1. JAKsistential, who has made videos on the symbolic take-over of Canada which we posted before, now takes on the Islamic 8 point star and the civil war/Jihad in Minnesota
This looks like the first right step. Before you worry about defeating the enemy, maybe stop actually funding them.
Following is an analysis of Minneapolis by one who has direct experience in counter-insurgency models.
As a former Special Forces Warrant Officer with multiple rotations running counterinsurgency ops—both hunting insurgents and trying to separate them from sympathetic populations—I’ve seen organized resistance up close. From Anbar to Helmand, the pattern is familiar: spotters, cutouts, dead drops (or modern equivalents), disciplined comms, role specialization, and a willingness to absorb casualties while bleeding the stronger force slowly.
What’s unfolding in Minneapolis right now isn’t “protest.” It’s low-level insurgency infrastructure, built by people who’ve clearly studied the playbook.
Signal groups at 1,000-member cap per zone. Dedicated roles: mobile chasers, plate checkers logging vehicle data into shared databases, 24/7 dispatch nodes vectoring assets, SALUTE-style reporting (Size, Activity, Location, Unit, Time, Equipment) on suspected federal vehicles. Daily chat rotations and timed deletions to frustrate forensic recovery. Vetting processes for new joiners. Mutual aid from sympathetic locals (teachers providing cover, possible PD tip-offs on license plate lookups). Home-base coordination points. Rapid escalation from observation to physical obstruction—or worse.
This isn’t spontaneous outrage. This is C2 (command and control) with redundancy, OPSEC hygiene, and task organization that would make a SF team sergeant nod in recognition. Replace “ICE agents” with “occupying coalition forces” and the structure maps almost 1:1 to early-stage urban cells we hunted in the mid-2000s.
The most sobering part? It’s domestic. Funded, trained (somewhere), and directed by people who live in the same country they’re trying to paralyze law enforcement in. When your own citizens build and operate this level of parallel intelligence and rapid-response network against federal officers—complete with doxxing, vehicle pursuits, and harassment that’s already turned lethal—you’re no longer dealing with civil disobedience. You’re facing a distributed resistance that’s learned the lessons of successful insurgencies: stay below the kinetic threshold most of the time, force over-reaction when possible, maintain popular support through narrative, and never present a single center of gravity.
I spent years training partner forces to dismantle exactly this kind of apparatus. Now pieces of it are standing up in American cities, enabled by elements of local government and civil society. That should keep every thinking American awake at night.
Not because I want escalation. But because history shows these things don’t de-escalate on their own once the infrastructure exists and the cadre believe they’re winning the information war.
We either recognize what we’re actually looking at—or we pretend it’s still just “activism” until the structures harden and spread.
Your call, America. But from where I sit, this isn’t January 2026 politics anymore.
It’s phase one of something we’ve spent decades trying to keep off our own soil.
12:03 PM · Jan 25, 2026
This geopolitical analyst makes a decent case that all this is British Colour Revolution tactics.
She also points out what appears to be a subtle mass-line narrative attack. A quote by Lord Palmerston, the author of the Colour Revolution to destabilize governments.
Frankly I think she is wrong own Minneapolis. I think that is an internal civil war being instigated and exacerbated by the Left mostly within the US. Foreign aspects may indeed be at play. China, or the UK or the EU or whatever, but I think Minneapolis is primarily a domestic leftist attempt at a civil war with the intention of overthrowing the Republic for a communist polity.
2. I do not yet fully understand the nature or scope of this new diktat emerging from the heart of Canada’s aviation bureaucracy, but on its face it appears to require all pilots in Canada — commercial, military, and private — to surrender their complete medical records not only to the state, but potentially to unnamed third parties.
If those third parties were ever to include foreign adversarial states — China, for example — then placing the medical vulnerabilities of every person in Canada capable of flying an aircraft into such hands would be self-evidently dangerous. I am not asserting that this is what is happening. I am noting that the structure of the policy makes such an outcome conceivable, and that alone should trigger serious scrutiny.
This pattern is not new. In 2017, the Law Society of Upper Canada — effectively the CPSO for lawyers in Ontario — imposed what it called a “Statement of Principles.” In plain terms, every lawyer and law firm was required to adopt regulator-defined ideological principles or risk losing the right to practise law.
These were not optional ethical reflections authored by lawyers themselves. They were principles defined by the regulator, imposed as a condition of licensure, with loss of livelihood as the enforcement mechanism.
As with so many developments in modern Canada, the language itself was deliberately unobjectionable. Only the mechanism mattered. Comply or lose your career. In retrospect, the episode reads as a perfect harbinger of what would later happen to physicians during COVID — and what now appears poised to unfold across every professional body whose members retain any independent authority the state wishes to take for itself and use for its own purpose, and not the purpose for which these professional bodies had been created, the protection of both the practitioner, and their clients.
There was pushback. Some law firms openly refused. The requirement was eventually withdrawn, though in altered form and under different language. Whether it remains dormant or merely rebranded is almost beside the point.
What matters is the now-established track record: regulatory bodies created to protect the public and uphold professional standards are being repurposed into dialectical enforcement mechanisms — institutions whose real function becomes narrative enforcement and professional disempowerment, granting the state arbitrary leverage over anyone who dissents or exposes falsehoods.
Any physician in Canada who maintained a spotless career for decades, only to be sanctioned for questioning COVID or mRNA mandates, understands exactly what this looks like in practice.
This new aviation policy smells the same. I am not yet certain precisely what is wrong — only that something is. And the stench is unmistakable.
3. Chicom propaganda. Really worth watching. The problem is complex here. Is this in fact the same Silver guy AI who was accurately predicting what was going on with the price of silver? Or was that an AI voice and image that can be reproduced by anyone? Either way, this is ChiCom propaganda for sure. IF it is linked to the Silver guy, is an open question. But either way it is most certainly meant to usurp or leverage the authority of the viral silver AI guy.
3. This claim is confirmed. Spain is doing this.
Thank you all for checking out this site. I continue to hope that it offers some value to a few people.
