Explaining equity, and then showing how it results in brutal totalitarianism

1. New Counterspell video on the dialectics of equity. It is rare that there is a peril in not seeing a video. But don’t watch this one at your collective peril. This needs to be understood to at least some degree for us to fight back effectively.

2. Ireland: Please watch this and then consider the video in item 1.

3. Toronto: Islamic street prayers block major Toronto road and street car tracks.

And here we are.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

5 Replies to “Explaining equity, and then showing how it results in brutal totalitarianism”

  1. Reader’s Vlad.

    My 97-year old father went into the hospital last week. He’d had a fall and was diagnosed with a brain bleed. A doctor called me up to ask a lot of questions. My father had been hallucinating before the fall, and they were trying to get to the bottom of things.

    How much alcohol did he consume? When did the hallucinations begin? Did he take his medications regularly? Who took care of him? When did he start speaking Hungarian to English-speaking people? What was he like four years ago?

    Wait, what? Four years ago? Why out of the blue precisely four, I wondered? Why not six or three? I immediately zeroed in on the good doctor.

    “My father received two covid injections,” I said. “I noticed no adverse effects, and he never got covid.”

    The doctor did not reply to this by saying he wasn’t referring to covid or the injections, or by correcting me to say this wasn’t what he meant and that I was misinterpreting his question. No, nothing of the sort, which means I had interpreted the questions exactly right.

    I extrapolate that doctors are juxtaposing increased incidence of dementia with C-19 injections because a pattern has emerged. Note that the doctor did not come out directly to ask if he had been injected–using the timeline question to circumvent what must remain the suppressive medical culture of a taboo subject. And if we try to explain the four-year question away as something else I’m all ears, but after over 30-million excess worldwide deaths and who knows how many injured, doctors may still be silenced but they aren’t stupid. They’re learning. Which places them on the horns of their next dilemma: they will not have ignorance as such an excuse the next time governments order them to push mRNA during the next plandemic.

    A small but telling tell.

    https://realclearwire.com/articles/2024/08/26/alzheimers_could_be_a_white_matter_disease_not_gray_1053904.html

    • Watched a lot of it, and assuming that graph is not just made up, it makes sense.

      But the question then is:

      IF this is all true why can anyone buy as much silver as they want at or below spot for industrial purposes anytime they want?

      That could only be true if the govt, was also subsidizing producing silver mines to bring the cost of extracting it out of the ground below the supply/demand price of the metal.

      And given that the state invents money as it needs to for its own purposes, and considers devaluation a kind of bonus one might suspect at least, then this is a real possibility. And that kind of catch 22 seems a common theme with powerful states.

      Still, I would like to see an answer to my question other than my own.