Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.
This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.
So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.
This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.
For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.
ADDENDUM:
This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.
Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)
We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary
or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.
Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.
This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.
Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.
Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.
This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.
Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.
Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.
Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.
That is dialectics.
Yesterday morning I saw a man picking through the garbage I had placed out at the curb. I walked up to him and said good morning.
“Good morning, sir,” he replied politely in some African accent. He had a bicycle and some shopping bags he filled with aluminum cans.
“Just make sure you don’t leave a mess,” I said. “Otherwise have a nice day.”
“Yes sir, thankyou.”
A couple of hours later I happened to be outside when the garbage truck came by. I often go out to greet it if I can to make sure they take everything. “Beautiful day,” I said.
“Ya, mon,” replied the man in his thick Jamaican accent as he jumped off the back of the truck. “Perrrfect weather, mon. Pray for sunshine!”
“Thanks,” I said. “I will.”
One man employed, the other not. Subprime human capital? To be fair, only time tells. However, back when my father came to Canada in the 1950’s they asked him what skills he had before granting him entry into this once-great country. “I can milk cows,” was his answer in very broken English.
“Ok,” said the immigration officer, who then stamped his entry. My father went on to work double shifts in northern-Ontario mines for the next eight years. During his time off he built two houses and sold them. The first winter with my mother and my oldest sister, who was then a newborn baby, was spent in the concrete block foundation of a house he was building in Elliot Lake. He put a tarp over the hole with a wood stove pipe sticking out of it. It’s hard to imagine what it was like down there when it was -40 at night. It is easy for me to imagine, conversely, what compelled that young couple through such hardship: it was better than the alternative.
The alternative for my father was having not left communist Hungary. For my mother it was having not left her family home with an Irish drunk of a father. Together they ventured out on this at-once precarious, intoxicating limb called freedom, ready to face whatever the world had in store because it was their own life to make. And for the next 50 years until my mother’s passing, make they did. He proved his high human capital value to his adopted country. This story was repeated millions of times by European immigrants. He did this by subordinating instant gratification to the rewards of patience, resolve, intelligence and the willingness to take risks.
Here is a present-day example of subprime human capital unwilling or unable to subordinate the impulse of instant gratification–the true face of the Great Replacement:
https://rmx.news/article/the-true-face-of-the-great-replacement-right-wing-politician-zemmour-says-french-riots-driven-by-hordes-of-north-african-and-african-barbarians/
Add to this the pathology of leaders who have engineered (this word, itself, defines it as an intended result) the circumstances of our societal demise, and we are lead to question the character of these leaders. What kinds of people are so reliably ruthless, deceitful, intelligent, and unfeeling as to engineer the destruction of the hopes and dreams of millions of people for personal gain once they obtain power?
History presents so many men who were willing and able to ascribe to Stalin’s rumored quote:
“The death of one man is a tragedy. The death of millions is a statistic.”
But what about women? Surely the equivalent female beast–in our blooming black-rose age of empowered, toxic femininity–roams among us. Is she Ursula von der Leyen? Christine Lagarde? Giorgia Meloni? Claudia Sheinbaum? Angela Merkel? The girl next door? I don’t know. But the female tyrant phenomenon deserves a good study as increasing numbers of men find themselves defending against the logical fallacies of accusations without evidence.
“Was it good for you?”
“I’ve had better, gumdrop.”
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/bangladesh-seeks-answers-after-saudi-arabia-executes-its-citizens-without-telling-them
NFL Quarterback Jalen Hurts out for the remainder of the season after being diagnosed with blood clots in both lungs and clots in his leg.
On the TARD/COMMIE/Israel protests in Toronto: