read.

The three concepts he cites which are responsible for the transition are, The Black Slate, The Noble Savage, and the Ghost in the Machine.

The concept of the blank slate is pretty much a marxist axiom. Marxists need to believe that all people are innately the same. That differences in outcome with humans have nothing to do with talent or any other kind of genetic adaptations, but differences in social circumstance leading to advantage or “privilege”. That humans are a kind of blank slate upon which, anything can be written. Therefore, any infant if removed from their parent’s preconceived values early enough can be sculpted into anything. Pinker’s book details how using both genetics and examples from many other species, this is distilled nonsense. And well refutes the examples used in the animal kingdom to ‘support’ the notion of the blank slate by demonstrating the behaviours cited. as in fact innate to the species listed. Pinker also explains the true mechanism of neuroplasticity, often used to try and prove that human behaviour is infinitely malleable, when in fact, it is an adaptive coping mechanism.  In other words, when the brain suffers an insult to one area, another area may in a limited way compensate for the damage, but if the part of the brain which interprets visual data is destroyed, the part of the brain which processes audio data will never reshape itself to allow you to see again. The brain, Pinker explains, is a stack of gadgets. This by the way, explains a great deal about us.

The Noble Savage is something especially Canadians are bombarded with as a kind of moral cudgel on a daily basis. The idea that humans are all born as good and Western society corrupts them, and we can see this by examining aboriginal people. Which if anyone actually does, may come up with a different image.

The Ghost in the Machine is the idea that there is self separate from your biological container so to speak. That reasoning and consciousness is separate from brain. This could be foundational to the notion being pushed on children that “they are born in the wrong body”. A metaphysical notion that would make most religious philosophers giggle, if not outright angry. As an interesting related aside, the Steven King Horror film, Pet Cemetery had as its main focus, a child that underwent a process which fundamentally changed his nature. The character’s name was Gage, which I assume was cleverly named after a real-life case of a man, Phineas Gage, who in the course of his daily work building the railroad, had a tamping iron penetrate his skull and go right through his brain. He lived, and was healed to physical health, but everyone who knew him said he was not the same man. Once you have cylinder of metal go through your brain, it just doesn’t work the same way.

And now, Erin Byrd on Sex at Dawn.

Those who have made it through the 3 hour + Maj. Stephen Coughlin video interview with myself and Sam Dubé, may recall a segment where Coughlin explains how Plato had explained that women should all belong to all men in common, and no woman is to live privately with any man. And the children… well read it below. It is from book V of Plato’s Republic.

Screenshot

In very much the same spirit as Steven Pinker, enters Erin Byrd.

We have posted one of her videos before on feminism and its real origins and purpose. The reasoning and presentation was so good, I was gently admonished by a friend for not posting more or her material as well as explaining how people can see more of her.

In this video she takes on another book in very much the Steven Pinker style, although probably without familiarity with his work, called, Sex at Dawn”. In this video analysis, she explains how incorrect the scientism in the book is, which leads the reader to believe in the destruction of the family and a total sexual free for all, which the book claims is natural and healthy for humanity.

In other words, Sex at Dawn is very much like the literature Pinker takes on, which appears to be scientific in nature, but in fact is replacing reason and science with scientism and conclusions which are destructive to all existing human systems of culture and organization short of communism.

We here at Vlad, would argue that the book, Sex at Dawn is an attempt to move us to the Platonic model as described in The Republic book V, and which is all part of the same effort to deconstruct humanity as it is, and remake it as something utterly alien, and which always, always, fails.

 

A few items suggesting the dialectical revolutionary nature of feminism from roots to trans

1. Has Feminism been a dialectical effort from its inception? With Fourth Wave Feminism (dialectical revolutions never stand still but are always working to destroy the previous order) being the current ‘Trans-movement’?

2. Stephen Coughlin’s Marxism’s War on women

3. Let’s see. The UK Labour party is 100% a product of The Fabian Society. The Fabian Society is a communist project to destroy the UK and remake it as a communist polity through subversion as opposed to violent revolution. Hence the logo, a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Labour just ‘won’ an election and their policies and views are starting to be made known and manifested.

Important: Interview with Trevor Loudon on Russian communist philosopher and “Putin’s brain”, Alexander Dugin

A lot to say about this. First of all, it will annoy and frustrate many of our regular readers. This is not the intention. A fuller understanding of the forces at work in the world is our intention.

The RAIR article on this video can be seen here and is a solid representation of the interviewee’s meaning and intentions.

This article is our own specific examination of this material, and an attempt to put it into the greater context of the materials we use to understand the complex nature of the information battle-space which commands our attention, and forms our views of events.

A few notes in terms of Trevor’s statements on the state of the war between Russia and Ukraine: it is hard to believe that anyone that we would get to read, actually KNOWS what is taking place. This site tends to rely on this particular analyst for information on the state of the war between Russia and Ukraine as he has proven to be reliable consistently in terms of locations, wounded and dead and advancement or retreat of forces for either side of the conflict. Therefore, we tend to look at the claims of casualties in the following interview with uncertainty as to their accuracy. Not to diminish Trevor’s interview in any way whatsoever, and perhaps he does have insider knowledge on the war statistics, But that is not the focus of this piece. Alexander Dugin is, and his dialectic of MAGA Communism.

Trevor’s statement of who is best to run the world is entirely correct.

Because the USA has enjoyed total global naval dominance for some time now, the entire world has gotten richer, more peaceful and more advanced.

This is because pirates and hostile nations can no longer threaten international trade on the oceans. And where people are not doing as well as other places is usually because of the dominant philosophy of that region, and usually some form of leftism.

The problem with US global hegemony is that the USA is rapidly devolving into a communist state. And in many ways, already is.

Concerning Alexander Dugin though, this is Trevor’s direct area of expertise. And we have little doubts that he is in the bullseye on this one.

Check this Twitter thread by Stephen Coughlin on a related matter.

Full text:

There’s the old adage that you cannot tell your friend that his wife’s cheating or that his baby’s ugly and keep the friendship. The same thing for people who bit too hard and too long on favored active measures. But there you have it, actually the graphic below. It follows classic Russian Active Measures efforts. Note the four levels of activity. 1. At the top of the AM food chain is a Russian government service like the GRU or FSB. They NEVER engage in direct contact with their assets. They create the entities that do.

2. Entities like RIAC, Strategic Culture, and Global Research are sponsored and staffed by a Russian government service.

These are the entities that make contact with their operatives who are recruited because they’re disgruntled, fired, bruised egos, down on their luck, etc.

3. Then you have Russian media like RTV and Sputnik interview the operatives along favorable lines to establish them as voices.

4. And finally, you have pseudo-populists blast the disinformation into target audiences to normalize the information while sensationalizing it.

Stephen indicates above what organizations are knowingly or unknowingly enacting the, let’s call it the Dugin Dialectic, intended to mobilize the anti-woke patriots against the woke communism we are now all aware of, for the purpose of creating “a more masculine, Stalinist communism” or as it is called in the US, “MAGA Communism.” yes, all will be explained in the video. But those who follow Stephen Coughlin’s work or James Lindsay or TIK History will know that dialectics in its simplest form is about smashing together opposite concepts in order to destroy both. We see that with the Trans movement in spades. A male or female that undergoes surgery becomes a monster, not the other sex. This is the real intention. MAGA Communism can be seen the same way. A dialectic created by Dugin to destroy the MAGA movement in order to create a communist state using the people we refer to as MAGA by appealing to their contempt of, let’s call it left, or ‘woke’ communism.

To explain the terms “left communism” and “right communism,” let’s look at chapters 3 to 5 of Postmodernism Explained by Stephen Hicks. This book is available free as an audio book on YouTube fortunately. 

You can skip to this segment for a brief look at left Vs. right collectivism, although his excellent look at Nazism and the state of Germany before Hitler’s rise to power is later on in the book and is truly an excellent read/listen.

One can think of pre-WWII Germany this way.

Picture a triangle that is 40 feet high and with the bottom two corners 2 mm apart. From even a short distance away, it would look like a straight line. The bottom left is Soviet or international communism. The bottom right corner is national socialism. The differences are Lilliputian to the people observing from the top of the triangle. We can call those classical liberals, or most of us reading this site. People who believe in a republic where the state power is limited and dedicated to protecting the rights of the individual. The bottom two points of the triangle are different in determining how collectivism will be sorted out and the nature of the details of how the state power will operate, (which is absolute in both cases). They called National Socialism “Right wing” because it allowed for some minimal private control of the means of production. But it was still far left by the standards of an individualist oriented person or society.

The immediate pre-Nazi years in Germany saw street battles between ANTIFA acting for the international socialists, and the Brown Shirts acting for the National Socialists. But when the Brownshirts won those battles, the ANTIFA had no problems changing uniforms and joining the Nazis as both factions wanted to destroy the individualists at the top of the triangle. Again, that is all of us reading this site, generally speaking.

Another way of looking at this triangle might be say, how Islam would view itself compared to Catholicism V Protestantism. Some of Europe’s most bitter wars was fought between these two groups yet they would seem identical in all ways that matter to Islam.

With an understanding of dialectics, Trevor’s thesis in this video makes poetic sense. Communist thought constantly creates opposing groups or uses existing groups and makes them oppose each other for the purpose of destroying the existing order (along with both groups) and moving the culture and society to the left. (Again, meaning more state control.)

To be clear, the left means more government control and power, and less individual rights, and ultimately no individualism at all. Communism will not stop until we are all dead, certainly in one way or another such as spiritually, culturally and in terms of identity, and even actually physically dead, or, we are for all intents and purposes, a kind of insect that clones itself and like aphids, is as related to all other aphids as it is to its own direct progeny, and living and believing whatever narratives the COMINTERN demands we accept that day.

The more International term for what could also be called The Dugin Dialectic, is “National Bolshevism”. What the Christchurch Mosque shooter claimed was his affiliation. And it does dovetail with the interview we did with Brad Johnson in 2019 explaining the motives the New Zealand self described National Bolshevik had when he did his attack. While Johnson focuses on his retaliatory intention against the Islamic mass murder and conquest of the Balkans, and all of his claims are clearly true, there is another layer to the Christchurch attacker’s motives. And that is his Duginist influence.

Loudon explains that the symbol of the Dugin movement is the Black Sun. The banner of National Bolshevism. This is also one of the insignias of the Nazi Ukrainian military unit, the Azov battalion, although their use of the symbol is more Nazi than Duganist one can bet, seeing as how they are fighting Russia.

Here is a section of the cover page of the Christchurch mosque shooter’s manifesto. The Black Sun is clearly at the centre of his graphic.

Screenshot

Here is the interview with Trevor Loudon on Dugin and his movement to usurp the patriot MAGA movement as an agent for communism:

 

The only other element I wanted to add to this was teh Stephen Coughlin session with Sam Dubé from a month or so ago. This is a 3 hour plus presentation by Maj. Coughlin but taken with these other materials offers a pretty large and complete tapestry of understanding of the matrix we live in now. It is we think, sufficient to see the plays as they happen and before they happen ,as opposed to stressing over apparent contradictions or inability to recognize the thing inside the wrapper because the wrapper claims to be something other than what is really inside. In other words, the names for things is generally to sell you on the thing itself, which is dialectically opposite to the name.

Think, ‘Trans-affirming care” for ‘the state plans to sterilize and neuter your child and it is a crime if you try and stop it’ as one example.

Looking forward to any thoughts and comments on this interview and thank you all for checking out this site.

Student film: Man and his symbols and the communist revolution

The following short video is by a young student film maker who is unusually aware of the events unfolding in the West and in particular in Canada.

This short film is his first exploration into how symbolism is being manipulated to create an outcome, rather than perhaps to reflect a culture as it develops.

I am posting this in the hopes that some of the readers here can offer their own insight, note disagreements, and offer additions to this concept as speaking personally, I feel this should be the first in a ten part series on the subject.

Thanks to all who take the eight minutes to watch and reflect and offer a comment.

It is very important that self-motivated young artists are encouraged to join the counter-propaganda forces so needed today, given that the revolution which has taken place was in no small part directed by artists from the far left.

Crushing of all media that is counter-narrative intensifies as list of media to be censored leaked in Spain

Newest item in Spain, leaked by Colonel Pedro Baños.

Read the story at RAIR

Here is a link to a previous post with a short list of new censorship across the West in item 1. Canada will lead the pack alongside Germany soon with bills C 63 and C 637. Details of which can be seen in the video below by constitutional Lawyer, John Carpay from his Ottawa Speech a few months ago.

Q&A 1

Q&A 2

James Lindsay: On Canadian communism, it’s history, it’s language and how it is being enacted today

Remember, if you think this doesn’t affect you in some other country, the same things are happening there with language designed for you to accept it. Or if not accept, find it difficult to fight against.

Please consider reading this essay on the history of Canadian communist prime ministers also.

This is critical information if you wish to understand how we got to this point.