1. Tucker Carlson and Matt Walsh on Canada and recent laws and policies in Canada such as MAiD
Whatever else you can say, and we do a lot, about Tucker’s new points of view on islam, Russia and MAGA Communism (Alexander Dugin) he is pretty close to a Bullseye on Canada. Especially on the issue of MAiD. The state must NEVER have the power to administer death. Even if you think it’s for your reasons. because as fast as a coin flips, it will be for the state’s reasons.
Related: here is a National Post article about an all star death doctor, how started out as an abortionist, then moved on to euthanasia. I would be interested to know her political opinions on all the other narrative attacks of the last ten years.
2. Australian Imam on the importance of physical jihad or ‘fittna’ struggle against the unbeliever for Islam. Clearly this goes to motive when it comes to looking at the attack in Bondi yesterday. But in a way it doesn’t. Islam believes that they must fight until all religion is for Allah. This is stated multiple times and multiple ways in the Koran. (Qur’an 2:193, 8:39, and 9:33) And while Islamic antisemitism is a core doctrinal aspect of Islam, it must be understood that it doesn’t matter what religion or sociological/philosophical principles you choose to live by. Muslims are willing to do a whole lot of killing to take away that choice from everyone. This is a core fact and so easy to prove that it’s a near insult to the intelligence that people do not just get it already. They will permit people to live once a region is under Islamic control and sharia law, so long as they are 100% subordinate to Islam in every way. They must be ritually humiliated “and feel themselves subdued” when under islamic law and paying a special poll tax in a humiliating manner for the crime of not being Muslim.
3. We have discussed Stephen Coughlin’s analogy of the sniper and the alleged ally who works for the enemy posing as your friend, who perches beside you and moves the muzzle of your rifle 1mm such that the 1 mile shot you lined up misses by several yards. This is of course, an analogy for how it is used in the political warfare campaign against Western Civilization.
There are at least THREE ways in which this is used against us all in terms of officialdoms’ response to the Bondi attack.
One is blaming it on terrorism. Terrorism is a word that has become so redefined it has about as much meaning as “vaccine” or, “extremist”.
So first let’s define it properly to understand how it is being turned against us and to make defence impossible.
Terrorism is a tactic. It COULD be a strategy, and it is for Islam for sure. But generally it is a tactic. It involves horrific attacks against soft targets for political reasons, but arguably have no strategic value other than the shock effects of the horror inflicted on soft targets. On October. 7, no attacks were launched against Israeli military or other hardened targets. But the results they got, and they are MASSIVE gains for Islam around the world, are entirely from the political warfare/spell-craft effects of the attack on various parties and soft targets.
Our COMINTERN leaders use the word, Terrorism to mean anything which opposes state narratives now. At least in the Anglosphere minus the United States. but under Biden and Obama it did. Blaming a strategic problem, one of Islamic jihad, on terrorism is a distinct shove of the muzzle and several degrees off target. At this point no one should have any doubt that the authorities will not allow us to name the enemy, which is ISLAM.
Second, I am going to call this, the Schindler fallacy. although I bet there is already an existing latin name for it which is much more impressive.
Although it is likely that the one person who actually tried to stop the Islamic Jihad attack has an Islamic name, he may in fact be a Maronite Christian, he is being painted as the Muslim hero that might have saved hundreds of Jews. This is not the first time we have seen this. In the past there have been a couple of instances where someone with a Muslim name did something to interfere in a positive way with Islamic attacks on soft targets in the West.
The media jumps on this always and creates a hero out of the “muslim” while ignoring the Islamic motives of the attackers in every case. So it is with the Bondi slaughter.
I am calling this “The Schindler Fallacy because the fact that Oscar Schindler saved many Jews from Nazi extermination does not make Nazism good because Schindler was a ranking Nazi officer. It makes him a really bad, disobedient and traitorous Nazi. So even if this hero, and hero he most certainly is by any rational definition and thank God the eternal for his actions, was Muslim by heritage, his actions were quite specifically un-islamic. Muslims are always to assist in jihad in any way they can. And to act against a Jihad attack and especially to protect Jewish people and a Jewish public event (the real issue but we covered that yesterday) would be exactly like Schindler lying to the Nazi party for the specific purpose of saving Jewish slaves in his factories. So if Ahmed Al Ahmed is in fact Muslim by heritage, he is a good person, but a bad Muslim in exactly the same way as Oscar Schindler.
THIRD:
And this one is so convenient to communist narrative positions on public ownership of guns that one has to wonder to what extent this was set up for it, or was this just a Mayday present to communist control of the public?
One of the common rebuttals of gun-confiscation active measures against the public is that licensed gun owners never commit these kinds of acts and rarely if ever, even conventional murders. But in this case, one of the arrested men for this mass casualty act of Islamic jihad did in fact have several legally registered weapons. And this despite his known connections to Islamic terror. Not that this matters to the point, but if the state was looking for a way to increase removal of guns from the law abiding public, this individual committing this kind of attack is most certainly a Chanukah gift from Hades to those who would remove your rights. Planned or not.
The following is Grok, (X’s AI) search results showing both the attacker’s legally registered guns and his known terrorist attachments.
Tweets Confirming Licensed Gun Ownership
- @MarioNawfal
(Verified, 1.1M+ followers, Dec 14, 2025, 21:02 GMT):
” BONDI BEACH SHOOTER IDENTIFIED AS LICENSED GUN OWNER – 6 FIREARMS SEIZED
NSW Police confirmed the Bondi attacker was a 50-year-old licensed firearms holder with six registered guns.
All 6 firearms were recovered, some at the scene, others during a raid at a Camp C property.
Ballistics are being conducted to confirm if those weapons were used in the attack.
Source: NSW Police”
Engagement: 1.1K likes, 252 reposts, 141 bookmarks, 556K views. [post:3] - @corechaincrypto
(Crypto news account, Dec 14, 2025, 21:48 GMT):
“BREAKING UPDATES
Bondi Beach Shooter Identified as Licensed Gun Owner – 6 Firearms Seized
NSW Police confirmed the Bondi attacker was a 50-year-old licensed firearms holder with six registered guns.
All 6 firearms were recovered. Some at the scene, others during a raid at a Camp C property.
Ballistics are being conducted to confirm if those weapons were used in the attack.
Source: NSW Police”
Engagement: 3 likes, 1 repost, 2.5K views. (Includes video of police briefing.) [post:0] - @naomi2009
(Journalist, Dec 14, 2025, 23:08 GMT):
“The 50-year-old terrorist had a gun licence and all six guns used at the scene were legally registered to him.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15383341/Bondi-beach-shooters-guns.html”
Engagement: 7 likes, 7 reposts, 2K views. [post:15]
Tweets Linking to Terrorism Support (with Gun License Mentions)
- @PaulaAlessPod
(Podcaster, Dec 15, 2025, 13:08 GMT):
“So the Bondi terrorist who had a gun licence for 6 guns is now being reported as being known to the authorities for having links to ISIS
@BBCNewsOf all the noise surround this attack, this is a key fact that needs to be investigated urgently – how can that have been allowed?”
Engagement: 0 likes, 29 views. (Directly ties license to ISIS links.) [post:13] - @StuddertNatalie
(Social scientist, Dec 15, 2025, 05:30 GMT):
“NSW AFP said this man had a gun license for 10years without incident. It seems to me his rights and that of any gunman under ASIO watch should have their gun license revoked.
ASIO examined Bondi Beach gunman in 2019 for ties to Islamic State cell – ABC
https://apple.news/AYHx2pAkzT_KkNpjeBQDHqA”
Engagement: 6 likes, 295 views. (Highlights ASIO’s 2019 ISIS probe of Naveed.) [post:17] - @witchinateacup
(Commentator, Dec 15, 2025, 04:26 GMT):
“ASIO examined Bondi Beach gunman in 2019 for ties to Islamic State cell – ABC News
ASIO knew that one of them was part of an IS cell & did NOTHING & STATE allowed the other to keep guns despite this because he was “ determined “ to keep them.
https://apple.news/AYHx2pAkzT_KkNpjeBQDHqA”
Engagement: 6 likes, 2 bookmarks, 220 views. (Emphasizes failure to revoke license despite ISIS cell ties.) [post:21] - @inversefox
(Political commentator, Dec 15, 2025, 11:30 GMT):
“The Bondi gunman was on the Australian intelligence radar for 6 years as an ISIS operative.
Not only was he not deported, but he was allowed to have a firearms licence.
Extraordinary failures here. Guilty men.”
Engagement: 5 likes, 84 views. (Includes image of news headline on ISIS links.) [post:27] - @Keck553
(Veteran/intel analyst, Dec 15, 2025, 02:51 GMT):
“The Australian government literally gave an Islamic jihadist license to own those guns.
You can’t make this shit up.
https://www.themirror.com/news/world-news/bondi-beach-shooter-hunting-license-1561891”
Engagement: 2 likes, 300 views. [post:23]
These tweets primarily draw from official NSW Police and ASIO statements, amplified by news outlets like BBC, ABC, and Reuters.
In the clip below from Australian PM, Anthony Albanese, you will see a dizzying display of the dialectical language of political warfare. He blames the Bondi attack on everything except Islamic Jihad. In fact he uses the exact tactic several times we discussed on our essay on skipping levels of abstraction by referring to “hate” as the problem. Also “evil”. On the surface, a completely ludicrous assumption. But understanding the points made above, and in the recent essays on this site it becomes clear that we are seeing weaponized language directed against the people of the west with no less effect than if they were firing guns at us. And in fact, far greater effect because it is so very much harder to realize you are under attack when it is constant conceptual reframing by authorities being used to destroy every, single, aspect of who you are, and what your rights are before the law and as a human being.
Albanese blames, “hate”, “Guns” “Right wing extremists” and Im gonna go out on a partial limb here and say blaming Antisemitism is another dialectical con. Why? Because again, it’s the wrong level of abstraction. It is not general antisemitism that caused this attack whatsoever. It wasn’t a bunch of people ripping on Jews for whatever reason at the pub or even publishing Holocaust denial material on websites etc. etc.
This was caused by Islamic Jihad, which must, as it states in the Koran no less than 3 times, fight all unbelief until ALL RELIGION IS FOR ALLAH.
Yes, it is true that the Jews and Christians appear to be getting it first. Unless you ask a Hindu in India or a Buddhist in Afghanistan except, whoops, they are extinct there. In fact how to do we even know Afghanistan was a Buddhist country? I don’t think the Muslims would build two, GIANT Buddha statues by carving them into the side of a mountain, both of them well over 100 feet tall. But, it did take the Muslims in 2001 to destroy them with infidel weapons and high energy chemistry. So you may get a different answer in countries that are not primarily Christian or Jewish but have been under Islamic attack for far far longer. A quick read of the diary of Islamic General Tamerlane and his rape slaughter and looting of Hindu India might also shed some light.
In the video below, I ask you all to watch it closely with your official club dialectical decoder ring turned on and listen to how these devices are used to make damn sure not only no bullet hits the target, but no shrapnel can even get the clothes dirty of the actual attackers. The ones the Australian government along with the UN and nebulous COMINTERN brought to Australia, and across the West for that matter, to do exactly what they are doing. Most of it is vacuous nonsense of course and meaningless platitudes and I apologize for not editing it out. But it is part of the obfuscation of dealing with the issue which could even potentially by, in any way at all, effective.
In summary:
-
Antisemitism is an attitude
-
Jihad is a doctrinal command
-
The attacker acted on doctrinal jihad, not general prejudice.
Post Script:
Please read this comment. It adds substance to the question of how the jihadi obtained a permit for 6 guns.
POST SCRIPT 2:
A Canadian politician does a masterful job of converting the slaughter of a dozen Jewish people into a complaint about Islamophobia. This is perhaps a perfect example of Hegelian dialectics as practiced by Muslims.
One of the many hurdles Australia places on gun ownership is the requirement of having a REASON to own any firearm. 70% are owned by white, rural Australians who would need firearms for protection of themselves, livestock, crops, etc. or who are engaged in rural sport hunting, etc.
Here is the fun part: The Bondi Beach mass murderer was granted SIX LEGAL FIREARMS but potential corruption or agenda-driven approval of granting such approval to an urban-dwelling Jihadi immigrant is impossible for us regular folks to determine. Aussie law or regulation is designed to DENY the public ACCESS to the critical “Reason” the applicant “NEEDS” to own A firearm, let alone 6. In other words, government has empowered itself to adjudicate these issues without any possible oversight or monitoring from the general public as to HOW they approve, and FOR WHOM they approve these hard-to-gain licenses.
So is the Red-Green Alliance ideology influencing WHO does NOT get legal firearm approvals and who DOES? In the urban areas where most Jihadi immigrants live, that would be rather relevant to know because it is hard as hell for regular native Aussies in urban areas to get such licenses. And it would appear this Jihadi father & son knew damned well that is the case as they feared no one shooting back at them.
there is some police dept in the U.S. that hired an illegal alien muslim as a police officer. Look at WHO is in charge of approving his license.
If people dont get serious about islam we are doomed.
proactive moves from US FBI in LA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AuRlrSXDsxU
The subjects self-identified as members of a radical offshoot of the Turtle Island Liberation Front (TILF), an extremist group
“Turtle Island, as the North American continent was known to the Anishinaabe, Haudenosaunee and other First Nations people”
Yeah cause they had satellites and advanced cartography and could see all of North America at once while not even having a written language.
Ok then…
Jooo-hate – today called antisemitism or antizionism – predates the Profit Moh by thousands of years.
Maybe a function of a pre-modern psychology that drives scapegoating.
Unfathomable misfortune? Blame it on the Other: the albino, the ginger-haired, the blue-eyed infant (Nigeria).
I don’t know.
I do know that it’s been used by authority figures to deflect blame for their own failures. Because it taps into the deep resonance of fear of the unknown unlike anything else. So easy to trigger with the slightest suggestion, even a series of tropes that have varied little for thousands of years.
It’s not only baked into believers in the kor-an. Or those who worship the abstract nonsense of marxist theory. It jumps out all of a sudden amongst hoi polloi in the midst of crazed mobs. Even in comment threads on high quality, conservative American blogs.
I don’t know why.
But it’s not just communism or jihad. Organized Christianity has threatened jooos far longer than either of those. Then again, Haman could whip up pagan Babylonians six centuries before the birth of Jesus.
Oversimplification is dangerous.
Counter-spell a useful start for deprogramming. But time is short.
At this point the threat we face goes beyond political warfare. Yes, recognizing words deployed as weapons serves as a shield, but don’t wait till you experience kinetic war directly. Prepare to meet rivers of blood and fight your way to save everything you cherish.
I’m overreacting to fresh spent blood and brains.
I loathe Bernard-Henri Lévy, but he takes me back to rational discourse:
…
I know one must arm oneself with prudence before establishing a causal link between words and crimes. And I know the danger of this slope, of this moral butterfly effect, and of the temptation to transform speech into culpability and to equate a call to murder with the act itself. But I also remember Primo Levi’s lesson in The Drowned and the Saved, reminding us that massacres never begin with weapons but with words.
I recall Victor Klemperer, the philologist who analysed the corruption of the German language by Nazism in The Language of the Third Reich, stating that “words can be like tiny doses of arsenic”.
Or quite simply Jean-Paul Sartre, whose famous phrase seems to me rarely as apt: words are “loaded pistols”.
And that is why, in sadness and anger, but without polemical spirit, I invite all those who, two years later, continue to believe that one can play with words of Jew-hatred and pogrom without consequence to an examination of conscience.
For what happened in Sydney is not an accident but a sign. Given that the same causes risk producing the same effects, it could happen tomorrow in New York, London, Rome, Madrid, or Paris.
In truth, it could happen in any city in the world where one is still frivolous enough to believe that words are just words, that slogans bind only those who chant them, and that hatred – when draped in the supposed love of an oppressed people – can be absolved of its consequences.
This is not about giving in to panic nor concluding that we face an irresistible wave like those at the most tragic hours of Western history.
But if keeping one’s cool is a virtue, turning away can be a crime – and wisdom demands acknowledging that there are moments when History gives warning.
Sydney is one of them. But one must still hear, see what is being said, and act accordingly.
https://www.thejc.com/opinion/the-intifada-has-been-globalised-v8do7nsq
The BONDI story – The brave man is a Muslim. His mom wears a hijab. It is said he is a very nice and generous man. A rarity in Islam.