DEI destroying the military, imminent war with Western troops? And a look at the Climate dialectic with some interesting examples: Links 1 for May 2nd, 2025

1. This is a very worthy video about how DEI is destroying the UK military. We certainly all know that, and Stephe Coughlin is on record saying that in fact the actual PURPOSE of DEI was to destroy the military.

But he makes a throw away remark that is worth noting. “And they say we are going to war very soon”. I have heard the same thing from sources in Canada in fact. And from extremely reliable sources. Things are in motion behind the scenes. And they aren’t good, depending on why these things are in motion.

2. Swedes are starting to treat bombings as a day to day affair. They are fully demoralized. Many Swedes seek to leave Sweden. I have no idea where they will go, but they clearly want to leave because their government, along with the COMINTERN offices like the WEF and UN and EU have destroyed their nation and identity.

3. Dr. Patrick Moore (Cofounder of Greenpeace) is totally scientifically correct in every assertion he makes in this video… but there is something that he may not get, or if he does, chooses not to address the problem in the way needed in this video.

This presents the same issue that many of our favorite scientists and doctors present when discussing the ‘science’ behind Covid and the mRNA injections. Which is that these and other lines of operations are narrative attacks on our civilization. That liars know they are lying and telling them the truth not only doesn’t matter, but it’s literally an allowable counter narrative to a degree. A form of controlled opposition.

With Covid and the vaxx, the real issue was that the state did not have the power to do what it did to us, even if, and I need to stress this, even if the damned injections were safe and effective. The dangers they represented is not actually the issue. It was the choice we all inherently have to refuse it for our own reasons.

And we maintain that there is simply only one allowable reason to refuse a medication. Only one ever, And that is that you don’t want to take it.

While I agree with Orwell in the voice of Winston Smith that “Freedom means the freedom to say 2+2=4” we also feel that Freedom means the freedom to do your own risk assessment. And for that matter, what constitutes a risk at all.

The state did not have the right to stop people from going outside. It did not have the right to cancel protests against Covid measures (while allowing BLM and other Marxist efforts during the same period). It did not have the right to coerce people into taking a potentially deadly experimental technology or face one form of societal destruction or another. Instead, the media sort of tolerate some forms of questioning of the value of the vaxx itself, although mocked and ridiculed all who even questioned it from the laity, while defrocking any actual doctors or credentialed authorities who actually spoke out with the scientific truth about it. But no where could people simply say, “I doesn’t matter if they work or not. I have bodily autonomy and will not submit for my own private reasons and the state does not, and was never given the power to make me take it” etc.

The Global Warming narrative is clearly created for the exact same reason as the Covid narratives. ‘We have a problem that is global in nature, so we need a solution which is global in nature. This means you have no rights and your nation state no longer may set policies for itself than run contrary to the global interests.’

And sometimes, arguing the actual science is mere controlled opposition, because it was never about that. It isn’t like they don’t know zero percent of their predictions on climate have ever come true.

Recently, A Ph.D in Biology, Madeline Weld, presented to the Club of Rome Canada. An organization which appears to be about global environmentalism but is clearly far far to the left and while perhaps not all members are seeking moving the nation and world to the left, the net effect of the Club of Rome appears to be about making that effort. Its predictions from its earliest report published in 1972 famously titled, The Limits to Growth made quite a few bold predictions for the future as well. At some future point we may peruse the book and check how well their predictions did. And the computer modelled future as a justification for policy, that is something which at this point should really ring alarms, which is what the Limits to Growth actually is.

Her presentation, which she was asked to do, was on Canada’s Century Initiative. This is the lobby group/NGO/GONGO (government funded and operated NGO that actually pushes government policy) which is the Canadian branch of the effort to flood Western nations with Muslims and Africans to dilute them to the point that they cease to be, as they have always been.

Even though they asked her to present on the dangers to the environment by increasing Canada’s population from now, 40M people to 100M people, each time she suggested not importing all these people she was met with counter-arguments that Western industry (not Chinese or Indian) had made their own countries unliveable due to Global Warming and we had an obligation to take them all. When she countered by questioning the facts on that, she was met with the usual dialectical show stopper.

“You sound like a denialist”.

Where exactly is the science in that? It is in reality, science denial. Check it out.

We have posted this clip many times before, and frankly it is extremely dense, even by this site’s standards. It is a Polish expert on Communism, meaning on its dialectical nature. In this clip he explains how a second generation Frankfurt School acolyte named Habermas invented a con called “Discourse theory”. In it, a communist think tank would come up with a narrative, and then launch critical theory attacks on anyone who challenged the narrative. This is what you see above. Not that Madeline’s interlocutor is aware of the machinations he deploys. At this point it is just how the culture works. Please note that “Denialism” is both adjacent to, and a precursor to “hate speech”, the direct communist analogue to Islamic blasphemy laws.