Category Archives: corrupt US leftists

Joe Rogan with Peter Thiel on a number of major issues

Posted on by

This is a hastily done post. But this is why I am doing it.

The following video is a 3 hour plus discussion/interview with the cofounder of PayPal, Peter Thiel. It is an interview I have not even watched yet. But, someone on Twitter posted 7 short clips which summarize very important topics. And that frankly, was some of the simplest and most important truths that shape our landscape that I have seen to date. From the short clips, it does not say why these things are as they describe them. But from the point of view of this site and its audience, we get confirmation of important things we all kinda knew, but now we can in fact know, that is, if we can take Peter at his word.

One example is how in most arenas including the Vatican, you cannot get into any position of real power unless the top tier has Kompromat on you. The example he gives is that you cannot make it to Cardinal unless you are homosexual in the Catholic Church. I think we all kinda know this. It is in part why they are trying to invent some on Trump, and if they can’t make it stick, they will try and kill him. Did I get the tense wrong? Sorry. ‘will have tried’ to kill him,

It also might explain weirdness like this. Should you decide to watch this clip, once you hit play please click the little gear bottom right and select the highest quality it offers you. The devil is in the details. If you can forgive the word play here.

Here is a link to the Twitter thread with the 7 key take aways from the interview, including also the estimate of why both Saudi Arabia and California work when due to their belief system, both should collapse in short order. California due to ‘wokeism’ What we know as Maoism, and although he doesn’t say the word, what he clearly means as Islam as the dominant principle in the KSA.

Having seen some of the clips, I plan to listen to the whole interview as time permits while out on errands. Chances are very little of it requires actually watching it. But from what I did see, and adding it to what we already know, this creates a nice strong foundation of reality to the nearly impossible to believe, scenarios that play out against individualism and freedom of choice and information every day.

 

Two extraordinary demonstrations of US and Georgia State government constitutional violations of a high order of magnitude

Posted on by

 

Former UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter raided by the FBI

UPDATE on Scott Ritter:

Scott Ritter is a bad guy.
Not just because he’s a twice-imprisoned pedophile: Putin’s [actually Shoigu] got him by that organ, provides him with what he seems to need. He travels around Russia to trash America and the West. Writes for RT, a media organ exclusively for foreigners who’ll swallow anything. Stuff Russians laugh at.

There appears to be genuine evidence of election fraud in Georgia that could have cost Trump the election. Apparently, there are logs that show that tends of thousands of ballots where counted twice but in different machines

Full text:

BREAKING: A group of citizens in Georgia DECLARED a State Of Emergency With Georgia Election System. They discovered a VOTER FRAUD in their state and they have receipts to back it up. “Ballots so they were counted twice for the second machine count. We know with certainty that this duplication of ballots was not, I want to repeat was not an administrative error, rather the duplication process was due to INTENTIONAL HUMAN INTERVENTION. Intentional human intervention is the predicate for election FRAUD.”

“You all know our cases SEB 2023-25. In that case you know that it involved 17,852 votes counted without ballot images. You also know that for the first machine count 20,713 ballots were counted with what I like to call receipts, I guess the fancy word is tabulator tapes. The last part of this complaint perhaps is the most concerning because we’ve uncovered some recent information that makes itself in addition to proving that 30,930 ballots were scanned and counted, I wanna say that again and counted twice.”

 

Third WHOPPER in as many days for the F. B.Lie

Posted on by

The biggest and most important one yet

Full text:

BREAKING: The FBI is now claiming that the Trump shooter Thomas Matthew Crooks had an unspecified “social media account” in 2019/2020 (when he was 14/15 years old) that posted “anti-immigrant and anti-semitic” content.

This is not consistent with Gab’s understanding of the shooter’s motives based on an Emergency Disclosure Request (“EDR”) we received from the FBI last week for the Gab account “EpicMicrowave” which, based on the content of that EDR, the FBI appeared to think belonged to Thomas Crooks.

Many, particularly regime media reporters, have doubted Gab’s claims that this request existed. Normally we don’t confirm the existence or content of law enforcement communications. In this instance we had to make an exception due to the overwhelming public interest in disclosure and transparency.

As a courtesy to law enforcement, we are not going to post the entire request. This is the first page of that request.

The story is this: the account for which data was requested was, UNEQUIVOCALLY, pro-Biden and in particular pro-Biden’s immigration policy.

To the best of Gab’s knowledge, as of 2021, Crooks was a pro-lockdown, pro-immigration, left-wing Joe Biden supporter.

We posted other major F.B.I. lies in the last couple of days here as well.

Below is one from the other day where the FBI was caught lying about crime stats to make the Biden admin look less awful. Quite a whopper as well.

Scroll back for a day or two and the earlier one should show up. But way to much to do this aft to look for it. This new one should leave everyone stunned for quite a while I would think.

New information on White House censorship of vaxx critics

Posted on by

“First amendment? First amendment! We don’t need no stinkin first amendment!!”

Before Alex Berenson’s post, maybe a look at some of the damage and suffering cause by the White House by censoring people’s ability to look at information critical of the damned mRNA/DNA vaccines.

https://twitter.com/vaxcasualty/status/1805359701758296430

 

Full text of the Tweet below in case he gets censored again. Please click through and retweet it if you have an account on TwitterX.

THE PFIZER/WHITE HOUSE FILES
In July 2021, a senior Pfizer board member secretly began working with a Biden Administration operative to suppress criticism of Covid vaccines on X, newly released internal documents from X show.
Top officials at Twitter (now X) viewed the men – Dr. Scott Gottlieb, the Pfizer director, and Andy Slavitt, the operative, who had officially left a senior White House post just weeks before – as speaking for the administration in their censorship demands, the documents show.
The new documents raise constitutional and legal concerns about the Biden Administration’s social media censorship efforts, as well as Pfizer’s role in banning criticism of a product that made up almost half its sales in 2021.
Within days, the Supreme Court is expected to decide Murthy v Missouri, a landmark lawsuit over the administration’s efforts to control debate on social media.
The new documents provide crucial perspective on the Missouri case, showing how far would-be censors went in 2021 to prop up public confidence in the Covid jabs. The documents also show the power the White House had over Twitter, which badly wanted to avoid a confrontation with it.
At the time, the Biden Administration was threatening to “review” a federal law commonly called Section 230, because it was angry social media companies were allowing Covid vaccine skepticism.
Section 230 was crucial to those companies for the near-total immunity it gave them against lawsuits from users. Twitter took threats to it seriously. “We will always be proactive and vigilant about protecting 230,” Lauren Culbertson, the company’s then-head of United States public policy, wrote on July 22, 2021.
—
None of these internal documents has been previously released.
They are part of a tranche of censorship-related material X is making available to me following searches of its internal archives.
Lawyers for X are reviewing the documents before releasing them. But so far only one document they have provided – an email from Jim Baker, Twitter’s then-deputy general counsel – contains any redactions.
In addition, no one at X, including Elon Musk, asked for or placed any restrictions on or had any input into the writing of this article. (Lawyers for X did ask to review it after writing but before publication, to be sure the names of junior employees or their email addresses were not included. Their review did not result in any changes.)
—
The censorship conspiracy by Slavitt and Gottlieb targeted me personally.
I am not named in any of the new documents provided so far. Slavitt and Gottlieb used careful – almost coded – language in their outreach to Twitter on July 18 and 19, 2021. They did initially not refer to any particular censorship targets by name. But emails and other internal Twitter documents that have already been released show I was a top target of both men.
I intend to use the newly released documents to amend Berenson v Biden, my complaint against Slavitt, Gottlieb, Pfizer chairman Dr. Albert Bourla, and the Biden Administration for conspiring to force Twitter to ban me in 2021. Gottlieb’s lawyers previously argued I had not alleged Gottlieb had had any contact with Twitter officials before August 2021. The documents show otherwise.
In fact, Slavitt introduced Gottlieb to Todd O’Boyle – a senior Twitter lobbyist who handled most of the company’s interactions with the White House – by email on Sunday, July 18, 2021. Slavitt, a longtime Democratic operative, had served as senior advisor to the Biden administration’s Covid response team.
“I wonder if you would be open to a 20 minute call with Scott Gottlieb and me about a policy matter,” Slavitt wrote. Slavitt referred to Gottlieb as “FDA commissioner under Trump” and failed to mention his role on Pfizer’s board.
Although he had officially left the Biden Administration weeks before, Slavitt’s email signature also contained his White House email address, asking that “Government Email” be sent there.

Slavitt’s outreach to O’Boyle came as the public debate over the Covid mRNA jabs was intensifying. The jabs, which had appeared very protective against Covid in the spring, were abruptly losing their effectiveness, causing the Biden Administration to consider encouraging Americans to receive a third “booster” shot.
The White House knew boosters – and potential vaccine mandates – would be controversial. As it tried to keep public confidence in the shots high, the administration escalated its attacks on Covid jab skeptics and on the social media platforms that gave them their biggest audiences.
Only two days before Slavitt’s email, on Friday, July 16, President Biden had said social media companies were “killing people” when they allowed vaccine skepticism. The firestorm that followed was mostly publicly directed at Facebook. But the new documents show that top officials at Twitter wanted to avoid similar criticism – or put Twitter’s Section 230 protection at risk.
On Monday, July 19, Gottlieb followed up by emailing O’Boyle directly, complaining about “false narratives on key public health issues” on Twitter.
Gottlieb told O’Boyle Twitter had an “affirmative obligation” to muzzle large accounts that made posts that concerned him. Gottlieb did not mention that he served on the board of a company that stood to make billions of dollars from the federal government if the Biden Administration rolled out booster shots and or jab mandates.
O’Boyle had already responded to Slavitt, offering to set up a conference call with the men that afternoon. “I’d be glad to speak with you and Scott,” he wrote Slavitt.

Note that O’Boyle’s response is time-stamped with a “UTC” code – he actually sent it at 9:22 a.m. Eastern time Monday morning, about 90 minutes before Gottlieb first emailed him.

O’Boyle also forwarded Gottlieb’s email to Culbertson, the head of Twitter’s United States public policy.
In turn, Culbertson sent it to even more senior officials with a comment indicating she viewed the email from Pfizer board member Gottlieb as directly related to the White House’s pressure campaign against vaccine skeptics. While the administration was angriest at Facebook, Twitter “could be next” and needed to “keep up the responsiveness,” she wrote.

Gottlieb increased the pressure on O’Boyle later in the week, after O’Boyle – apparently accidentally – failed to set up their promised conference call. Gottlieb, a regular panelist on Sunday morning political talk shows, wrote O’Boyle on Friday that he would be discussing the issue “on TV this weekend and wanted to just see if you still wanted to connect so I may have the benefit of your views.”
Within minutes, O’Boyle sent his “sincerest apologies” to the Pfizer board member and said he was “absolutely available.”
At the time, I was arguably the most prominent Covid vaccine skeptic on Twitter.
Slavitt had targeted my removal at least as early as April 2021, when he and Rob Flaherty, another White House official, met with Twitter and asked a “really tough question” about why the company had not suspended my account. I was also a sharp public critic of both Gottlieb and Slavitt.
But Jack Dorsey, Twitter’s chief executive, supported me internally, and the company initially refused to ban me. By the summer, however, the Biden administration’s attitude towards vaccine skeptics had hardened. Meanwhile, Dorsey’s position at Twitter was increasingly tenuous; he would step down as chief executive in November.
Other Twitter officials did not appear to view the free speech rights of their users as a crucial issue in the same way as either Dorsey or Facebook’s top executives did.
In a note to other top Twitter lawyers and policy executives on July 19, Jim Baker, Twitter’s deputy general counsel, wrote only that “we have to be very thoughtful about how we interact with the government and what we say about it in communications with the USG [United States Government].”
So the White House censorship campaign came at a time when Twitter’s users were more vulnerable than they had ever been.
And it succeeded. In a matter of months, it forced Twitter, which had once called itself “the free speech wing of the free speech party,” to become willing to ban anyone – including me – who questioned the efficacy or risks of the Covid jabs.

Note: as X releases more documents to me about Gottlieb, Slavitt, and the 2021 censorship campaign, I will write more articles.

 

Andrew Cuomo, former Attorney General of NY admits the trial of Trump was political and never would have happened to anyone else

Posted on by

Tucker Carlson exposes a serious breach of all law and constitutional rights … of a Black Marxist Revolutionary group

Posted on by

Of course the irony is his side won, and he is a victim of the consequences of that. What this man is experiencing, is the Night of the Long Knives in slow motion.

Tucker Carlson update on the “Qanon Shaman”

Posted on by

Major Jordan’s diaries on communist subversion of the US back to WW2

Posted on by

This is an astonishing document. As far as I know, only two people were jailed and for a very, very long time for assisting the Soviets to get the nuclear bomb. Yet listening to Major Jordan, it should have been a goodly part of Washington DC. Having read part of the Whittaker Chambers book, Witness, this video makes an excellent companion to his document about the nature of communism in that era, and how penetrated the US, and clearly Canada was at the time.

Psychiatrist, Dr Keith Ablow explains to Tucker Carlson why the DEA stole his laptop and guns and never returned them, or charged him with anything, ever

Posted on by

Election rigging, not just by the FBI, but the CIA had a hand in trying to throw the election for Clinton in 2020

Posted on by

Wouldn’t it be great if Canada had a few actual journalists who could look into the RCMP and military and maybe figure out if the same was done for Trudeau etc. Canada is much more controlled in most ways than the US though.

UPDATE on Keri Lake’s leaked call

Posted on by

Actually he tried to bribe her NOT to run. I hope that is a minor error on Gorka’s part.

Two different items from two countries from two border issues, yet curiously the same

Posted on by

Curiously incompetent Press Secretary to majorly demented US president-usurper, Joe Biden

Meanwhile, in Canada, the law seems curiously flexible and can also be directed against people trying to actually obey the law. Just like above.

Tucker Carlson on the released of names on the Epstein files

Posted on by

Not having watched it yet, I have a related question:

If the FBI is willing to blatantly lie about Hunter Biden’s Laptop, claiming it was Russian disinformation when they knew damn well it was real, and therefore the intention was election rigging against Donald Trump, why would we believe for a moment that the FBI did not fabricate this list to get RFK Jr out of the race?

President Trump removed from 2024 ballot by state of Colorado

Posted on by