Highly disturbing video from Dr. John Campbell on nano-structures in blood caused by mRNAS injections [PEER REVIEWED]

Welp. This is one. Has Campbell jumped the shark on this one? Or is the unbelievable true? or is it as he says, given that he links to peer reviewed papers from Japan and South Korea. Or was he set up to publish this to destroy his credibility for being over the target for so long now on so much government and phrama-fraud?

Watch and decide.

Also it is possible that this is a sort of crystallization phenomenon and may not be a deliberate effect of the vaxx, but some sort of Crystal structure that forms from some component in the vaxx.

No idea.

YouTube has pulled the video. Here is is on Rumble below:

Link to peer reviewed study.

Several more related links.

***Additional thoughts on Sept. 8, 2024***

The reasons for not taking the shots were scientific and had massive political consequences as well, because the state itself moved from science and reason and rights to scientism and dialectics and collectivism.

But the reason not to take the shots was that the evidence was not there that it was safe or beneficial, so when the state said it was, we knew the state was lying, not wrong, but lying. And therefore we should do our own research and analysis best we can rather than trust the state’s word to be reflective of reality or the public interest.

Lenin, I believe it was, said the best way to defeat the opposition is to lead it. And shortly after people started to recognize and identify issues with the shots, massive claims bordering on, and sometimes entering the realm of the supernatural started to be made about the negative effects of them.

When it first was said that the shots caused massive long weird blood clots, I dismissed the claims. It seemed unlikely and there was no evidence for it. Subsequently, a number of practicing embalmers came forward with the same set of experiences and a great deal of evidence. Then, I did believe it.

Determining what this means then, is another matter.

Many people came forward also saying that post injection, self assembling things that looked mechanical was found in people’s blood. The claims about these things were fantastical. That they where bluetooth networks or I dunno, alien base stations or any number of things.

John Campbell now has produced two peer reviewed studies showing that there are “self assembling” objects in people’s blood after taking one or more of the mRNA injections. So for the moment, unless Campbell himself is being punked or set up to be discredited, which I would believe as that would be a fairly ordinary and common information warfare move, let’s accept that this is true about the self assembling objects.

OK then…

The following is PURELY speculative. I am NOT a scientist. I make no claims from my own credentials or research. These are just speculations which would be my thought process in terms of attributing a position on these phenomenon for the moment, accepting what we think we know, and not conflating that with what other people impute is the meaning behind these phenom.

The Blood clots:

The mRNA within the shots was delivered to our blood cells via something called “Nano-lipid particles”. Lipid means fat. The blood clots they are pulling from people are made of fibrin I have been told.

Here is what CHAT GPT says Fibrin is:

Fibrin is a tough, insoluble protein that plays a critical role in blood clotting. It forms when the protein fibrinogen, which is present in blood plasma, is converted into fibrin by the enzyme thrombin during the clotting process. Fibrin strands weave together to form a mesh that, along with platelets, helps to stop bleeding by creating a stable blood clot at the site of an injury.

Ok we already know that the shots cause clotting. In fact, it was known very early on that after injection, some people had to go into hospital for anti coagulant infusions for some time. MANY died of heart death caused by various forms of clots. So it is easy to see how the same factors in the shots would also cause the formation of these freaky calamari like fibrin clots in the blood.

No one has said that it means we are being attacked by space octopi, but you can see where I’m going with this.

Most life on Earth is Carbon based. This is because Carbon seems to have the greatest ability to bond with other elements and form complex compounds. I think the next most likely is silicone, which is why some science fiction speculates about silicon based life, and of course, people who make sex robots are working 3 shifts to figure out how.

Carbon also forms crystals, the most famous of which is diamond. Diamond is in the cubic crystal system. It can be cubic, or like the more desirable structure from a gem cutter’s point of view, 2 X 4 sided pyramids back to back. But it forms crystals easily.

I asked Chat GPT to list examples of carbon based crystals:

Examples of carbon-based crystals include:

  1. Diamond: A crystal structure where each carbon atom is covalently bonded to four other carbon atoms in a tetrahedral arrangement. This gives diamond its hardness and transparency.
  2. Graphite: A crystalline form of carbon in which the atoms are arranged in layers of hexagonal rings. These layers are weakly bonded, allowing them to slide over each other, making graphite a good lubricant and conductor of electricity.
  3. Graphene: A single layer of carbon atoms arranged in a two-dimensional honeycomb lattice. It is known for its extraordinary strength, flexibility, and electrical conductivity.
  4. Fullerenes: Molecules composed entirely of carbon, in the form of a hollow sphere (e.g., buckminsterfullerene, C60), ellipsoid, or tube. Fullerenes are used in nanotechnology and materials science.
  5. Carbon Nanotubes: Cylindrical nanostructures composed of carbon atoms in a hexagonal arrangement. They have exceptional strength and electrical properties, and they are used in various applications from electronics to nanomedicine.
  6. Lonsdaleite: Also known as hexagonal diamond, this rare carbon crystal is similar to diamond but with a different arrangement of carbon atoms, making it slightly harder than traditional diamonds.

These forms of carbon exhibit unique properties due to variations in how carbon atoms bond and arrange themselves.

We already know the shots contain graphene. No idea if it is graphene oxide or straight graphene, but it doesn’t seem unreasonable that a meta material like graphene, given the properties of carbon, and especially the meta-material Graphene, that it could form 10 micrometer structures like the ones in the studies.

Leaping to what those structures do, or are capable of, or even that they are deliberate requires evidence. And those suggesting the purpose of them without evidence are just the same as those who say the shots are safe and effective.

Reason and science might save us. Scientism and reflexive opposition will destroy us.

This isn’t to say that everyone who speculates on this is wrong. Just that the reasons for the specific phenomenon of the clots and the structures in the blood have simple and ‘reasonable’ explanations based on what we KNOW is in the vaxx, and what we know they do. The nano-lipid particles alone are thought to cause clumping of cells to form clots. (That is crudely put and as I write it, I can hear Dr. Shoemaker’s admonishing voice in my head on that point.)

Also this isn’t to say that the clots are not dangerous. They are clearly lethally dangerous for untold thousands. Maybe more. As for the nano-structures, I do not believe at this particular moment that they are more than odd crystalline artifacts from the graphene. I doubt they have a purpose. But lets see some experimentation to see if they do. We actually did some testing on some of the claims about the vaxx. Crude ones, and ones I wouldn’t submit to a journal, but we did our best with what we had and some of them seemed to be true. The spots where the vaxx was administered seemed to have a magnetic property for a while at that spot. Other claims were not. Like chip readers registering something at the injection site. That was a hoax to mock the rubes by a vet tech. She put a dog ID RFID chip under her folded short sleeve shirt and pretended it was the vaxx that made her reader show numbers.

Personally I think that was a loathsome thing to do under the circumstances. To create disinformation as a way of winding up the vaccine skeptical. And It would be just as bad if we skeptics were wrong.

In any case, just because the state lied to us in a way unprecedented perhaps in Western nations, and certainly since WW2, does not mean all who agree with us on some issues are also not lying to us, either for personal gain, because of poor thought processes, or in fact are agents of the state pied pipering us to destruction through a path that appears to be of our own choosing, but is just another state line of operation in an information warfare battlefield.

Oh and yeah also now this:

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

12 Replies to “Highly disturbing video from Dr. John Campbell on nano-structures in blood caused by mRNAS injections [PEER REVIEWED]”

  1. Jessica Rose https://x.com/JesslovesMJK/status/1832375792854003947
    has responded to the study.

    “The layers of wtf are almost too much to process here. That paper is riddled with oopsies (I am being nice) and besides John backing it’s ‘authenticity’, it’s shocking that the meat grinder we call media is prompting others to “call him out” for backing this ‘story’ now, and not 4 years ago.

    I don’t even know where to start. I like John. But he’s being deceived.

    I intuit, have extensive background and years of research under my belt to support a claim that this is a red herring.

    KNOW IT FOR YOURSELF. BY SEEKING.

    The shots are dangerous, YES. But seek to discover WHY IN ACTUALITY THAT THEY DANGEROUS.

    Think amyloids. Think LNP chaos. Think membrane potential disruption. Think immune dysfunction. Think metabolic collapse of cells. Think lack of CQAs and potency assays. Think assholes trying to gain financially.

    Don’t give up your common sense and rationality for a sensationalized version of the truth.”

    This is the study she is referring to. It’s the one John Campbell discussed:
    https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/102

  2. Interesting thread. This was in the response to one of the twitter links you posted about the study…. see the image posted.

    https://x.com/franklin_reeder/status/1832399089637708203

    “When the co-author of a study claiming the presence of “self-assembling nanobots in an injectable” is also a self-described expert in how propaganda campaigns are conducted…?…

    there’s your sign.”

    • Messianic Mad Men, Medicine, and the Media War on Empirical Reality: Discourse Analysis of Mainstream Covid-19 Propaganda
      Authors
      Daniel Broudy, Darwin Hoop

      https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=c00mCrcAAAAJ&citation_for_view=c00mCrcAAAAJ:_Qo2XoVZTnwC

      Publisher
      Institute for Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research

      This article critically examines the emerging global war on pathogens mimicking the Global War on Terror (GWOT). We draw upon the history of recent wars and the fear-driven narratives aimed at nudging the public toward uncritical acceptance of the new emerging social and economic global order. We adopt Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky’s ‘Propaganda Model’ to describe how mainstream media perform in manufacturing consent to policies that tighten control over populations and degrade rights, agency, and sovereignty. Here we consider the efforts of globalist political actors who seek to co-opt or influence political institutions around the world and position themselves as unelected rulers of an emerging authoritarian order. We argue that agenda-setting media are predisposed to serve elite interests that shape news coverage, bound public debate, and obscure new forms of warfare behind the smokescreen of a manufactured Global War on Pathogens (GWOP). We introduce critical analysis and alternative perspectives, largely marginalized by the mainstream, on the hidden conflicts of interest involved in the demands for full social compliance.

    • Noam Chomsky, political dissident and author of Manufactured Consent, was an expert on propaganda too. What was his position on the vaccine and the mandates?
      He said “Scepticism should be overcome.”

      Who can you trust these days?

  3. I have a doctor friend who was a big advocate of the covid vaccine until his 20 something came down with long vaxx and there is nothing that works to alleviate the problem. This study may provide a clue regarding what kind of damage uncontrolled nano self assembly is causing. Can this be reversed or turned into something useful in the body is the ultimate challlenge.

    • Graphene is a meta material. Work has to be done to figure out what can make it come apart that doesn’t also kill people.

  4. Sheesh. I am so weary of this nonsense… the internet has done a fair number of good things, but this hyper-spreading of crazy is not one of them.