Beware of censorship by RORY LEISHMAN

From The London Free Press

While the Canadian Human Rights Commission has bowed to widespread public opposition to proceeding with a complaint against Maclean’s magazine brought by the Canadian Islamic Congress, less powerful and prominent Canadians should beware: For them, the threat of censorship remains.

Even Maclean’s is still under investigation by the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal in a parallel case initiated by Mohamed Elmasry, national president of the Canadian Islamic Congress. He has charged the magazine with expressing hatred and contempt for Muslims with the publication of an article by Mark Steyn on the escalating threat posed by radical Islam to democracy and freedom under law in Canada and other Western countries.

Continue Reading →

National Post on Canada’s HRC’s and free speech in comedy

From Canada’s National post

Comedy And Cruelty

B.C.’s human rights censors don’t understand what it takes to be a funny man. Their ignorance may sound the death knell for stand-up in this country

Jonathan Kay, National Post Published: Monday, June 30, 2008

Last week, George Carlin was obituarized as a brilliant comedian, a scathing social critic and a fearless enemy of government censorship. All true. But it turns out the legendary funny man can also teach us a thing or two about human rights.

A few years back, Carlin was doing a stand-up bit about the austere-sounding names assumed by popes (“Somehow, ‘Pope Corky the First’ doesn’t command a lot of authority”) when a heckler got under his skin. The comedian, pausing from his Godly shtick, smote the loudmouth thusly:

“Would somebody just put a d–k in that guy’s mouth, please? That’s what he wants! He’s a c–ksucker in disguise! He’s got his mouth open because he wants someone to cum in it!”

And then it got worse:

“If you keep it up, we’ll grab your ass and throw you on the f—ing street where you belong with your mother. And I’m f—ing her in the a–hole every night anyway. So f–k you and your sister and your wife. If you got a kid, I hope your f—ing kid dies in a car fire. How do you like that you stupid c–ksucker?”

Bald-faced bigotry. Gratuitous obscenity. Wishing the death of a child. Forget the seven dirty words: We’re talking here about three of the most powerful taboos known to Western society.

Which is precisely why the crowd loved it. Carlin got an ovation. And one can safely assume the “c–ksucker” kept his mouth shut the rest of the night.

Among good comedians, heckler-bashing is an art form — one whose brush strokes are rendered with the filthiest, most juvenile words imaginable. The goal is not just to shut the guy up. It’s to humiliate him as a warning to others — to reclaim control of the room by pile-driving the guy into his seat.

It’s not the sort of experience you forget. Back when I was at CEGEP in Montreal more than 20 years ago, one of my broomball buddies got on the case of a comedian at a downtown night club. After a while, the exasperated performer waded into the audience, stuck the butt end of his micstand into my friend’s face, and started making furious beeping noises. “My s–thead detector ? it’s going off the charts!” he exclaimed.

The comedian just stood there, beeping and beeping and beeping away — for what seemed like a full minute — while my friend literally collapsed into his own ashen-faced mortification. The crowd went nuts.

Since that day, I have never even thought about opening my mouth at a comedy club.

It’s a cruel, Hobbesian disciplinary protocol. But it’s also essential to good comedy. If every two-bit office ham with three mojitos in him felt at liberty to pipe up, comedy shows would all transform into open-mic night, and stand-up itself would become a dead letter.

Which is why the aforementioned Mr. Carlin must be rolling around in his grave right now. Thanks to a decision rendered last week by a B. C. Human Rights Tribunal, comedians performing in Canada may soon be responding to hecklers by asking them earnestly to “please refrain from further spurious commentary.”

The case in question dates from May 22, 2007, when a certain Guy Earle was performing comedy at Zesty’s Restaurant in Vancouver. Late into his act, a group of women — who, by the manager’s account, had been drinking on the outside patio for the previous seven hours — took seats next to the stage and started heckling. (Earle himself has offered a more precise description: “Two of them started making out, flipping me the bird and saying I hated lesbians.”)

Canada and the HRC’s and the CRTC

I have wondered what Canada’s Prime Minister Stephen Harper thinks about Canada’s so called ‘Human Rights Tribunals’. So far many Canadians and even some long time Liberal supporters feel Harper may be the best PM Canada has ever had.

Even so, his silence on the HRC’s have been enough to take my meager contribution to the Conservative party and benchmark it for the defense of the Canada six, the bloggers who are slated to be keel hauled by Canada’s various HRC’s.

Then thanks to fellow Vlad contributor Grace, I saw this:

“Human rights commissions, as they are evolving, are an attack
on our fundamental freedoms and the basic existence of a
democratic society … It is, in fact, totalitarian.”

– Stephen Harper, 1999

This is a rather excellent bit of good news. Lets hope he acts on it. The above link is one in a flood of recent articles condemning the HRC’s and Canada’s rapid slide into totalitarian leftism. I’ts wonderful to see many of Canada’s major newspapers and media suddenly showing a little guts and risking HRC attacks on themselves to do their jobs but still, fear of Canada’s CRTC prevents them from telling the truth about immigration from Islamic nations and violent crime directly related to the politics of their nation and religion of origins.

Continue Reading →

Elmasry: Canada’s ayatollah-in-waiting

Much has been discussed regarding the decline of freedom of speech in this country. While the cases of Ezra Levant and Maclean’s/ Mark Steyn are high profile ones, many other smaller fish have been caught in the trolling net of various HRC’s. Mr. Levant and Mr. Steyn, along with numerous other journalists, broadcasters, bloggers and t.v. hosts have done an excellent job of exposing the creeping and dangerous desire by some to shut down open thought. It needs to continue until these fascist “courts” are dismantled.

That being said, I’d like to bring some well deserved exposure to the major complainants behind the push to silence Canadians. First, let’s read what CIC’s national vice president Wahida Valiante, has to say on freedom of speech in Canada. “Real democracy depends on the free flow of ideas, of debate and disagreement, and newspapers are the best forum for those debates”. It would be wonderful if she meant it, but in fact, she doesn’t. Click here For a full understanding of her actual view, And so the exposure of the bullshit begins.

The Canadian Islamic Congress and it’s ayatollah-in-waiting Dr. Muhammed Elmasry, is the main plaintiff in the Maclean’s/Mark Steyn affair. Of course, Elmasry denies this, preferring to describe his position as one of “facilitator”, merely playing a supporting role to the 3 or 4 Osgoode Law students. According to the CIC, these legal beagles are the real “complainants”, but according to the facts of the case, this is totally false. Elmasry is one of two plaintiffs with the law students playing the secondary role.

Continue Reading →

Hizbolah threatens Canadian targets, CIC wants them to be removed from terrorist list

While various western intel agencies publicly state that Hizbolah is planning a large and showy terrorist attack on probably Jewish targets within North America and probably Canada, The Canadian Islamic congress wants Canada to remove Hizbolah from Canada’s terrorist list.

If there was any doubt that Mohamed El Masry of the CIC, the same one who launched the Human rights attack on Macleans Magazine and then on the CIC website claimed it was really launched by 3 U of T law students, was a disengenious schill for Islamic manifest destiny, now there should be no remaining trace.

All the links are worth the visit especially the last one. Its an article by Mohamed El Masry and for those familiar with the Macleans case and other Canadian Islamic congress issues, you will see many blatant lies.

Eeyore

Richard Warman, the HRC’s and Canadian rights.

Its becoming increasingly difficult to tell the fascists from some other type of fascists these days in Canada. It would appear, opportunist Richard Warman has turned in a reformed beautiful young women to a Nazi group as having betrayed them when she realized they where idiots and went her own way.

This story is a little complex but worth the read. Please settle in and have a look

From Ezra Levant’s site

Post script, I made a special category for Richard Warman (former employee of the Canadian Human rights commission and now its largest user) some time ago as I knew it would eventually be in good use.

Mark Steyn on Michael Coren

Mark Steyn was his usual brilliant self on the Michael Coren show Thursday Night May 8th 2008. Of course I will try and have the feed here for you to see.

In segment 1 he speaks a bit about Israel and its history in a refreshing way.

Continue Reading →

An excellent article about the CBC stolen from another blog

http://marginalizedactiondinosaur.net/?p=3724

Well yeah? I appreciate the honesty: the CBC’s news boss acknowledged, for the first time, that they are afraid that if they cover Muslim news in the wrong way, there could be violence against their reporters in Muslim nations. So they don’t.That is an astounding admission to make. It’s not just a question about bias; it goes deeper than that. It’s one thing for the CBC to wilfully have an editorial position that is pro-Muslim or anti-Israel, as has often been alleged. But it’s quite another for the CBC news boss to acknowledge that their editorial decisions aren’t even the result of their own views or decisions, but the result of external pressure by Muslim radicals, and the fear of Islamic violence. That’s the equivalent of CNN’s admission that it let Saddam Hussein change their reporting about Iraq, to guarantee access for CNN reporters.

Continue Reading →

Where Wilders and Pipes are wrong

Geert Wilder’s and Daniel Pipes are both excellent spokespeople for the anti jihad. There efforts are courageous and inspiring.

I wish to take no admiration away from either one. Both and perhaps especially Geert Wilder’s lives under constant threat of there very lives for their stance on Islam and the threat it poses to western Jeffersonian liberal values.

Continue Reading →

An open letter to the Canadian Human rights Commision

To: gc**@**********gc.ca

Subject: Warman v Lemire tribunal hearing

Dear Ms Cyr

I am writing to request that the Warman v Lemire tribunal hearing that is scheduled for March 25, 2008 be open to the public. Canada is a free and democratic nation by design and must remain so. No institution should be above the law or above public scrutiny.

Continue Reading →

Sometimes its funny and then sometimes its…

Apparently Canadian men have a basic human right to a labiaplasty.

For those that don’t know, a labiaplasty is an elective plastic surgery for people who have vagina’s to make them more attractive looking. I have no idea if this right extends to women but for sure Canadian men have a god given, (for god we will substitute a Trudopian Government) right to have their vagina lips look just right.

Continue Reading →