About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

It is NOT selective enforcement – it is the dialectic negation of Western Civ by repurposing the law and the instruments of state to a different agenda

1. This is an excellent example of the topic

2. Sask. Doctor still practicing after conviction for assaulting a child with a weapon and

Compare the college’s treatment of this doctor with ones who in good faith advised against taking the mRNA shots. Clearly, a communist state can be defined as criminalizing any opposition to a state narrative. Initially from a position of authority, but eventually anyone from anywhere. Which may explain bill C-22

3. Illegal rapist in Canada gets luxury health benefits

4. In this story about an anti-‘Israel’ protest in Montreal at RAIR Foundation, anyone who is honest with themselves knows what would happen if you substituted leftist leaders and generic Muslims for the effigies hung and beaten in this particular display over the weekend.

5. How REJECTED immigrants get massively better services from Canada than Canadians

Thank you all for checking out this site. Hopefully some of you are finding it easier to access these days.

Viva Frei did a comprehensive video on the man kidnapped by the state into a mental hospital because he spoke truth about Chinese influence and communist Canada laws are to legacy Canada.

If the cop thought he had a bomb on him, HE WOULD NEVER EVER HAVE GOTTEN THAT CLOSE. Slam dunk. case closed.

UK, historical myth making and Chinese control of Canadian state agencies: Links 1 for May 29, 2026

1. In the UK the man who stabbed an unrelated British stranger, a Sikh I believe it was, has been now arrested and charged and found guilty of murdering Henry Nowak.

However it was the British state and the police working for it, who are at least in large part responsible for his death. They handcuffed him and let him bleed out instead of taking him to medical help. They did this because his stabber, told police he said naughty words about his race. Video evidence showed that was untrue later on as the killer, Vickrum Digwa, chased him and stabbed him from behind, with zero element of self defence of any kind.

Therefore, the state put its hand on the scale so heavily that they made the greater crime the mere allegation of a racial epithet, than the stabbing and ultimate death of a random person on the street.

If the UK was still anything like a republic, or had anything like rule of law, the police would be an accessory to murder.

So this looks like a victory. But is not in any way that restores the rule of law. He was stabbed by some person who very possibly should not have been in the UK at all. But he died because of state policy and police who more resemble the Clockwork Orange thugs than anything like enforcers of law.

2. Will fact check this video as much as possible. But so far this is the only thing I have seen on this worthy of posting. The underlying logic is fully believable though. Many people including Canada’s installed Dear Leader, Mark Carney, says that people “will eat less meat” makes one included to look into what the actual plan is to force people to submit to their will.

There is as far as I know, no name for a crime of this magnitude if indeed, the claims in this video are true.

I had to beat this out of Grok, as Grok defaults to heavily loaded language. (if there is any interest I’ll post the whole one or two pages of prompts and responses to get there) Grok initially used terms like “Conspiracy theory” etc. Was like reading Blue Sky almost. But pressed on what is factual:

Are any claims presented as facts in the video actually false?

Most core descriptive claims are true or directionally accurate, but a few are exaggerated or misleading:

Lone Star tick causes Alpha-gal syndrome (AGS): True.

Matthew Liao discussed using the Lone Star tick mechanism for “human engineering” to reduce meat consumption: True (he said it publicly at the World Science Festival ~10 years ago).

Western Michigan University bioethics paper arguing it is morally required to spread Alpha-gal via ticks: True (published 2025 in Bioethics).

Bill Gates / Gates Foundation funded genetically engineered ticks: True (but see below on details).

U.S. Army released large numbers of (radioactively labeled) ticks in the 1950s–60s: True (documented Cold War-era research).

Bill Gates invests in lab-grown meat: True.

3. Is the increase in Alpha-gal accurate as a percentage?

The 10,000% increase is technically true in some datasets but highly misleading without context:CDC data (2017–2021): Positive tests rose from ~13,371 to ~18,885 per year ? ~41% increase in that period.
Longer-term / different datasets (e.g., TriNetX large cohort studies): Incidence rose dramatically — one 2025 analysis showed over 5,500% increase in new diagnoses in recent years, with some periods approaching or exceeding 10,000% relative growth from a very low baseline.
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Overall: CDC estimates >110,000 suspected cases (2010–2022), with true numbers possibly ~450,000 due to underdiagnosis. The explosion is real and well-documented.

Grok went on to make counter claims though, that Gates used a different kind of tick for research, a cattle tick for ‘livestock disease control” and that he never released them.

I guess we would have to look at Gates’s history of truthfulness and efforts since, I dunno, maybe when he stole the first Graphical User Interface from two IBM scientists and released it as Microsoft Windows without attribution or credit. Then everything since, especially during Covid with the mRNA shots to decide how to take Grok’s counter claims. I’ll save the whole argument in a text file I guess if anyone feels they want to see it.

But given Gates’ belief in the need to reduce world population, (and there is a case to be made for that for sure, lots of people feel that way) and given Gates’ personal ethical system and willingness to advance his agendas with the tremendous powers he has, it is not unreasonable to consider if he is not being entirely truthful. There is an old adage that “The half truth is the damndest of lies”. So maybe he did admit to research on cattle related ticks but named some other one. I don’t know in any meaningful sense of the word, “know”. But as hypothesis go, this is worthy of investigation to the point of a court worthy theory.

But there is a really fundamental difference between the belief that global human population is too high, and acting in a way to reduce it that is a crime of biblical proportions. Advancing birth control in areas of the world where the birth rate is highest and has the least ability to actually produce materials for life in a way that doesn’t pummel the environment, like eating bush meat to extinction as an example, would be a way most people would be OK with. Not forcing our choices to go how oligarchs want. The consequence of widespread meat allergy means lowered production of meat overall as farms will find it increasingly unprofitable. Human health will go down the toilet as people are forced to eat vegetables, especially as most mass farming methods have depleted soil of nutrients such that many or most commercial food plants requires supplementation of micro nutrients in pill form.

Lastly, if Alpha gal syndrome manages to get so many people allergic to meat that the problem is amplified by farmers switching to plant foods, the ocean will be a much safer place to swim in a few years as all fish stock gets plated.

In any case, no matter if we are right or wrong on the science, it is a VERY secondary issue. The real issue is who gave them the right to force their choices on us and what do we do about it.

The guest doctor, Dr. Nicolas Hulscher, at around 4 minutes in points at the dialectical name for the effort: “Bioterrorism is masquerading as bioethics now”. That, is what we call, dialectical naming of a Line of Operation.

3.  Rupert Lowe MP refuses to apologize for a rational statement about the equivalence between industrial rape and tporture of British girls and the Holocaust.

Full text:

I want to be really clear in my response. I am not going to retract anything, I stand by every single word. Labour are calling for me to apologise. The answer is no.

Industrial rape across almost every town and city in Britain.

Sexual torture. Murder. Endless rape.

I sat there for two weeks, listening to these girls.

I heard how one girl was raped by a dog, as Muslim men bet on what the animal would do.

Girls drugged and locked in cages, like rats.

Another, raped by 700 men over three years.

Dozens and dozens of these stories through our inquiry, and we are barely scratching the surface.

This was allowed to happen EXACTLY because politicians were cowards, refusing to discuss it.

I will not make that same mistake. I said what I said, and I meant it.

The Labour Party have blood on their hands, yet they think they can demand an apology from me for highlighting the systemic evil they allowed to infect our entire country?

They can piss off.

I am angry about it. Furious. When you hear directly from these girls about what they have been through, it changes the way you see politics. Forever.

Our report will be out very soon.

When that happens, I don’t want any apologies from the Labour Party. I don’t care about that.

I want to see those politicians responsible for covering up this atrocity behind bars for what they have done to these girls.

One cannot possibly solve a problem if one cannot name the enemy, or properly describe an event for what it is.

Marine Le Pen’s father was destroyed for saying something like (roughly) the Holocaust in historical terms, was not a unique event” or something equivalent. He was correct. The Islamic slaughter of Hindus is thought to be 17 MILLION under Muslim general Tamerlane, (Timur) alone. And he wasn’t the only Muslim attacker to try and kill all the Hndus. Altogether the number is something like 60-80 MILLION.

More recently there is the Maoist mass murder of his own people to make communism work. That number is estimated at 40-80 MILLION.

The Soviet genocide attempt of Ukrainian farmers, was 13% of the total population at around 4.5 MILLION people.

So looking at the industrial destruction of British culture and mass rape and torture of British women and girls, I think it would fit the UN definition of Genocide before the UN itself started promoting it as ‘Replacement population” in official policy. 

On a related point, one of the great errors made by the West in the past 80 years or so, was turning the socialist leader, Adolf Hitler into a ‘far right wing’ god of evil. By doing so, you create worshippers, even if it starts as a cult, and much much more importantly, when you take a person and make him into a myth, you cannot spot it when it arrives again. There are other Hitlers in play today for all practical and rational definitions and descriptors, but no one can see them for what they are as we have made Hitler into a giant. A myth. A one off historical monster. There is a quite good German film that more or less addresses that actually. If yu can find it, it is well worth the watch. beyond any messaging, (and it is remarkably free of didacticism and preaching) it is very entertaining. The movie is called,Er ist wieder da (Look who’s Back) and makes this point very well. If you don’t know who and what he really was, you will be blindsided when he returns to do the same things all over again. And maybe even go along with it.

additional data point:

4. If a Canadian retweets or likes this short video on Chinese control of Canadian government, will we be kidnapped into a dialecticaly named, mental health facility and force fed brain destroying drugs?

5. Be interesting to know what truth there is behind this.

6. This tweet mistakenly claims that the British industrial rape of legacy girls by Muslim gangs has spread to Canada now. Actually it has been here for quite some time. We had a SUN TV video on a trial from many years ago in Ottawa where a number of unnamed men from a highly enriched neighbourhood had been charged with luring and drugging and raping girls. The trial, also in Ottawa, was closed to the public.

Thank you all for checking out this site.

Reader’s Lunks for May 29th, 2026

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

Nicholas Jordan Wagter 48 hour psychiatric hold has been extended indefinitely?

The other day we did an article about Nicholas Jordan Wagter, who was Soviet style kidnapped into a mental hospital, bypassing any form of due process because apparently he was passing out information about Chinese penetration of the Canadian political and industrial institutions, and waking people up to how much of a threat that is.

There is an update:

Press For Truth does a decent video above. But again, like during Covid and the Vaxx etc. the central question is missed. Probably because the Canadian spirit has been broken for generations now.

The question of course is: Why does the state have the power to do this? Why is there no due process? How can this be allowed to happen?

Sir William Blackstone (1723–1780), an English jurist, judge, and politician, once said when speaking about criminal law:

“It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer.”
The version we need is let ten crazy people walk the streets before you certify one and imprison them and force mind altering drugs on them. But the fact is, we clearly already have that. The cities are crawling with the mentally unwell and even violently so. Often from recreational drug abuse, but that is hardly the point. This arrest and detention is as much an egregious breach of all spirit of the law of a free country as was the detention of Dr. Mel bruchet, who was forced into a mental hospital, also in Vancouver, for standing in front of a hospital with the FACTS about how many babies died due to the mRNA Vaxx injections.
In Canada, if you have counter-narrative views, and worse, if you have PROOF of those views, then Caveat Orator. Let the speaker beware.
Gulag Archipelago (Volume 2, Part III)
During a hunger strike, a prosecutor asks an inmate ‘Why are you torturing yourself?’. Stunning the prosecutor with its ‘irrelevance’, the inmate replies: ‘Justice is more precious to me than life’. This individual is subsequently transferred to a psychiatric facility, where a doctor flatly affirms: ‘We suspect you may be a schizophrenic’.

Here is the interview that was done in the coffee shop that led to his state-kidnapping.

We cleaned up the audio as best as we could and subtitled it as accurately as the audio quality allowed.

Please leave your thoughts in the comments.

Discussing this case with Grok we have a few things to add. The story so far, and what the state is able to do to him, ‘legally’ under the form 4 they used to kidnap him.

  • The coffee shop “ambush”: Several weeks before his detention, Wagter was in a café (reportedly for a meet-and-greet with like-minded people). A psychiatrist (Dr. Christine Taylor) and another health worker approached him. They identified themselves and tried to do an on-the-spot “mental health check.” He told them to read his materials and leave him alone, then got up and left. He later described it as feeling like an orchestrated confrontation.
  • The pull-over and certification: On May 23, 2026, Vancouver Police pulled him over while driving. Officers told him he had already been certified under BC’s Mental Health Act (Form 4) based on the earlier café observation + input from his family. He was taken to Vancouver General Hospital for involuntary assessment.
  • Initial 48 hours ? ongoing: It started as a short-term hold (Form 4.1 allows up to 48 hours), but a second certificate was issued, extending it (up to 1 month initially, with possible renewals for longer periods). As of the latest posts (May 27–28), he is still being held at VGH and claims he has been cleared by other doctors but remains detained.

Why it feels very Soviet:

  • No immediate crime.
  • Certification based heavily on observation in a public place + family input, without a fresh full in-person evaluation at the time of apprehension.
  • He was filming police during the stop (his right), and officers asked him to stop.
  • He is an activist/researcher who posts about Chinese influence in Canada, government overreach, and other controversial topics. Supporters call it retaliation / “medical kidnapping” to silence him. Critics say his content shows signs of genuine mental health concerns (e.g., fringe ideas about wireless tech, energy fields, etc.).

This case has gone viral in alternative circles exactly because of how it looks: a seemingly functional, educated young man with no violence or immediate threat being detained after public political/activist activity.It’s a fresh and very raw example of how BC’s Mental Health Act can be applied — broad powers that critics say are ripe for abuse, especially when someone is outspoken.

Under the order that they have on him, can they force psychiatric drugs into him?
Yes — under BC’s Mental Health Act, once someone is certified as an involuntary patient, they can be forced to take psychiatric drugs against their will. How it works in practice:

  • Form 4 (the initial certification) allows detention for assessment.
  • Within 24 hours of admission, the facility must complete a Form 5 (Consent for Treatment – Involuntary Patient).
  • On the Form 5, if the patient refuses medication (or is deemed incapable of consenting), the facility director (or designate) can authorize treatment anyway. This includes psychiatric drugs (antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, etc.).
  • Once authorized, staff can use chemical restraint (forced injection) or other coercive measures if the patient physically resists.

This is standard under the Act. Involuntary patients explicitly cannot refuse psychiatric treatment, including medication. For Nicholas Jordan Wagter specifically:

He is currently held under this system at Vancouver General Hospital. If they have completed (or will complete) the Form 5 authorizing treatment, the hospital has legal power to medicate him against his wishes — even if he is conscious, competent in other areas, and objects.This is exactly why many people call these cases “Soviet-style” — the state can override bodily autonomy on psychiatric grounds with relatively little external oversight in the short term.Note: He (or his representatives) can request a Review Panel hearing to challenge the certification, and he has the right to a lawyer and a second medical opinion, but the treatment can still proceed while that’s happening.This is the legal reality in BC right now. Let me know if you want sources for the exact forms or how to support his case.
Comparing what a single psychiatrist can do Vs. the entire justice system to any person in Canada:
Criminal arrest (normal justice system):

  • Police arrest you ? You have the right to call a lawyer immediately.
  • You must be brought before a judge within 24 hours (bail hearing).
  • You are presumed innocent.
  • The state cannot force psychiatric drugs into you.
  • You have full Charter protections, evidence rules, right to silence, etc.

Mental Health Act certification (what happened to Wagter):

  • One doctor (often with family input or a single public sighting) signs a Form 4.
  • You can be picked up off the street (or pulled over) with no warrant.
  • No immediate right to a lawyer in practice.
  • No judge has to approve the initial detention.
  • They can and do force psychiatric drugs (including antipsychotics) into you against your will, even if you are competent and refusing.
  • The “due process” (Review Panel) comes days or weeks later — after you’ve already been medicated.

Reader’s Links for May 28th, 2026

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

On the MAC Convention in Toronto and massive state funding for Islamic antisemitism

Please read this post over at RAIR about the MAC Convention in Toronto and know two additional things.

Melissa Lantsman and others) repeatedly mention that last year (for the previous convention or MAC programs), Canadian Heritage gave MAC $20,000 through the Anti-Racism Program (or Multiculturalism and Anti-Racism Program).

MAC as an organization receives ongoing federal funding (hundreds of thousands to millions over the years, including a larger $349k grant in 2021 for anti-racism work)

Secondly, that the Ottawa Government went to great pains to shut down a film a few years ago at the Ottawa Public Library which was a factual documentary about the consequences of mass Islamic importation into Europe. The movie was called, Killing Europe. And various state agents within the municipal government of Ottawa went to great efforts to shut it down.

Killing Europe is below:

After various agents associated with both the Ottawa council and one or another “Human Rights Commission” (clearly not considering freedom of speech to be a human right) the same film maker made another documentary about how his first one had been shut down, where he exposed the various agents involved, we have tactfully not named in this article.

This post is a microcosm of how things now work across the West — especially in the Commonwealth, Germany, France, and much of Western Europe.
Add in the definition of dialectics from the daily Reader’s Links, and the picture becomes complete. It is a big ask to watch two films, but when you consider when they were made (killing Europe: 2017 and Killing Canada: 2018) and read the RAIR piece, the jigsaw feels complete. What we are living through is the culmination of decades of deliberate effort by leftist agencies: the systematic disempowerment of the individual and the elevation of the State to near-God status — a State that decides what is true, what may be said, and what must be punished.

It is a big ask to watch two films. But when you think about when they were made, and look at the post at RAIR it forms a pretty well completed jigsaw. There have been things at work for decades culminating in what is here and what will grow, shaped mostly via empowering small minded people by making certain thoughts either outright criminal, or worthy of social ostracism.

All moves take society to the left.

All dialectic attacks move society to the left.

All new laws take society to the left.

Taking things to the left means the disempowering of the individual and creating a near God-like state that can determine what is true and not true and enforce those narratives as suits their agenda at any given moment.

Islam is one of their primary cudgels. And in a few years from now, what legacy Canadians remain might look at the last 20 years with a great deal of sympathy for Harp Seal pups. We shall know what it is to be clubbed.

Reader’s Links for May 27th, 2026

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

The abuse of the medical system to discredit counter-narrative people in BC

This story about a BC man who was essentially arrested and forced into a mental health facility for evaluation is still undetermined as to its nature. At least fully. However, this site has a regular reader who had a VERY similar thing happen to her. She may or may not choose to share her experience in the comments. But it mirrors this event nearly perfectly. Even to having 2 doctors determine that she should not be in the facility, and not being let out till she saw a judge.

Secondly, even what we found about his posts on Social media indicate that his views are counter-narrative, and therefore considered to call his ‘sanity’ into question.

Thirdly, there was a doctor we wrote about a fair amount on this site who was sectioned, as they used to call it, during Covid for questioning the vaxx’s effects on the not-yet born. This would be Dr. Mel Bruchet. He was locked up for speaking clear and obvious vaccine truths if memory serves. In fact he was saying much what the Helen Grus research would have turned up. Helen in fact, is relatively lucky compared to Bruchet.

All of this is forward to the current issue. But an event means far less as an isolated case than when you flesh out the context in a relevant way. This is not reaching to a rhetorically useful level of abstraction. That is one of the leftist’s greatest rhetorical cons. We are showing that people with counter-narrative views, especially when they have some academic or societal authority can be destroyed without even the decency of a captured legal process, by channeling them into the mental health system. The gentleman currently facing this Soviet style tactic is a biophysics researcher with a background at Western University.

Below is what Grok gave me on the issue including the narrative negation of the likely truth of the matter:

What Happened

Nicholas Jordan Wagter (a biophysics researcher with a background at Western University) was involuntarily detained under British Columbia’s Mental Health Act (specifically a Form 4 certificate). A psychiatrist named Dr. Taylor (Vancouver Coastal Health) observed him in a public café some time earlier.
She gathered additional information from his family members (referred to by him as the “Wagter-Browns”).
Based on that, she issued the certificate authorizing police to apprehend him for psychiatric assessment.
He was stopped in his car by the Car 87 mental health crisis response team (police + mental health workers) and taken to Vancouver General Hospital.

He has been posting videos from inside the hospital claiming:It’s unlawful / retaliatory.
He’s been “cleared by two other medical professionals” but is still being held.
It’s connected to his online research and political views.

Why Was He Committed?

The official reason (according to the process described in his own videos and collateral reports) is the standard criteria under BC’s Mental Health Act:He appeared to be suffering from a mental disorder.
He was deemed to be at risk of harm to himself or others (or unable to care for himself).

No public evidence has emerged that this was done solely for his political views. Family members appear to have been involved in providing collateral information, which is very common in these cases.

Context from His Own Content & Public ReactionWagter has been posting extensively about government corruption, Chinese influence in Canada, intelligence issues, etc.
Many of his followers are calling this “medical kidnapping” or political persecution.
A significant number of comments (including on Reddit and Instagram) suggest he may be in the middle of a manic episode or other mental health crisis. His family reportedly has a history of concern.

This is a developing situation — he is still posting from the hospital as of today.Main LinksHis main video announcing it: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYsnXzbyOwO/
“Proof I’m still in here”: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYup9RrzZIu/
His profile: @nicholas_jordan_wagter

The fact that CSIS itself has made a number of speeches, testimonies and interviews attempting to show Canadians the extent of Chinese influence in Canada doesn’t seem to be a mitigating factor here. In other words, he believed that China exercises undue influence. The fact is, anyone who doesn’t comes closer to a definition of crazy.

What’s missing is the order of events.

Reading this, it looks to me like what is at least equally likely is the following:

A psychiatrist who was aware of his social media postings, planted herself at a cafe she knew he would be at. She ‘observed’ him for a while, then went on to seek his family and get data that would add gravitas to her commitment of him. Next thing you know, well you will see the video of his arrest below and subsequent videos from inside the facility.

But even if I am wrong on this and it was a coincidence that the shrink was at the same cafe and she had already gotten reports from his family etc. etc. there is one pressing question that really matters and only one.

From where did the state get the power to do this to him?

It cannot be that they felt he was a danger to himself. The number one killer of Canadians now is the state itself with its increasingly lax criteria for administering MAiD.

A danger to others? Seems to me that if that was the case, every religious Muslim and ANTIFA member should be in the nuthouse and now.

Something really, really stinks about this. The fact that the arresting officer, yes its an arrest when they take you somewhere you don’t want to go and you have no choice. An arrest at best. A kidnapping is also a reasonable characterization given that there is ZERO DUE PROCESS.

I cannot embed the video but you can watch it here:

https://rumble.com/shorts/v7adu2y

From inside the facility:

https://rumble.com/shorts/v7aelaq

Now this may be pure coincidence. In that video he mentions that his was the only room with no drapes. As a consequence, he couldn’t sleep until he taped material over the windows because of the amount of light coming in to his room from them.

As it happens, I am at the part of the Gulag Archipelago where Solzhenitsyn is explaining the various tortures used to get people into a state of willingness to confess to whatever is shoved in front of them, Special emphasis is placed on forcing a lack of sleep. Solzhenitsyn even states that had medieval torturers been aware of the amazing properties of forcing sleep deprivation on people, they could have forgone all the messy and expensive torture devices so typical of the age.

Last data point, British Columbia is the most communist province of Canada. They ran a multi-year pilot decriminalizing pretty much all recreational drugs. Which worked out as one might expect.

But all this aside, every word of it. The only thing that matters is, how did the state take the power to do this to anyone?

Why are we not furious about it and demanding it be undone NO MATTER that justification, given the clearly dialectical way that these kinds of powers are deployed. Again, there is not an Imam in Canada that shouldn’t be locked up based on this criteria. Just thumb through a real translation of Koran, or peruse MEMRI’s site looking for sermons given in Canada.

Make Canada a Republic now.

A post script thought that may help take the point home, In the National Post article showing how a doctor had assessed a man outside a Tim Horton’s restaurant (For American readers, that is basically a McDonalds run by people from India, owned by Brazilians and named after a Canadian Hockey Player) decided he would be better off dead and drove him to his assassination site and killed him with drugs. For this set of actions, the same CPSO that destroyed medical careers of doctors who simply gave their best medical opinions that the mRNA vaxx was not always the best idea for their patients, told this doctor he could continue, but with 6 months supervision.

A London, Ont., doctor who assessed a patient with inflammatory bowel disease and a history of mental health issues for MAID outside a Tim Hortons location and later personally drove the man to the place his life was ended has agreed to a minimum six months’ supervision. […]

As part of an investigation by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) into two public complaints made against MacLean, an independent assessor appointed to review a number of MacLean’s charts concluded that he “did not meet the standard of practice of the profession, displayed a lack of judgment and that his conduct exposes or is likely to expose patients to harm or injury in five out of twenty charts reviewed,” according to a summary decision of the college’s inquiries, complaints and reports committee.

MacLean was called before the committee to be verbally “cautioned” with respect to the MAID complaints.

In addition to agreeing to mandatory clinical supervision for at least six months as part of an “undertaking” with the college, MacLean will undergo ongoing review of his MAID patient charts and mandatory professional education related to MAID, consent, documentation, professional boundaries and professional behaviour.

Compare that to what happened to Dr. Mark Trozzi for just one, and a dozen other doctors I have interviewed, or know personally in Canada, like Dr. Mary O’Connor. They simply didn’t think the vaxx was a good idea and that no one had the right to force it on them. For those two opinions, one of which turned out to be medically true and the other is axiomatically correct, they were destroyed in terms of their medical careers and licences.

This is apples to apples. We are talking about the SAME CPSO, or College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.

UPDATE: Someone prompted AI to write a song about this. its AI slop, bit hopefully it will get more attention on this issue.

 

Reader’s links, May 26, 2026

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

A few film and TV items that might help steer the cultural titanic before it rams the iceberg head on

1. I just got this email. Make of it what you will. But it feels like a bad omen when a state will not accept its own money.

I had to renew my passport. Last week I went to Service Canada — they no longer take cash. The girl said they stopped taking cash approximately 6 months ago. Surprise, surprise, bit by bit we are moving to a cashless, controlled society.

2. I may have posted this before, but there are some insights/jokes in it that are worth seeing twice

3. I guess this is going to be a pop-culture post in a sense. Below is a scene from the movie, The Remains of the Day. It seems relevant now because of the way the Nazis presented themselves at a table of naive European diplomats in order to gain tactical advantage before they attacked them. The speech by the American diplomat is legendary and the best part of the movie. However the whole scene is worth seeing. If I can find it I will post it.

4. This film was made in 1939 and stars Gary Cooper among others. It was made about how the US in 1906 helped the Philippines defend itself from raping, slave taking, murdering Muslims acting in accordance with islamic scripture. It was also made before communist dialectics saw to it that you could not actually name a threat accurately without fear of punishment, and even more weirdly, without self flagellation as if speaking the truth had somehow been made a taboo even in our own heads.

We post this movie every year or two, but most people have still not seen it. Take the time. Its refreshing.

General Pershing is not named or portrayed in the film The Real Glory, but the pig-skin tactic shown in the movie is often popularly attributed to him. Pershing was indeed in the Philippines (he served as governor of the Moro Province from 1909–1913). and mentioned the Pig blood bullets and pig skin tactics in his memoirs.

5. Two scenes from South Park from back when it was relevant and funny. This one is pretty much a descriptor of how Western people deal with Islam as a whole:

It is a scene from a 2 episode series called, “Cartoon Wars” and is excellent from start to finish. I believe both episodes have been banned. But search around for them, maybe on Tor or something. They are out there to watch for sure. Or possibly still available to buy.

The next one is a great scene from where the kid’s teacher gets a ‘sex change’. I have to put that in scare quotes as there is no such thing as a sex change. But they call the weird sexual medical experimentation on Children that so…

Anyway in this scene, they sarcastically explain that if people actually saw what the surgery looks like to make one sex into a kind of coarse imitation of the other, more people would do it. Which of course isn’t true, and wasn’t the real intent. They do show real scenes from these surgeries. SO BE ADVISED.

Thats it for this post. I think pop culture can be a valuable tool to get people up to speed. Which is likely why the left forced everything to go the other way. Like, as has become nearly cliche, ‘when is the last time you saw a straight white couple in a TV commercial?’

It isn’t the mixed couple that is infuriating. It is the social engineering. The deracination of ourselves as a people, a culture or even cultures, a history and a set of laws. And most of all, a set of laws applied equally to all, and based on rational and measurable evidences.

Maybe I’ll just add this old Procol Harum song for pure nostalgia.

Funny thing is, I bet they ban A Whiter Shade of Pale before they ban that one.

Thank you all for checking out this site.

Reader’s Links for May 25th, 2026

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

Jeff Evely interview and presentation at his May 5th de-transition event in Ottawa

RAIR Foundation has the article.

(To increase your viewing experience, please click the gear at the bottom right of the video window once it starts playing and wind it up to the best quality available)

Of all the mass line narrative attacks created by the State for the destruction of our identity, individualism and rights, perhaps the Trans-issue is the most ludicrous, and therefore destructive. The idea that a man who claims he is a women, is a real woman and must be treated as such, is perhaps the greatest single attack on reality in modern times. But Bill C-4, which empowers the state to talk children into going to spay and neuter clinics to become a sexually amorphous medical experiment, and then punishes parents with 5 years in jail and massive fines if they just suggest the child wait till they are old enough to vote to begin these destructive and irreversible processes, is the perfect end game for the left. And by the left, I include the dialectically named, “Conservative Party of Canada” who danced in the isles after the bill passed, and after they had requested not to bother debating it and consider all the protocols in advance of the bill to have been completed.

Jeff Evely, the man who walked in the woods of Nova Scotia in defiance of a massively Ultra-vires order not to do so, unless you where attending a gay wedding or an anti-European play by Amer-Indians, held a conference in Ottawa on May 5th to try and raise awareness of the horrors of the trans-issue. And horrors it is. Forgive me the comparison, but frankly I don’t think it is much of an exaggeration to say the doctors who do this sit somewhere between Jospeh Mengele and Dr. Victor Frankenstein.

The prime differences being that the suffering these people endure come for the rest of their lives but not during the surgeries, unlike Mengele, and Frankenstein had the decency to only operate on corpses and not school children, tricked into accepting the insanely metaphysical position that whatever is bothering them at the moment is because they were ‘born in the wrong body’.

We interviewed Jeff the evening before his conference took place on parliament Hill, and then at Biker’s Church in Vanier

His story is well worth the watch.

There was also a full press conference with all the people he brought in for this conference at West block Parliament hill. But as expected, they didnt allow many journalists in, and the ones they did allow in, few came. The Western Standard was the one exception and they did make it into the presser.

Here is the CPAC video of the event at the West Block:

Jeff’s own presentation at his event that evening. Jeff went to the philosophical level of this issue. This is what has to happen if we want to educate enough people to develop tactics needed to defeat this steady onslaught of narrative attacks.

The Q&A Panel with a question from yours truly

Below are some of the other videos and testimonies from people who spoke at this event.

Athena Davis:

High School Teacher, Amy McKay: Fighting in court to keep her teachers licence after stating factually correct biology)

Barry Neufeld: (Fined 750,000.00$ for saying something true but counter narrative about human sexual dimorphism)

Interview with Rose: Detransitioner

Faith and Kelly interview part 1:

Part II:

Scott Newgent:

If anyone is still in doubt that the Trans-issue as is is today is a vector of attack on Western Civilization, maybe this MC from the Trans-pride march in Ottawa a couple of years ago will help inform:

Chris Fluery: Men in women’s prisons

There is a documentary about the whole day coming out soon which will contain other experts not covered here yet such as Dr. Ann Gillies, Mia Hughes and many others well worth hearing from.

 

Charting the growing tyranny through language and technology: Links post 1 for May 24, 2026

1. Women in Texas arrested and jailed for making factual post about bad water quality.

The thing is, does this event represent anything? Is it indicative of a pattern, or just some municipal petty tyrant using a nebulous law for awful reasons. Certainly if it was in Canada or anywhere in the Commonwealth, it would be a solid data point for a 1984 matrix being rapidly established.

I asked Grok to verify her story with area news and it gave me this:

Yes, the post is mostly accurate based on multiple news reports.

nypost.com

Key facts that check out:Jennifer Combs (a resident and self-described citizen journalist running “Southern Belle Watch”) posted on Facebook in early April 2026 about Trinidad, Texas’s (a small town in Henderson County) ongoing brown/contaminated tap water issues. She mentioned reports of residents being hospitalized due to bacteria and encouraged people to report discolored water, odors, or health problems.

fox4news.com

The city has acknowledged long-standing water problems (aging 1950s-era pipes, sediment, discoloration). They’ve issued boil water notices, and the Texas environmental agency has been involved.

On May 8, 2026, Trinidad police arrested her on a felony “false alarm or report” charge (escalated because it involved a public water supply). She was jailed. Police Chief Charles Gregory defended the arrest, calling her claims false and saying they caused unnecessary fear/panic.

A Henderson County grand jury declined to indict her (charges effectively dismissed for lack of evidence). A related protester’s charges were also dropped.

Combs has filed a federal lawsuit against the city, the police chief, an officer, and a council member, alleging political retaliation and First Amendment violations.

Nuance / what the post frames strongly:The X post calls it outright “tyrannical retaliation” and compares it to North Korea. That’s opinionated rhetoric, but the underlying events (arrest for a social media post about a real public issue, quick dismissal, and lawsuit) support concerns about overreach. Officials claim her specific claim about hospitalizations was unverified/false, while she says she was relaying reports.

This isn’t just abstract free speech—Texas has a specific statute for false alarms/reports that can be charged as a felony in certain contexts (like public utilities). Critics argue it was weaponized here.

Overall, the post gets the core story right: a woman was arrested for posting about dirty tap water in her town, the charges didn’t stick, and she’s now suing. It’s a real case that’s been covered by Fox 4, NY Post, and local Texas outlets. Small-town government vs. citizen activist over infrastructure problems escalated badly.

The fact that she was out fast and that the jury declined an indictment means the system is working properly, at least at that level. The nebulous charges though, should not exist. We see that in Canada and the UK and all Muslim countries where some version of ‘Making mischief on the land’ can be used to protect political power.

2. This checks out as factual. It’s actually somewhat worse.

A 2026 Swedish study found significantly higher odds of rape convictions among those with immigrant backgrounds even after adjusting for socioeconomic, psychiatric, and criminal factors.

Post was deleted but here it is:

Screenshot

3. Good thing these rapists aren’t in Canada threatening terrorism. They could end up with a “peace Bond”.

3. It has become critical to understand that we don’t have unfairness in the justice system. We have a total reformatting of the justice system in order to be an instrument of communism. A large large aspect of that, is the stunningly soft punishments, if they happen at all, to essentially illegal immigrants, especially African or Muslim ones, for VERY serious crimes including violent gang rapes, as compared to what happens to regular legacy Europeans or Canadians. In fact, more anymore often, the European victim of violent crime gets charged with hate speech if they are even accused of saying no-no words to their attackers! Even after the attack!!!

The case of Henry Nowak in the UK being the current prime example.

4. A well documented cause of murdering a teen girl because she wouldn’t “marry” an older cousin.

People’s exhibit B Ma’am:

I’d like to take this opportunity to de-spin some Islamic-Leftist dialectics here.

Marriage: The VOLUNTARY pairing of (once upon a time) one man, and one woman, to form a legal and cultural familial foundation. That each person would commit to the other as deeply as possible. But that was fully based on each person committing to the arrangement VOLUNTARILY. Like Christianity and Judaism, and frankly most religions, your commitment means nothing if you do not commit freely and of your own free will. Islam perverts both concepts. They force adherence to islam, and Islamic ritual. They don’t care if you believe necessarily, only that they can count you among their numbers.

And calling these forced arrangements on penalty of death, “marriage” is not just a distortion. It is a grotesquery. An abomination. And yet people use the term comfortably. And this is why nothing gets done about it.

5. Grok, X’s AI verified these facts and this graph:

Thank you all for checking out this site. Apologies for no posts for the past few days. it has been crazy busy with other work on the same general topics. So hopefully it does at least as much good for the cause as posting here.

This summary of Digital ID is accurate according to Grok

Reader’s Links for May 24th, 2026

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

Reader’s Links for May 23rd, 2026

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.