In our opinion, this is an indicator of a serious problem with the state of democracy in Ontario. The Freedom of Information Request, denied for a government business, is serious.
“The secret of all victory lies in the organization of the non-obvious.” -Marcus Aurelius
In our opinion, this is an indicator of a serious problem with the state of democracy in Ontario. The Freedom of Information Request, denied for a government business, is serious.
B.C Human Rights Tribunal was a gong show. An eyewitness account of Yaniv v. various waxing salons. pic.twitter.com/IJuVlXRg76
— Cosmin Dzsurdzsa (@cosminDZS) July 21, 2019
Personally I think this witness is far far to kind in his account of the HRC Soviet show trial. We all can see that the man, claiming to be a woman, is except from all normal limits and rules, both on Twitter and in real life. This witness also refers to him as “she” which is already going a step too far as if a person has a Y chromosome, its a freaking male. And if it isn’t a male, he doesn’t have balls to wax. So there you go.

A mother and business owner was forced to end her Brazilian waxing business after being taken to the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal for refusing to wax a transgender woman’s male genitalia.
Maria Da Silva, who is an immigrant from Brazil operated the business out of her home where her small children also live. Da Silva claims she refused to perform the procedure on the claimant, Jessica Yaniv, due to safety concerns raised by her husband and alleged harassment on Yaniv’s part and not because of the claimant’s identity.
Yaniv, who was formerly known as Jonathan Yaniv, has taken fifteen other B.C. women to the tribunal for refusing to wax her male genitalia citing discrimination based on gender identity and is seeking financial compensation. Many of the woman are of East Asian ethnicity and have English as their second language.
During Wednesday’s tribunal proceedings Da Silva claims that the incident directly led to her shutting down her business and losing it as a source of income for her family.
“Some of my clients have been very significantly affected on a personal level. [Another client also] closed her business, she has been depressed, anxious, sleepless and that has gone on for a period of many many months,” said her representative and Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms lawyer, Jay Cameron.
“It is a very serious thing to launch a human rights complaint against a person. My clients are people. They have a right to make a living and this has interfered with their livelihood, but also you have the stigma of being associated with this hanging over you.”
Please read the rest at the source. Perhaps most shockingly is the justification for these suits by the ‘plaintiff’. A true example of deconstruction of reason and a reversal of victim-aggressor. Something we are sadly getting used to under the new tyranny of leftism and Islamic rule.
It also shows how the “Human Rights Commissions”, a phrase that belongs in the sarcasm hall of fame, is complicit in genuine racism and targeting the vulnerable and hard working, as this plaintiff’s victims are nearly all ethnic, and in this case, East Asian. He clearly selected these people as he knew they were most likely to go with reason instead of post modern thought so he could launch one of his seemingly numerous similar suits.
He also had the astonishing temerity to claim that the people who refused to pretend his testicles is a vulva, of forcing their religious beliefs on him. Perhaps the most astonishing claim of all, and one which the “Human Rights Court” agrees with.
(I am referring to the plaintiff as he, because a person with a penis and testicles is a male and therefore gets the pronoun ‘He’. This entire case, and all his other ones against aestheticians, are about others refusing to pretend that Y is X. In a modernist world, one that adheres to facts, reason and evidence, one goes with reality, and not destroys the business of someone who refuses to pretend along with whatever may walk in.)
H/T SB.
Direct link: https://d.tube/v/vladtepesblog/QmU4ygcJdWsrTUoiFuvoRFWzJoWSoK5G4R15CdmgBVDq1q
This should give life-long Conservative voters a sense of how the party has shifted to just another narrative party, Liberal Lite in most ways, afraid to deal with reality, or worse, controlled by the same forces the Liberal party clearly is.
I have just been informed by the Prime Minister of Canada that I am removed from the Liberal caucus and as the confirmed Vancouver Granville candidate for the Liberal Party of Canada in the 2019 federal election. More to come…
— Jody Wilson-Raybould (JWR), PC, OBC, KC ??? (@Puglaas) April 2, 2019
Jane Philpot was also kicked out:
Tonight I was expelled from the caucus of the Liberal Party of Canada. Sadly the decision was made without me being provided any opportunity to speak to national caucus. This is profoundly disheartening for me, my staff and my family – and I know people in Markham-Stouffville will also be disappointed.
I was accused publicly by people in caucus of not being loyal, of trying to bring down the Prime Minister, of being politically motivated, and of being motivated by my friendship with Jody Wilson-Raybould. These accusations were coupled with public suggestions that I should be forced out of caucus.
These attacks were based on inaccuracies and falsehoods. I did not initiate the crisis now facing the party or the Prime Minister. Nor did Jody Wilson-Raybould.
Rather than acknowledge the obvious — that a range of individuals had inappropriately attempted to pressure the former Attorney General in relation to a prosecutorial decision — and apologize for what occurred, a decision was made to attempt to deny the obvious — to attack Jody Wilson-Raybould’s credibility and attempt to blame her. That approach now appears to be focused on whether Jody Wilson-Raybould should have audiotaped the Clerk instead of the circumstances that prompted Jody Wilson-Raybould to feel compelled to do so.
For those of you that think the RCMP are honest actors and act in accordance with rule of law and the enforcement of the legal rights of the public, please watch the videos at the bottom of this post.
‘Project Wide Awake’: How the RCMP Watches You on Social Media
How police are using new software to expand surveillance of citizens’ activities.
The RCMP has been quietly running an operation monitoring individuals’ Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and other social media activity for at least two years, The Tyee has learned.
The existence of Project Wide Awake has never been reported.
And The Tyee investigation revealed that the RCMP has moved from a “reactive” approach — analyzing specific social media accounts as part of a criminal investigation — to a “proactive approach,” which the RCMP said aims to “help detect and prevent a crime before it occurs.”
That involves ongoing wide-scale monitoring of individuals’ social media use and could pose a threat to Canadians’ privacy and charter rights, say experts.
Yes the RCMP are now doing pre-crime. Maybe that was their excuse for looting the homes of people in High River for legally owned guns using a list the RCMP was expressly forbidden from having by an act of Parliament under Stephen Harper.
H/T ML.
In the days approaching former Attorney General Jody Wilson-Raybould‘s testimony to the House of Commons’ Justice Committee on February 27, at Prime Minister Justin Trudeau‘s behest, Karina Gould, the Minister of Democratic Institutions, reached out to social media giant Googleto pressure the firm to curtail political criticism of the Trudeau government on its platform.
Gould placed a call to a senior government relations executive at Google, during which she complained about ‘hate speech’ and ‘toxic rhetoric’, referring multiple times to specific criticisms of the Trudeau government that she found objectionable. She then threatened sweeping regulations that would require unprecedented disclosures of advertising sponsors.
The firm’s existing ad systems are not technologically capable of complying with Gould’s demand. It would require a months-long reconstruction of the software to meet the compliance requirements she laid out.
In response, the firm announced that it will not accept political advertising through the October elections. That disappointed Gould, who implored them to reconsider, even complaining to newsmedia that, “they have enormous financial and technical resources… they can get this done.” […]
Please read Spencer Fernando for Canadian material like this whenever you can.
.@stevenmackinnon says "our belief is that this company is one that is, like its competitors around the world, entitled to a deferred prosecution arrangement like they would be able to have access to in the U.K., in France, throughout Europe, in the United States…" #cdnpoli pic.twitter.com/dSIur2SY9N
— Power & Politics (@PnPCBC) March 4, 2019
Read Spencer Fernando on this here: