Category Archives: vaccines

Some important Covid and vaxx updates. Now even Pfizer admits to heart damage: Links 1 for Oct. 18, 2023

Posted on by

1. New John Campbell: Vaccines do not in any way stop the transmission of Covid

(Right at this moment, I know personally two people who have or got VERY sick from Covid. Both had over 2 shots and one was vaxxed up to schedule with the max offered at that point. No one I know who did not get the shots got that sick.)

2. Lancet Study on Covid Vaccine Autopsies Finds 74% Were Caused by Vaccine – Study is Removed Within 24 Hours

A Lancet review of 325 autopsies after Covid vaccination found that 74% of the deaths were caused by the vaccine – but the study was removed within 24 hours.

The paper, a pre-print that was awaiting peer-review, is written by leading cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough, Yale epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch and their colleagues at the Wellness Company, as well as top pathologist Dr. Roger Hodkinson and others, and was published online on Wednesday on the pre-print site of the prestigious medical journal.

However, less than 24 hours later, the study was removed and a note appeared stating: “This preprint has been removed by Preprints with the Lancet because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.” While the study had not undergone any part of the peer-review process, the note implies it fell foul of “screening criteria”.

The original study abstract can be found in the Internet Archive. It reads (with my emphasis added):

Background: The rapid development and widespread deployment of COVID-19 vaccines, combined with a high number of adverse event reports, have led to concerns over possible mechanisms of injury including systemic lipid nanoparticle (LNP) and mRNA distribution, spike protein-associated tissue damage, thrombogenicity, immune system dysfunction and carcinogenicity. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate possible causal links between COVID-19 vaccine administration and death using autopsies and post-mortem analysis.

Methods: We searched for all published autopsy and necropsy reports relating to COVID-19 vaccination up until May 18th, 2023. We initially identified 678 studies and, after screening for our inclusion criteria, included 44 papers that contained 325 autopsy cases and one necropsy case. Three physicians independently reviewed all deaths and determined whether COVID-19 vaccination was the direct cause or contributed significantly to death.

Findings: The most implicated organ system in COVID-19 vaccine-associated death was the cardiovascular system (53%), followed by the hematological system (17%), the respiratory system (8%) and multiple organ systems (7%). Three or more organ systems were affected in 21 cases. The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days. Most deaths occurred within a week from last vaccine administration. A total of 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated as directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination.

Interpretation: The consistency seen among cases in this review with known COVID-19 vaccine adverse events, their mechanisms and related excess death, coupled with autopsy confirmation and physician-led death adjudication, suggests there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death in most cases. Further urgent investigation is required for the purpose of clarifying our findings.

The full study does not appear to have been saved in the Internet Archive, but can be read here.

(Please let me know if either the full study or the Archive no longer work so they can be restored.)

3. Pfizer must have new lawyers, or new concerns. Is this like the warnings on a cigarette box? More protection for the company than the user?

For the upcoming Nuremberg Trials of Pfizer execs and government shills:

https://twitter.com/backtolife_2023/status/1714212118126342622

4. Apparently, this boy who was used to make a Pfizer injection advert when he was 5, died of a heart attack when swimming at 8 years old.

Yeah that happens.

An 8-year-old boy featured in a video used to promote Covid shots for children in Israel died after suffering a sudden heart attack.

According to reports, Yonatan Moshe Erlichman, grandson of a distinguished physician in Beit El, Dr. Mati Erlichman, “died unexpectedly of cardiac arrest while taking a bath.”

The boy reortedly slipped under the water after his heart suddenly stopped beating, causing him to drown. After being rushed to Hadassah Hospital on Mount Scopus, Yonatan died a few days later on Sept. 28.

In 2020, at the age of 5, the child had appeared in a video produced by the regional council of Mateh Binyamin. The video was part of a government program aimed at pushing the Covid shots on children, despite the nearly universal immunity of children to the Covid virus.

This will do for now. Thank you all for checking it out.

 

Maddie Cusack dies at 27

Posted on by

2021:

2023:

Tributes paid to Sheffield United’s Maddy Cusack who has died aged 27

Tributes have been paid to Maddy Cusack, a Sheffield United footballer, who has died at the age of 27.

Cusack had played for the women’s team since 2019, making more than 100 appearances for the club. She also worked for the club as a marketing executive.

The cause of death has not been disclosed.

Two items: Important testimony on the vaxx, and an open letter to union members by Tom Morazzo

Posted on by

1. This is quite a significant bit of testimony about the mRNA gene therapy shots that increasingly appear to be problematic.

Alex Berenson also offers an article about the uniquely Marxist reason that the shots are being pushed in the USA and not anywhere else.

American epidemiologists are feeling defensive.

They’re embarrassed that people have figured out the new American push for mRNA Covid jabs doesn’t match what the rest of the world is doing.

As you may know, most countries are not recommending Covid boosters for most healthy adults under 65 this fall. Meanwhile, the United States is pushing shots on six-month-old infants as well as healthy teenagers (!) and adults.

So why is the United States so far out of step?

This morning, Dr. Katelyn Jetelina, who writes the “Your Local Epidemiologist” Substack, and Dr. Gavin Yamey, a first-order mRNA fanatic, decided to answer that question – an unleashed one of the great self-owns of all time.

Yes, the reason that the United States needs mRNA shots this fall when other countries do not is … wait for it…

The American health-care system is so terrible.

Follow the logic here, please.

Drs. Jetelina and Yamey want Americans to ignore the advice other countries are giving and take expensive mRNA shots – because those countries deliver far better (and cheaper) health-care than the United States does.

Note how they are using the classic leftist dialectic that Capitalist USA has inferior medical care, despite the fact that everyone who can afford it from billionaire dictators to middle class foreigners, fly to the US when their own health care abilities hit its limits. They are trying to appeal to people who actually believe Michael Moore movies to get them to take more shots. Fascinating.

2. The following Tweet is from Tom Morazzo. He is appealing to union members to carefully consider if Unions actually reflect the interests or values of its members. Please read it and pass it along to any civil servants or union members you know.

You’ll have to click Show More to get the essay. I’ll paste it all below:

PLEASE SHARE FAR AND WIDE. PLEASE TAG YOUR LOCAL POLICE DEPARTMENTS.

@OPP
@NiagRegPolice

A Crucial Moment for Union Members: Time to Reconsider Your Stand Dear Union Members and Teachers, This is a plea for a serious re-evaluation of your roles within the context of your unions.

Have you ever questioned whether the actions of your union align with your personal and professional ideals? This is not a question to take lightly, especially given recent events. The Question of Professional Mandate Since when did it become the role of unions to engage in militant activism, adopting Antifa-like tactics to confront parents?

The troubling language of “Rapid-Response teams” and the call for a Provincial and National “Antifa” movement is alarming. Is this truly the role you envisioned for your union, an organization that’s supposed to fight for your professional interests? The Line You Never Thought You’d Cross Remember, these are the same unions that many of you feel did not provide adequate any support during the Covid-19 pandemic mass job losses, myself included from OPSEU.

And yet here it is, crossing lines that make many question its mission. How did we reach a point where teachers, the educators of our future generations, are pitted against the parents who entrust them with their children? The Ethical Dilemma: Whom Are You Really Serving? As a teacher, did you sign up to engage in ideological battles that potentially harm the psyche of our children?

What happened to the days when you felt proud to teach, to nurture young minds, and to be an integral part of a community? When you look in the mirror, do you still see that teacher, or do you see someone who has been coerced into an activist role that you never signed up for?

Do You Really Know Your Union Leadership? Who are the people guiding your union’s agenda, and do you fully understand their motives? How deep is the influence of groups like the Antihate Network within your union’s leadership?

And have you ever questioned their role in shaping your union’s activism? Parental Rights and the Importance of Family Understand this: parents are not the enemy. They, like you, want what is best for their children.

The hostility and division that we currently see serves no one and harms everyone, particularly our children. When the school system encourages secrecy between students and parents, isn’t it clear that the system has overstepped its bounds? A Call for Immediate Action The potential for violence has escalated rapidly. Chiefs of Police in cities hosting protests should contact the leaders and organizers from both groups and offer an immediate meeting.

This is a rare leadership opportunity to manage expectations and de-escalate the growing potential for violence between the Unions militant members and Parents. If not, this will most certainly become another Ottawa, February 2022.

This is you chance to do engagement instead of enforcement. The Politicians will betray you again if you don’t serve your communities. A Plea for Responsible Leadership and True Education At this crossroads, the question looms: will you allow your union to operate outside the scope of its intended mandate, or will you reclaim its original purpose of advocating for your professional well-being?

The unsettling push for counter-protests against parents isn’t just a departure from your role as educators; it’s an affront to the very principles of community and collaboration that the education system should embody.

Remember, this is the same union many of you believe did not adequately support you during the unprecedented challenges of the Covid-19 pandemic. How can such an organization be trusted to guide you in matters that go beyond your professional obligations, plunging into ideological confrontations that harm the very children you vowed to educate and nurture?

Now, more than ever, you hold the power and the moral responsibility to stand for what is truly important: the well-being of our children and the integrity of the education system. This is not a moment for passivity or resignation. It’s a moment for action. You have the option to align yourselves with parents who, like you, are motivated by the singular goal of children’s well-being.

Standing with them sends an unmistakable message that you prioritize your true roles as educators over any form of partisan or activist agenda. Don’t let this pivotal moment slip through your fingers. Take this as an urgent plea to stand up and reclaim your union’s original mandate.

If the current leadership cannot or will not do so, it may be time for a change at the top. This is your opportunity to restore not just the trust of parents, but the faith of society at large in the nobility and essential function of teaching. Stand tall, speak up, and act now—for the sake of the education system, for the sake of our children, and for the sake of your own professional and moral integrity.

Dr. Peter McCulough and many more speak to the European Parliament: WHO’s proposed new rules

Posted on by

Having now watched it, please make sure you watch Dr. David Martin at 30 minutes!

Lethbridge Herald raw stats from obits

Posted on by

Have not had a chance to check this for authenticity yet. But it seems pretty consistent with all the other data, graphs and exposes we have seen on excess deaths since the vaxx roll out.

CBC has an excuse for it though. People slipping on banana peels and so on.

The number of Albertans who died over the last three years was significantly higher than what would be considered normal for that stretch of time, and not all of that increase is attributed to COVID-19 deaths, according to new data from Statistics Canada.

Weekly death estimates from the federal agency show there were 9,821 extra deaths over the course of the pandemic, from early 2020 to the first week of November 2022. That is, close to 10,000 more people died than what would normally be expected for the same time period. Researchers call this number excess deaths.

The official count of COVID deaths suggests the disease is responsible for a large proportion of excess deaths. Alberta Health data shows 5,277 people died of COVID-19 between January 2020 and early November 2022. 

But experts say COVID-19 numbers miss the true loss of life that has occurred since 2020. They point to a variety of potential factors for the other deaths, including the province’s toxic drugs crisis and an under-pressure medical system.

Others argue Alberta is undercounting COVID-19 deaths.


Dr. McCullough’s Speech at the European Parliament

Posted on by

This just in: Ontario College of Family Physicians sent out the following to doctors:

M files: South Africa publishes Pfizer contracts

Posted on by

SOUTH AFRICA – State to comply with South African High Court Judgment to make public COVID-19 vaccine contracts and is not appealing

State to comply with South African High Court Judgment to make public COVID-19 vaccine contracts and is not appealing

===============================

Open the Contracts: Court rules in favour of vaccine transparency
Judgment handed down in the Pretoria High Court on 17 August 2023!

Pfizer contracts :

–1. Manufacturing and Supply Agreement.

46 pages (PDF)

Click to access OCRPfizer-1_Redacted.pdf

==========================

-2. Amendment to Manufacturing and Supply Agreement.

5 pages (PDF )

Click to access OCRPfizer-2_Redacted.pdf

============================
-3. Binding Term Sheet.

8 pages (PDF )

Click to access OCRPfizer-3_no-sign.pdf

==========================

MORE :

Pandemic Transparency

 

Discourse Theory and vaxx rejection as Holocaust denial application of it

Posted on by

This site has referenced Habermas’ Discourse Theory numerous times. But some examples beg for a new visit.

THREAD: Meet

@CaulfieldTim

, a Canadian law professor and health law ‘expert’ at the University of Alberta. During Covid, he notably defamed anyone questioning Big Pharma. But should a “science communicator” act this way? Isn’t the essence of science to challenge our own hypotheses and explore all possible options? What Timothy Caulfield did was equate those distrusting Big Pharma with Holocaust deniers instead. This association was made both directly and indirectly, as he frequently used the term “denier” in numerous posts—a term often linked with Holocaust denial. He also never questioned the ‘vaccines’ and public measures such as ‘masks’ and ‘lockdowns’. One should be cautious accusing others of corruption due to potential consequences. However, the attached evidence suggests otherwise. In April 2020, Caulfield received $380,000 to combat Covid misinformation, and a year later, a whooping $1,750,000. Under the hashtag #ScienceUpFirst, he cherry-picked data and discredited those with differing views—all in the name of science. Timothy Caulfield has acted as a digital witch-hunter for the past three years, which I’ll prove in subsequent tweets. I would strongly advise

@UAlberta

to consider initiating disciplinary proceedings against this “anti-science aggressor” (to borrow Caulfield’s own phrasing). Otherwise, the institution may soon face scrutiny for its continued association with someone who appears to be an overtly unscientific propagandist. (I’m writing this thread in real-time, so please come back for upcoming posts or hit the notification bell on my profile!)

Seldom does one find such a clean and perfect example of second generation Frankfurt School, Critical Theorist, Habermas’ application of his discourse theory. The idea put overly briefly, is that a consensus is created by the people who wish to control what is believed, and any attempt to deviate from the consensus view, is destroyed by attacking the person introducing evidence to contradict the consensus view, as being evil by nature. In this case, by claiming that denying the value of the vaxx is equivalent to denying the Holocaust. Of course the communists don’t give a sweet God damn about the Holocaust, since they basically caused it, (and if you are not yet ready to accept that National Socialism was Socialism, the Soviets did their own version of it) just like they don’t care about women’s rights (as we see from the push for ‘trans-rights’ which are designed to obliterate Women’s rights). But they do care about how they can use public perception of these things to force the Revolution forward.

Also note that in this case, Consensus does not equal agreement. Consensus means a group, such as for example, Pfizer, the FDA, the CDC and parts of the executive branch will decide that everyone has to get the mRNA injections. It doesn’t matter that some or all parties know it doesn’t work and its tantamount to Russian Roulette. It matters that the consensus is followed and Discourse theory will be used to force it.

Please do watch the video below. It is a little dense, and does require concentration. But it is not long and is well worth it. Another key to the disinformation universe we now find ourselves in. For those too tight for time to watch all ten minutes or so, go to 4:45 and watch the next couple of minutes to understand how the concept of “consensus” differs in this use of it than how we are meant to understand the term from a non-club member. So to speak.

As an aside, for those who have not seen the excellent mini-series, Chernobyl, after understanding Discourse Theory, Soviet modus operandi as described in the series makes a great deal more sense. It is well worth the watch. But from our point of view, the value of the 5 part series is more in how communist thinking created the disaster and nearly several more than in the drama itself.

Also please read the whole thread on this Canadian scientism-ist here.

 

Dr. John Campbell on the newest scariant and Biden’s promise to inject us all

Posted on by

The following video (language warming en extremis) claims that Biden has announced that there will be a new vaxx that everyone will be made to take.

If anyone is aware of that video of Biden making that claim, PLEASE post it in the comments. Having said that, one must wonder if “made to take it” doesn’t mean what this gentleman thinks it means. If they want to force us all to take it, they easily could by hiding it in things we already do. No details, because I don’t want to give anyone any ideas. But here we are. Should they decide to force all of us to take something, one begins to think that they will do it in a way that simple force is not an option for us.

Donald Trump: We Will Not Comply

Posted on by

Interview with Dr. Mark Trozzi

Posted on by

This was a very enjoyable interview to do. I hope you all enjoy watching it as much as I did doing it.

Please read the write up at RAIR Foundation.com

To donate to Doctor Trozzi, please click here

Earlier videos of Dr. Trozzi predicting what is happening now.

World Council for Health

A quick note, I did watch hours of the ‘trial’ of Dr. Trozzi. It had nothing to do with finding truth and setting policy to benefit the public and was entirely about punishing doctors who did not follow state diktats and honour state ideology, whatever it was that day.

Note video below:

Anyone watching that and still thinks the CPSO or the provincial or federal government policy is centered around public health may want to check in for another mRNA injection.

Dr. John Campbell Ph.D. on grotesque under-reporting of Myocarditis

Posted on by

John Campbell gets one thing staggeringly wrong. I guess his friends are cardiologists and not oncologists. No, mRNA vaxx is not a good risk benefit for people with cancer.

Prof. of Oncology, Dr. Angus Dalgeish

Dec. 2022: Prof. of Oncology about the vaxx and “turbo-cancer”

Posted on by

When the mechanism of the mRNA injection was first described to the public, some percentage of people must have thought, ‘How can this not cause a massive amount of weird cancers?’ I know I did. The idea of forcing your own cells to make an alien protein and then train your immune system to attack the protein your own cells created seemed a little more dangerous than say, artificial sweetners. Or even a pack a day of cigarettes.

Then the small cabal of honest doctors who did speak out and were immediately branded as conspiracy theorists and worse, started talking about the number of patients they started to see that had recurring cancer or new cases, but that are much more aggressive than the usual forms.

What we can reenforce from this, is that in the post-revolutionary West, the facts do not matter. And more importantly, the facts will not be allowed to pollute the narratives. As we like to say here at Vlad, at least recently, all we are told from the government media complex is the dialectic opposite of the truth. Not the opposite, but the dialectic opposite. Which is harder to pin down, but makes sense of the odd relationship between what is true, and what we are told. Calling people who believe they have a right to personal medical choices, “racists and misogynists for example, is a dialectic opposite of the truth. Some of them may have been. But that has nothing to do with the issue.

Below, a ranking oncologist from December 2022 that made an attempt to warn people. I wonder if he ever made it onto BBC or CBC. Put another way, when do we march into BBC and CBC with a column of 200 police and ten thousand of the public and arrest all the principle people at BBC and CBC ETC?