Harvard Donors start to notice the shift in culture at that formerly great institution

Billionaire Harvard Donor, Bill Ackman writes letter exposing the fully communist nature of the culture at Harvard

Daily Mail: Bill Ackman posts excoriating letter to Harvard’s president Claudine Gay taking aim at anti-Semitism, free speech and discrimination against straight white men and Asian students in the guise of ‘equity’

Billionaire hedge fund manager Bill Ackman took aim once again at Harvard University’s leadership in a scathing open letter in which he highlights their failure to address anti-Semitism and other forms of discrimination on campus. 

Ackman, 57, posted the letter on his X page on Sunday. In one section he wrote that anti-Semitism is ‘the canary in the coal mine for other discriminatory practices at Harvard.’

The Harvard graduate also alleged that straight white males are subject to discrimination and denied opportunities at the school.

The Daily Mail article emphasizes Harvard’s antisemitism. But Ackman equally excoriated Harvard for its anti-White hatred, where antisemitism is merely a subset of anti-white hatred because Jews are seen as white. Sadly, this means that while Ackman is capable of observing what is obvious and stating it, he is not yet understanding what is taking place on the Harvard Campus. Communism views things in terms of power. What they view is the group holding power must be overthrown, and those who do not have power must be elevated in what will be a PERPETUAL revolution. Exactly like the pamphlet said in the anti-Israel protest in Ottawa a couple of weeks ago. The photo below is from the Trotskyist League at the anti-Israel demo, Nov. 25th

To get a good read on the Ackman letter, please check out that segment of Today’s Charlie Kirk show.

It is well worth the time. And as Kirk said, when you meet Harvard grads, at least recent ones, its time to treat them as they are. Not as the legacy they bought.

Letter from OCDSB [Ottawa School Board] to families with kids in the system on the anti-SOGI march September 20th

I will post the body of the email here short of the addressee information.

It would be great if readers of this site would read it carefully and think about what the implications, both overt and more subtle actually are for this email. To what extent is this political? How much does it have to do with educating children? Is the school impartial on the issues? Think of other aspects of this email that need parsing and add your thoughts in the comments.

———

From: OCDSB Communications [mailto:di**********@***sb.ca” data-original-string=”zqd/KKWoRBLEQ0eyVHu0Xg==03cnFW4aNFZq1JL7qPD+2keLK3P11qGZPAqB2kRsP9Av2pc190FvCFeMf9EH9fTBI7zKYOPc3gko4BaHUHooBvmzg==” title=”This contact has been encoded by Anti-Spam by CleanTalk. Click to decode. To finish the decoding make sure that JavaScript is enabled in your browser.]

Sent: September 22, 2023 3:34 PM
To:
Subject: Parent/Caregiver Update: September 22, 2023

Dear OCDSB Families,

Earlier this week, rallies were held across the country and on Parliament Hill “against how schools teach gender ideology”. This has become very divisive and commonly pits claims for parental rights, protection of children, and indoctrination against claims of hate, transphobia, and safety. These demonstrations foster a culture of hate and fear.

What is unfortunate is that the demonstrations and counter demonstrations do not lead to conversation. They do not generate critical thinking, dialogue, or discussion. There is no learning from each other, there is little respect, acceptance or empathy. 

Schools are places of learning. We have a responsibility to provide an education to all students in a safe, caring, and welcoming environment. We stand unequivocally with the 2SLGBTQ+ community who we know are facing rising discrimination and violence. Please read our statement.

The rest is on unrelated matters. Do comment. Another aspect could be, does this email conform to Marcuse’s “Liberating Tolerance” dialectic?

Here is a link to quite an excellent Tweet. While his analogy is far from perfect for a few reasons, it is still an excellent example of the problems with the normal reasoning as applied by the letter above. Also read the thread below. Its quite clear.

Parent stopped from reading Children’s book at school board meeting

Parents speaking back to communist school boards has become one of my favorite categories of videos. If only those parents understood that these are communist boards, or the policies they object to are communist policies. It might help them get to the point. In any case, we need to pass these videos around. People need to know what schools are doing to children.

This is a witty man. Remember his last line. Let’s all remember to use that line in similar circumstances.

Herbert Marcuse’s Repressive Tolerance as dominant principle at work in Ontario (and everywhere) School Boards

In the second video which was shot at the Durham District School Board at some point in Q1 of this year, we see what should be familiar to everyone by this point, even if people are not familiar with the strategy at work and still refer to what they see as ‘leftist hypocrisy”.

Below, is a 4 minute primer on Repressive Tolerance which is worth seeing first before watching the School Board meeting. For those who want to know more about Marcuse’s semantic marxism, please search YouTube for James Lindsay and Stephen Coughlin with additional terms, Repressive Tolerance or Marcuse. Also this video is very good and very relevant. 

Below is a video from the Durham District School Board in Ontario. See if you can spot the many ways in which Marcuse’s Repressive Tolerance is the principle used to deflect parent’s concerns about the collection of sexual data on young children.

This video is unedited from the original taken from Facebook, other than the background noise, which was considerable, was removed and some speech levelling was applied.

For those that wish a deeper and academic dive into the specifics of the strategy used to revolutionize our school boards, and for that matter, every aspect of our civilization, we recommend reading 5 pages a day of Stephen Coughlin’s essay on the Left’s Tactics to Transform America.

Additionally, Marxism and homosexuality, easily extended to the “trans” movement.

Interview with Josh Alexander, the teen who dared fight the “gender demands” at a Catholic school

Please read the story details at RAIR Foundation.

James Lindsay: The Marxification of education

Like all Prof. James Lindsay’s lectures. this is profound and important. Anyone who has children in schools or recently changed their values while in schools should watch this. This video is a brilliant explanation of the methods and tactics of Marxists within the school system to destroy children’s whole belief set and value system, and make them activists for a permanent system of endless destruction.

Lindsay explains who Marx is not a philosopher, but is someone who simply created a system for transforming people into agents of destruction, of everything, eternally.

One could, if one wanted, score another point for the claim that communism is demonic. At the practical level, it is.

 

Rebel News speaks with fired “tenured” prof. for failing to submit to narrative views…

and sticking with facts which disprove narrative views on many issues. Thank you Prof. Frances Widdowson for your bravery in speaking your truth. Rebel story here.

(Personally, I may take issue with her views on socialism Vs. Postmodernism. I suspect they are both strategically about the same, but differ slightly in tactics. Postmodernism attacks beauty, art, sexuality and so on, but still with a purpose to destroy classical norms.)