Vlad Tepes

1. James Woods, like several other major conservative voices recently, has noticed Islam as the threat that it is, or has decided the cost benefit of talking about it is lower than not talking about it. Either way, WELCOME ABOARD and so glad you saw the light.

Fed Up with Islam, James Woods Issues Savage Statement That Will Offend Every Muslim on Earth, But Could Give Hope to Everyone Else

Western Civilization needs to have an honest conversation about Islam after Sunday’s deadly shooting at Australia’s Bondi Beach, as it is by no means a stand-alone affair.

Actor James Woods is someone who realizes this, as his Wednesday post on social media platform X showed. Woods noted that the shooters that day in Sydney, Australia, targeted Jews celebrating Hanukkah.

He also pointed to the genocide of Christians taking place in Nigeria.

The common thread, he pointed out, is Islamic terrorists.

“It isn’t just about who is being killed,” Woods wrote. “It’s more about who’s doing the killing. It is, of course, Islamic terrorism. The jihad to eradicate ‘infidels’ and occupy their nations is in full swing.

2. In the Tweet above, James Woods retweets an account called Casey Babb who we are unaware of till tonight. But independently, someone sent me this Tweet from the same account:

3. The general climate on US colleges

4. What would the best and fastest way to turn boys into misogynists be do you think?

I think the Brits have nailed it.

Full text:

??? BOYS AS YOUNG AS 11 COULD BE SENT TO “ANTI-MISOGYNY” TRAINING: THE UK’S NEW THOUGHT POLICE?

Under new plans to tackle violence against women and girls, UK schools may soon refer boys as young as 11 for “re-education” if teachers detect what they deem to be “toxic” or “misogynistic” views.

That could mean anything from parroting Andrew Tate clips to making “inappropriate jokes” could be flagged for early intervention.

Why did this happen? The UK Department for Education commissioned research and found that 70% of secondary school teachers surveyed, said their school had actively dealt with sexual violence and/or harassment between children.

And what’s the goal with this new policy? According to ministers, to stop violence before it starts.

Teachers will be given specialist training to talk to pupils about issues such as consent and children who show harm towards parents, siblings or in relationships will be signed up to behavior change programs.

However, what counts as “toxic” is fuzzy, and it gives schools sweeping power to decide which thoughts need correcting.

Genuine concern for women’s safety is being paired with a worrying creep toward ideological policing, and it’s happening in the classroom.

Raise respectful boys? Absolutely.

But surveillance and indoctrination by school staff? That’s a very slippery slope.

Source: Daily Mail, The National Scotland

Here’s a hint for any British lad who is being sent for communist feminist reeducation:

Just tell them you’re Muslim. Then the school will fund your misogyny and arrest anyone who speaks badly about it.

Case in point:

5. ANOTHER reason why we should be BEGGING to be the 51st state

Thank you all for checking out this site.

We have been out today and off and on for the next few days collecting interviews and original materials on various stories we track. So posting may be a bit light here on the site till all that is ready. But here are a couple of things that are worth looking at.

Helen Grus was in the endless hearings over her attempt to stop babies from being killed by the vaccines. Well that isn’t quite fair. It was trying to find out IF the babies were being killed by the vaccines, which they 99% certainly were.

One of her supporters made her this amazing constitutional cake. I had the chance to take a photo of it.

And this has to be seen and read. President Trump has added explanatory plaques under the images of past presidents at the White House. I would have to say he trolls better than Ben Bankas.

Click through and read up on your favorite presidents. The plaques under Obama are truly epic.

Lastly, this Daniel Greenfield Article is brilliant. Simple. Factual and in a sense, the easiest explanation for dialectics there is.

1. This was the lighting of the Menorah on the 14th, a couple of days ago. Mark carney showed up, apparently, according to the Rabbi who officiated the ceremony at city hall, unexpected.
Carney of course is the one consistently bringing in Johadis and seemingly funding them, disarming their victims and essentially deracinating all forms of identity except Islamic. For the moment.

So this was confusing. If it was an attempt to assuage the Jewish and Jewish ‘allies” community that he was sympathetic about the attack in Bondi, then why not publicize that he was attending. Again, if indeed it was unexpected. Then again, security etc. There wasn’t much there. More Shomrim (Jewish community security with great uniforms and no weapons) than actual police that I could see anyway.
Or it could be a politician trying to be all things to all people. That would be a thin enough reason to be believable. A kind of optics of nothingness. Because of course, if you are all things to everybody you are nothing to anyone.

The article at RAIR has a few photos and a more compelte description And here is a video from the event.

2. CBC report on Israel denying leftist anti-Israel Canadian politicians entrance to the country unless they signed a document of some kind. The nature of the document was given to CBC by CAIR Canada, a known HAMAS front group, now called NCCM, but formed as CAIR, Canadian branch. CBC accepted CAIR’s explanation for this event without question.

This is the group of “Canadians” who tried to enter Israel and are upset they had to sign something.

As the meme says, “You can’t hate the CBC enough.

3. This is a new video by Dr. Michael Yeadon, former VP of Pfizer, discussing the nature of the mRNA/DNA injections for which he makes the case that they are weapons. From a personal point of view, they may or may not be weapons, but they most certainly are not ‘vaccines’. In any case, this clip is unfortunately going viral in an edited version with the constant interruptions of Alex Jones, expressing urgency but adding no actual information. Not even time source or date for this clip.

The issue here is how that kind of presentation tends to diminish the gravitas and effect of information from a genuinely high value source like Michael Yeadon rather than amplify it to an audience that otherwise may have been receptive to it. Bright people I know became more resistant to real information about the harms of the injections because of presentations like that.

I have zero idea if Alex intends that effect or not. Hopefully not. But it would be great if the whole unedited clip was pushed out to his large audience with time it was made, where it was found and better, why it was made. This is apparently in aid of a major law suit being prepared for “The “Stassen legal effort”

The Straasen Legal effort is a civil tort lawsuit (not criminal) filed on behalf of Dutch citizens who claim they were injured by COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Originally seven plaintiffs (one of whom reportedly died), with additional victims seeking to join in 2025. The core allegation is that the defendants deliberately misled the public about the vaccines’ safety and efficacy, inducing people to get injected under false pretenses through deception, coercion, and concealment of risks.

Full Kudos to Elon musk though for making Grok an actually useful device for getting to the facts of the matter and sourcing things that actually matter. With Grok’s help we got to the original video, or so we think, that is dated 1 day ago.

Here is a YouTube page with a collection of videos that appear to be for this law suit.

In the presentation by Dr. Micheal Yeadon, he mentions something that was not publicized at all, or at least not at all in proportion to its importance, and which I know for a fact was absolutely true. That Covid patients had been administered a mix of morphine and Midazolam. This combination is known to doctors as “End of life” drugs.

We did an interview early early in the Covid “pandemic” with a Swedish whistle blower doctor who exposed the whole plan to kill off a lot of the elderly by denying them oxygen and administering them that exact cocktail. Further, that the Swedish state had issued a SECRET directive to do so, which he shows us and is discussed also by a nurse in the following interview by Dr. Tallinger himself.
This interview was done on or before June of 2021

4. I think Charlie Kirk had it about right on everything

5. This movie brought to you by Winston Smith, the Ministry of Truth and the memory hole of actual meaning

Click through to YouTube for the comments. It isn’t lost on them. Many are brilliant. Note the release is on MayDay.

“If I saw this on a plane I’d still walk out” wins though.

Thank you all for checking out this site.

And for your thoughts, tips and contributions for things worthy of our attention in the Reader’s Links.

1. Tucker Carlson and Matt Walsh on Canada and recent laws and policies in Canada such as MAiD

Whatever else you can say, and we do a lot, about Tucker’s new points of view on islam, Russia and MAGA Communism (Alexander Dugin) he is pretty close to a Bullseye on Canada. Especially on the issue of MAiD. The state must NEVER have the power to administer death. Even if you think it’s for your reasons. because as fast as a coin flips, it will be for the state’s reasons.

Related: here is a National Post article about an all star death doctor, how started out as an abortionist, then moved on to euthanasia. I would be interested to know her political opinions on all the other narrative attacks of the last ten years.

2. Australian Imam on the importance of physical jihad or ‘fittna’ struggle against the unbeliever for Islam. Clearly this goes to motive when it comes to looking at the attack in Bondi yesterday. But in a way it doesn’t. Islam believes that they must fight until all religion is for Allah. This is stated multiple times and multiple ways in the Koran. (Qur’an 2:193, 8:39, and 9:33) And while Islamic antisemitism is a core doctrinal aspect of Islam, it must be understood that it doesn’t matter what religion or sociological/philosophical principles you choose to live by. Muslims are willing to do a whole lot of killing to take away that choice from everyone. This is a core fact and so easy to prove that it’s a near insult to the intelligence that people do not just get it already. They will permit people to live once a region is under Islamic control and sharia law, so long as they are 100% subordinate to Islam in every way. They must be ritually humiliated “and feel themselves subdued” when under islamic law and paying a special poll tax in a humiliating manner for the crime of not being Muslim.

3. We have discussed Stephen Coughlin’s analogy of the sniper and the alleged ally who works for the enemy posing as your friend, who perches beside you and moves the muzzle of your rifle 1mm such that the 1 mile shot you lined up misses by several yards. This is of course, an analogy for how it is used in the political warfare campaign against Western Civilization.

There are at least THREE ways in which this is used against us all in terms of officialdoms’ response to the Bondi attack.

One is blaming it on terrorism. Terrorism is a word that has become so redefined it has about as much meaning as “vaccine” or, “extremist”.

So first let’s define it properly to understand how it is being turned against us and to make defence impossible.

Terrorism is a tactic. It COULD be a strategy, and it is for Islam for sure. But generally it is a tactic. It involves horrific attacks against soft targets for political reasons, but arguably have no strategic value other than the shock effects of the horror inflicted on soft targets. On October. 7, no attacks were launched against Israeli military or other hardened targets. But the results they got, and they are MASSIVE gains for Islam around the world, are entirely from the political warfare/spell-craft effects of the attack on various parties and soft targets.

Our COMINTERN leaders use the word, Terrorism to mean anything which opposes state narratives now. At least in the Anglosphere minus the United States. but under Biden and Obama it did. Blaming a strategic problem, one of Islamic jihad, on terrorism is a distinct shove of the muzzle and several degrees off target. At this point no one should have any doubt that the authorities will not allow us to name the enemy, which is ISLAM.

Second, I am going to call this, the Schindler fallacy. although I bet there is already an existing latin name for it which is much more impressive.

Although it is likely that the one person who actually tried to stop the Islamic Jihad attack has an Islamic name, he may in fact be a Maronite Christian, he is being painted as the Muslim hero that might have saved hundreds of Jews. This is not the first time we have seen this. In the past there have been a couple of instances where someone with a Muslim name did something to interfere in a positive way with Islamic attacks on soft targets in the West.

The media jumps on this always and creates a hero out of the “muslim” while ignoring the Islamic motives of the attackers in every case. So it is with the Bondi slaughter.

I am calling this “The Schindler Fallacy because the fact that Oscar Schindler saved many Jews from Nazi extermination does not make Nazism good because Schindler was a ranking Nazi officer. It makes him a really bad, disobedient and traitorous Nazi. So even if this hero, and hero he most certainly is by any rational definition and thank God the eternal for his actions, was Muslim by heritage, his actions were quite specifically un-islamic. Muslims are always to assist in jihad in any way they can. And to act against a Jihad attack and especially to protect Jewish people and a Jewish public event (the real issue but we covered that yesterday) would be exactly like Schindler lying to the Nazi party for the specific purpose of saving Jewish slaves in his factories. So if Ahmed Al Ahmed is in fact Muslim by heritage, he is a good person, but a bad Muslim in exactly the same way as Oscar Schindler.

THIRD:

And this one is so convenient to communist narrative positions on public ownership of guns that one has to wonder to what extent this was set up for it, or was this just a Mayday present to communist control of the public?

One of the common rebuttals of gun-confiscation active measures against the public is that licensed gun owners never commit these kinds of acts and rarely if ever, even conventional murders. But in this case, one of the arrested men for this mass casualty act of Islamic jihad did in fact have several legally registered weapons. And this despite his known connections to Islamic terror. Not that this matters to the point, but if the state was looking for a way to increase removal of guns from the law abiding public, this individual committing this kind of attack is most certainly a Chanukah gift from Hades to those who would remove your rights. Planned or not.

The following is Grok, (X’s AI) search results showing both the attacker’s legally registered guns and his known terrorist attachments.