Half of yesterday’s post and some solid benchmarks of the state of the revolution now: Links post -1 for June 26 2026

1. Israel is preparing to send rescue teams to Venezuela to help with the consequences of a severe Earthquake in that South American nation. This is despite the fact that there are no reports of Israelis as victims of this event. It is only news for this site because the chances that any socialist or Islamic nation sending aid, despite being far wealthier from natural resources in many cases, and having a higher population, will likely send nothing, but Israel will continue to be the focus of multiple critical theory attacks like “genocide in Gaza”. And this despite Gaza’s steadily growing population. So this item is just a cynical pre-emptive I told ya so on the very near future of the news cycle. Not that we will get the chance, because legacy media bent on the destruction of the Nation State by critical theory attacks, primarily on Israel but also Canada and others, will never celebrate Israel’s charitable international acts, or condemn the Islamic world’s total lack of them.

Having said that, Canada may manage to find a way to waste a lot of money claiming it is to help in Vz. without actually accomplishing much or anything there.

Israel preparing to potentially send aid team to quake-stricken Venezuela; no Israelis known to be harmed

Israel is making “immediate preparations” for the possible deployment of an aid delegation to Venezuela, the Foreign Ministry says in a statement, as thousands of people are potentially missing following powerful earthquakes in the South American country.

The ministry is “conducting a situational assessment with the relevant authorities in Israel and is examining possible avenues for assistance,” the statement adds.

There is currently no knowledge of any hurt or missing Israelis in the country amid the natural disaster, The Times of Israel understands.

2. This is a one hour interview with Queens U law prof. Bruce Pardy on a number of bills being rammed through parliament to destroy Canadian liberty and identity. Yes, identity. Stopping people from being able to speak means forcing people to accept the state’s imposed definitions of who Canadians are. People may recall this was one of the consistent and frequent signatures of the Trudeau regime. he would frequently speak about who and what Canadians are, and in nearly all cases, it was imposed with no real basis in Reality. Carney does the exact same but less frequently as he isn’t in love with the media as Trudeau was. But saying “Islamic values are Canadian Values” is a spectacular example of exactly what we mean here. So understand, freedom of speech is about a lot more than just being able to criticize religious and political authority. It means being defenceless against imposed narratives as to who and what you actually are, and what you actually believe and think.

Think of it as banning guns from the public but for ideas and it suddenly all falls into place.

In conversations with people far more knowledgeable than I on all these matters, it was pointed out to me that pretty much every official ‘Conservative’ organization in the US is an ‘op’. This means created for, or at least now, is actually part of the process to destroy Western civilization and culture while appearing to be on the side of liberty and Western values.

It has to be said that major Jewish organizations are clearly on that list as well. They are not unique as ops against individualist culture and freedom by a long shot. But neither are they exempt from that list. In Canada, the organization that claims to speak for all Jews is B’nai Brith. This was one of their releases and mail outs to anyone whose email address they had in their data base. not just members.

One wonders if they are useful idiots, thinking that somehow rule of law was intact, and these totalitarian bills would somehow be used to stop the very real persecution of Jewish people now in Canada by the Communist and imported Muslims, or if they knew all along how this would work out. I guess the answer is mind over matter. Doesn’t matter. Never mind. There was always only one stance to deal with these issues.

STOP mass immigration to Canada and the West. NO unvetted immigration of people who hate our values. INCREASE personal liberty and freedom of speech for all. Good ideas will beat bad ones when they are allowed to. Which is why communist states ALWAYS verbally and mentally disarm the public with laws restricting thought. As well as remove access to force multipliers for the law abiding, while lowering penalties for actual criminals in possession of illegal arms.

[The bill seeks to address “systemic inequities, including the overrepresentation of Indigenous Peoples, Black, and marginalized Canadians in the criminal justice system.”]

Continuing with what does need to happen: Learn REAL tolerance, which means putting up with ideas you find offensive because dialectical enforcement of ideas will ALWAYS BE FAR, FAR WORSE than hearing idiots lie and say things you don’t like.Ernst Zündel was a publisher and promoter of historical fiction and antisemitic material, bit of small stature and scale in Toronto till he was made into a rock star by banning him by Jewish groups like The Remembrance Association.

 

 

Screenshot

3. So abut moving from covert to overt communist/Islamic revolution…

4. This is such an excellent example of dialectics in France that one could not have asked for a more obvious and clear event to demonstrate the case. Perverts parading around in front of children in a way which is illegal in pretty much every country, are not only encouraged to describe and otherwise illustrate sex acts for kids, but the person who busted the event is facing a year in jail and a massive fine for “hate crimes” for doing so.

Once again, Muslims who call for the death of homosexuals, Jewish people  etc. etc. will not be charged.

Similar example of dialectics in Canada:

5. This is equal to or great than in Canada as well.

 

The site’s failure and a stunning short video from Newsmax on ISLAMIC terrorism

I had a great post all written and ready to go yesterday and when I hit publish, nearly all of it vanished with no way to recover it that I could see.

This is hours and hours of work and careful re reading and editing with a lot of research to check facts, all down something much faster and seemingly more permanent than a toilet.

Many people have reported similar things with comments, which is why I guess there are very few of them now.

I don’t really know why the site is doing this to all of us. And this is not the first time it has happened to me, and I have backdoor access to everything I thought. But this time was the worst in terms of both lack of indicators that it might happen, and the amount of work I lost.

So I really do get everyone’s frustration when they report on this event for themselves. It is supremely frustrating. I aim starting work on a solution. When I even think I have it working properly I will let you know.

The only thing ALL of us can do now, is write articles or comments on a notepad or Word and copy paste it into the site. If it disappears, then wait an hour and try again and see if the firewall is being less aggressive at that point.

Meanwhile, admire this stunning video from Newsmax. Haven’t seen a lot of clips this honest about the threat to the West since 9/12.

 

 

 

Reader’s Links for June 26th, 2026

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

Reader’s Links for June 25th, 2026

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

Reader’s Links for June24th, 2026

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

The CBC pulled its usual active measure on the Montreal attack yesterday and more: Links 1 for June 23rd, 2026

1. Montreal yesterday. We are still, or perhaps more honestly, “I” am still in the ‘fog of war’ stage on this story. Many events which have not resolved yet into a coherent set of definable events for analysis.

There appears to be two separate or related events in Montreal yesterday. The one everyone knows about near a Middle Eastern grocer where a police officer was killed, another injured and a Rabbi was killed, apparently by a female officer nearby at point blanc range. That has sparked the usual debates. And debates worth having. One might think intuitively that women would be faster to use force multipliers as they have a natural disadvantage in speed and strength. Unless of course they are men LARPing as women in sports. In which case… back to the point, this may or may not be the reasons here.

The shooter, who may not have actually killed anyone, as its increasingly looking like cross fire in all case except the shooter himself who was killed by an officer, left a manifesto. And the CBC was given early access to it in order to fabricate a narrative. The CBC did not disappoint. And in this they never do. They claimed it was an ‘Incell”. this is a word used by leftist agencies to try and move the muzzle of the barrel off of the real target and on to what they want destroyed dialectically. Straight white males.

Incell is short for, “involuntarily celibate”. In other words, a male, always so far a white one, who is frustrated that he can’t get laid by a woman. This has so many dialectical advantages. It clears him of whatever his real reasons are for one thing, which is usually bad for the leftist reconstruction of reality as they represent it now.

However Ezra Levant did get his manifesto and offers it for all to see here along with his own analysis.

And yeah it turns out like pretty much all of them, he was a leftist antisemite.

The second story in Montreal I have not seen anything about. What I am going to say here is from a first person account from a series of phone calls I got from someone I know well who was actually stuck in traffic at this exact location. The area is Westmount Montreal. This is an upper middle class area and very widely mixed demographics but yeah, a lot of Jewish people live there.

The account I have is from yesterday afternoon, a few hours after the incident downtown had resolved itself. There were apparently 130 police officers more or less. My contact saw several of them crouched or running around with guns drawn. There were 2 helicopters overhead and certain parts of the”the Blvd” had been closed off. Now this could be a kind of heightened hysteria reaction based on a report the police may have gotten about a suspicious incident or person. That would stand to reason given what happened before that day. But it’s still a major police reaction. I have no idea if this is reflected in the News yet. I am just writing based on a first hand account from the location yesterday at around 2 or 3:00 PM.

But the take away here that matters is the CBC is nothing but an Active Measure now. Watching or listening to CBC should only be done with the lens of knowing what the state demands we believe, and what the current and coming narrative attacks on reality are. And not for anything like information whatsoever.

Below, a short clip of Yuri Bezmenov explaining what Active Measures are during a now ironic interview on CBC in 1984 when they still trafficked in information and news.

2, This RAIR article offers a worthy look at the Potemkin replacement of Kier Starmer with whatever face the Fabian/Labour Party intends to carry on the revolution. Think of it this way: Obama becomes Biden. Trudeau becomes Carney. Different face but the actual agenda actually accelerates rather than changes course.

3. The Canadian state propaganda networks warn Canadians to lock their doors and use ineffective measures to protect themselves from groups of thugs and criminals the Canadian state brought in to terrorize legacy Canadians.

No description of the gangs is offered anywhere. Of course.

4. So no matter how you look at it, Canada is funding both sides of the war between Russia and its fraternal state, Ukraine. Canada has a strategic partnership with the PRC. We seem to have more than a free trade deal, in that stuff can be ordered from China and delivered to a home in Canada rapidly and with little to no duty or taxes.

So CANADIANS are funding the Russian side of the war via our purchases of nearly everything since it’s pretty much all made in China at this point, while we actually give money directly to Ukraine to fight against our money in Russia.

It almost seems like its that 1984 equation where the purpose of war is…

The essential act of war is destruction, not necessarily of human lives,
but of the products of human labour. War is a way of shattering to pieces,
or pouring into the stratosphere, or sinking in the depths of the sea,
materials which might otherwise be used to make the masses too comfortable,
and hence, in the long run, too intelligent.

Even when weapons of war are
not actually destroyed, their manufacture is still a convenient way of
expending labour power without producing anything that can be consumed.

A Floating Fortress, for example, has locked up in it the labour that
would build several hundred cargo-ships. Ultimately it is scrapped as
obsolete, never having brought any material benefit to anybody, and with
further enormous labours another Floating Fortress is built.

In principle
the war effort is always so planned as to eat up any surplus that might
exist after meeting the bare needs of the population. In practice the needs
of the population are always underestimated, with the result that there is
a chronic shortage of half the necessities of life; but this is looked on
as an advantage.

It is deliberate policy to keep even the favoured groups
somewhere near the brink of hardship, because a general state of scarcity
increases the importance of small privileges and thus magnifies the
distinction between one group and another. By the standards of the early
twentieth century, even a member of the Inner Party lives an austere,
laborious kind of life. Nevertheless, the few luxuries that he does enjoy
his large, well-appointed flat, the better texture of his clothes, the
better quality of his food and drink and tobacco, his two or three
servants, his private motor-car or helicopter–set him in a different world
from a member of the Outer Party, and the members of the Outer Party have
a similar advantage in comparison with the submerged masses whom we call
‘the proles’.

The social atmosphere is that of a besieged city, where the
possession of a lump of horseflesh makes the difference between wealth and
poverty. And at the same time the consciousness of being at war, and
therefore in danger, makes the handing-over of all power to a small caste
seem the natural, unavoidable condition of survival.

I don’t know much about economics. But in frequent conversations with those who do, it seems like every government policy leads to a prediction that looks like that in the future. And the fact that we are funding both sides of the Russia/Ukraine war, never seems to get even an honourable mention in State Media like the CBC or CTV or Global. Correct me please if I am wrong. In truth, we don’t listen to them much.

5. Palestinian Journalists

Thank you all for checking out this site.

Does anyone else think if you closed your eyes you could swear this was Christopher Hitchens?

 

 

Reader’s Links for June 23, 2026

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

RIGHT NOW: Active shooter in Orthodox Jewish area of Montreal ongoing

Emergency alerts has just been sent to everyone’s phone in the area. I don’t know if its all Montreal or just the area!

Active Shooter Situation in Montreal – Developing Right Now (June 22, 2026)Location:
Côte-des-Neiges / Décarie Boulevard area (near Westbury project / Broadway Pizza) — a heavily Orthodox Jewish neighborhood.
Key Reports (as of the last few minutes):

  • Multiple shots fired (reports range from 10–20+).
  • At least one police officer shot/injured.
  • Suspect(s) still at large / on the run.
  • Heavy police/SWAT response, road closures, shelter-in-place orders in the immediate area.
  • Some unconfirmed reports of civilian casualties.

Best Live Links Right Now:

Official sources (check these for confirmed updates):

  • Montreal Police (SPVM) website: https://spvm.qc.ca
  • SPVM Twitter:
    @SPVM

    (they usually post official statements)

UPDATE AS OF 1:54 PM ET

Confirmed Casualties:1 Police Officer — killed (died from wounds).
1 Additional Police Officer — injured (condition varies in reports, some say critical).
1 Civilian — wounded.
Suspect — “neutralized” (killed) by police.

What Happened:Shooting started around 11:30 a.m. near Courtrai Avenue & Trans Island / Décarie area, close to PA Westbury grocery store.
Suspect was armed and exchanged fire with police (reports mention camouflage clothing and shooting from an elevated position).
Heavy police response, helicopters, dogs, and a wide shelter-in-place emergency alert.
The area has a large Orthodox Jewish community, with kosher restaurants and institutions nearby.

Suspect Identification:No name or detailed identity released yet.
Police have not publicly identified the shooter. The investigation is still very active, and they’re reviewing surveillance footage and witness statements.Current Status:Scene is still secured.
No confirmed motive at this time.
Some early speculation on X about possible targeted antisemitic attack given the location, but nothing official supports that yet.

Good Live Sources:Montreal Gazette live updates: https://montrealgazette.com/news/breaking-two-montreal-police-officers-shot-in-cote-des-neiges/
CTV News / CBC Montreal coverage
SPVM official statements (they’re updating gradually)

Reader’s Links for June 22nd, 2026

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

Two posts about the state of liberty in Canada and how the state uses antisemitism laws to manufacture antisemitism

Link to article

One line of the article is here:

  • “accuses a group of carrying out secret conspiracies to gain global control or that they are plotting to destroy western civilization”

But it’s a fact. The Muslim Brotherhood is indeed doing exactly that. The Project, and the Memorandum both explicitly state what the plan is for religious Muslims to do as it is specified within Islam’s own canon. My guess based on how things have been in Canada for the last 20 years or so, is people who make factual and verifiable claims about certain groups will face persecution, while people who launch massive conspiracies about Jews, which takes place in every mosque every day, will not. Why can we say this? Because it has already been tested when Muslims have broken existing and far more rational ‘hate crimes laws’ if such a thing is possible.

In any case, anyone who thinks this is great and antisemitism will be illegal and finally Jew will be protected from hate yada yada wuzza wuzza, lemme tells ya, that ain’t how it’s gonna go.

It will massively increase hatred of Jews who will be seen, and partially correctly, as being the architects of destroying freedom of speech. They will suddenly appear to be that exact thing which people have accused Jews of being forever. A tiny group that controls everything. And there will only be enforcement against whatever target suits the real interests of the state. Chances are extremely high that groups like the dialectically named, “Canadian Anti-Hate Network” will fund a few Nazis like Second Sons or Diagalon, and the state will pick off a few of them to make examples of them. We can say that with high confidence because their parent organization the SPLC was funding every hate group they could find.

But no charges against any mosques that actually demand genocide of the Jews at pretty much every prayer session and twice on Fridays.

This is one example out of hundreds available on MEMRI.Org, RAIR Foundation, Gates of Vienna and here for that matter. This one is from Toronto.

And below is a story about one brave Montrealer who tried to bring one of the most virulent imams to the Human Rights Commission.

But wait! There’s More!

Full text:

Ezra Levant: Thanks to floor crossers, Carney can now ram through his spy bill

Using his newly acquired majority, Carney’s government has moved to dramatically curtail debate on Bill C-22, the so-called lawful access bill.

The answer? It is a direct assault on parliamentary democracy and your freedoms.

Last year, Mark Carney won the election with just 43 percent of the vote. That delivered him 169 seats out of 343 in the House of Commons, three short of the 172 needed for a majority. Canadians deliberately gave him a minority government. Sometimes voters do that on purpose, wanting to keep a politician on a shorter leash and force him to work with Parliament rather than dominate it.

But Carney was not content with the verdict of the electorate. While the political establishment spent years warning that Donald Trump might refuse to accept election results, Carney set about changing his own. By persuading a string of opposition MPs to cross the floor, he secured the majority Canadians had declined to give him at the ballot box.

The obvious question is why? Justin Trudeau governed for nearly a decade without a formal majority, relying on NDP support to pass budgets and survive confidence votes. There was little reason to believe Carney could not have done the same.

Ezra’s answer is that Carney wanted something more than legislative support. He wanted the ability to shut down parliamentary scrutiny itself.

That is now on full display.

Using his newly acquired majority, Carney’s government has moved to dramatically curtail debate on Bill C-22, the so-called lawful access bill. The legislation would compel technology companies to retain user data for up to a year and make that information available to government authorities. Civil liberties advocates have raised serious concerns about privacy, government overreach and the expansion of state surveillance powers.

The concerns are hardly theoretical. Canadians have already witnessed a government willing to freeze bank accounts and invoke extraordinary powers during the trucker protests. Mark Carney himself, while living in Europe at the time, wrote in The Globe and Mail that Ottawa should take a harder line against convoy participants and their supporters. It is therefore not surprising that critics view Bill C-22 as part of a broader push toward greater state control.

What makes the situation particularly troubling is not only the substance of the legislation but the manner in which it is being advanced.

The government has introduced a motion declaring that, notwithstanding any standing order or usual practice of the House, Bill C-22 will be pushed through Parliament on an accelerated timetable. In plain English, the normal rules are being set aside.

Committee members will have just 30 minutes to complete clause-by-clause consideration of the bill. Any remaining amendments will be deemed moved and voted upon without further debate. The legislation will then move rapidly through report stage and third reading with strictly limited speaking time for opposition parties and virtually no opportunity for extended scrutiny.

For a bill that constitutes one of the most significant expansions of government surveillance powers in Canadian history, Parliament is being afforded remarkably little time to examine the details.

Professor Michael Geist, one of Canada’s leading experts on technology law and digital policy, has publicly criticized the government’s approach. Geist argues that hearings are being cut short, amendments are being rushed through without proper discussion, and the public is being denied the transparency normally expected during the legislative process. His warning is not about partisan politics but about the erosion of parliamentary accountability.

This is why Carney needed those extra seats.

The issue is not merely that opposition MPs crossed the floor. It is what those additional seats are now being used to accomplish. This is a double violation of democratic principles: first, altering the balance of Parliament after voters had already spoken; and second, using that altered balance to restrict Parliament’s ability to debate, amend and scrutinize legislation.

The implications extend beyond a single bill. Across Canada, the United Kingdom, France and Australia, governments are increasingly embracing online surveillance measures, age-verification requirements and expanded regulatory control over digital spaces. These initiatives are almost always presented as necessary protections for children or public safety, yet they also require citizens to surrender more privacy and give governments more information about their online activities.

It is a stark contrast to the vision of technological progress championed by figures such as Elon Musk, who promote innovation, space exploration, artificial intelligence and the expansion of human potential. One approach sees technology as a tool of freedom and advancement. The other increasingly treats it as something to be monitored, regulated and controlled.

This is what an unchecked majority can look like under Mark Carney: Parliament reduced to a rubber stamp, debate curtailed, privacy placed at risk and major legislation rushed through with minimal scrutiny.

Canadians deserve better.

The democratic process only matters if it is respected when it becomes inconvenient. If Parliament is no longer permitted to properly examine legislation, question witnesses or challenge the government of the day, then the institution itself is diminished. That should concern every Canadian regardless of political affiliation.

 

A few more indicators of where things are at with the communist – Islamic revolution across the West: Links 1 for June 21, 2026

Today’s quote from the Gulag Archipelago: “Standing for freedom is nothing. For Freedom, you have to sit – in jail.”

1. Yesterday we mentioned a movie, Citizen Vigilante. Having watched about half of it at a friend’s, it’t not an amazing movie from the point of view of dialogue, plot sophistication and other things that define a narrative film. The genius of it is that they made a film that shows who are committing the crime wave across the West, why in many cases, and the actual political class that caused it all. They spoke truth in defiance of state narratives. Which makes it dangerous. At least to the COMINTERN, which at this point could be safely defined as the UN, the EU and Canada. (Increasingly I suspect Russia is a part of it as well actually.)

But if one games this out, meaning anyone in the last 20 years who saw all this coming and thought abut it for around 10 seconds, then it becomes obvious a certain amount of citizen vigilantism would occur. And the agents who have now taken over control of the apparatus of state, typically make sure that the reaction to their policies also get used to further their agenda, and diminish the existence of the individual identity in the West.

How this might happen in this case, would be wait till a few conspicuous vigilante groups appear, and once the various state governments have managed to replace an educated military, and a police force that understand rule of law, with Muslims and Africans who have zero stake in Canadian or Western culture, and often even an animus to it, it will be easy to move the revolution from the dialectically driven language based revolution to the kind we read about in all those books.

I think this is what George Soros calls, “Reflexivity”. Like when terrorists bomb a target, then lay traps or snipers to attack the first responders who are there to assist the injured.

And as if on queue:

The tech exists now to make sure anyone who encourages guys like this, or even celebrates the actions, or is even sympathetic to them, will, at least for the moment, go on a list.

The time has come to increase use of Samizdat. Dust off your pens. Maybe even fountain pens. Write on bills maybe? Find ways of publishing that are not electronic. Keep truth alive and keep reason as a system of thought at least as a counter-culture. It certainly is being extinguished in the state architecture, and in Canada, that is nearly everything. Schools, courts, just about everything.

2. This is what truth Vs dialectics looks like:

3. The UK joins North Korea, Iran and other totalitarian states in banning VPNs

4. It will be a day worth celebrating when any kind of official statement can be made by any elected representative in Canada. Instead we have the “Conservative” party of Canada dancing in the isles after they helped the “Liberal” party pass a bill that made it a crime for parents to try and talk their own children out of being spayed or neutered.

5. Ezra Levant believes the US may be the only hope for saving Canadian liberty from Carney

Thank you all for checking out this site.

 

Reader’s Links for June 21st, 2026

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

When a movie with truth becomes the most dangerous cultural product in Germany: Links 1 for June 20, 2026

1. Regina gets the minaret treatment

2. EU country ‘punishing’ the elderly with crazy meat restriction of just 2.8 ounces per day — because they ‘screwed up’ the climate

An eco-warrior politician has sparked outrage in Denmark after she defended guidelines limiting residents of government-run nursing homes to just 2.8 ounces of beef a week — which is less than one Big Mac.

Birgitte Kehler Holst of the left-wing green Danish party The Alternative was also accused of saying old people in nursing homes should be “punished” by restricting their meat intake in comments made in a meeting of Copenhagen’s City Council on April 30.

She was speaking against plans to exclude nursing home residents from guidelines in the Danish capital that restrict meals at government-run sites to just 2.8 ounces (80 grams) of beef, lamb, or veal per week.

“Everyone, including the elderly, must contribute to achieving our climate goals,” Holst said at the city council meeting, adding, “It is precisely the generation that has screwed up the most.”

3. An excellent example of dialectical naming. The new “Human Rights Museum” in Canada is planing an exhibit on the Genocide in Gaza. It is dialectical of course because they are negating a historical fact of the Nazi genocide of the Jews, with a complete fiction of the non-event of a genocide that somehow leaves the population larger each year it happens.

This makes it exactly like the Canadian Human Rights Courts and tribunals, which actually remove real rights from the individual, and give rights to often imaginary collectives. Which means of course the state. Like when Johnathan Yaniv sued a number of ethnic and conservative spas for refusing to wax his testicles because he claimed he was a woman, when he isn’t and the HRC found against the poor women that didn’t want to have to handle his man parts.

4. This may well be the most interesting movie of modern times. Picture your classic vigilante movie, but one that tells the truth about who is doing what to who, and where THE DIALOGUE IS TAKEN FROM ACTUAL COURTS AND JUDGES showing the lenience given to foreign rapists and murderers! Naturally Germany has flat out banned it. We suggest you get it now and watch it before it becomes aa crime to have even seen it.

Friends have told me that this movie is hidden on some sights under the name of other movies in order to avoid bans. So if you want to see it in Germany you have to look for film titles like “The Dark Knight” or something like that, I can’t exactly remember, in order to find it.

5. Sometimes people ask what cultural deracinating means.

Translation: In the United Kingdom, they have just approved the law on LEGALIZED INCEST, due to pressure from the Muslim lobby. Keir Starmer has just legalized marriages between cousins and siblings. A deputy confronted Starmer: – “This carries catastrophic risks to people’s health, many of which cannot be determined until the child’s birth. Mr. Starmer, do you understand what you’re doing?”, Starmer: – “Yes. I’ve already expressed my position, thank you. How much further does this infamous government plan to go?

Thank you all for checking out this site.