1. US actions on Iran. Why the delay?
2. More attacks on Christian places of worship along with theft and desecration of sacred items.
Has anyone seen this news on CBC, CTV or Global?
3. Not like anyone didn’t already know this who cared to know it. But it’s nice to see it in wide circulation.
Activists on Big Apple college campuses are among those in the US who are peddling propaganda directly from Hamas that “encourage[s] acts of violence against Jews,” a terrifying new study has found.
“Protestors and activists are not merely praising the activity of terror groups; they are actively sharing their official propaganda, disseminating communiqués, videos, and other materials directly onto mainstream platforms,” wrote the Anti-Defamation League Center on Extremism in its study titled, “Digital Couriers: How U.S. Anti-Israel Activists Amplify Terror Propaganda on Mainstream Platforms.”
The distribution of such hate on Telegram and other social-media platforms, including X and Instagram, since the Palestinian terror group Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, attacks on Israel “shows the increased normalization of rhetoric and messaging from terror organizations that overtly encourage acts of violence against Israel and Jewish people,” the report said.
Strongly related:
Full Text:
BREAKING: ISRAELI COMEDIAN’S NYC SHOW SHUT DOWN BY PRO HAMAS SUPPORTERS in Mamdani New York City.
Israeli comedian Guy Hochman’s scheduled performance in New York was cancelled after anti-Israel protesters blocked the entrance to the venue, preventing audience members from entering.
As demonstrators surrounded the club and obstructed access, the NYPD ultimately shut down the event, citing safety concerns.
Let that sink in.
A lawful cultural event in New York City was effectively silenced, not because of violence inside the venue, but because protesters were allowed to veto speech by intimidation outside it.
When Jewish and Israeli voices can be shut down in America’s largest city by hostile crowds, it raises serious questions about freedom of expression, public safety, and whether Jewish events are being afforded the same protection as others.
And in Toronto:
Toronto
A mob chanting ‘Allahu Akbar’, ‘intifada’ and ‘your days are numbered’ outside a Jewish center hosting an Israeli comedian.
What does the police do?
They arrest the Jewish guy that tries to counter-protestThere’s more!
Fresh graffiti appeared reading ‘kill Jews for peace’.
Local residents complained about endless noise harassment. Yet NOTHING was done to address the issue!
To be clear: If the Fed Guv did not want this happening, it would not be bringing these people in to Canada and paying them to do it, as well as paying for the education to turn the youth into a new generation of Communist/Nazis.
4. Lots and lots of analysis out there on Carney’s trip to China and curious statements he made at the WEF about how he intends to dismantle Western thought and civilization in Canada for a more Marxist-Chinese favoured set of policies. Some of that analysis in our opinion is pure Chi-Com propaganda. Like this:
I doubt I need to spell out to this readership how unlikely it is that Carney’s master plan is to try and get Chinese people in China to crack open their savings accounts and buy maple syrup.
But some of the analysis is a lot more worth reading and a lot less risible.
Canadian police tradecraft is valuable to a state that blends criminal, intelligence, and political objectives seamlessly.
OTTAWA — After nearly five decades in policing, intelligence, and financial-crime investigations—including professional experience working in Asia—I have learned a simple rule: who you cooperate with matters as much as what you cooperate on.
Last week, the Prime Minister’s Office announced that Canada and the People’s Republic of China will enhance law enforcement cooperation on drug trafficking, transnational and cybercrime, and money laundering. On paper, this sounds reasonable. Fentanyl is devastating communities. Cybercrime drains billions. Organized crime adapts faster than borders.
But experience teaches me that cooperation with the PRC is never just technical, never apolitical, and never insulated from the priorities of the Chinese Communist Party. Canadians deserve to understand the risks.
In Canada, policing is constrained by courts, disclosure rules, independent prosecutors, and an entrenched—if imperfect—commitment to individual rights. In the PRC, law enforcement is an extension of state security. Its primary function is not public safety as Canadians understand it, but regime stability.
During my work in Asia, this distinction was never subtle. Human rights, due process, and judicial independence were not guiding principles; they were obstacles to be managed. Criminal labels—fraud, subversion, cybercrime, economic offences—were routinely applied to political, ethnic, or commercial targets when it suited the state.
Juno News makes the claim that CBC omitted the statement which Carney himself put SO much emphasis on, “The New, World. Order.!” To us that was of secondary importance to his term of art, “Strategic relationship” with China. That has real definable meaning. New World Order means what you want it to mean. But CBC, not being the sharpest tools in the Marxist toolshed decided to omit that, Juno news claims. Although they don’t provide a link to the clip CBC showed.
This clip appears to be it
Carney continues to sabotage Canada-US relations.
5. Not sure how solid this is, but the account is usually good. I think some readers of this site might have good comments on its validity.
Thank you all for checking out this site. We are pretty behind on posting for a variety of reasons. but there is some really interesting things going on in Texas which is good news for a change. Please check @AmyMek on TwitterX and RAIR Foundation and search for Murphy Texas.
Here is ONE example of testimony to the Murphy City Planning Council
Trump leadership stands tall.
In 2026, Donald Trump revisited his interest in Greenland, which is an autonomous territory of Denmark. Previously, in 2019, he proposed purchasing Greenland, a suggestion that was met with resistance from not just Denmark but also the global community. At the World Economic Forum in January 2026, Trump and NATO officials discussed a framework for a future deal regarding Greenland. This did not imply ownership transfer, but rather a cooperative framework addressing security and potential military bases.
The framework aims to allow the U.S. to build additional military bases on Greenland for missile defense purposes, particularly in line with Trump’s “Golden Dome” project. The U.S. seeks access to mineral rights, particularly for rare earth minerals, which are essential for technology and defense sectors. Danish sovereignty over Greenland remains intact, as emphasized by Danish officials who insist on the respect of the self-determination of Greenland’s people.
Trump has backed down from threats to impose tariffs on European countries opposing his Greenland proposal, indicating a softening of his stance to mend transatlantic relations. The framework introduced at Davos is more about strengthening cooperative security measures in the Arctic region rather than an outright sale or transfer of sovereignty over Greenland. The situation as a potential “squirrel” tactic for deflecting main stream media propaganda anti Trump rhetoric or as a maximalist demand for negotiation appears to hold merit, given the context of Trump’s approach and the complexities surrounding the territory’s status. Based upon the recent developments which reveal a diplomatic approach focusing on security collaboration and resource sharing, rather than a unilateral demand for territorial ownership.
This framework signifies a focus on enhancing security measures in the Arctic rather than asserting territorial claims. The ongoing dialogue suggests a diplomatic path centered on security collaboration and resource sharing rather than unilateral demands for ownership.
This Greenland “art of the deal” possibly linked to broader geopolitical strategies, including challenges posed by BRICS nations to the U.S. dollar’s dominance. The Greenland deal primarily revolves around security collaboration between the U.S. and Denmark, particularly concerning military bases and resource access. The BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) have been increasingly vocal about reducing their dependency on the U.S. dollar for international trade.
Establishing military bases in Greenland could enhance U.S. capabilities in the Arctic, potentially countering Russian influence and securing key shipping routes, which is critical amidst rising geopolitical tensions related to BRICS. Access to Greenland’s resources, including its rare earth minerals, could bolster U.S. supply chains that are crucial in maintaining technological and military superiority. Strengthening U.S. positions globally (like in Greenland) may serve as a counterweight to any moves by BRICS to establish a currency that could undermine the dollar, reinforcing U.S. economic interests.
Greenland’s strategic importance is connected to U.S. interests in Venezuela, particularly regarding oil reserves, involves several key geopolitical factors. As an autonomous territory of Denmark, Greenland’s geographic location in the Arctic is strategically vital for U.S. military operations, especially in countering rival influences from Russia and China. Venezuela is home to some of the largest oil reserves in the world, making it a significant player in global energy dynamics. The capture of Venezuelan leadership by U.S. interests could be seen as a move to secure energy supplies while simultaneously diminishing the influence of countries like Russia and China that have vested interests in Venezuela.
While the direct links between Greenland’s status and the U.S. strategy toward Venezuela may not be immediately apparent, both are part of a larger framework of U.S. geopolitical maneuvers aimed at securing strategic resources and asserting influence in key regions. The dynamics of securing energy resources from Venezuela and ensuring military readiness in Greenland illustrate the interconnected nature of global political and economic strategies. This multifaceted approach highlights how countries navigate complex international landscapes to protect their interests.
Ask your AI guy why msm characterizes PT as ‘backing down’ on tariffs while not mentioning that Europe ‘backed down’ on selling U.S. T-Bills? In fact Trump didn’t back down at all. He played them like fiddles. If Europe wants to sell T-Bills it will weaken the USD, which is the stated goal of the administration, anyway. Right, M?
7000 shekels have dropped in ur account for this post…..he walked out of Davos with nothing he didnt already have.
The weak dollar only helps once you’re a manufacturing powerhouse with more exports than imports, which US is decades away from. He was alive during the era of the Plaza Accord, he should have paid more attention to that if he wanted a weaker dollar without burning needed market bridges. The market signalled “sell America” trade this week, and he had to TACO.
As far as Can-US relations and any issues he has with Carney, Trump has no one to blame but himself. HE backed Carney and wouldn’t shut up about how he wanted him in power, he was butthurt over some perceived slight PP had given him. He betrayed the PPC/conservative minded people he backed during the convoy and spooked the herd of boomer sheep up here to erase a 40 point Tory lead and any real chance at a fast US-Can trade deal we would have gotten with PP in.
So to paraphrase Colin Powell back in the Iraq war days “you break it, you bought it” Trump bought years of public needling and Canada trade moving away, with a possible slim chance of capitulation if Brookfield shareholders say so to Carney, so he’s got that going for him, a la Carl the Greenskeeper in Caddyshack LOL
But for what I would say, honest to goodness Canadian nationalists, old stock Canadians, we are pissed that we got stabbed in the back by both sides, and have to watch pretend nationals of Libtards playing the as “Maple doodle Dandies” (so for them, its ok to for Canada to be a nation now, and the Canadian flag is not racist now, thanks libtards) AND we have Trump foolishly wanting to detonate his own party’s chances at the senate and house in perpetuity by taking all of Canada as an extra state vs a territory.
All you “art of the deal” ppl, you know how much MAGA’s hate California and oppose adding Puerto Rico as a state, well, Canada as a state vs territory, is like adding an extra California to the electoral and senate map. Back in the convoy days, some of us would have took a chance to move to the US to get away from the rules here, but we certainly didnt want the remaining entire pop of libtards joining us there repeating the same mistakes and making the US, Canada 2.
Thanks
Alberta may be the wildcard in all of this.
I can’t see too many leftist Canadians with sore and cold elbows moving to Alberta. But I can see a lot of the rest of us doing so.
Maybe if Alberta became a state and the rest of Canada can fester in its own ooze we would get a medium term solution.
Eventually Canadians will figure it all out.
Factually, cold countries like this tend to have collisions with reality faster than hot ones where food grows all over the place and no one freezes to death.
5 Yes, overall MEMRI is reliable. I am aware of 2 (minor?) controversies regarding translation:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MEMRI#Translation_accuracy