Forget WHY they are doing this to you. Come to understand WHAT they are doing, the why is a distraction: Links 1 for April 21, 2026

1. Mass shooting at the Pyramid of the Moon in Mexico: When seconds count, the police are just “10 to 15 minutes away”

That’s the only point of this story. Its CTV so watch your blood pressure for all the salt you need when reading. But keep the title above in mind if you favour the Canadian state plan to disarm everyone.

2. The switch of Great Britain into a totalitarian police state must not be dismissed. Much like once Texas is Islamic, the rest of the US will fall like dominoes, once the US is Commu-slamic then so goes the commonwealth.

3. Canada: Former CIA Analyst Rebukes Senator Woo’s Attempt to Discredit the Study That Has Now Captured Woo’s Own Group as Its 576th United Front-Linked Organization in Canada

OTTAWA — A former Central Intelligence Agency analyst whose Washington think tank documented a swarm of Chinese Communist Party-linked community organizations across Western democracies — and identified Canada as the most heavily penetrated per capita — told Parliament that a sitting Canadian senator’s effort to discredit the research amounted to “a kind of laziness,” after that senator’s own newly founded advocacy group was identified by the same researchers as the 576th United Front-linked organization in Canada.

4. Canada: The destruction of all industry:

5. “Schizophrenic” Muslim behind Toronto army recruiting centre knife attack approved for Mecca pilgrimage. Ayanle Ali also plans to fly to Somalia to meet a potential bride brokered by his father

A man found not criminally responsible on three counts of attempted murder for a March 2016 knife attack at a Canadian Forces Recruiting Centre in Toronto has been granted a three-week travel pass for Saudi Arabia and Somalia, despite the fact that he “continues to pose a significant threat to public safety.”

Ayanle Hassan Ali, who is Muslim, plans to go on a pilgrimage to Mecca with his father and meet a potential bride his dad found for him in Somalia. […]

Ali’s doctor testified that his patient’s “faith and religious beliefs continue to be very important to him, and he attends his mosque weekly, and he prays five times daily,” according to a recent decision from the independent tribunal that regularly reviews the status of individuals found not criminally responsible due to mental disorder.

Article content

“He and his father have planned for a religious ritual of Umrah pilgrimage to Mecca in Saudi Arabia. Mr. Ali is studying to memorize the Koran and attends the mosque by his father’s house daily to meet with his teacher. He is hopeful that his tutor may assist him in securing a volunteer position at a local school to tutor in math or French.”


A few thoughts and hypotheticals about Canada and its immediate future.

Let’s start with some factual things:

From Peter Foster’s article about Mark Carney, with quotes drawn from carney’s own book, Values.

In his book Value(s): Building a Better World for All, Mark Carney, former governor both of the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England, claims that western society is morally rotten, and that it has been corrupted by capitalism, which has brought about a “climate emergency” that threatens life on earth. This, he claims, requires rigid controls on personal freedom, industry and corporate funding. […]

Carney draws inspiration from, among others, Marx, Engels and Lenin, but the agenda he promotes differs from Marxism in two key respects. First, the private sector is not to be expropriated but made a “partner” in reshaping the economy and society. Second, it does not make a promise to make the lives of ordinary people better, but worse. Carney’s Brave New World will be one of severely constrained choice, less flying, less meat, more inconvenience and more poverty: “Assets will be stranded, used gasoline powered cars will be unsaleable, inefficient properties will be unrentable,” he promises.

That’s just the opening act. Keep Carney’s own words in mind. We’ll come back to them.

The other day having dinner with some old friends who live abroad, I was asked questions about what is taking place here in Canada. Eventually, after some discussion about how state policies are destroying both individual rights and prosperity in Canada, the inevitable question of “why would they do that?” was asked.

Having had more time to think about it, I want to take a shot at a better answer than I had at the time. But frankly, the why really only matters if you are trying to convince someone that the thing in question is actually happening in terms they can understand. And that is neigh impossible. The frame of reference of those doing the destruction is fundamentally different from those of us raised in a classical, Socratic, Aristotelian West.

The why in practical terms doesn’t really matter. Quite often we cannot understand the why of things without a great deal of effort, because the motives of alien systems of thought or ethics will not make sense to us, and so we will dismiss the events themselves since the motives don’t make sense to us.

“I don’t believe they would do that because no one would want that result”. Is what you get if you try and explain what is actually happening to the public.

Take for an example of a foreign system of thought, Islam. Islam holds it as central dogma that they have to murder Jewish people, destroy civilization and replace it with sharia law, Understanding why means reading thick heavy books by people like Andrew Bostom, which not nearly enough people do. Reading the Koran is not enough because most Christians or Jews who read the Koran will think its as interpretable a book as their own canon. They will read it in their own context. It isn’t of course anything like other religions. It’s a set of instructions, not an interpretation of history or any kind of allegory. It is literal instruction.

All that is needed to be understood, is that Islam is determined to kill Jewish people and or disenfranchise them wherever possible, and then everyone else who isn’t Muslim, and eventually, everyone who isn’t Muslim enough. The why of it is really trivial in terms of planning a response. In fact will prevent an effective response because they why of it will distract from the facts of it.

Israel got badly wounded on October 7th a few years ago for precisely this reason. They lapsed into a comfortable mode of thought that Gaza “just wanted the same things we all want”. Peace and prosperity etc. etc. A better life for their  children. Islam doesn’t value life. In Islam, religion is not a part of life, life is a part of religion. That isn’t me saying it. That is Sam Solomon, the former Islamic jurist. Life itself is a flash in the pan compared to an eternity after life, which in order to avoid hellfire, you must behave as Islam instructs. But again, I am deflecting to the WHY of it. (It is also noteworthy that Carney is importing a massive amount of Muslims and subsidizing their belief system, and giving them far, far less criminal punishment than legacy Canadians for serious crimes like rape and assault etc. Islam is a major destructive force in Canada and the West in general. So beyond a mere example of a different system of thought resulting in destructive behaviour, it is also an example of Carney’s policies to destroy classical Canada.)

And again, those who are unable to fathom the thinking of Islam and therefore understand the why of it, will dismiss the what of it.

-Actions are downstream from philosophy. Philosophy determines all that we do and how we act-

Most people are not able to understand a set of axioms they do not themselves hold. But they should be able to understand that actions signal intent.

The same problem arises when discussing communism. When you point out that communist policies reliably produce suffering and scarcity, the instinctive Western response is: “Cui bono?” — Who benefits? Why would anyone want to destroy prosperity?
But this question assumes a Western frame of reference. One in which leaders are supposed to seek the flourishing of their own people. Communism operates on an entirely different set of axioms. As Stephen Coughlin has documented at length, Lenin, Mao, and others did not “do communism wrong.” They did it exactly as intended.

In 1984, it explains that the purpose of war was to destroy the output of human productivity. Not to win or lose any particular battle or strategic objective. But to destroy all the stuff we create in order to impoverish the people. Perhaps that is to make sure they are so worried about meeting their most basic needs that the concept of revolution, of personal liberty is a great luxury for them.

Inner party members had a few more necessities which appeared as luxuries compared to the common folk in Orwell’s 1984. Enough to make them loyal party members, but not enough to allow them the luxury of political thought. Maybe that is one of the purposes of the destruction of wealth. But communist thought is dialectical thought, not Socratic. Dialectics itself is merely polysyllabic word for destruction.

Canada is doing several interesting things simultaneously. All of which have been documented on this site by authoritative sources. Top constitutional lawyers for example, and even main stream media sources.

One is that Canada is spending an undisclosed amount of billions to import, house and feed a vast number of migrants, which will, according to the century initiative who’s plan this is, (again all of this has been VERY well documented repeatedly on this site) to outnumber legacy Canadians by 3:1 more or less, and depending how you define legacy Canadians.

Canada is expropriating vast amounts of farm land to build housing for these immigrants, and now is expropriating and destroying even more farm land to build a redundant and pointless rail system no one wants.

(It is our prediction that very little of the new high speed rail will ever be built, but the expropriations, reduction in property rights already being passed into law to build it, as well as the funds needed to build it will still be taken/printed and the money used to import and feed more people who have no stake in Canadian culture or well being)

So we have these two facts: 1. The amount of food needed to sustain people in Canada is growing at a very high rate of speed. 2. The ability to produce this food is being destroyed as quickly as possible. 3. The logical, obvious and inevitable result is less food per capita. And looking at a teleological analysis, which is the only way to look at events today, this must be the actual purpose of these policies, because it is the obvious and inevitable result of them. Maybe go back to the quotes from Carney’s book above and see if that helps make it clear.

Canada, as we see from some of the items in this post, is dismantling its trade relationship with the United states as quickly as it can. That trade relationship defines our prosperity. meanwhile we have created a new “strategic-partnership” with the Chinese Communist party, and are trying to integrate with the European Union, which, to paraphrase CNN ‘Is the white face of Chinese Communism’.

In one video here in this post it is stated categorically that a foundational industry, one which is a requirement for all other forms of manufacturing has been rendered impossible to continue to exist in Canada. Again, teleology dictates that this must be the only purpose of the attack on the tool and die trade. I guess the collapse of Canadian industry due to the policies generated by the ‘Climate crisis’ did not destroy enough industries with enough speed to satisfy the Bilderberg/Carneyite,WEFers.

Hanlon’s Razor, that one should never attribute to malice what can be explained by incompetence, is a dialectical weapon of mass distraction. The truth, more often than not, is the opposite. Never let evil people off the hook for brutal acts of destruction and suffering with the excuse of feeble mindedness. These people are brilliant. And when not brilliant, at least bright enough to know what their intent is, or at the very least what the inevitable result of their policies are.

And most importantly, as has been repeated many times by Diana West and so many more excellent thinkers and analysts, “With the left, the point is never the point. The Revolution is always the point”.

In other words, what they say they do a thing for, is never what it is for. What the results are of the thing is always what thing was for. And that result will always be bad for the general public.

 

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

4 Replies to “Forget WHY they are doing this to you. Come to understand WHAT they are doing, the why is a distraction: Links 1 for April 21, 2026”

  1. I see so many crime stories of peace coming out of Ireland nowadays, I get the impression they’re as enriched as western Europe nowadays.
    PS Fuck Abdelilah Habbouly with a cactus.