Canadian/UK state apparatus and media retasked as communist dialectically operating orgs

The various ministries or departments of a republic are clearly intended to operate as per their title, to accumulate information or regulate industry for the benefit of the people within the parameters of their field and authority. The media was to make sure they did their task as designed and hold them accountable when they did not.

The communist revolution across the West has made these institutions into ones that operate, as one would expect, as they do in communist polities like the Soviet Union. Statistics Canada no longer collects important information in order to inform government policy and to let the public know what the facts are to see how they should vote in order to affect said policy, but to promote state narratives no matter how destructive they are. And, like all dialectical organizations, their very purpose is destruction. So the operation of the media and institutions of state is now destructive by design.

Here are two examples from Statistics Canada. One is obfuscating reality in order to have no idea about the truth of crime statistics whatsoever, and the other a promotional video celebrating the consequences of destructive state policy, namely mass immigration by hostile ideologies into Canada.

Both of those videos show that the agency is operating in the opposite manner that it was created for, and how people expect they still operate. It is too difficult a pill for most Canadians to understand this transformation however. Explaining it to them kindly, with patience and with enough evidence for any pre-communist court or actual scientific analysis to conclude this is the case, only makes them come to a slow boil rather than convince them.

Still, one has to try. The more they listen and absorb, the faster their own day-to-day experience will lead them to the truth of their senses. And it will be because of what you showed them, even if they don’t remember it, admit to it, or credit you. But we must do it.

Moving on to Health Canada:

This is a presentation at Parliament Hill on Oct. 25th 2025 by Shawn Buckley, a Constitutional lawyer who started and ran the National Citizens Inquiry which was the only forum for truth, or if truth is an uncomfortable word in the purest sense, the only venue for counter-narrative views and science during the Covid years.

In this presentation they discuss Health Canada’s newer regulations which prevent people from accessing effective health care.

Moving on to police/media complicity to enforce narrative. This has become so common that it feels like a potential insult to the reader to post examples. But it is very important to stay aware of the real nature of the media and state organs if one wishes to preserve ones’ sanity in these times.

Below, the ongoing narrative attack on Private property by the state, using the totem of abuse of Amer-Indian people. For those that don’t know, for months, flags were at half mast and the public was bombarded by state media on alleged graves of Amer-Indian children at residential schools, the evidence for such claims has never been demonstrated, and now there is talk of criminalizing requesting that evidence. This would be “Residential school denialism”. This fits into the Orwellian pattern the rest of this post is pointing to. More on that farther down.

In this clip, someone trotted out to be an Amer-Indian leader explains that they do not want the alleged bodies exhumed and they want them left right where they are, but they can just sense that they are there. This is where reality gives way to scientism, exactly as it did during Covid.

OK this is maybe marginally related. But the fact that she queued in to the destruction of the English Language with Orwell’s essay on Newspeak makes it worth putting here.

I think this was somewhere in the city still called, Toronto, but bearing no resemblance to a Canadian city of a few decades ago, an employee at a GoodLifeFitness gym followed her instructions to evict anyone displaying a weapon. She was promptly fired for it. Of course it was a Sikh. And as one might expect, his behaviour in the gym at least appears to have been deliberately provocative to create this exact scenario such that he has an easy payday ahead of him, and equality before the law gets dissolved a little bit more in the acid of dialectical multiculturalism.

I don’t know who this guy is, or what his deal is or his party is. But overall what he said is exactly right. I would take minor issue with some of his history, but in terms of the nature of these bills he references, yeah. It’s what he said. And yes, there is a configuration of these bills that can end with life in prison for thought crimes.

Today’s excerpt from the Gulag Archipelago. I would ask that all of you, Canadian, American, European if you can still even read this site (I get reports that many cannot) PLEASE read this little excerpt then search for videos on Canadian bills, C9. now law, C22, C8 and C 34 I think it is.

“Article 58 consisted of fourteen sections. In Section 1 we learn that any action (and, according to Article 6 of the Criminal Code, any absence of action) directed toward the weakening of state power was considered to be counterrevolutionary.

Broadly interpreted, this turned out to include the refusal of a prisoner in camp to work when in a state of starvation and exhaustion. Thls was a weakening of state power. And it was punished by execution. (The execution of malingerers during the war.)

From 1934 on, when we were given back the term Mother- land, subsections were inserted on treason to the Motherland- la, 1b, 1c, 1d. According to these subsections, all· actions directed against the military might of the U.S.S.R. were punishable by execution (lb), or by ten years’ imprisonment (la), but the lighter penalty was imposed only when mitigating circumstances were present and upon civilians only.

Broadly interpreted: when our soldiers were sentenced to only ten years for allowing themselves to be taken prisoner (action injurious to Soviet military might), this was humanitarian to the point of being illegal. According to the Stalinist code, they should all have been shot on their return home.

(Here is another example of broad interpretation. I remember well an encounter in the Butyrki in the summer of 1946.

A certain Pole had been born in Lemberg when that city was part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Until World War II he lived in his native city, by then located in Poland; then he went to Austria, where he entered the service, and in 1945 he was arrested there by the Russians. Since by this time Austrian Lemberg had become Ukrainian Lvov, he received a tenner under Article 54-1a of the Ukrainian Criminal Code: i.e., for treason to his motherland, the Ukraine! And at his interrogation the poor fellow couldn’t prove that treason to the Ukraine had not been his purpose when he went to Vienna! And that’s how he conned his way into becoming a traitor.)

One important additional broadening of the section on reason was its application “via Article 19 of the Criminal Code”-“via intent.” In other words, no treason had taken place; but the interrogator envisioned an intention to betray and that was enough to justify a full term, the same as for actual treason. True, Article 19 proposes that there be no penalty for intent, but only for preparation, but given a dialectical reading one can understand intention as preparation. And “preparation is punished in the same way [i.e., with the ~_ame penalty] as the crime itself’ (Criminal Code). In general, “we draw no distinction between intention and the crime itself, and this is an instance of the superiority of Soviet legislation to bourgeois legislation.”

This section goes on for some time. But it is clear as day what it is speaking about. The rapid creation of a number of laws that were created specifically to be interpreted as broadly as possible such that the state can get anyone, at anytime, for anything.

And the top legal experts in Canada such as John Carpay and Bruce pardy have been VERY clear that the recent spate of laws passed in Canada, some of them WITHOUT DEBATE are written in exactly that way.

Many interviews are on this site with both experts.

Moving on to Transport Canada:

So this would be an example of the dialectical transformation of both Provincial, (in this case Ontario) and Federal regulatory bodies to make highways unsafe and trucking in particular a threat to transportation. There is simply no way that a school or schools like the ones issuing Potemkin licences to illegal, mostly Sikh migrants could possibly ever operate for 40 minutes without being shut down by police in a functional republic as Canada was not long ago. Think about each and every ticket you have had, showing licences and registration and insurance to police for a busted tail light or speeding a little over the limit. This MUST be by design.

Screenshot

Thank you all for checking out this site.