Category Archives: Explaining leftism

It’s not hypocrisy, it is strategic weighting of one side of the game field: Links 1 for June 29, 2024

Posted on by

Adapting the thinking of Stephen Coughlin somewhat, one of the most important things to understand is that when a person points out the hypocrisy of the left, they are in fact missing the target in exactly the way the left wishes you to do.

The left operates on a different system of thought than those of us from a more Socratic culture do. Their semantic math if you like, is different from ours. What is hypocrisy in our semantic reality, is strategic selective enforcement in theirs. But much more than that. One can hear it with every narrative attack. None of it adds up in the world of real meaning because the purpose of leftist narrative attacks are to destroy meaning. What Stephen might call a “liquified reality”.

Many people cannot or don’t want to believe the left is this complex.

Let me say that complexity is often just alienness which requires the unlearning of how you think and the reabsorption of another system of thought, that once understood is actually another kind of simplicity. The Buddhist concept of Enlightenment may be an example of this. Years of meditation and specific guided practice to unlearn your way of filtering and interpreting your perceptions, and once opened up to the wider data set of all you can perceive, you have achieved a new way of thinking which manifests itself in a new kind of thinking and a great deal of insight in the case of Buddhism.

Indian Classical music is another example. If you try and understand it through the lens of Western musical systems of rhythm, you will abandon its pursuit as impossibly complex. If you abandon your Western education on counting musical time and accept that most of the world’s music (if we count cultures as opposed to what is produced) is based on a series of accented pulses, then it becomes something manageable.  (Indian Classical is still the most complex even of these systems.) The point being, it is another system of thought which is no more complex, but is alien and appears complex through the lens of our own way of seeing things. This is because of the effort required to understand it through your own lens, which has to end with the abandonment of that lens for the purpose of understanding, or incorporating it into one’s own thought process.

Stephen often explains that dialectics is the epistemology of the Left. Epistomology is the branch of philosophy that concerns itself with the theory of knowledge altogether. It’s the branch of philosophy most often represented in cartoons, if you like, of philosophy where you might see philosophers rapidly talk each other into believing nothing exists because you can’t really prove anything does.

Buddhism takes the position that suffering is real, and to be avoided, and then bases everything from that.

Which is actually a pretty decent premise. Especially if you come from India several thousand years ago.

Socrates demonstrated that with his system of reason and logic, you can predict future events, and describe reality by the attributes of things to a degree by understanding past and present behaviours of things. Models, in other words, can be built which reflect reality often well enough that you can build things which utilize the attributes as described by natural-science (Socratic philosophy) that will actually do what you want them to do. Nothing metaphysical at all. A always does this and B always does the other. So put them together and you have something which utilizes the attributes of A and B to create C.

So a Socratic world observes reality, then develops a taxonomy, or series of formal classifications of the observable world, and moves forward with that.

Taxonomy in fact may be one of the most powerful inventions Humans have ever created.

It can be used for tremendous harm or tremendous benefit.

The Nazi use of taxonomy is the clear example of evil uses of the science. But  the Nazis are just a branch office of the Left. Communists are the greatest weaponizers of taxonomy of all. The entire basis for commuinist thought is the imputation of attributes to its taxa as it created them. The Proletariat and Bourgeoisie.  And with this taxonomy, they have incorporated the metaphysical.

How might that look?

Western thought looks at humans and says: There are appear to be two basic kinds. Men and Women. And when they interact in a certain way, they make children. Nature overall appears to work that way across a wide variety of animals. So the basic taxa are males and females. And as nature is not a perfect copying machine, there are errors in translation of this genetic information from time to time which leads to subtaxa. Hermaphroditism and its sub branches for example.

Nothing metaphysical about any of this.

The Left though, as part of its narrative attacks against this very thing at all levels, gives us the ‘Trans-movement’.

The idea that a person can be “born in the wrong body” is very much a metaphysical idea. The ego of a thing and its physical container must be separate entities. It is, as Steven Pinker explains in his excellent book, The Blank Slate, one of the three concepts at the roots of modern leftist thought. And one of the concepts is from the book, The Ghost in the Machine.

(The other two are, The Blank Slate as per John Locke, and The Noble Savage by Jean Jacques Rousseau)

Mark Steyn in his post linked here the other day on the debate come massacre between Trump and Biden, described the leftist ambition as not so much convincing us of the lie, but forcing us to live with the lie. This would be the tactical use of the narrative as it is used against us with the idea of trans-people. But the inner logic is metaphysical and there are people who truly and genuinely believe it. In some cases, you can identify them because they cut some of their bits off trying to achieve a sort of Silence of the Lambs effect with less killing of other people. Some of them though, know exactly what they are doing. You can identify them because they do kill often a lot of people. A more and more noticeable trend despite media and state security apparatus attempts to hide those killings by ‘Trans-people’ as they do of Muslims in the name of Islam.

Theodore Dalrymple put it most excellently though…

The only improvement would be to explain that “political correctness” is in fact dialectics in the form of Discourse Theory cancelation of all who oppose narrative attacks.

Put much more simply, the left makes up something by committee which the committee all agree on. This will be called a “consensus”.

The “consensus” will be near total bullshit, or as Stephen explains in another video, the truthfulness of it will be as real as it needs to be, to get the effect they want.

The committee, usually a COMINTERN think tank, will then launch critical theory attacks on anyone who points out that the narrative attack is bullsh*t.

In other words, they call you names.

They call you names which the left made sure has such power, that your basic life as you know it can be, and often is destroyed.

One of those insults is the word, ‘Racist’.

At this late stage of the revolution, pretty much everyone recognizes how that being a racist is a concept that is never allowed to be spoken or thought. Much like uttering the word which starts with a letter between M and O. That everyone has to make sure to demonstrate in every action and word that they are not a ‘racist’. So being called on generally destroys a person’s reputation pretty severly, and results in job losses and even ostracism from their communities and even cities. Yet no one stops to realize that except in Western nations, not only does no one give a crap aboout racism,. but it is actually policy in most of the world.

Don’t believe me? Ask anyone who is not Han Chinese living in the PRC. Or any white person near British Gianna or the Atlantic coast of Costa Rica. Or any African who is the wrong kind of African in most of Africa.

And our favorite example of all of the above, is how the Left, turned Islam into a race somehow, even though Indonesia is the most populous Muslim Country and are East Asians ethnically, and accuse anyone who doesn’t like Islam as a doctrine as being “racist” and Islamophobic, and forbidding anyone from speaking the obvious truth from within islamic scripture, history and contemporary sermons that Islam is almost nothing more than a system of war.

A perfect killing machine against all who will not accept Islam as their total authority in all things.

The precise same model is used to push Global Warming.

There is never a mention allowed that China and India produce most of the world’s CO2. We should actually be grateful to them as that is why we have better and better crop yields recently, but the COMINTERN push it as an existential threat. So we cannot point out that the extremely destructive and pointless measures imposed only on Western nations in the name of Climate Justice, are never expected of the people who do most of the Carbon production. Just like racism. You will be called “A holocaust Climate denier” and worse.

For those interested in the science of climate and the facts on it, search for any videos of lectures by Tom Harris. 

We argue that while yes, it is important to understand the true workings of the climate to inform better policy, there is nearly no point in understanding the reality of it until at least you understand that these narrative attacks on us to force us to accept that which isn’t real, or at least live with it, is intended to make everything worse, and worse for Western Civilization until there is nothing whatsoever left of it.

This morning walking around this little part Ontario one couldn’t help but notice the unseasonably cool and wet weather we have despite the dialectic bomber of the CBC letting everyone know all the time that this is the hottest summer ever in human history etc.

(Yes, I know the difference between climate and weather but the CBC makes damn sure to claim hot weather is reflective of the climate at every opportunity)

So I got to thinking. Maybe the CBC could launch a new narrative attack. It could go like this:

Humans exhale so much moisture in their breaths that they are causing Global wetting. And the only way to solve this problem is a massive tax on your breath, which would apply even more harshly on people involved in one of the few industries not already being destroyed by the Carbon tax. Farmers of course would pay the most if they keep animals. And none of this would apply to China, India or Africa.

The reason they probably wouldn’t do this narrative, which is no less ludicrous than the ones they do use, is because they don’t want to appear pivot back to overpopulation. That was a narrative attack they used to stop people of European extraction and even of European culture, Western civ in other words, to stop having children. We see now with all Western nations claiming they face an existential threat unless they import millions of hostiles to their countries that those nations will cease to be. Suddenly, the problem is underpopulation, even though the Earth’s population is  more than double what it was when they launched the overpopulation dialectic through the Club of Rome report in 1972. About 3.85 billion people then, and about 8 billion in 2023.

So Islam and Leftism use very similar methods of destroying who we are in every sense of our identities. eventually to replace our personal self identification with whatever they want.

In a sense I suppose you could say the plan is:

Where B = Brain,

  1. Format B,
  2. install OS Comuslam.

And now a few current examples:

1. ANTIFA ‘Trans’ person on trial for extremely violent behaviour

https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1806848733658730676?s=19

Recently a person in the US went on trial for leaking the manifesto of a trans mass school killer because it exposed the trans-motives for the murder of children at a Christian school. To be frank, that fact alone should tell us all we need to know about the current state of the machinery of government.

2. Hot summer days in Arizona is proof that there is climate change which is also proof that Donald Trump lied in the debate for failing to accept that particular narrative attack and instead, spoke about real climate issues.

3. Gassy cows and pigs will face a carbon tax in Denmark, the first country to do so 

COPENHAGEN, Denmark — Denmark will tax livestock farmers for the greenhouse gases emitted by their cows, sheep and pigs from 2030, the first country to do so as it targets a major source of methane emissions, one of the most potent gases contributing to global warming.

The aim is to reduce Danish greenhouse gas emissions by 70% from 1990 levels by 2030, said Taxation Minister Jeppe Bruus.

As of 2030, Danish livestock farmers will be taxed 300 kroner ($43) per ton of carbon dioxide equivalent in 2030. The tax will increase to 750 kroner ($108) by 2035. However, because of an income tax deduction of 60%, the actual cost per ton will start at 120 kroner ($17.3) and increase to 300 kroner by 2035.

Although carbon dioxide typically gets more attention for its role in climate change, methane traps about 87 times more heat on a 20-year timescale, according to the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

4. This one speaks to the narrative attack, ‘Safe and Effective’

5. This is arguably a pure example of the simplest aspect of tilting the game table. The lack of reporting on ANTIFA attacks of the debate, and the encouragement of the rioting taking place in 2020

The subjects and ideas in this post are complex and some are subtle. I can say with some certainly right now that I probably did not do a very good job of expressing them well, and certainly not as well as they should be.

Please do post any questions or criticisms and factual corrections to the comments and thank you in advance for doing so.

Deconstructing the careful language of a queer activist on CNN

Posted on by

Once you understand the language the left uses, you discover that many of them are extraordinarily honest. I mean they know well how we will interpret what they say, and that we will interpret it in a way which is destructive to us. But if you know the language of the left, then its actually, lets say, internally honest.

Let’s look at this interview of a Queer activist on CNN:

Notice how the interview subject who is clearly a walking provocation, is careful to always use the word, “Queer”. Not Trans or any of the other terms the CNN useful idiot offers it to respond to. The Pink Provocation nearly corrects her to the word, “Queer”. Pink creature knows full well how the vast vast majority understand the word queer. An older term for homosexual.

Please watch the video below for real clarity.

Queer, is purely a political term. And this video will explain her statements, and appearance.

 

Yesterday’s attacks at an LA Synagogue and more with a look at the nature of the enforcement and reportage on it

Posted on by

Time to add a little clarity to the actual world we live in. Not the one we had, if we ever did, but the one we are in now.

The world operates by a clear set of rules. But they are so contrary to what people believe is taking place, that they get mired in words like “hypocrisy” so that eventually, many of us to just shut down altogether. Kinda like the original Star Trek logic bomb they used a few times. Computers would be faced with a paradox and shut themselves down because they could not adapt to the reality of the situation and continue forward. That’s who most of us are. Landru the computer-God Or Nomad, the sterilizing probe.

One of the rules actually in play is fairly simple.

A leftist or a Muslim acts provocatively. In fact provocatively enough to guarantee a reaction. The people who react are then guilty of islamophobia or transphobia or interfering with the freedom of speech or religion of the rights somehow of people doing the provocation. Another is revealing narrative weapons against the public.

Here is a good example. A Twitter user in Germany was criminally charged for assembling a list of Covid-era insults that politicians and ‘celebrities’ hurled at those who refused the vaxx.

Examples of the provocation tactic of the Islamic Street prayer flavour are now so numerous that I’ll just post one or two. But anyone reading this can think of probably half a dozen of personal experiences where they wanted to react to a leftist, trans, Islamic, lgbtQ action with even a negative remark but held their tongues for fear of the consequences. Cause at some level, we do know the rules from a limiting of behaviour way.

https://twitter.com/islamwatch_/status/1716463760595124636

 

These street ‘prayers’ are everywhere now in Canada. But this site has been documenting these provocations, which are really more of a close order drill than of a religious ritual, for 18 years in France and other parts of non-Muslim Europe.

It is worth mentioning as an aside, that these rituals are never performed in an actual Islamic country. If they did mass prayers in the middle of a busy road in Ryad Saudi Arabia there would be a lot of very bloody tires at the Lamborghini dealership the next day. These events are political. Just like the Q in lgbtQ. 

So we know that reacting to even an illegal act like the one above, denying people the right of way on a public road in a demonstration that very likely had no permit, will get you a negative reaction. The police will not act on your behalf stating that you asked for it, you provoked them, or it was two gangs voluntarily fighting. See how that works? its the language of the law, but is as far from the law as it can be.

On the other hand…

If people who believe in a more or less republican form of government with equality before the law, and in fact, the rule of law being the standard of enforcement, and dare to stage a protest asking for unity and the restoration of rule of law, well we can ask anyone who was at the Freedom Convoy on the last 2 days how that would go. The blame will be entirely on the people asking for thier actual rights, no matter how peacefully or respectfully they do so.

The media is the real army in an information war. The legacy broadcast media and most social media for that matter.

Another front of the information war, is how the state deals with information that is a threat to the revolution. One of my favorite examples, we cannot show as arrests will follow if we do. But we did get a chance to see the actual manifesto of the Christchurch mosque shooter before it was banned, and all the Western governments who quoted it, made up the quotes. It was wholly altered to fit the revolutionary narrative. Same thing of several documents written by people who took drastic and illegal actions against the revolution as they saw it. Perhaps banning the live streams from publication is understandable. But making it a criminal offence to have the video is not. A hundred times more so for possessing or sharing the Christchurch shooter’s manifesto. But the reasons they did criminalize its possession is now clear. It was to prevent people from exposing the way in which it was going to be used. To create a narrative, or a supporting set of lies to the narrative already in play.

Here is an example of the exact same thing we can show you. A reporter may face jail for leaking the manifesto of a person who claimed to be the other sex and went on a school shooting spree.

A public records case over a leaked manifesto belonging to Audrey Hale, a transgender individual who shot up the Covenant School in a Nashville suburb – killing three 9-year-old children and three adults, has spiraled into a contentious legal battle which could see a journalist tossed in jail if he doesn’t reveal his source. On Monday, Chancellor I’Ashea Myles of Davidson County ordered Michael Patrick Leahy, editor and owner of the conservative news website The Tennessee Star, to appear in court. Leahy is to participate in a “show cause hearing” on June 17to address why he should not be held in contempt over his publication’s use of the leaked documents.

Once upon a time a court might ask for a source in order to prevent a future crime perhaps. In this case, it is to prevent a state narrative from taking damage by the truth.

Let’s take another example from, say, 3 minutes ago.

A large group of leftists, leftists LARPing as Arabs, as well as some actual Muslims, went to a Jewish area in Las Angeles and started attacking Jews, and Jewish institutions like food places and Synagogues.

If you search YouTube for:

“Muslims attack Jews in LA”, which is actually what happened, Jews didn’t gather in an angry mob in front of a mosque, here is what you get:

Screenshot

As you can see, the entire event is relativized.

Not that Jews or Jewish areas were attacked, but they “faced off”. “Clashed”

We all know how the media would present it if people representing classical views went near say, a school and asked teachers to stop showing children pornography, or not allow adult men to parade around nearly naked with their children at schools in lurid dances or even if schools were asked to stop telling children they were “born in the wrong body” and should have their genitals removed to fix it. Somehow.

This is consistent across the West now. Examples range from the banal, to the ‘well we can sort of understand that’, to the outrageous. Like how a girl who was savagely gang raped by over 9 men in Germany spent more time in prison than all but one of the rapists for calling them savages.

https://twitter.com/ferryman4747/status/1804973081431085458

Rebel news reports on a major ANTIFA colour revolution effort in Montreal. Here is how it went first hand. How will it be reported? How will CBC listeners come to know about it, if at all? Since selective reporting is in fact a principle tool of the information based tyranny we now live in. One which will become kinetic very soon we fear.

 

Let’s have a look at some of the material from yesterday’s attack on Jewish people and institutions from 1st hand observers:

This search string will bring you to more of these videos

https://twitter.com/search?q=Adas%20Torah%20Synagogue%20LA&src=typed_query

If we do not start to understand that these examples along with Covid and Vaxx truths define our times and are not exceptions or examples of a problem, we are never going to be able to dig our way out. If you cannot take the blindfold off, you cannot hit the target.

But in a way, we do understand it. Most people clearly are afraid to speak out against the most obvious and egregious lies. Like a man who claims to be a woman should be treated more than as a woman than a woman is, and be celebrated for being brave and special as he accesses women’s private domains and activities. We have semiconsciously at least come to accept the revolutionary order of things. And when we do speak out, we limit ourselves to the allowable arguments doled out to us. Arguments that serve only the Left’s purposes.

 

A little history of Karl Marx and perhaps the central motivation for the dialectical method

Posted on by

The following video is a discussion between Jordan Peterson, and a historian who has made it his mission to chronicle the life and motivations of the person credited with inventing communism, Karl Marx.

I say credited, because it appears that in fact what he did was weaponize the Hegelian dialectical method.
The Hegelian dialectical method, once you get right down to it, is nothing more and certainly nothing less, than a method to destroy everything. Yes, everything. not to create something better, although it could be argued that persuading people to join the mission by making the claim that it was to make a better world, might be a dialectic all on its own. But to destroy everything. In the big picture, things like feminism to destroy the family, male-female relations and ultimately, as Stephen Coughlin points out. to destroy women as autonomous people in the way in which Plato described as desirable.

Much of the deep dive into dialectics is understanding its mechanics. Which is in fact a different system of thought, and does twist the brain around trying to understand it in our own Western terms. Which is partly why it works so well. No one believes that people can or would think like this, and no one wants to take the effort to understand it.

As an example when one tries to explain Trudeau in these terms, everyone rightly says they don’t think he is smart enough to understand this stuff. But like the Chinese 5 year old who speaks Chinese, it doesn’t take a genius when that is how you are raised.

But the basic fact is that dialectics is about destruction. The Trans-sexual thing being one of the most obvious dialectics in several ways.

In the following video, Marx’s favorite quote is revealed. It is a quote attributed to Mephistopheles.

“Everything that exists deserves to perish”.

And there you have it. Perhaps this is at the heart of why leftists are so full of hate and rage. Why debate is anathema. Why non-applicable insults and accusations are made against those who support Western Civ and especially perhaps, people who maintain Jewish and Christian beliefs.

Communism is the practical application of Hegelian Dialectics. Hegelian dialectics is simply opposition to all. And even as communists manage to replace the healthy and normal with their own warped and destructive constructs, once it becomes normalized, it too comes under fire from Marxists. This is already happening to transexuals as we saw it happen to normal homosexuals who otherwise are happy healthy participants in Western Civ.

Communism is a never ending revolution against the normal at every level.

And perhaps now we know why.

 

A few brief words about the Century Initiative, the single greatest threat to liberty and national sovereignty by orders of magnitude

Posted on by

Before I get to today’s list, a few words about yesterday.
Not that much gets to me in terms of setting me off balance for hours on end, as I, we, have been doing this for some time. And not much surprises anymore. But it has always been the subtle things that have been the particular focus of this site. The subtle things which show the direction we are being moved in. Once the killing and authoritarian stuff starts, well we knew it was coming years earlier. Whatever else that may be, it isn’t a surprise.

But it’s the little meetings with initiate language and dialectical lines of operation, screw the jargon, its the plotting and planning and scheming to destroy Canada and present it to us as if it was a god-damned birthday cake. That, is what get’s to me.

Yesterday was the annual ‘Century initiative‘ meeting which went out on a webcast. The special guest speaker was mark Carney, and he actually dialled his BS back a lot compared to other times he has pitched his ‘net-0’ crap at us all. There were others who spoke though, that gave up more than he did.

Ever wonder why suddenly the roads are narrower and the sidewalks occasionally wider, and why there are unused unneeded bike lanes all over the place with plastic dividers and why the roads are more congested even as they fill the city with more and more people brought in through a planned invasion?

Well guess what. That is part of the 15 minute city plan. Don’t believe me? Take it from the architects on the board of the Century Initiative. They tell you in plain language.

What isn’t in plain language are the massive, Jurassic scale lies and contradictions within all these speaker’s pitches for how they are taking control and changing our country without asking us or any kind of genuine public consultation. This is a project of the elites. And if you add CBDC to this equation, they won’t need to put us in Gulags. The cities will be gulags. Wrong social media score? or more accurately, express counter-revolutionary views? Your access to necessities and minimal liberties will and can be easily further restricted.

Some of the contradictions are that the infrastructure in Canada is in trouble, so they are going to triple the population from the 33 million it was before the mass migration campaign began. So not enough infrastructure for the people we have, so triple the people! Oh and as it was pointed out repeatedly in this presentation and the others, if we don’t like the utter and total obliteration of our culture, lifestyle, liberties and so on, it is cause we are racist and no other reason. We are reminded of that by another speaker that reminds us that he is still brown even after he brushes his teeth. Whatever that means. Maybe these people should go to China and try and get them to change their country from 99% Han Chinese to everyone else in the world and see how that goes over. They are actually trying it in Japan and thankfully the Japanese are resisting it it seems.

Saying a person is anti-immigrant if they object to the utter and total obliteration of their country by weaponized mass migration is like telling someone who didn’t like being waterboarded, that it is because they are bad people with pathological hatred of water.

Another one is that virtually all of the people being recruited to come live in Canada as permanent citizens are from hot countries. This means their “carbon footprint”, itself a meaningless metric in the way they use it, is multiplied by four times as Canada is a cold country. They will need warm homes and additional use of energy. Which brings us to the next set of contradictions. We are using contradictions because it is a nicer word than lies, and a les irritating one than dialectics, but choose your poison. They never mention nuclear as an effective way of creating power without CO2. It is always methods that frankly can never produce enough power, even for the current population, let alone for 100M. There is also the lie that Canada is a huge country. Nearly no one lives more than 100 miles North of the US border. And for anyone who things global warming is real and will open up the North, I invite you to get ahead of the curve and move out there now while property is still cheap but getting anything from the south is still expensive. Make sure you bring a few years worth of vaccines with you, and look out for ozone holes.

It would be interesting to see if Mark Carney’s various investment firms have invested in real estate for development up north for when global warming makes it habitable. But the answer to that question is so obvious it isn’t even worth the effort to look. If there are investments, it’s for resource companies, or areas where government will be injecting cash.

The other day we ran into a fellow putting in those plastic dividers on the road for a bike lane on a relatively sleepy suburban street. When it was mentioned that it seemed an injudicious use of city resources, it was explained by the municipal worker that it was far worse than it looked. That actually, they would only be there about a month, because by the time they were all in place, they would have to come down so the snow plows don’t hit them. Meanwhile, there is a low water advisory in effect in parts of Alberta despite the fact that it has been raining so hard there for weeks off and on that they don’t seem to be able to get the forest fires really going this spring. So in other words, creating an unnecessary inconvenience is a higher priority than something like having water in the summer. Yes, these events are in different cities, and yes, municipal governments are famous for these kinds of stupid policies. But when all of them add up to a plan it isn’t incompetence, its malice. And when they tell you that plan, it should be impossible to ignore. And yet somehow we manage.

There are other parts of this talk from yesterday, also including the likely next PM of Canada, Mark Carney which will be posted soon enough. But the reason there was very little posted yesterday was the pressure inside the skull was very high after watching this presentation about how they were going to negate this entire country in every possible way, including, but not limited to, destroying all our liberties in a way in which we won’t notice until its too late. Like you can still buy a car, but it will be crazy expensive and there wont be anywhere to put it as building codes have changed to not require parking, roads will be narrow and congested, and you will need a permit to leave the 15 minute cities, which at first will be easy, but once you accept it, they will be fewer and fewer and require better and better justification. Much like vaccine mandates, or “two weeks to flatten the curve”.

There is a great deal more to say about this plot. this century initiative. It is so massively destructive to Canada and Western civ, that it feels like everything else that is hurled at us, all the other lines of effort, of operation are distractions from this. So we won’t notice our cities filling with people which of course has to mean a reduction in liberty, a destruction of shared frame of reference, which in turn means a political revolution. And it iwll be said. But it is hoped to high heaven that you all will have thoughts about this and what it means and will share it in the comments.

In Stephen Coughlin’s presentation a couple of weeks ago with Dr. Sam Dubé and this site, he made a more or less,  throw away remark:

He said, “The cost of us being right, Is the person who took the red pill and realizes he’s in a world of shit.”

That’s about right.

 

 

Multiple Lines of Effort exemplified with current examples: Links 1 for May 29th, 2024

Posted on by

1. Think the autopsy will show he died of a fentanyl overdose? Or police killed him. Im gonna go with A. Fentanyl overdose if George FLoyd is the new standard of evidence and justice

Full text:

I don’t care about George Floyd. The entire narrative is a fraud.   Meanwhile, Daniel Shaver was actually assassinated by a cop in Arizona. And you’ve probably never heard of him.  Because he was white.  In the bodycam footage, he is clearly seen lying in the hallway of his hotel with his hands out in compliance, begging, “Please don’t shoot me.” The cop, Philip Brailsford, assassinates him with 5 shots from an AR-15.   The Mesa Police Department initially refused to release the bodycam footage. Then, they offered to let Shaver’s widow watch the video if she agreed not to discuss its contents with the press. Later, the District Attorney’s office asked a judge to seal the footage forever. The cop, Philip Brailsford, was charged with 2nd degree murder, and later acquitted. His history of excessive force was not introduced at trial. Although terminated by the police department, Brailsford was subsequently re-hired for a day, so that he could qualify for a pension and retire at age 28.   He will collect $31,000 a year until he dies. If the victim had been black, we’d have gold caskets, Presidential tweets, and nationwide riots. And unlike the George Floyd case, this one would actually have some legitimacy.

2. Trudeau used this particular mass line narrative attack (forcing a total destructive lie on the population through all media channels, social and legacy)  to dramatically reduce any sense of entitlement of the people who built this country in order to destroy it with mass immigration. After all, if the European travellers who came here and made Canada this amazing place everyone wants to move to are so damn evil, what right do we have to stop anyone else from coming here and destroying what we, and our cultural and genetic ancestors built? Right?

The Trudeau govt. still pushes several lines of effort at once. The Indian graves thing, which has been proven false and would still be debatable as to its meaning if it was true, Global Warming, which is an LOE against Western industry and prosperity, the vaxx, an LOE against scientific reality as well as bodily autonomy and others.

3. Dr. John Campbell on sex based cancer stats which is changing recently cause reality is cancelled by DEI. One wonders about the value of presenting reality back to those imposing the pseudo reality on us. Its clearly part of the strategy to allow us to push back. But only so far and only in certain ways, and only certain people are exposed as being the creators and enforcers of these LOEs.

Let’s have an example of allowable pushback which is tantamount to controlled opposition for a moment. Check out this Ottawa Citizen Article about growing antisemitism in Canada and elsewhere. Yes, the problem can be mentioned. A plea can be made to do something about it with no specifics at all. The Trudeau government actually funded a number of educational programs on Jewish history and antisemitism, some specifically on the reality of the Holocaust. But then we look at things like The Century Initiative, Canada’s plan to bring our population, already top heavy with Islamic migration, up to 100 million people from the Middle East and largely from Islamic North Africa. And then we look at what we are not allowed to say.

We are not allowed to say that Islam is systemically, historically and doctrinally sintered with antisemitism as a central pillar. More than just sintered, it was forged in the cauldron with the rest of Islam by Mohammad himself. Sites like Jihad Watch and this one have been delisted by Google. Finding articles on this site is difficult even at my level of access to it.

So what is not allowed is to point out a real cause and offer a real solution. What is allowed, is whining about what people say in order to give the state power over what is allowable to say or think, write or publish. This is what the state wants. This is why the Citizen article is 100 controlled op whether the author knows it or not. With this method, the government has managed to make Jewish people the architects of their own destruction. Which may explain one curious thing. A Liberal MP named Housefather has been one of the most outspoken politicians against the October 7 attacks on Israel. Yet he is also one of the founding fathers of Trudeau’s M 103, the bill which attempted to criminalize or otherwise chill any criticism of Islam specifically as a doctrine. Not talking about Muslims as a people, which is what antisemitism is 99% of the time, but talking about their dogma and doctrine which motivates Islamic jihad. This was nearly made legally problematic instead of just extralegally as it is now by technical means and revolutionary groups like ANTIFA.

At least this article is asking people to speak up themselves against antisemitic references and not asking for more laws. But the giant omission is the fact that the left and Islam are responsible for this. That the attack on Oct. 7, which had zero military strategic value could only have been to precipitate the obvious Israeli response and then launch a global campaign against the West, with Jews at the tip of the spear. But all Western nations close to the tip. The tents and materials for the campus protests appear to have been purchased months before October 2023. Antisemitism was the desired result. Funding a few things where Jewish people attempt to speak truth into these massive efforts to destroy all identity in the West is urinating into the back end of a turbine.

4. “He who controls the past, controls the future. He who controls the present, controls the past” -George Orwell from 1984

Internet Archive and the Wayback Machine under DDoS cyber-attack

The Internet Archive, the nonprofit research library that’s home to millions of historical documents, preserved websites, and media content, is currently in its third day of warding off an intermittent DDoS (distributed denial-of-service) cyber-attack. According to library staff, the collections are safe, though service remains inconsistent. Access to the Internet Archive Wayback Machine – which preserves the history of more than 866 billion web pages – has also been impacted.

Since the attacks began on Sunday, the DDoS intrusion has been launching tens of thousands of fake information requests per second. The source of the attack is unknown.

 “Thankfully the collections are safe, but we are sorry that the denial-of-service attack has knocked us offline intermittently during these last three days,” explained Brewster Kahle, founder and digital librarian of the Internet Archive. “With the support from others and the hard work of staff we are hardening our defenses to provide more reliable access to our library. What is new is this attack has been sustained, impactful, targeted, adaptive, and importantly, mean.”

Cyber-attacks are increasingly frequent against libraries and other knowledge institutions, with the British Library, the Solano County Public Library (California), the Berlin Natural History Museum, and Ontario’s London Public Library all being recent victims.

In addition to a wave of recent cyber-attacks, the Internet Archive is also being sued by the US book publishing and US recording industries associations, which are claiming copyright infringement and demanding combined damages of hundreds of millions of  dollars and diminished services from all libraries. 

5. Feminism is a line of effort against the family.

Thank you all for checking out this site. And apologies for the grim realities presented on it. The intention is to inform people to fight back effectively. Not to discourage or demoralize.

The videos on the Frankfurt School and its influence on the revolution that has taken the West which Stephen Coughlin referred to in his presentation

Posted on by

These are the videos Stephen Coughlin referred to in his presentation with Vlad Tepes and Sam Dubé a few days ago

Analysis on the Communist ambitions for the European Union:

Marcuse on how a minority can dominate a majority

Hate Speech: A frankfurt School Concept

There may be a 4th in this series. I will continue to look for it. Hoping to find the name of it so I can find it somewhere in my records. But these three are very important and well worth watching.

 

Ezra Benson on meeting Khrushchev, Secretary of Soviet Communist Party in 1953

Posted on by

Stephen Coughlin: A detailed explanation of leftist strategy to destroy America, and every aspect of our identities

Posted on by

The following is a wild ride with Maj. (Ret) Stephen Coughlin, Sam Dubé and I did a 3 hour and change session with the retired US military intel analyst on the strategy and the history of the strategy which is the overarching method-of-thought of the enemies of civilization. Having more or less focus-grouped this session, I can say with some confidence that it has been watched all the way through and understood by the people who have seen it so far. Also they have expressed a greater understanding of the events taking place today for having seen this session.

All of the jargon which Stephen often uses in his shorter briefs is well explained and examples are drawn by Stephen and the other participants from recent and current events as a way of showing the application of the strategies used against us, that Stephen details.

In the following brief and Q&A with retired Military Intel officer, Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin, Vlad Tepes and Dr. Sam Dubé go through the detailed analysis of the leftist strategy which defines the tactics they use to not just destroy the West, but manage to get most of us to assist them in destroying the west as unwitting Controlled Opposition.

The following three hours is a riveting conversation and brief with Maj. Coughlin, discusisng how so many of our modern concepts have been cons to maneauver us away from real science and understanding to a place of uncertainty, where reality itself can be “liquified” by the left such that we have to accept whatever narratives they throw at us.

Where real science is a crime, and ‘sceintism’, the kind of language we saw during the Covid pandemic, not to mention global warming and ‘gender theory’ become compulsory, and deviance from these narratives can result in the state use of force against all who resist.

Personally i have been through this three times and working through it again to make a TOC in order to find specific points more quickly in the future. I’ll post what I have so far, but only up to 50 minutes.

RAIR Foundation has a good write up on Stephen with some of the points detailed in this session as well.

Some of the points in the first 50 minutes:

10:00 Stephen’s wife in the pentagon when its attacked on 911

16:30 Islamic Days of Rage from the Danish Cartoons to Pro-Hamas demonstrations today

18:00 President is not really in control. Arguing about Biden’s dementia is maintaining the narrative

18:45 Klaus Schwab along with Biden are people we are allowed to orient against

20:00 Afghan troop suicide rates higher than combat kill rates

20:25 Days of rage explained in terms of Danish cartoon riots

23:00 DEI is an attack on the military

28:20 on Gramsci

29:50 Hegel implemented Plato abstract.

30:00 Hegel coins the term Aufhaben, meaning to create and destroy at the same time and is a violation of the law of identity and is the root of cancel-culture.

38:20 ANTIFA and the Jacobins equivalence

44:30 knowing dialectics is a win and Marx doesnt matter is because Marxism just an application of dialectics.

48 minutes we get into the Gaza pro Hamas anti America protests across colleges

 

Videos from yesterday’s press conference on the March for Life today in Ottawa

Posted on by

Please see the detailed description for each speaker at RAIR Foundation 

Ruth Robert:

George Buscemi:

Jack Fonseca: (If you only have time for one, please make it this one. This one deals with the censorship being applied to those who have counter-abortion views. Once the state takes this power for one issue, well… ah… Covid. Right? Anyone even remember what happened to people who tried to warn against lockdowns or the vaxx when it still mattered?

Josie Luetke:

Pete Baklinski:

The videos are presented here in the exact opposite order that they spoke (in the pouring rain) Yesterday on Parliament Hill.

We could write an essay about how with the left the point is never the point, the revolution is always the point, but no time. In point form, once the state has taken the power to limit your rights, either for the collective good or for health reasons, then that is a power that will become the new normal for all issues where the state has ambitions against the public’s interests and rights. It is never about the issue, although they may seek the desired outcome of the issue as they spin it.

Start listening to Mark Carney and how he uses climate and net zero to obliterate Canadian industry when he is made PM. And he will be. And he will do it.

 

Perfect example of intersectionality

Posted on by

Two words the dialectical left use we need to understand.

“Intersectionality”, and “queer”.

We understand the word queer to mean gay or better, homosexual. But it has been repurposed by the left to mean a kind of corralling of all deviant sexual identities to weaponize them as battering rams against classical civilization and healthy values. Intersectionality, means the point at which various dialectic attacks which are on the surface quite different such as feminism and Islam, but both have the intention of destroying the West. This may be given different names in order to hide the intention somewhat, like “the patriarchy” or “Dar al Harb” the world of war where the infidels rule. But intersectionality is where all groups no matter how different work together to the same purpose.

Below, is just too good an example not to post.

For a much better explanation of the nature of Queer as a concept, please search out James Lindsay’s video on the subject. If I get time, I will add it to this post later on.

It’s not hypocrisy, and it isn’t corruption

Posted on by

At this point its past undeniable that a communist revolution has taken place in North America, and frankly over a great deal of what was Western Civilization overall.

It has become so obvious that the word communism as an adjective for various events and policies, which mere months to a few years ago caused grimacing and smirks in all listeners, has now become a common descriptor, even among the less aware commenters out there. (No offence meant to the linked hosts. They point out important aspects of the revolution and show clips of Trudeau that all need to see)

A large part of this revolution has been the imposition of pseudo-realities, and forcing people to play along with them. This strategy has been applied to everything from immigration to covid to the created Trans-issue and the created climate ‘crisis’.

Governments across the world are rapidly criminalizing expressing opposing views to government dialectics on things like Global Warming using the ‘hate-speech’ catch-all.

Opposing one of these efforts is what made Jordan Peterson famous and influential. He came on the scene because as a Prof. at U of T, he objected to being forced to use pronouns that people chose for themselves. He referred to this as compelled speech. A much more severe form of communist control than mere censorship. And of course he was entirely correct, even if he himself could not see through the same strategy as it applied to Covid and the Vaxx.

As a commenter said below this excellent example of the captured institution, Scientific American under its article on Gender:

“If a man wants to pretend he’s a woman, that’s up to him.

If that man wants me to pretend he’s a woman, that’s up to me.

No actually it isn’t. It is now up to the state. This is an excellent juxtaposition of Socratic thinking Vs. Hegelian. Anyone who likely reads this site would find what he said to be a pithy and accurate description of the nature of free thought. One actually worth fighting over. Which it certainly is. But in order to do that and win, we need to understand where we actually are now on a political map. And where we are on that map is well demonstrated on the Scientific American article to which the tweet above is a Response:

One of the complains quite often made on this site is when people confuse hypocrisy with dialectics. The difference is subtle, and yet it isn’t.

Here is a fumbly attempt to explain the difference:

Hypocrisy, like corruption, all exist within a single overarching system. Corruption is when a person or group takes advantage of a position, or weakness within the system to advantage themselves in some way.

Hypocrisy is similar. A person speaks or even leads people in a way that indicates self sacrifice, or claims to behave in a way that results in delayed gratification, or advocates for other morally superior behaviours, while in secret they behave in exactly the way they advise others not to do. In both examples, the hypocrites and the corrupt require our Western system to be intact, in order to take advantage of it.

But the system we all knew and grew up with has been replaced with another one.

Therefore, the advocates of that system are not corrupt. They are in fact ideologically pure, but of another system altogether.  They may, and usually do, speak in a way that lets their fellow travellers know what they really mean and intend, (with Trudeau being an excellent example), while knowing full well how the uninitiated will understand their words.

For example, when Trudeau says that those who will not take the mRNA gene therapy shots are racist, misogynists who take up space, he is really saying they are counter-revolutionaries and must be eliminated, or at least their views must be, with the people who refuse government directives being marginalized and disenfranchised. No travel, no leaving or entering Canada, no restaurant access etc.

As an example of what corruption actually is or better, corruption Vs. revolution, The MAFIA requires that the banks and other institutions work as they always have as they need a place to store their own wealth. They need to know that they can build their own homes with cement that will not fall apart after 6 months. They need to know that the cancer that they often are on civilization, does not fully metastasize. Because organized crime, even regular crime for that matter needs a healthy host.

I read a story recently about gangs of people in the US robbing stores, and opening their own sidewalk stores to sell the goods they just stole. I couldn’t help but wonder when gangs will rob those sidewalk shops and set up their own shops with that same merch another block away.

Now while that would make for a decent comedy sketch, we all know why it won’t happen.

The initial robbers who stole the merch from the legal owners, are unencumbered by the rules that stop actual legal merchants from using force against thieves.

In other words, you can rob from the stores with total impunity in many places in the US. Leftist places. Blue cities and states. But try and steal from the thieves and you will be hurt badly or killed.

The following Tweet by president Trump is a powerful indicator of how the courts and justice overall is now dialect as opposed to, well justice based.

The trial isn’t rigged. Trials no longer do what we all thought they did.

Courts, like the CPSO hearings, like the Helen Grus hearings, like many many processes in the Western World which have been captured have re-tuned their entire process to create a pre-determined political outcome, and no longer exist to determine what is true, or lawful or in the interests of society as a whole.

It is no longer using evidence and reason to a rational outcome, but a needed outcome that determines what reasoning and evidence will be allowed.

Looking at the take-over of the Columbia U campus, and other campuses by leftists and Muslims:

We all know that if anything even 10% as antisocial as this happened by Trump supporters what would happen. Or people opposed to Trudeau mandates in Ottawa. What is being permitted on campuses, like what was permitted in 2020 in Seattle and in many cities where the Marxist revolutionary group wearing a beard of Black victimhood called BLM is not hypocrisy.

It is the product of a fundamentally changed system. We need to understand this going forward.

This means there is no changing things back to individual rights and a truth based system by using the system, even if there are partial and occasional victories in the courts.

We need to see first how those victories translate into policy that actually is put into effect to know if our institutions still have any meaning as we thought, and many still think they do.

We, as freedom minded people, as classical liberals perhaps, as believers in the rights of the individual including the right to private property, and raise our children according to our own values, cannot develop effective tactics if we cannot understand the enemy strategy, and more importantly or at least more immediately, know where we are on the game board and what stage of the game is being played.

Senator Babet in Australia does a decent job of listing some of the dialectic attacks for which their system is being re-tuned. Censorship is the new normal now. It has been for decades really, but its enforcement is now overt and exponentially more common. The focus is the same though. Again, David Suzuki and Nuclear Winter as a stunning example of how dozens if not hundreds of hours of TV appearances by Canada’s Fruit Fly Scientist who was banging a drum daily about how Western industry would block out the sun and cause an ice age, are impossible to find. Al Jolson videos from the 1920s. But nothing from Suzuki’s Nuclear Winter narrative attacks from the 1970s. There was video tape by then. Two kinds.

Full text:

Canada does an excellent job of demonstrating dialectical enforcement of protests for or against narrative positions:

Gender identity protestors face arrest in BC if law bans demonstrating at schools

British Columbia’s NDP government is considering new legislation that makes it illegal to demonstrate within 20 metres of school grounds to block gender identity curriculum protests.

Premier David Eby said that the Ministry of Education “has documented 18 major disruptions” of protests at schools in the province since the start of the 2023-24 school year, which he claims disrupt educational activities and intimidate students. 

“We’ve had people banging on school windows in British Columbia,” he said.

“It never crossed my mind to be worried that a grown adult would be waiting on the school perimeter to yell at my child about pornographic books or about puberty blockers,” added Eby.

 

In fact, the Government of BC is passing a law creating bubble zones around schools in the same way the Fed Guv did around abortion clinics.

Laws which are enforced strictly enough that a man who stood with a sign which merely read: “Freedom of speech is the cornerstone of our civilization” was arrested for holding it across the street and yards down the block from an abortion facility. And now, you won’t be able to protest the state sterilizing your own children near a school. Interestingly, both policies have the same outcome. No babies. Quell Coincidence non?

Meanwhile, at NYU

Columbia U:

Not Hypocrisy.

Revolution.

Chip Roy, and what he is missing

Posted on by

Seems that Chip Roy is about 60% of the way to figuring it out. But clearly has not got it all.

Not going into how and why both sides of the house are making everything worse, because in effect, that is all this whole website is about. The capture of institutions by the COMINTERN and the move from Socratic methods of determining and utilizing objective truth, to a Hegelian one of imposing a pseudo-reality on the public, and punishing both legally and extra-legally anyone who won’t obey that pseudo-reality for being a counter-revolutionary.

What I do want to go into, is taxes. More and more it is clear that governments pretend to use tax dollars as the fuel for their programs. In fact they use taxes to punish the middle class while creating the illusion of rational (read microeconomic theory) financing. The juxtaposition I like for Canada is this one:

When Trudeau doesn’t like a relatively low cost program:

Meanwhile, Trudeau seems to be financing this semi-official program called, The Century Initiative. This is the plan to bring Canada’s population up to 100,000,000 people by the end of the century, and they are ahead of schedule, having brought in another million people to Canada since Stats Canada CELEBRATED an official population of 40,000,000 people just a few months ago. Note the stunningly propaganda nature of this Stats-Canada video. This was never the purpose of Stats-Can. It was to coldly report facts in an unbiased way in order to help determine policy for the future. A Socratic epistemology. First figure out the truth, then apply the truth in a way that makes things better until you have a better truth. That is not what Stats-Can is now. The video below is pure propaganda and a central department of state pushing a policy, rather than reporting on the population and showing how the numbers were determined.

 

Nearly all of these people are from Africa and the middle East. Few have the resources to live in a country like Canada where heat is expensive and mandatory for survival. Many have lots of children. And one gets the impression that Children in Canada are expensive, especially if you have to obey all the rules and laws that apply to children, such as car seats and so on. So it kinda sorta looks like 2/3rds of the nation’s new citizens will be funded by the state to one degree or another, while veterans who want proper medical care for damage taken in the military will not be funded ‘for lack of available funds’.

So beyond the clear illusion of taxation as a necessary part of the weaponization of money for the destruction of Canada, we also have PROOF that the Trudeau government itself knows global Warming is a lie, since each person from the middle East and Africa multiplies his or her carbon footprint by a factor of FOUR. That’s right. If you move from a 3rd world, tropical or desert country to Canada, the carbon required to keep you warm and moving to the things you need to do, is 4 X greater than it was a point of origin, and the state knows this for a hot fact.

The same thing obviously has happened with Health Canada. This is a fun exercise you can follow along with at home!

In summary:

– Taxation is likely an illusion to one degree or another. The government prints to do what it wants to do, and taxation is for the illusion of rationality, and likely to punish the middle class, given the Marxist-Leninist-Hegelian nature of our rulers in nearly all of the West today. For those who haven’t read it, you may want to carefully read this NP article on the next prime minister of Canada, Mark Carney.

-Global Warming is another dialectical bomb to destroy Canada in whatever way they need at the moment. Often by selectively enforcing elements of it as needs be.

-Canada’s various departments have all been transformed into a Hegelian-Marxist weapon against Socratic reality. What vestigial aspects of these departments remain, is largely to create the illusion to the blue pill people that their reality is safe. That the rest of us are Chicken Littles, and no amount of clouds or meteors hitting them in the head will allow them to suspect maybe that tiny poultry was in fact correct. As a prediction, the pretence is likely about to be removed. Slowly the institutions of state will allow themselves to be known more closely as to what they really are, as they determine that their old names and purposes were racist and anathema to the revolution.