Author Archives: Eeyore

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

Reader’s Links for May 6th, 2026

Posted on by

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

Reader’s Links for May 5th, 2026

Posted on by

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

Reader’s Links for May 4th, 2026

Posted on by

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

Mostly on how the communist state will use AI, data points for replacement migration and the accelerating revolution in Carney’s Canada: Links post 1 for May 3rd, 2026

Posted on by

This morning, while perusing the pretend-random YouTube feed that comes up on my sandboxed YT app, I decided to watch one titled, “Why AI agents are either the best or worst thing we’ve ever built“.

It was pretty much what you may expect if you have watched a bunch of videos on AI but slightly better than average in presentation. It wasn’t political, or philosophical at all. That is until about 7 minutes in. Then the philosophical issue of agency came up. The argument ran that instead of the more or less 1950 sci-fi imaginings of a human brain/agency and robot bodies, which we have had pretty much for decades now, we are switching to robot brains/agency and human bodies.

She brought on a guest. A philosopher,  Niklas Lönnblad. I can’t tell between her accent and his name being strongly Scandinavian. Then it got interesting from our PoV.

Without using the term, ‘game-theory’ he started out by defining an aspect of it. The issue of limited time and resources hence each agency, be it a person or a state would necessarily prioritize for what goals needed to be addressed while ignoring the rest due to lack of actual agency/agents.

Time and agency will be removed from the equations of life, which means a fundamental shift. All animals factor in the time and effort required to achieve a goal. Imagine what would happen if that wasn’t a factor, and a Marxist state deployed that kind of game-change.

The example they used was, if suddenly the state, which they refer to as the government, were suddenly able, through the use of AI agents, to ticket EVERY car that went 1 KM over a speed limit, you would, as he put it, have a dictatorship within a democracy.

We clearly, clearly are approaching that exact example now without even having AI. Just speed cameras and regular old computers sending tickets to people who go over the limit based on licence plate connection to the car owner.

But the concept is worth extrapolating on, because it will be the case. The state can essentially criminalize everything and arrest or otherwise hurt any given person based on what the actual priorities of the state are, rather than a criminal justice hierarchy of crime.

In other words, they can know any minor infraction you did, and then arrest you because you denied Global Warming, or insisted on biological reality of human sexual dimorphism.

And again, this already happened in the Soviet Union as painstakingly detailed in the Gulag Archipelago decades before there were computers. Or even cell phones. But AI actually extends agency to the state to infinity. This will change a lot of equations. And might explain why Mark Carney was so adamant about building massive AI server farms as (at one point) his main campaign platform, while also BSing everyone that they all insisted on large amounts of “green electrical supply”. A lie anyone who bothered to think about it for a moment could see through instantly. No company ever cared where its power came from.

In the following excerpt from the video, the examples given of course are banal. But I would ask anyone interested enough to read this, or watch the video to extrapolate. See where this has already happened, or how it will be applied. As Mark Twain said, “History does not repeat itself. but it does Rhyme”.

“I’m not sure how to feel about this. So, we have autonomous AI agents already out there hiring humans to do their bidding, which sounds like the plot of a very bad science fiction film. But I called up my friend, the philosopher Niklas Lönnblad.

Nice, I’m so excited I get to talk to you about this. Likewise. Have you been playing around with OpenCLR? Of course I have, absolutely.

He had a different way to think about this:

Well, I think autonomy is widely overvalued, because autonomy means that it does what it wants. And we’re nowhere near designing bots that have a will of their own or agency of their own.

We call them agents, but they’re really delegates. Nature develops agency first. Intelligence is a resulting effect or emergent effect of the looping of agencies.

And then that’s how you get intelligence. Whereas we’ve done it sort of really backwards with the artificial intelligence project, where we build intelligence first. And then we’re now sort of going back to figuring out, can we do agency? What we want is to be able to delegate and extend our agency in different ways.

I think that will present a whole different class of problems for us. The troubling thing then isn’t yet that AI has too much agency, it’s that we do. Almost all societies are premised on the fact that agency is scarce.

Attention is scarce. We’re limited by time. Take a super simple example, like there is a concert and the tickets are being released.

You have people queuing up to get to this concert. And this queue works why? It works because there’s a limited amount of attention, time and agency that people can spend. Now, imagine a world in which you

can tell your agents that if there’s any concerts by this particular band and I want a ticket, so queue up for me virtually.

Suddenly there’s like this abundance of agency and the queue breaks. Think about a society where everybody can will 10 times more, 100 times more, 1000 times more. What does that mean if we increase the amount of will in society? A lot of our other concepts like justice depend on this too.

Because now flip the coin and imagine that the government has abundant agency, infinite agency. And suddenly every single violation of the law can be enforced. So imagine, for example, every time you speed and you’re three or four or five kilometres or miles per hour over the limit, you’re automatically issued a ticket.

There’s something about this full enforcement of the law through abundant government agency that actually comes very close to a dictatorship, although we’re still in a democracy. Abundant agency in the hands of governments is potentially terrifying. But what about in the hands of an individual? Because one thing that you can say about humans is that we have no shortage of ideas.

What we have is a shortage of time and energy and frankly, the will to deal with the admin. Cass (the name of the AI agent they built, short for Casandra and is the name the AI agent picked for itself) has none of those problems. And so we thought what is the most ambitious thing that we could ask her to do? Not fix a pothole, not buy paperclips.”

It continues with an interesting idea about using it to create destructive propaganda. Their example is about trying to crash a stock. People might figure it out eventually, but by then the damage is done. This also is a perfect reflection of Western nation’s reality since 2020 or before. Covid, the vaxx, global warming, all of it was Maoist mass line narrative attacks, intended to create an effect. The state becomes less interested in preserving the narrative itself once the goal, which is the damage that is done to the target, has been achieved. At 12:50 more or less, she describes tasking an AI agent to create a mass line narrative attack in order to tank a stock. Again, extrapolate forwards, and interpolate backwards to see how this was already done to damage individualism. What is the multiplier on this effect AI will have, going forwards?

She also touches on another of Stephen Coughlin’s themes. Ultimately, the damage is done to trust in the systems altogether. This is what Stephen calls, “The liquification of reality”. A total destruction of our own ability to make decisions on any of the information coming our way.

(As a complete aside, for anyone looking for a temporary solution to the immediate problem of same, it is easy. Stop watching TV and stop listening to news on radio. Especially in Canada. For people who say, “Where will I get my news” the answer is easy, You are not getting news now. For information, search X. When you see anything interesting, query Grok, X’s AI agent as to the date and trtuth of the Tweet in question. So far I have found it to be on the whole, very good for that.)

Interestingly Canada is still preserving the Trans-narrative attack in spades, along with several others. Many thinkers are claiming that Canada is dropping the Global Warming narrative attack because no one believes it anymore.

Untrue on both counts. The elbows up crowd still chant it like life depends on it, and the state doesn’t give a rats kidney if people believe it or not. They are happy to have their useful idiots out on the street pushing these narratives, but they don’t care who believes them. They just care that people are afraid to oppose them. Because, as we often say, “with the left, the point is never the point. The revolution is always the point.” -David Horowitz Obama’s Rules for Revolution/Diana West.

Arguing against the narratives is ignoring the intent of them. And inadvertently working for the enemy, unless one includes the telos of the narrative. The effect the narrative will have on individualism and classical thought.

On to the list of indicators of the state of Western nations:

1. A decent example of Canada moving from a nation of rule of law to a dialectically driven, narrative based state

Click through to read the entire commentary.

2. Multiculturalism in Spain is going as expected

Also comments under that one.

3. This, like similar programs, are great for getting a few people that don’t already know what is happening with Islam especially in Gaza to wake up to the facts. People who are committed to the Islamic and ‘Palestinian’ cause of course, would just agree with the training and propaganda. it would make no difference to them. but at the end of the day, none of that matters. What does matter is: A: Do we have faith in our own right to exist, our culture, our beliefs, our history and B: are we ready to fight for it with the requisite amount of force and sacrifice to win.

Generally speaking I would say no. Most do not believe in either, and those that do believe in A are not ready to believe in B.

4. Ezra follows up with the whole Rocket Launch pad con that the Fed Guv and the socialist Nova Scotia provincial government set up. Of course most news that bothers to report on this at all, say, CBC, CTV and Global, IF they bother to write on this, will frame it as incompetence, or at worst corruption. But what they won’t ever say, is where the money goes. I would argue it goes to hotels and caterers who house, feed and otherwise pander to all the needs of the endless supply of Africans and Muslims being brought in to Canada and housed at Holiday Inns (at least one I know of in Ottawa’s East End) to replace liberty minded Canadians and deracinate Canadian-ness.

 

5. The political state of Canada. Watch all of these for a decent snapshot of how Carney and the WEF/Bilderberg revolution is coming along.

I wonder if the USA will have an issue with Canada deciding that Taiwan is rightfully Chinese now.

Passed Fact Check:

 

Thank you all for checking out this site.

A little something to add to the pile of the Global Warming narrative damage data.

Lastly, PLEASE if you are in or near Ottawa on Tuesday, don’t forget about this event!

There will be a Town-Hall with all the speakers in a panel and I think taking questions from the public Tuesday evening as well. The location is very central to downtown and there is parking not far away.

 

Reader’s Links for May 3rd, 2026

Posted on by

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

Trevor Loudon details the Duginist attack on the West via many of our favorite Russian and Chinese ops

Posted on by

Previously, we posted an interview with Trevor Loudon on Alexander Dugan, the Russian, and actually formerly dialectical engineer, now operating various lines of Operation against the West, such as MAGA Communism.

It was basically a point form interview, but an excellent introduction to the basics. If you haven’t seen it, you can watch it here.

Below is a more recent and much more detailed interview on the same subject and may I say, it is fascinating.

On the advancement of Communism, Mark Carney’s agenda BRILLIANTLY laid out in a Tweet, and a couple of words about Pit Bulls: Links 1 for May 2, 2026

Posted on by

1. Remember, the Detective Helen Grus story is a microcosm, or a rather an excellent data point for what has happened to our civilization. The replacement of Rule of Law and all that means, to a narrative based, dialectical system where the state determines what is true, and the only real crime is defying a state narrative. Especially from a place of any kind of authority. The preceding statement, for what it is worth, is my personal definition for what communism actually is, as opposed to what it’s useful idiots agitate for at yesterday’s ‘May Day’ marches across parts of Canada.

RAIR Foundation has a lot of information about the hearings of Det. Helen Grus. For those not familiar, click through and catch up if you like.

2. A couple of items on yesterday’s Useful Idiots day in Canada. CTV of course, parrots the Communist party line brilliantly, framing it as requested, “Protecting Workers Rights” when of course, in Communist countries there are exactly ZERO workers rights and that lack of rights is highly taken advantage of by the state.

It is also amazing how CTV managed to hide the Communist iconography that permeates these demos and marches. That takes real effort. It should also be noted that whenever actual liberal minded people asking for constitutional rights, freedom of speech, freedom of bodily autonomy etc. etc. attempts any kind of protest, these people will make sure its as unpleasant as possible for them. Conversely, they have all their antisemitic, Anti-Israel, anti-Nation-State, anti freedom protests frequently, often several times a week and sometimes every day, and no western minded group opposes them. We believe in their freedom of speech. They do not believe in ours. It doesn’t take a lot of math to see exactly how that did, is, and will work out. Which brings us to item 3. How we win.

This one is FAR more representative. Look closely at the iconography. it is an excellent blend of every ideology which wishes to attack and destroy individualism, Western civilization and control people, even if the final outcome of that destruction is not agreed upon. We see that the anti-West communist movement has perfectly merged with the”Palestinian anti-Israel narrative attacks, and a lot of vegan iconography is also present. This stands to reason as the subtext is that the state should ban meat and force people to eat what they are told. We can see that in the form of the protestors who dress up as pigs, cows and chickens as was represented in Ottawa and Montreal. This is also in perfect harmony with Mark Carney’s stated agenda in his book, Values.

3. Rep. Mike Belcher, who has the X account, Counterspell and does some of the best material on the dialectical nature of the left, and perhaps more importantly, how we beat them, has done a 2 part video on this issue.

Part 1

Part 2. 

Both videos are on Substack which there is no way to embed here that I am aware of. Below though, is one we post often and offers context to the above. And frankly everything else. Which is how the ancient art of spell craft has become Political Warfare in the modern era. First by the Soviets, and now by everyone. Additionally, reading the definition of dialectics as we present it in the Reader’s Links every day also offers context.

4. Speaking of communism:

Sorry that wasn’t enthusiastic enough…

Speaking of communism, PLEASE watch the video below. it is the best thing on Mark Carney and his actions and intentions since Peter Foster’s article in the NP that this site posts probably once a month since it was published.

5. I do not believe this Tweet. I do not believe they will serve anything like the time given. I’d be surprised if they served any time at all.

Thank you all for checking out this site,

 

Reader’s Links for May 2nd, 2026

Posted on by

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

UK, Canada and an interpretation of events or two: Links 1 for May, 1, Commie Christmas, 2026

Posted on by

When we first started this site, we knew something was wrong, and had a decent idea of exactly what. If you check the link at the top of the home page called, “Agendas and Views of this Site” you can see our purpose and philosophy laid out as it was when we started it. Basically it has never been altered except maybe once or twice to add data points to the thesis.

But what feels like it needs to be said today, is that when we started, finding news stories that actually made sense, from Europe or anywhere, that connected the dots on reality was difficult. It was like finding diamonds in the mine. Videos were so rare, that I learned what minimal video editing skills I had specifically to assist the matter. To find videos and add context or decrypt the propaganda ones, and eventually to film speakers and events and edit them for the site and archives.

Over time it became easier to find stories that revealed the nature and intentions of Islam and the communists, and while both still produce disinformation to try and hide it, and both still use a certain amount of initiate language to speak to their own people one way yet appear to be saying something else to non-initiates, it is getting more common to find materials that are foundational to the project of alerting people to the nature of reality.  Also, increasingly more and more people have the keys to understanding what they are hearing, although not nearly to the extent required to break free of the Matrix.

In this speech given at Golder’s Green, the gentleman gets a 70% on his description of reality and 100% on where the disinformation is coming from. But as long as he uses the term, “Islamic Extremism” he will lead his people to slaughter like the Pied Piper. The extremists are the people he says who are Muslims and stand with the Jewish community, or against jihad. They are in fact, apostates. Mun?fiq (?????), someone who outwardly claims to be a Muslim (professes faith, prays, etc.) but inwardly lacks true belief or fails to act according to Islamic teachings.

The Koran has an entire chapter on them.

  • Key traits include:
    • Deception and lying (especially about their faith).
    • Weak or absent commitment to core Islamic obligations.
    • Double standards: friendly to believers in public but opposing them privately.
    • Cowardice or reluctance when it comes to striving in the path of Allah (including jihad in its various forms)
    • Harboring hatred or enmity toward certain groups that Islam instructs believers to oppose (historically Jews and polytheists in the Medinan context, but applied more broadly).

British Comedian, Josh Howie, April 30, 2026

As much as we must appreciate this man’s courage for doing this, and I mean it, saying “Oh my gosh someone said it! Islamic Extremism!” is risible. That is the narrative term. The allowable counter-narrative. It is a form of Hanlon’s Razor. Deflect from Islam so you can allow the continued colonization by Muslims by claiming those that act in concert with its core beliefs are extremists.

In any case, before I sidetracked myself, the point I wanted to make now, is that this site since it started went from working very hard to find and understand data points, to eventually having to sort out a cornucopia of materials showing the nature of the issues, to this point, which is that concentrated flows of information is now so fast and intense that one needs frequent breaks over the day to settle down from it.

It also in part is why this site is attempting to focus more on the philosophy, as a certain percentage of the public have to understand what is happening to us at the level of the epistemology of communism and Islam to even be effective information warriors. Too often people who were on side, get made into controlled opposition without them even being aware of it. Islamic extremism is one example. But as Maj. (ret.) Coughlin said, politics is downstream from philosophy. And as it turns out, law is downstream from culture. So the attacks on philosophy and culture have viceral effects.

On to the list.:

1. The architecture for a new Iron Curtain is being laid down in Europe right now. And, as we may recall, Mark Carney spefically said he wants Canada to join the EU. It was NOT for our prosperity. Which is something he made clear in his manifesto book, “Values”.

Mike Benz is a former U.S. State Dept. official, and current executive director of the Foundation Freedom Online.

This is not a “Digital Iron Curtain”. This is an iron curtain. The method is the least important aspect of it, even in dystopian fiction. In 1984 there was no effort used to describe the technical aspects of the totalitarian surveillance state beyond what was critically necessary for willing suspension of disbelief, and frankly, given that it was written in 1948, he stuck to TVs with hidden cameras and helicopters.

What we have here is the new Duma, the new Western European Socialist Democracies establishing an informational firewall to protect state narratives. Especially from the United States. And anyone betting that Canada will not join this under the Uniparty Carney regime had probably not had their bank accounts frozen for contributing $5.00 to a 100% legal protest movement in 2022.

Related:

2. We are not certain as to exactly how accurate this report is. On the surface though, it is believable given how Canada has been using DEI exactly for what it was intended. To destroy the Military. I would watch with careful skepticism and see what comes out as a result, or if they release the whole report.

3. Yesterday, astonishingly British police raided an islamic organization for running a sex slave racket. Which makes you wonder what they really raided them for, since harems AKA child sex slave rackets among Muslims in the UK are pretty common, and almost no criminal charges in the UK are for what they say they are for.

Below, a crown of Muslims demands the release of the leader. If anyone cares to make a few dollars, it might be worth setting up a bet on Polymarket and betting that he will be released, sometime in the next 24 if he isn’t already.

4. What would anesthetics sound like in the information battlespace.

Most of it is spin and deflections in order to conflate lethal antisemitism with those people who tell the truth about Islam. Some of it is outright lies though.

5. I can only guess that had this jihadi not been playing loud action drama music as he attempted to break into the Israeli Embassy in London, he may not have been caught and apprehended. So we can be thankful for that I guess.

Thank you all for checking out this site.

 

Reader’s Links for May 1st, 2026

Posted on by

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

Brilliant Tweet on Islam Vs. Christianity

Posted on by

Here is the Tweet but I am pasting the entire text here as it needs to be in as many places as possible.

I think this is the best I have ever seen it stated. In short form for sure.

@DanBurmawy
Let me tell you why a Muslim would stab a random Jewish person on the streets of London.

I was raised Muslim, and I know exactly why this happens. It’s not a reaction to the war in Gaza. It’s not oppression. It’s not radicalization. It’s the logical outcome of Islam itself.

It doesn’t matter if you’re a Muslim or not, we as human beings carry guilt deep inside us. We know we are not good enough, and we spend our life trying to redeem ourself through good deeds, thinking it will make the suffocating guilt go away.

Christianity for example offers a way out of guilt, a solution not based on your works but on Christ’s.

Salvation isn’t earned, it’s given. You accept that you can’t redeem yourself, because Christ already did everything on your behalf. That means you’re free. Free to live, free to build, free to serve, free to love.

And when a Christian feels lost, broken, and in need of forgiveness, they can go to church, talk to a pastor or priest, and leave knowing they are forgiven.

Islam, on the other hand, doesn’t offer redemption, it weaponizes guilt.

Instead of providing salvation, Allah exposes you, holds your sins over your head, and threatens you with hellfire and torture in the grave.

The Quran isn’t a book of peace, it’s a book of threats. It bullies Muslims into obedience through fear, humiliation, and punishment.

So what happens when a Muslim seeks redemption? They try to be better Muslims.

They pray, fast, give to charity, go on Hajj, do everything Allah commands. But it never works. I know it. I did it.

And no matter how much you pray, no matter how much you try, the guilt never goes away. Because deep down, every Muslim knows it’s not enough. Allah always demands more.

Allah loves those who die fighting against the infidels. That’s not an opinion, it’s in the Quran, in Hadith, in every lesson taught to children.

This is why Muslims, even the so-called “moderates,” always hesitate to condemn terrorism. Because they know jihad is required by Allah. They might not be willing to commit it themselves, but they can’t say it’s wrong.

So when a Muslim fails to reach peace through religious rituals, they have two choices:

Give up, stop being devout, and learn to live with the guilt, or commit to jihad, because that’s the only way to be true to yourself.

The Quran spells it out clearly: “Kill those who do not worship Allah or obey the Prophet” (9:29).

So when a Muslim embraces this identity fully, killing infidels isn’t just justified, it’s joyful. It’s an act of:

Saving yourself, obeying Allah, securing your eternity, finally escaping the crushing weight of guilt

This is why a Muslim can stab a random jewish person on the streets and feel nothing but satisfaction.

Because for the first time in his life, he finally believes he has done something worthy of redemption.

B’nai Brith and other GONGOs and the perpetual effort to hide the money to fund the replacement migration to the West: Links 1 for April 30, 2026

Posted on by

1. The director’s cut of the take-down of the tard stabber in Golder’s Green

It has been interesting to watch the evolution of the narrative attacks by Islam. When a Muslim committed a terrorist attack back after 911 it was Islamophobic to associate terrorism with Muslims and the claim was that the terrorist was not really a Muslim and we should ignore the Koran, Hadiths, his own manifesto, his suicide martyrdom videos and the vast body of Islamic history showing exactly what his operating system was. That he was a “lone wolf” and that it had nothing to do with Islam, even while all the mosques handed out candy.

Now the narrative runs that it is Islamophobic to actually deal on a guy everyone just saw stab two human beings cause Muslims want to kill Jews.

https://twitter.com/realMaalouf/status/2049483569693704693?s=20

Yes, we are being deracinated with our own stupidity and lack of faith in the evidence of our own senses and loss of Western beliefs.

2. Canada, like the rest of the West undergoing a communist revolution, has conned the left, including I would say pretty much every official Jewish organization, into supporting authoritarian anti-free speech laws on the absurd premise that somehow it will protect them from the consequences of this:

There already exist laws that criminalize this kind of speech, whether one agrees with those laws or not.

Expanding those laws simply gives the state even more discretionary power to selectively enforce them, and they will almost always be weaponized against people who challenge official narratives on pandemics, mandatory medications, residential school “mass graves,” climate alarmism, and mass immigration.

In this context, major official Jewish organizations, B’nai Brith, CIJA, and others, function as Judas Goats. They claim to represent Jewish interests while aggressively lobbying for speech restrictions and authoritarian measures that ultimately make Jews more vulnerable, not safer.

(If you are having difficulty accepting that, look at the indictments that just came down against the SPLC, and the ones that most certainly should come down against the GONGO -Government operated non-governmental organization- the dialectically named, Canadian Anti-Hate Network.)

They demand that Jews support these laws, even as they alienate the broader population and increase resentment by appearing to demand special treatment before the law.The truth is the only long-term solution and the truth is seldom pleasant. Pleasant lies almost always end badly.

A note to the general public:
B’nai Brith does not speak for the Jewish people. It speaks for B’nai Brith. The same goes for CIJA and the other professional advocacy groups. Just as BLM never spoke for all black people. it was largely a vehicle for communist activists, including many and seemingly mostly white communists performing what was essentially a Minstrel Show of the communist revolution. These organizations do not represent the broader Jewish community. Even if their intentions are sometimes naive, the results are the same: increased division, more state power, and increased resentment against the Jewish members of society.

And while the Tweet above is about UK mosques, we have posted tons of examples from Canadian mosques as well. One is below, but you can find dozens more at MEMRI.org

All of these examples took place after strong clear legislation was brought into law, that would make these criminal offences.

3. We have made an estimate multiple times on this site that all projects like the one below, are a fraud or double fraud, not for personal gain. I’m sure there is that for the players. But the communist revolution uses corruption as a tool. A means to an end and not an end in itself. While we see many videos now about Migrant hotels in the UK, very nice ones, where revolutionary leaders like Starrier imports genocidally minded Muslims by the millions and puts them in really nice hotels and funds all their daily needs, while protecting them from being exposed to the public and even covering for them when they rape and kill British citizens, let it be known that the exact same thing is happening in Canada. I get calls and private reports from people who have seen Holiday Inn hotels choc-a-block full of migrants living large on the public dime while their kids are bussed to and from school and they do not seem to have any visible means of support.

THIS is where the money for all these projects go. Corruption is meant to be a dead end street for anyone mildly looking in to where all the massive public debt is incurred. This is a weaponized version of Hanlon’s Razor, where we assume a kind of benign malice, (corruption) with which we can tolerate and understand as opposed to the order of magnitude greater malice of the total destruction of our identity as a people, history, ethnic group(s) set of laws, culture etc. As an afterthought, the Amer-Indians/First Nations are in for one hell of a shock when they find out their new non-status under Islamo-communism.

This goes for everything that DOGE found as well.

4. This issue MUST not be allowed to be memory holed. The only rational explanation for why a simple conduct hearing over a single police officer’s investigation would drag on for several YEARS is that it is the visible sore on a very deeply rooted disease. They are hoping the public loses interest.

5. On a related note:

Thank you all for checking out this site.

People may want to watch a Ben Bankas show before it becomes a criminal offence to have seen one.

There is something to offend everyone here.

Reader’s Links for April 30th, 2026

Posted on by

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

A lot of awful news, and Canada’s compelled speech now extends to more narratives than just pronouns: Links 1 for April 29, 2026

Posted on by

1. RAIR Article on the book, Table Talk, or what could properly be called, the Gospels of Hitler. A little known but massively important book on the actual private thoughts of Adolph, as he himself dictated it to his close friends, and asked them to write them down. An authorized gospel one could say.

HIs views on Christianity, Islam, and his feelings about all white people east of Germany for that matter.

For those interested in that little known book, below is a video by Tik History on this fascinating look at Hitler’s private thoughts.

2. Yesterday we discussed the arrest of a former University Prof. for ‘trespassing’.

The Rebel has coverage of it with an interview with her here. Please pay attention to what the charges read. They confirm exactly the explanation we offered in yesterday’s post. Classic leftist tactics.

3. Today in North London UK, an area called, Golder’s Green, a Muslim went and randomly stabbed two Jewish people.

Below is the video. RAIR has an article with details.

BBC offers this version.

Dunno what Kier Starmer said but you may as well make it up. You know he will.

4. Did a little bit of digging on this, and yeah. There is no other reason. It was purely antisemitism on the part of the Greek musicians. I was hoping it was unfairly framed. Maybe a personal matter or financial. But in fact, the Greek part of this effort voted not to perform with Jews.

 

I asked Grok if there were any other aspects to it, or if this was being misrepresented. Below is the entire answer:

Yes, there’s significantly more to this story—the X post from @MOSSADil
accurately captures the core incident, but mainstream reporting (including The Australian, Haaretz, JTA, and others) adds key details, direct quotes from the people involved, and broader context. This isn’t fringe or exaggerated; it’s confirmed across sources, with the Hellenic Choir’s own president publicly acknowledging antisemitism in his community as a driving factor.

What Happened (Full Confirmed Timeline)The “Concert for Hope and Unity” was scheduled for June 28, 2026, at Sydney Town Hall. It was a joint fundraiser featuring the Australian Hellenic Choir (50 members), the Sydney Jewish Choral Society (30 members), and a major Australian choir.

All proceeds were to go to charities supporting families of victims from the December 14, 2025, antisemitic terror attack at a Hanukkah gathering on Bondi Beach (which killed 15 people).
The program included a joint performance of The Ballad of Mauthausen—a piece about a romance between a Greek POW and a Jewish prisoner in a Nazi concentration camp.

(The two choirs had successfully performed it together in 2022 with no issues.)
It had secured $15,000 in NSW government funding and was positioned as a cross-cultural event promoting “hope and unity.”

At a rehearsal meeting last Monday (around April 21), more than half of the Hellenic Choir voted against sharing the stage with the Jewish choir. The joint event was scrapped entirely.

Reasons Given (Straight from the Hellenic Choir President) James Tsolakis (founder and president of the Australian Hellenic Choir) initiated the concert himself but had to cancel it.

He was “extremely disappointed and pretty upset” and told The Australian: “There’s a bit of antisemitism in the Greek community; I didn’t realise the extent of it. Unfortunately, we have a lot of people in the community blaming the Jewish community for what’s happening in Israel, Palestine … that’s not correct. You want to hate [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu? Hate Netanyahu, but what have the Jewish people done to you? The whole antisemitism thing has got to be wound back.”

He cited “the political climate” and members’ “nervousness about performing at the Town Hall and anxiety over the antisemitism that exists in the Australian climate.”
Some members explicitly feared for their personal safety (potential attack on a Jewish-associated event).

Tsolakis emphasized the irony: the choir had collaborated successfully before, and the music was about “love and peace and harmony.” He still plans a future performance with the Jewish choir (possibly in Canberra next year) and said, “I have every intention to perform again with the Jewish Choral Society.”
haaretz.com

The Jewish Choral Society’s ResponseAnne Spira (chairperson, Sydney Jewish Choral Society) announced the cancellation in a letter to members: “The result is, like many other Jews in the arts since 7 October, 2023, we have been cancelled. We have been de-platformed and it is deeply upsetting for us and for the broader Jewish community who have been the target of anti-Jewish racism in this country for 2½ years.”

They had performed the same Holocaust-themed piece together in 2022 as “a perfect example of cross-cultural bridge-building.”
The society has made an official complaint/submission to Australia’s Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion. Some Hellenic Choir members are reportedly making personal submissions (anonymously).

Broader Context: This fits into documented rises in antisemitism in Australia since October 7, 2023—including protests, synagogue incidents, and the Bondi attack itself (explicitly antisemitic, targeting a Hanukkah event). The government established the Royal Commission partly in response.
haaretz.com

A local Greek-language paper (Greek City Times) called the vote “embarrassing.”
The Australian’s editorial said it “almost beggars belief” and belongs before the Royal Commission, citing a “lack of historical empathy.”

Reactions on X (from the Thread You Linked) The post (with the image of the Hellenic Choir performing) has gone viral (~146K views as of now). Replies are overwhelmingly critical:

Many Australians (including some of Greek heritage) expressed shame: “I am Greek and I’m ashamed of them.”
Calls to boycott/defund the choir or replace them for the event.
A few antisemitic replies blaming “Zionists” or defending the vote on “genocide” grounds.
One reply noted the choir has internal bigotries (e.g., excluding Greek Orthodox Lebanese-Australians).

No major reversal or new developments as of April 29, 2026—the concert remains canceled. Tsolakis has been open about the internal issues, which adds credibility beyond the original post.

In short: the X post got the shocking headline right, but the president’s own words reveal it was explicitly tied to antisemitism and Israel-related politics overriding aid for terror victims. It’s a stark example of how post-Oct 7 tensions are fracturing even “unity” efforts in Australia.

5. Some very interesting commentary abut Mark Carney. Not having researched every point she makes, the ones she mentions with which we are familiar, she is quite correct.

There is a lot of material well worth hearing though. Russia, she claims, is funding the various environmental groups that are crippling the West. Which makes rather perfect and consistent sense given the stratagems of war being used by China and Russia against the West in a way that would make it politically impossible to respond militarily.

Thank you all very much for your continued loyalty to this site despite the fact that it is becoming increasingly frustrating to use.

Jordan Peterson rocketed into fame for very rightfully objecting to compelled speech. The issue at the time was absurd and arbitrary pronouns, often or usually bereft of all reality.

Peterson pointed out that even in the Soviet Union, while there was a ton of things you could not say, they didn’t force you to say things., So this was worse.

I think the people who passed out and were hospitalized from prolonged clapping after a Stalin speech might disagree about that. But in any case, the precedent in Canada was set.

If you refuse to produce a (likely bogus) land acknowledgement, then you get failed.

 

Actually this Tweet from March 18th might help to explain a few things

 

Reader’s Links for April 29th, 2026

Posted on by

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.