Category Archives: Explaining leftism

Rafi Farber: PM Premiums at all time high, EU calls for Absolute Soviet style controls

Posted on by

As a forward to one of the aspects to this video, we offer a kind of explanation for one remark Rafi makes in this video about silver.

it is generally believed by advocates of precious metals (PM) as either a currency, a basis for currency, or as a way to protect your wealth from inflation and other bad policy moves by government, that the supply of metals such as gold and silver is much lower than is reflected in the price. In other words, if the actual availability of PMs was reflected in the price, the cost would be a multiple of what it is as the public spot price for the metal, and not just some few percent higher.

The explanation for this most often given, is that people buy and sell mostly paper representations of metal to one degree or another, which makes it subject to the same kinds of manipulations via shorts and other derivatives, that we saw with the Hedge Funds and a certain game company, where the price was deliberately tanked in order to make shorts work for the people who made them. Something which should be criminal, but for some reason isn’t depending on who does the crime.

As I understand it, which is abstract at best, metal prices are manipulated in this way but by more and bigger players in order to keep currency strong, or the belief in the currency strong.

The evidence that this is the case, is what is called “the spread”. This means that if you look at the cost of say, silver based on the spot price and compare it to the cost of buying some and having it physically delivered, the difference is at an all time high.

A few years ago, the average spread between the spot and the cost of items you could have delivered  on most products was around $2.50/Oz and maybe a little less in bulk and maybe a little more if it was an odd product you bought such as silver cartridges or a wolf’s head or something. This would be from a dealer like Silver Gold Bull.

As of the time of writing, to buy a few Silver Maple Leaf 1 Oz. rounds/coins the cost is about USD $27.00 per, depending on method of payment while the listed spot price of silver is about USD $18.80 per Oz.

That makes the premium around USD $8.20 per Oz. Which is crazy high. There could be other explanations for this. Demand for silver products, such as bars and rounds or coins could outstrip demand as opposed to the demand for the actual metal, which might be normal or even lower than usual if industrial use of these metals is falling. In that case buying the raw metal could be an indicator.

On Amazon.com Sterling Silver casting grain is around $34.95 USD. Casting grain means it is just rough, uneven beads of silver, made to be melted and reshaped as a liquid into whatever product or jewellery you want. It is also .925% silver, or “Sterling” silver and not quite the .999 or in the case of the Canadian mint, .9999 fine silver you get in the rounds, bars and coins. (Sterling is better for jewellery as its harder and more durable and contains around .075% copper and or other metals)

RioGrande however, has it at USD $23.68 if you buy 3 Oz or more. And that is for .999 fine. This means the REAL spread on the actual metal even for more or less retail is only around USD $5.70/Oz. This is still crazy high compared to the more normal USD $2.50 or so for actual coins, bars and rounds, but is not the whopping spread it is now and is a better reflection of the actual difference in supply and demand of the metal as opposed to demand for familiar silver products which people are clearly buying in vast amounts for very rational reasons.

All this is an explanation for a remark Rafi makes at the start of this video, that we felt deserved a bit of explanation.

James Formosa speaks on his experiences in the Canadian military as it moved through vaxx mandates

Posted on by

We did an interview with James about his discovery that the higher the rank in the military the higher the acceptance rate for vaccine exemptions. So once you hit Lt. Colonel, it was 100% acceptance for all who didn’t want the gene therapy. You can watch that interview here.

Today I had the chance to do a longer interview with Capt. Formosa (Ret.) on a lot of subjects. That will be available as soon as possible. But for now, here is a talk he gave to a group of people in August on bodily autonomy. It is just shy of 30 minutes.

Two examples of the dialectic at work to destroy fundamentals of Western culture and thought

Posted on by

Sorry to keep coming back to this concept. But it isn’t beating a dead horse. It’s beating an invisible T-Rex rampaging over our countries and nations. We beat it hoping it makes enough noise that people finally notice it is there, and what exactly is doing all the damage to us.

Example 1:

The Atlantic is a magazine written to propagandize Americans on behalf of the Democrat party and move them to the left on every issue, and accept any crazy policy they invent, including training and funding Al Qaeda under Obama. (Link will be added as soon as the originating site is working for that document) The Atlantic though, is written for people who think they are smart.

In a recent Atlantic propaganda piece, they try and make the Catholic Rosary into a right wing extremist symbol, using the usual component of Critical Theory and Habermas created Discourse theory.

(Interesting media article on the response)

The basics are, create a narrative with which you can attack a target, then paint all opposition to the narrative, which is necessarily a lie, as hate speech.

Just as the AR-15 rifle has become a sacred object for Christian nationalists in general, the rosary has acquired a militaristic meaning for radical-traditional (or “rad trad”) Catholics. On this extremist fringe, rosary beads have been woven into a conspiratorial politics and absolutist gun culture. These armed radical traditionalists have taken up a spiritual notion that the rosary can be a weapon in the fight against evil and turned it into something dangerously literal.

Their social-media pages are saturated with images of rosaries draped over firearms, warriors in prayer, Deus Vult (“God wills it”) crusader memes, and exhortations for men to rise up and become Church Militants.Influencers on platforms such as Instagram share posts referencing “everyday carry” and “gat check” (gat is slang for “firearm”) that include soldiers’ “battle beads,” handguns, and assault rifles. One artist posts illustrations of his favorite Catholic saints, clergy, and influencers toting AR-15-style rifles labeled sanctum rosarium alongside violently homophobic screeds that are celebrated by social-media accounts with thousands of followers.

Essentially it is what we all should expect in terms of the #1 axiom of today’s world:

Anything revolutionary will be amplified and rewarded. Anything counter-revolutionary will be destroyed. Dialectically if possible, but with force if and when needed.

Example 2:

Police Evict Lesbians from Pride Parade, Their Presence Angered Biological Men who Identify as Trans Women

The dialectic is the main tool of the perpetual communist revolution. Up until now, our favorite example has been how outspoken feminist, J. K. Rowling was hurled under the revolutionary bus when she wouldn’t negate all women by accepting men who claim to be women, as actual women. Women, under leftist thought, are required to self negate when required, by denying any actual biological connection to their sex, in the name of imaginary gender. I think the new favorite example is now this:

A group of lesbian women were removed by law enforcement during a Pride march in Cardiff, Wales, for “causing confrontation” after they were verbally attacked by trans activists. The organization, Get The L Out”, opposes the addition of transgenderism to the LGB category and carried banners that read “lesbians don’t like penises” and “trans activism erases lesbians.”

Videos uploaded to Get the L Out’s Twitter account depict an exchange between Get the L Out organizer Angela Wild and a police officer.

“I want to make sure I understand. You are removing lesbians from an LGBT march. Is that what you’re doing?” Wild asked the officer.

“Yes, that is what’s happening. For your safety and for other people’s safety,” he replied. “At the moment, your march is causing confrontation between different groups of people.”

In the background, a man wearing a dress can be seen rushing towards Liane Timmermann, activist and lead campaigner with the organization, while shouting insults.

https://twitter.com/GetTheLOutUK/status/1563490240912044033?s=20

You can see more at RAIR Foundation.

So, much like Covid and the vaxx, Safety Uber Alles. The excuse to move the revolution forward, is that it is for your own good. But the facts remain. Instead of treating hostile invaders to the LGBT march, (for whatever reason that needs to take place since people with unconventional non-reproductive sexual appetites already have more rights than heterosexuals do) the police removed actual women who are lesbians because men claiming to be women are causing a confrontation with them, and the revolution must move forward. In this particular case, and with J K Rowling, by obliterating the very concept of biological sex in favour of a purely Tabula Rassa, or blank slate concept of what a human being is. The core communist concept. There is no reality except thinking makes it so.

Interestingly, J. K. Rowling has on her wrist, a tattoo of the alchemical phrase, “Solve et Coagula”. Dissolve and remake. Arguably a statement of commitment to the perpetual revolution of the left. I guess she didn’t mean it to go quite that far.

Eeyore for VladTepesBlog.

Important Lowell Green reboot show on Ottawa’s full on authoritarian revolution disguised as Climate justice

Posted on by

For those who don’t know Lowell Green, he was the finest voice on Ottawa radio for decades. When Bell Media bought CFRA, the talk-radio station that Lowell was by far the most popular voice. They waited till they could phase him out, and once that was done, they mass fired all the conservative hosts. Even ones who had the highest ratings in Canada for that time slot. I’m thinking of Pastor John Council as one example. But Nick Vandergragt was also sacked in the same meeting. Now CFRA is another narrative voice peddling the same leftist dialectics as everyone else. Think CNN without all the hair.

Bell Media also owns CTV, and a dozen or so other media outlets in Canada.

Today, Lowell Green did a show on Facebook. I had no idea he was even still on the air, or had a public profile at all. But he does, and anyone living in the Western world needs to listen to today’s show if you want to know your present or your near future. But if you are in Canada, and especially in Ottawa, and especially if you own any property at all, you really, really have to watch this:

(I grabbed this off of Facebook and placed it on an open platform which doesn’t track you, and also isn’t Facebook. When you watch tonight’s Tucker, you will have yet another giant reason to despise Facebook. Turns out they did help rig the election, and now they are blaming it on the FBI. Which while also true, doesn’t change a damn thing about Facebook’s rigging by preventing fundraising and censoring pro-trump groups.

Dialectics: The prime weapon destroying Western Civ – a proto-post

Posted on by

For weeks now I have been ruminating on a paper or post about the state of the dialectic attack on Western civilization via every single imaginable metric. That is to say, think of a value or a compartment or a taboo that is part of the Western culture and thought process and it is under attack. From national feelings to sexual habits to your traditional form of diet in the West.

A lot of people get it at one level, but at the meta, its quite a well constructed ceaseless attack, created and launched via communist and postmodern think tanks, some of which date back over a hundred years.

The evidence is overflowing. So permeated is our culture now that you can basically play a version of dialectic Pin the Tail on the Donkey and win every time. You could blindfold yourself and spin around and walk forward with your arm out and whatever you stop against is probably an example.

(Subsequent to writing this article, this more or less happened when we stopped to take the picture of the embassy flag below, and happened to find this poster beside us)

Each day that goes by, my list of examples grows, and of course, the project becomes more intimidating. So I have decided to do a kind of proto-post on the subject. Perhaps each time I add a data point, I’ll do it in a separate post and link back to this one. It may be messy, but at least the ideas will be out there.

Let’s begin with this video on Diversity training:

What the makers of this otherwise excellent video fail to understand, can be seen in the last couple of sentences:

“Whatever the explanation, it is bad business in the long run”.

See, it’s meant to be. That is what many who are proper critics of the revolution that is now taking place, do not recognize or express. It is meant to ruin not just business, but all aspects of cooperation in our culture between all people by grouping them in various ways and setting them at each other. In fact they may not even recognize it as rhetorical/dialectic weapons in an actual war on Western thought, and the very concept of the individual itself. (My personal theory as to the nature of the vaccine mandates, was specifically to in part or in whole, dissolve the concept of the individual in our own heads and form an almighty collective we put before ourselves, guided by a God like state.) This is why people must be lumped into groups as the attackers define those groups, and set us all against each other. To not do so, is somehow racist, when in fact racism is a key part of the strategy by the leftist revolutionaries.

Another example is sexual preferences, which have been turned into sexual identity now. So much so, that cross walks are sometimes painted with rainbow colours, and crossing lights for pedestrians are sometimes modified to show homosexual people or couples. This is, as we now know, because the most important thing about crossing a busy street is celebrating men having sex with other men.

Much like this flagpole in front of a posh prestigious private school in Ottawa Canada:

Because after the National flag and the crest of the school, the most important thing about educating children from grade 5 to 12, is celebrating sexual identity and practice of anyone engaging in non-conventional sex acts and identifying as being part of groups with similar preferences at the expence, it would seem, of more meaningful identities. This is so important, they actually have to flag the school with it.

How long till that flag finds its way to the top? And then what is known as dialectic negation could occur. The replacement of the National flag, which is anathema to communism, with group identities which maintain acrimony and division. Until of course its all the party flag which by then will be a hammer and sickle.

Perhaps Trudeau’s first minister of health could design it. After all, her training was entirely in graphic arts. Her replacement is a graduate of the communist think tank university, The London School of Economics. Neither of them have any medical training.

 

Then we have the Rogers Communications building on Richmond Rd. in Ottawa. One of the HQ buildings for Canada’s main cable TV, internet, and cell phone providers.

Rogers is more prepared than the private school. They understand that the dialectic attack is part of a never ending revolution, which is what communism is. Their flag is the most up-to-date one with the bits added for Trans and whatever else has been added in the last year or so. At this point the Rainbow flag is at risk of being called racist since it is insufficiently inclusive of whatever new ‘groups’ or ‘communities’ have been created as part of the ongoing dialectic.

These photos are all from this August, 2022. “Pride Month”, which itself is revealing since it’s not “Gay Pride” anymore as, like the flag, its not inclusive enough, was all of  June.

(Also noteworthy is that the literally millions upon millions of young, healthy, productive and nearly entirely men, who sacrificed themselves for our freedom and culture and rule of law, get half a day a year to be celebrated and remembered, while people who like to have sex in unusual ways get a whole month.)

Two months later, and the flags are hanging off buildings which are highly symbolic of important aspects of our culture.

To be clear about the highly annoying and too-often repeated word, “Dialectic”, I mean one thing. Operationally defined for the purpose of this post: dialectics is the weaponization and re-tasking of language in order to be used against classical thought and non-communist, or counter-revolutionary people.

It takes many forms. One common form would be to define a word in such a way that the user of that word, no matter what the context or how that person may use or understand that word, or how its has always been used up until now, can now be made to be guilty of an actual crime based on the new assignment of meaning to that term by communist groups. But that is just one form of dialectics and one worth understanding. Dialectics are always selectively enforced. More accurately, they appear to be selectively enforced. But it is better to see it as a calculated form of weaponized language, the purpose of which is always to move the culture and the law ever leftwards.

When for example, it is not an actual crime to use one of the selected words, they can cite the use of that word to destroy the person in much the same way as if it was. Sometimes worse. I think it was Wendy Mesley of CBC who used, (now get this cause its an example with an example), “The N word” OFF AIR near colleagues, while quoting someone else who used “the N word” to try and show how horrible that person was because they used “the N word” and was fired or otherwise castigated and punished in some manner by the state broadcaster for doing so. The fact that she was waging a dialectic attack against a hated non-leftist by quoting him wasn’t important. It was the blasphemous utterance of the word itself, now more fetish than language, which caused her to metaphorically be put in stocks and have fruit thrown at her.

US Embassy August 21, 2022 Ottawa

The government funded media in Canada, mostly CBC, CTV and Global, but City News, whatever that is, and other news orgs. use the same MO.

They do not cover news and views. They wage dialectic attacks against targets they wish to destroy. Mostly ones which could be properly described as believing in individual choices for themselves and real non-racism as racism was originally sold to us.

Then there is this flag on a private home in Ottawa:

Asexual ‘pride’ flag

This one is extra special. Its an “Asexual pride flag”. This person takes such pride in what they don’t like to have sex with, they flagged their home with it. That, is their identity.

In essence, there is only one metric at play in the developed world now. And its very easy to understand. Any revolutionary act will be amplified, rewarded, normalized and in all ways promoted. If the act is illegal, such as throwing a firebomb at police in Portland or Seattle, or killing a Trump supporter who is an unarmed woman-veteran waved into the Capitol building in the US, it won’t be punished and the person who committed these acts will be protected. Any counter-revolutionary actions will be punished. Even if the act was fully legal and harmed no one, it can and will be construed as “hate speech” along the lines of Marcusean Discourse theory. Suddenly speaking a simple empirical truth will be a crime, and if they cannot make it an actual crime, they will doxx you, attack you in other ways, cause you to lose your job or punish you in legal and illegal ways. This is a full scale war for all the marbles. It just happens to be using information warfare for the most part at this time.

I have witnessed this myself for days at the building referred to as “The United People of Canada building on St. Patrick. Media will fire astonishingly awful attacks with question marks against the people within the organization, while asking softball questions to hate-filled protestors on their lawn. One question I heard repeatedly was, “Can’t you understand that people in this area would be frightened when they see vehicles here that are decorated in a similar fashion to the ones in the convoy when they were so traumatized by the protest?” This isn’t a question. It’s the crown attorney grilling a suspect when he knows they have no lawyer who will object. Had that question been asked as a “guilty by association” issue about any in-fashion group, we all know what would happen to the questioner. Imagine it about fearing a racial or sexual orientation group because of the imputed experience of people with other members of that group. You can see what I mean.

Rude and aggressive protestor who claimed to represent the area

The example above, of reporters asking questions about the symbols associated with the Freedom Convoy of last February, is expressed much more simply by this leftist protestor below. She attempts to destroy the police nearby who tried to remove her for trespassing with one of the simplest and most direct forms of dialectic attack:

I suppose this will do for a start. If anyone made it this far, my sincere thanks.

There will be MUCH more on the United People of Canada soon. It does appear that it was Ottawa’s Mayor who is interfering with their rent payments. I really hope they have a good lawyer.

Cash-strapped Britons give up pets as living costs soar

Posted on by

The following is a guest post by contributor, Xanthippa Socrates, who’s family escaped from behind the Iron Curtain from what was then, Czechoslovakia. 

https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/cash-strapped-britons-give-up-pets-living-costs-soar-2022-08-14/

Note: in the 1970’s Czechoslovakia, pets (in particular, dogs) were declared a luxury and the tax on dogs was raised to be about the same as my family paid in rent for 3 months for what was considered a large, modern apartment (the building had an elevator and everything – and it was assigned to us before my dad became a political dissident, so the bureaucracy found it difficult to kick us out afterwards). It would have been well over a year’s worth of rent that my great-grand-parents were paying annually for their kitchen/sitting room, a bedroom across the common hall (their only access to running water was in that hall and shared with all the tenants on that floor) and a shared toilet…

And the cruelty people were capable of towards their pet dogs when they suddenly became expensive to keep was, for me, unimaginable, incomprehensible…

Taking the dog out to a forest, tying it to a tree (out of sight of anyone who might report it – or save the dog) and leaving it there. Even Hansel and Gretel had a better fighting chance… And this was just an example of ‘passive cruelty’, not the more active types.

This was useful to the regime because it sowed discord and hate into nuclear families: typically, one spouse and/or the kids were pro-pet and willing to do anything for them, and the other spouse resented the cost (and political stigma attached to owning a Western-style luxury pet) and that would be the one ‘getting rid’ of the pet. It broke the trust between spouses, parents/children and so on.

Destruction of the nuclear family at its most fundamental.

The kicker was that because of the housing shortage, even broken families often had to live together for quite some time after the marriage failed, so, no privacy and spite-spying on one’s spouse was easily accomplished.

Bonus: becoming callous to the plight/fate of the beloved family pet dehumanized the ones doing it/witnessing it, making it that much easier to behave inhumanly to others, including, well, everyone… much like taking in an animal, making the kids become attached to it and then sacrificing it to Allah for Eid does. Different ideology, same methodology for dehumanization.

OK, so the ‘tax’ here is based on food/vet bills, but, while the means are a different shade of green, the effect is the same. By giving up their pet, because the cost outweighs their love, people are becoming less humane, more ruthless and feeling more justified in doing whatever it takes to make their life easier, regardless of the cost to anyone else, even their loved ones.

Of course, not all people will fall into this trap. But those who do become useful tools for the tyranny machine.

Xanthippa Socrates

TEVUS, The Attack on Rushdie as White Supremacy and the FBI against Americans

Posted on by

Rumours have come to me from a good source that the FBI, once a crime fighting, constitutionally protecting force, is now tasked to monitor all conservative social media for threat assessment.

(The irony here is that Qanon is almost certainly an FBI false flag operation. If not FBI, CIA or another of the US alphabet agencies)

At one point, all of us would be OK with that. We all understood the word “threat” in the same way. And none of us wanted a threat from anywhere on ourselves, our governments or our institutions. But at this time, we all know that the left, now in control of nearly everything, redefines things in order to make them effective weapons to advance the revolution. Recent examples include “vaccine”, “recession”, “Insurrection”, and many other critical things that allow the left leaning governments to take drastic action which limits the freedoms and rights of the public in a manner selectively applied, (more accurately, described as dialectic attacks) to advantage the Marxist revolution.

We saw how communist violent revolutionaries threw firebombs at police and police stations and took over parts of American cities and declared them Autonomous Zones and even killed people who were Trump supporters. This was not considered a threat and as far as I know, no consequences to anyone involved in those actions yet. So we already know the word “threat” has been redefined to mean: Anyone who is counter-revolutionary.

This site has maintained for some time now that there is only one real metric at play, which nearly perfectly explains most of what we see day to day in the news.

Any action which advances the Marxist, authoritarian, collectivist, totalitarian whatever other adjectives you wish to use, will be rewarded, not punished if illegal, and spread.

Any action which is counter-revolutionary and preserves the basic tenets of the Constitution, and most importantly of individual rights and freedoms will be undone and the people responsible will be personally destroyed. Until now by extra-legal means such as media attacks, personal attacks by communist groups such as ANTIFA etc. harassment and so on. But now the various agencies which were created to protect you and your rights appear to be tasked against you and them. The easiest example is the investigation of parents who go to school boards and object to Marxist teaching such as critical race theory (or any other aspect of critical theory) as terrorists by the FBI.

Yes. A parent who objects to their children being fully indoctrinated by a public school in Marxist doctrine, or tactics derived from Marxist doctrine such as the idea that kids should be talked into believing they are the sex they are not, and then put on dangerous chemicals to prevent normal development, and then surgery, both of which will sterilize the child before they are even old enough to understand sex and if they want children, they are considered terrorists now.

As posted here at Vlad and in the numerous reports in the Reader’s Links following the attack on Rushdie, every effort is made to detach the attack from Islam.

We did this interview quite some time ago now, about how the Biden admin, (we really need a new name for it. Biden is a scarecrow at best and couldn’t run a sausage stand at a baseball game) redefined white supremacy to include acts of Islamic terror. Meanwhile, they delete the Islamic motive from those same attacks as we see clearly with the attack on Salmon Rushdie. Every attempt is made to make it appear to be a hit by the Islamic Republic of Iran without explaining the reason for the fatwa against Rushdie was he questioned the supremacy of Islam in a book and that cannot stand. Increasingly for all of us. At this point many Western nations now have “hate speech” laws, which contain effectively elements that mirror blasphemy laws but only for Islam.

UPDATE: Dinesh D’Souza on “A short history of the corrupt FBI”

Marx and the banning of elements in the periodic table

Posted on by

Examining the problem, reaction, solution/thesis, counter thesis, solution, or the dialectic scam of the left.

There certainly seems to be more than one understanding of this phrase. Here is our shot at it. Of course, there are scholars of Hegel/Marx who read this site, and we welcome any corrections or other interpretations of this well known phrase.

Picking Global Warming as an example, we have a completely invented problem which of course can be manipulated in any way needed to end up at the point you want to land on. Primarily, the destruction of the West with its notions of free market economy and individual rights. Since the problem is fake, and created and enforced by “consensus” (See video below) all the reactions from people calling it out as fake must be dealt with using the dialectic attack of hate speech. This was fabricated by a second generation Frankfurt School acolyte, a certain Habermas, in the form of “Discourse Theory”.

For the past many decades, various leftist controlled governments and leftist think tanks, have attempted to use the element of Carbon as a means to control industry and humanity in a highly selective manner. Like slavery as an issue, we must only examine the ‘problem’ of CO2 production in Western and free market nations, more accurately perhaps, in cultures with the concept of individual rights as being sacrosanct. We must not look at slavery in Africa or Islam ever but must focus on the past actions in The USA pretty much exclusively in terms of passing moral judgment. And we must not look at really dirty industrial activity, let alone CO2 production in China or India but must pretend that CO2 produced by any and all means connected to humans in the West as an existential threat to the entire planet.

There should be no need to try and disprove the idea that CO2 is a problem on this site. I do have a dedicated page to the science of it here on Vlad but I don’t maintain it very well as to engage in a debate based on a lie is to lose that debate since only one side seeks to know the truth and the power of the lie is much greater in the short run. At least where the goal is destruction.

One fact though, is that where CO2 is produced, more life happens. Plants grow etc. Plants, and life, are made of carbon. Even on the side of highways, plants tend to thrive from a truly poisonous form of carbon, CO1 or Carbon monoxide. CO2 is actually pumped into greenhouses to help plants hit their optimal growth rate.

But let’s pretend that CO2 production was a problem. Then why are those who wrap themselves in a false flag of environmentalism, so opposed to nuclear power? Its the obvious solution to those who claim that carbon dioxide is an existential threat to the planet. Whatever the issues with nuclear power, it cannot be as bad as that.

And then there is this:

Geothermal

A very worthy deeper dive:

So we have a solution now for food production that is safe, energy efficient and absorbs far more carbon than it produces.

Global Warming is a consensus based thing though. Meaning communists agreed on creating it and presenting it as an existential problem in order to get to the solution they want, which is communism. No real world approach to solving even the non-problem of “global-warming” will be entertained and any attempt to expose it as the fraud it is will be met with charges akin to hate speech. “Climate-denier” for example, makes moral equivalence with a Holocaust denier to one who would deny the ‘existential threat of global warming’. A fairly palpable use of the Hate-Speech tactic.

More recently, in order to destroy farming in the Netherlands and replace these farms with what will almost certainly be beehive brutalist housing for illegal mostly Muslim and African migrants forced on the local population since before 2015, a new element and compound had to be demonized as an existential threat. Nitrogen, which makes up damn near 80% of the total atmosphere, and ammonia.

I won’t even bother to deal with the issue of nitrogen. To think that the tiny amount of nitrogen released on a few dutch farms justify the actions against farmers we see in the Netherlands is even worthy of rebuttal on that basis, means a lack of understanding of the tactic at play. Much like when one knows that nearly all human beings are born either a man or a woman (with the exception of extremely few genetic mutations which end with those individuals as they tend to be sterile) and to pretend these are fungible is, well risible.

So let’s look at the new threat of ammonia.

How could we somehow solve the issue of ammonia in a way that would satisfy those who claim its a problem while maybe at the same time, solving other problems many are concerned about:

The bottom line is:

The problems we are bombarded with, from Covid to vaccine hesitancy. From global warming to cow flatulence. From Nitrogen to ammonia, are all fake problems which, even by engaging about it, causes us to lose. These are not problems at all, and some, to the extent they might be, are selectively enforced against the Western nations and peoples with zero effort to deal with these non-problems in places like China, North Korea, India and other places where the raw production of these gasses and so on are orders of magnitude higher than in the West.

We need to understand that so much of what we engage with on a day to day basis is we, the intellectual descendants of Socrates, being constantly basted with pseudo-reality and false cosmologies in order to destroy Western civilization where it actually lives.

In our own minds.

Eeyore for VladTepesBlog.

 

Dr. Andrew Bostom on Blaze TV: Twitter and the new Lysenkoism in the West

Posted on by

Please watch the entire thing. Andrew cuts to the chase at the end. Being permanently suspended from Twitter is certainly a serious thing when all you did was post a peer reviewed paper on the vaxx and male fertility.

Put another way, you are put in information solitary confinement for speaking what is scientific truth in the National Town Square.

By the end of the video, Dr. Bostom starts to talk about the state of science in the US. I would extrapolate that to the entire West. He specificlly cites Lysenko. The Soviet conclusion based reasoning method that destroyed so many lives in so many ways from 1917 to today in communist states.

3Speak appears to be down. Below is the same clip from Bitchute

Its OK to have racist and sexist hiring practices so long as it moves the country leftwards

Posted on by

There is a lot to be infuriated about in this video.

But the main two things for this site are:

The news reader talks about “CIS Gender” as if she buys into the notion that sex is merely an arbitrary designation by a doctor at birth by looking at genitals. Its so obscenely an attack on our taxonomy that you could make the same claim about species and even phylum. A person is born and declared a human being when really they could be a half a pound of squash.

The second thing is how the law only works to move the culture to the left. This person is breaking laws on hiring discrimination wherever he is for absolute certain. But there will be no penalties. If you asked him if he thought it was OK for a similar business to not hire black or gay people, we all know what he would say. The law only operates to enhance the dialectic. To move the culture ever leftwards.

Interview with Australian Senator Malcolm Roberts: How language has been weaponized to destroy our liberties

Posted on by

Please read an article on other aspects of this interview at:

https://rairfoundation.com/senator-malcolm-roberts-globalist-predators-and-major-bankers-control-governments-around-the-world-exclusive/

Actual climatology – just the facts ma’am with Prof. Ian Plimber

Posted on by

Remember the climate huxter, David Suzuki? In the 80s he used to shill for communists by claiming Western industry was going to destroy the Earth by putting out soot (Carbon) that would block out the sun and cause an ice age. He called this, ‘Nuclear Winter’. Then, once CBC buried all the video of him saying this bilge, he reappeared with the exact opposite narrative and started saying carbon from Western industry would cause ‘global warming’.

Here is he blackmailing children to send him money to save the polar bears.

The worst kind of ugly climate propaganda: David Suzuki targets kids at Christmas in the name of climate change

Here’s the popup message solicitation you get when you visit the website for the first time:

 

Climate change is melting the North Pole and it’s no longer safe for Santa and his Workshop. So our dear old friend is packing up the sleigh to find somewhere else to live.

You can help! Move your mouse over this website to find gifts you can buy Santa to help him set up a temporary Workshop and protect the North Pole for his return.

Of course, you’re savvy enough to know we won’t be sending actual gifts to Santa. You will receive a tax receipt for 100% of your purchase and proceeds will be used by the David Suzuki Foundation to support our critical work to protect nature and the environment from threats like climate change.

Buying these green gifts and personalized ecards on behalf of hard-to-buy-for friends or relatives on your holiday list is a great way to show you’re thinking of them — and the planet!

The current vaccine, digital currencies, Covid, and lots of other attacks on the west via language, are not the first lines of effort against classical thought. Crypto-environmentalism was most definitely one of them. A line of effort is a point of focus for a disinformation campaign intended to damage a target in specific ways.

Let’s take a purely hypothetical and absurd example as I find fiction often helps to illustrate a point.

One of the main targets of disinformation would be the enemy military. So imagine if you can, that say, the US military picked a man to be a four star general who openly stated he was really a woman, and they picked him, not because he was the best candidate with a peculiarity but specifically because he is a man who insists he is a woman, and has some of the outward trappings of a female, but clearly is not one.

Just to add to the impossibility of this farcical situation, imagine the military was paying for cosmetic surgery for any person to sort of kind of look like the other sex, making them sterile for sure, but also making them less effective as soldiers, and certainly taking them out of potential combat for some long period of time.

Then imagine that the military would put time money and effort into making flight suits specially for pregnant women, where the high G forces of fighter jets would most certainly damage or destroy a gestating baby no matter what the costume worn. G forces are G forces. And the human limit is about 9 Gs for a fit healthy person with no hangover. Imagine what just 2 or 3 X the normal pull of gravity would do to a developing embryo. The most expensive abortion of all time.

(It is possible that the military developed a flight suit, which is basically just customized overalls for pilots and not a G suit for pregnant women. This should have cost about USD $19.95 at wall mart though. A normal flight suit with some spandex around the middle would work fine.)

All of this seems absurd of course. As absurd as if the US government picked a supreme court judge who said as she wasn’t a biologist, she didn’t know the difference between men and women.

Clearly none of these things could possibly happen. But if they did, it would mean the end game of a massively successful disinformation campaign intended to damage all aspects of the machinery of state. And these hypotheticals would represent just one other line of effort. The attack on basic taxonomy. It has become effectively a criminal offence, even if punished outside of the legal space, to advocate or claim there is truth in classical thinking on the biology of sex. On chemistry of climate. On asking for proof of the safety of medicines. Of asking for availability of medicine which is safe and actually works.

It would almost be like as if a Climate activist were to go to the Louvre, disguised as an old woman, and rip of the wig and attack the painting of the Mona Lisa with a cake. What has the Mona Lisa to do with climate? Global warming activism is about one thing. A line of effort against classical thought, culture and values and especially industry. The Mona Lisa is a major symbol of classical artistic achievement. So if such an absurd thing where to happen, well that might explain it.

And then there is  defence of Western culture from one of the most pernicious disinformation attacks of all, the oxymoronic concept of “multiculturalism”. Culture is a set of values which each society codifies into law. Having more than one set of these laws operating within on jurisdiction is not sustainable. Either you have animal cruelty laws or you do not. You cannot allow muslims to slaughter goats or sheep in the garage because they feel its a religious/cultural obligation on them. Either men and women are equal before the law, or they are not. The multicultural aspect of the disinformation lines of effort could go on for volumes. But the point is made.

 

1983: John Birch Society – Larry McDonald on the New World Order

Posted on by

Around May of 1983, approximately 4 months before being shot down in KAL007, Congressman Larry McDonald takes on Pat Buchanan and Tom Braden on Crossfire as they badger him about his new role as Chairman of the John Birch Society. He easily handles them and answers questions concerning the Elite’s Conspiracy for a One World Government.

 

It is interesting to watch the host castigate the John Birch Society for statements it made on or before 1983 which have turned out to be 100% true. Here is the zip file of the pdf of the actual Rockefeller document showing exactly what he said is factually correct. It is from 2010. Decades after they described it.