1. In the UK the man who stabbed an unrelated British stranger, a Sikh I believe it was, has been now arrested and charged and found guilty of murdering Henry Nowak.
However it was the British state and the police working for it, who are at least in large part responsible for his death. They handcuffed him and let him bleed out instead of taking him to medical help. They did this because his stabber, told police he said naughty words about his race. Video evidence showed that was untrue later on as the killer, Vickrum Digwa, chased him and stabbed him from behind, with zero element of self defence of any kind.
Therefore, the state put its hand on the scale so heavily that they made the greater crime the mere allegation of a racial epithet, than the stabbing and ultimate death of a random person on the street.
If the UK was still anything like a republic, or had anything like rule of law, the police would be an accessory to murder.
So this looks like a victory. But is not in any way that restores the rule of law. He was stabbed by some person who very possibly should not have been in the UK at all. But he died because of state policy and police who more resemble the Clockwork Orange thugs than anything like enforcers of law.
2. Will fact check this video as much as possible. But so far this is the only thing I have seen on this worthy of posting. The underlying logic is fully believable though. Many people including Canada’s installed Dear Leader, Mark Carney, says that people “will eat less meat” makes one included to look into what the actual plan is to force people to submit to their will.
There is as far as I know, no name for a crime of this magnitude if indeed, the claims in this video are true.
I had to beat this out of Grok, as Grok defaults to heavily loaded language. (if there is any interest I’ll post the whole one or two pages of prompts and responses to get there) Grok initially used terms like “Conspiracy theory” etc. Was like reading Blue Sky almost. But pressed on what is factual:
Are any claims presented as facts in the video actually false?
Most core descriptive claims are true or directionally accurate, but a few are exaggerated or misleading:
Lone Star tick causes Alpha-gal syndrome (AGS): True.
Matthew Liao discussed using the Lone Star tick mechanism for “human engineering” to reduce meat consumption: True (he said it publicly at the World Science Festival ~10 years ago).
Western Michigan University bioethics paper arguing it is morally required to spread Alpha-gal via ticks: True (published 2025 in Bioethics).
Bill Gates / Gates Foundation funded genetically engineered ticks: True (but see below on details).
U.S. Army released large numbers of (radioactively labeled) ticks in the 1950s–60s: True (documented Cold War-era research).
Bill Gates invests in lab-grown meat: True.
3. Is the increase in Alpha-gal accurate as a percentage?
The 10,000% increase is technically true in some datasets but highly misleading without context:CDC data (2017–2021): Positive tests rose from ~13,371 to ~18,885 per year ? ~41% increase in that period.
Longer-term / different datasets (e.g., TriNetX large cohort studies): Incidence rose dramatically — one 2025 analysis showed over 5,500% increase in new diagnoses in recent years, with some periods approaching or exceeding 10,000% relative growth from a very low baseline.
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Overall: CDC estimates >110,000 suspected cases (2010–2022), with true numbers possibly ~450,000 due to underdiagnosis. The explosion is real and well-documented.
Grok went on to make counter claims though, that Gates used a different kind of tick for research, a cattle tick for ‘livestock disease control” and that he never released them.
I guess we would have to look at Gates’s history of truthfulness and efforts since, I dunno, maybe when he stole the first Graphical User Interface from two IBM scientists and released it as Microsoft Windows without attribution or credit. Then everything since, especially during Covid with the mRNA shots to decide how to take Grok’s counter claims. I’ll save the whole argument in a text file I guess if anyone feels they want to see it.
But given Gates’ belief in the need to reduce world population, (and there is a case to be made for that for sure, lots of people feel that way) and given Gates’ personal ethical system and willingness to advance his agendas with the tremendous powers he has, it is not unreasonable to consider if he is not being entirely truthful. There is an old adage that “The half truth is the damndest of lies”. So maybe he did admit to research on cattle related ticks but named some other one. I don’t know in any meaningful sense of the word, “know”. But as hypothesis go, this is worthy of investigation to the point of a court worthy theory.
But there is a really fundamental difference between the belief that global human population is too high, and acting in a way to reduce it that is a crime of biblical proportions. Advancing birth control in areas of the world where the birth rate is highest and has the least ability to actually produce materials for life in a way that doesn’t pummel the environment, like eating bush meat to extinction as an example, would be a way most people would be OK with. Not forcing our choices to go how oligarchs want. The consequence of widespread meat allergy means lowered production of meat overall as farms will find it increasingly unprofitable. Human health will go down the toilet as people are forced to eat vegetables, especially as most mass farming methods have depleted soil of nutrients such that many or most commercial food plants requires supplementation of micro nutrients in pill form.
Lastly, if Alpha gal syndrome manages to get so many people allergic to meat that the problem is amplified by farmers switching to plant foods, the ocean will be a much safer place to swim in a few years as all fish stock gets plated.
In any case, no matter if we are right or wrong on the science, it is a VERY secondary issue. The real issue is who gave them the right to force their choices on us and what do we do about it.
The guest doctor, Dr. Nicolas Hulscher, at around 4 minutes in points at the dialectical name for the effort: “Bioterrorism is masquerading as bioethics now”. That, is what we call, dialectical naming of a Line of Operation.
3. Rupert Lowe MP refuses to apologize for a rational statement about the equivalence between industrial rape and tporture of British girls and the Holocaust.
Full text:
I want to be really clear in my response. I am not going to retract anything, I stand by every single word. Labour are calling for me to apologise. The answer is no.
Industrial rape across almost every town and city in Britain.
Sexual torture. Murder. Endless rape.
I sat there for two weeks, listening to these girls.
I heard how one girl was raped by a dog, as Muslim men bet on what the animal would do.
Girls drugged and locked in cages, like rats.
Another, raped by 700 men over three years.
Dozens and dozens of these stories through our inquiry, and we are barely scratching the surface.
This was allowed to happen EXACTLY because politicians were cowards, refusing to discuss it.
I will not make that same mistake. I said what I said, and I meant it.
The Labour Party have blood on their hands, yet they think they can demand an apology from me for highlighting the systemic evil they allowed to infect our entire country?
They can piss off.
I am angry about it. Furious. When you hear directly from these girls about what they have been through, it changes the way you see politics. Forever.
Our report will be out very soon.
When that happens, I don’t want any apologies from the Labour Party. I don’t care about that.
I want to see those politicians responsible for covering up this atrocity behind bars for what they have done to these girls.
One cannot possibly solve a problem if one cannot name the enemy, or properly describe an event for what it is.
Marine Le Pen’s father was destroyed for saying something like (roughly) the Holocaust in historical terms, was not a unique event” or something equivalent. He was correct. The Islamic slaughter of Hindus is thought to be 17 MILLION under Muslim general Tamerlane, (Timur) alone. And he wasn’t the only Muslim attacker to try and kill all the Hndus. Altogether the number is something like 60-80 MILLION.
More recently there is the Maoist mass murder of his own people to make communism work. That number is estimated at 40-80 MILLION.
The Soviet genocide attempt of Ukrainian farmers, was 13% of the total population at around 4.5 MILLION people.
So looking at the industrial destruction of British culture and mass rape and torture of British women and girls, I think it would fit the UN definition of Genocide before the UN itself started promoting it as ‘Replacement population” in official policy.
On a related point, one of the great errors made by the West in the past 80 years or so, was turning the socialist leader, Adolf Hitler into a ‘far right wing’ god of evil. By doing so, you create worshippers, even if it starts as a cult, and much much more importantly, when you take a person and make him into a myth, you cannot spot it when it arrives again. There are other Hitlers in play today for all practical and rational definitions and descriptors, but no one can see them for what they are as we have made Hitler into a giant. A myth. A one off historical monster. There is a quite good German film that more or less addresses that actually. If yu can find it, it is well worth the watch. beyond any messaging, (and it is remarkably free of didacticism and preaching) it is very entertaining. The movie is called,Er ist wieder da (Look who’s Back) and makes this point very well. If you don’t know who and what he really was, you will be blindsided when he returns to do the same things all over again. And maybe even go along with it.
additional data point:
4. If a Canadian retweets or likes this short video on Chinese control of Canadian government, will we be kidnapped into a dialecticaly named, mental health facility and force fed brain destroying drugs?
5. Be interesting to know what truth there is behind this.
6. This tweet mistakenly claims that the British industrial rape of legacy girls by Muslim gangs has spread to Canada now. Actually it has been here for quite some time. We had a SUN TV video on a trial from many years ago in Ottawa where a number of unnamed men from a highly enriched neighbourhood had been charged with luring and drugging and raping girls. The trial, also in Ottawa, was closed to the public.
Thank you all for checking out this site.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer
Q“The people that make stupidity unstoppable why see the lie and staying silent allows evil”.
Burgess was incredibly accurate in his predictions about what the future Britain would be like, but a lot of lesser known authors were very accurate about what the fate of the Western Civilization would be. The jury is still out on the question of will the idea of individual rights and freedom and the rule of law with everyone equal under the law will survive and help form the civilization that is going to replace the murdered Western Civilization.
#3 Correction: though Tamerlane (who followed a Sufist order) is estimated to have killed 17 million people, most of his victims were actually muslim, not Hindu. True, he basically exterminated the inhabitants of Delhi, but he did the same to Isfahan, Baghdad, Aleppo, Damascus, and New Sarai. He invaded Georgia several times, Armenia, subjugated the Ottomans, defeated the Crusaders (Knights of Rhodes):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Smyrna
He even went after the Ismailis (order of Assassins), though not at the infamous Alamut Castle, which had fallen to the Mongols over a century earlier:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anjudan#Timur's_Siege_of_Anjudan
So he fought Sunni and Shia muslims, Christians, the (shamanic) Golden Horde, and had plans for the Chinese (Ming dynasty), who followed Confucianism. He considered Beijing the great prize, but he passed away before he could attack it.