On the MAC Convention in Toronto and massive state funding for Islamic antisemitism

Please read this post over at RAIR about the MAC Convention in Toronto and know two additional things.

Melissa Lantsman and others) repeatedly mention that last year (for the previous convention or MAC programs), Canadian Heritage gave MAC $20,000 through the Anti-Racism Program (or Multiculturalism and Anti-Racism Program).

MAC as an organization receives ongoing federal funding (hundreds of thousands to millions over the years, including a larger $349k grant in 2021 for anti-racism work)

Secondly, that the Ottawa Government went to great pains to shut down a film a few years ago at the Ottawa Public Library which was a factual documentary about the consequences of mass Islamic importation into Europe. The movie was called, Killing Europe. And various state agents within the municipal government of Ottawa went to great efforts to shut it down.

Killing Europe is below:

After various agents associated with both the Ottawa council and one or another “Human Rights Commission” (clearly not considering freedom of speech to be a human right) the same film maker made another documentary about how his first one had been shut down, where he exposed the various agents involved, we have tactfully not named in this article.

This post is a microcosm of how things now work across the West — especially in the Commonwealth, Germany, France, and much of Western Europe.
Add in the definition of dialectics from the daily Reader’s Links, and the picture becomes complete. It is a big ask to watch two films, but when you consider when they were made (killing Europe: 2017 and Killing Canada: 2018) and read the RAIR piece, the jigsaw feels complete. What we are living through is the culmination of decades of deliberate effort by leftist agencies: the systematic disempowerment of the individual and the elevation of the State to near-God status — a State that decides what is true, what may be said, and what must be punished.

It is a big ask to watch two films. But when you think about when they were made, and look at the post at RAIR it forms a pretty well completed jigsaw. There have been things at work for decades culminating in what is here and what will grow, shaped mostly via empowering small minded people by making certain thoughts either outright criminal, or worthy of social ostracism.

All moves take society to the left.

All dialectic attacks move society to the left.

All new laws take society to the left.

Taking things to the left means the disempowering of the individual and creating a near God-like state that can determine what is true and not true and enforce those narratives as suits their agenda at any given moment.

Islam is one of their primary cudgels. And in a few years from now, what legacy Canadians remain might look at the last 20 years with a great deal of sympathy for Harp Seal pups. We shall know what it is to be clubbed.

A few film and TV items that might help steer the cultural titanic before it rams the iceberg head on

1. I just got this email. Make of it what you will. But it feels like a bad omen when a state will not accept its own money.

I had to renew my passport. Last week I went to Service Canada — they no longer take cash. The girl said they stopped taking cash approximately 6 months ago. Surprise, surprise, bit by bit we are moving to a cashless, controlled society.

2. I may have posted this before, but there are some insights/jokes in it that are worth seeing twice

3. I guess this is going to be a pop-culture post in a sense. Below is a scene from the movie, The Remains of the Day. It seems relevant now because of the way the Nazis presented themselves at a table of naive European diplomats in order to gain tactical advantage before they attacked them. The speech by the American diplomat is legendary and the best part of the movie. However the whole scene is worth seeing. If I can find it I will post it.

4. This film was made in 1939 and stars Gary Cooper among others. It was made about how the US in 1906 helped the Philippines defend itself from raping, slave taking, murdering Muslims acting in accordance with islamic scripture. It was also made before communist dialectics saw to it that you could not actually name a threat accurately without fear of punishment, and even more weirdly, without self flagellation as if speaking the truth had somehow been made a taboo even in our own heads.

We post this movie every year or two, but most people have still not seen it. Take the time. Its refreshing.

General Pershing is not named or portrayed in the film The Real Glory, but the pig-skin tactic shown in the movie is often popularly attributed to him. Pershing was indeed in the Philippines (he served as governor of the Moro Province from 1909–1913). and mentioned the Pig blood bullets and pig skin tactics in his memoirs.

5. Two scenes from South Park from back when it was relevant and funny. This one is pretty much a descriptor of how Western people deal with Islam as a whole:

It is a scene from a 2 episode series called, “Cartoon Wars” and is excellent from start to finish. I believe both episodes have been banned. But search around for them, maybe on Tor or something. They are out there to watch for sure. Or possibly still available to buy.

The next one is a great scene from where the kid’s teacher gets a ‘sex change’. I have to put that in scare quotes as there is no such thing as a sex change. But they call the weird sexual medical experimentation on Children that so…

Anyway in this scene, they sarcastically explain that if people actually saw what the surgery looks like to make one sex into a kind of coarse imitation of the other, more people would do it. Which of course isn’t true, and wasn’t the real intent. They do show real scenes from these surgeries. SO BE ADVISED.

Thats it for this post. I think pop culture can be a valuable tool to get people up to speed. Which is likely why the left forced everything to go the other way. Like, as has become nearly cliche, ‘when is the last time you saw a straight white couple in a TV commercial?’

It isn’t the mixed couple that is infuriating. It is the social engineering. The deracination of ourselves as a people, a culture or even cultures, a history and a set of laws. And most of all, a set of laws applied equally to all, and based on rational and measurable evidences.

Maybe I’ll just add this old Procol Harum song for pure nostalgia.

Funny thing is, I bet they ban A Whiter Shade of Pale before they ban that one.

Thank you all for checking out this site.

Jeff Evely interview and presentation at his May 5th de-transition event in Ottawa

RAIR Foundation has the article.

(To increase your viewing experience, please click the gear at the bottom right of the video window once it starts playing and wind it up to the best quality available)

Of all the mass line narrative attacks created by the State for the destruction of our identity, individualism and rights, perhaps the Trans-issue is the most ludicrous, and therefore destructive. The idea that a man who claims he is a women, is a real woman and must be treated as such, is perhaps the greatest single attack on reality in modern times. But Bill C-4, which empowers the state to talk children into going to spay and neuter clinics to become a sexually amorphous medical experiment, and then punishes parents with 5 years in jail and massive fines if they just suggest the child wait till they are old enough to vote to begin these destructive and irreversible processes, is the perfect end game for the left. And by the left, I include the dialectically named, “Conservative Party of Canada” who danced in the isles after the bill passed, and after they had requested not to bother debating it and consider all the protocols in advance of the bill to have been completed.

Jeff Evely, the man who walked in the woods of Nova Scotia in defiance of a massively Ultra-vires order not to do so, unless you where attending a gay wedding or an anti-European play by Amer-Indians, held a conference in Ottawa on May 5th to try and raise awareness of the horrors of the trans-issue. And horrors it is. Forgive me the comparison, but frankly I don’t think it is much of an exaggeration to say the doctors who do this sit somewhere between Jospeh Mengele and Dr. Victor Frankenstein.

The prime differences being that the suffering these people endure come for the rest of their lives but not during the surgeries, unlike Mengele, and Frankenstein had the decency to only operate on corpses and not school children, tricked into accepting the insanely metaphysical position that whatever is bothering them at the moment is because they were ‘born in the wrong body’.

We interviewed Jeff the evening before his conference took place on parliament Hill, and then at Biker’s Church in Vanier

His story is well worth the watch.

There was also a full press conference with all the people he brought in for this conference at West block Parliament hill. But as expected, they didnt allow many journalists in, and the ones they did allow in, few came. The Western Standard was the one exception and they did make it into the presser.

Here is the CPAC video of the event at the West Block:

Jeff’s own presentation at his event that evening. Jeff went to the philosophical level of this issue. This is what has to happen if we want to educate enough people to develop tactics needed to defeat this steady onslaught of narrative attacks.

The Q&A Panel with a question from yours truly

Below are some of the other videos and testimonies from people who spoke at this event.

Athena Davis:

High School Teacher, Amy McKay: Fighting in court to keep her teachers licence after stating factually correct biology)

Barry Neufeld: (Fined 750,000.00$ for saying something true but counter narrative about human sexual dimorphism)

Interview with Rose: Detransitioner

Faith and Kelly interview part 1:

Part II:

Scott Newgent:

If anyone is still in doubt that the Trans-issue as is is today is a vector of attack on Western Civilization, maybe this MC from the Trans-pride march in Ottawa a couple of years ago will help inform:

Chris Fluery: Men in women’s prisons

There is a documentary about the whole day coming out soon which will contain other experts not covered here yet such as Dr. Ann Gillies, Mia Hughes and many others well worth hearing from.

 

Comrade Carney and the real state of law in Great Britain: Links 1 for May 21, 2026

1. This is a video about several people offering evidence of massive voter fraud in recent Canadian elections.

I would only add this.

In any discussion I have about mark Carney, my calculous always includes the following observation.

Mark Carney is not a person who would ever leave anything important to him to chance. Nothing. Ever,

2. It was always about removing private property

3. It would be good to know what is behind this. Hell it would be good to know what is behind all the massive lapses in civilizational normalcy that has somehow evaporated. But then again, maybe it wouldn’t. Because maybe we know.

4. About interference with the Alberta independence referendum

I would really like to see other interviews with Mr. Rath from the same location. I can’t help but be suspicious that CBC altered his audio to make him hard to listen to and unpleasant to focus on his voice. I know for a fact that if he really did have audio that bad, it could have been improved. I may grab it and do it myself to prove the point and I am just a guy with a computer, not a multi-billion  corporation with all the expertise and equipment anyone could fantasize about having. I caught CBC using some tech at a demo on parliament hill to block out crowd noise back in 2020 I think it was, in order to prevent their audience from hearing what the speakers on Parliament Hill were actually saying, because they had invented an entire narrative around it. In fact the rally was to march to the US. Embassy and demand Trump cut Canada from the new trade deal because Trudeau had already violated the terms of that agreement. But the CBC made it about bitter far right extremists angry about not being able to have a Canada Day party because of the fascist Covid measures the Trudeau state had imposed. So we know for a fact the CBC is not above anything like using technical means to diminish their ideological adversaries. Itself a major problem as a TV network isn’t supposed to have any.

CBC has been busted in many major frauds now, always with a political bent in a certain way. Probably the best one one may remember is when they talked about how hospitals were jammed way past capacity during Covid (in fact they were so empty the parking lots were just a few cop cars and most of the lights were actually out) and once they even showed a clothing mannequin with a tube over its wooden lips in a gurney being wheeled into an ICU.

More recently the RCMP is ‘investigating’ the recent sting they did on counter-narrative people over their views on the alleged graves at Residential Schools.

5. Two opinion/analysis pieces on Comrade Carney

6. We need to investigate this farther. But at the moment, this looks very much like something that belongs in the Kevin Krehan files. A migrant, dunno yet if it was a Muslim, stabbed a British person. The migrant told the police that the British stab victim had said hurty words to the migrant. The police arrested the British person. The British person died bleeding out in custody. If Tommy does another march, this should be the poster everyone carries and they should stand silently around 10 Downing and other government centres until something is done.

 

An 18-year-old kid gets stabbed in the street. He’s running for his life, begging for help, and instead of saving him, the police handcuff him while he bleeds out because the attacker claimed “racism.”

They let him choke on his own blood. No urgency. No humanity. Just cold, ideological policing.

Months later? Still no names. Still no suspensions. Still no accountability.

Meanwhile, the same UK police have arrested over 12,000 people for social media posts.

They move at lightning speed to jail citizens for tweets and online comments, yet they can’t even name or discipline the officers who allegedly let a stabbing victim die in handcuffs on the street.

This is the definition of two-tier policing: aggressive against ordinary people speaking online, but protective when it comes to their own failures and protecting the narrative.

The British people deserve real justice, not another cover-up.

Justice for Henry Nowak.

The implication is Henrty died. But let’s state it plainly. Henry Nowak DIED bleeding out under arrest under allegations of saying hurty words.

Vickrum Digwa (23) was arrested and charged with murder shortly after the incident. But not arrested till after Henry Nowak died.

As of May 2026, no public disciplinary action, suspensions, firings, or criminal charges have been reported against the specific police officers involved.
They should be charged with accessory to murder.
As should the prosecution and judge in the case of Kevn Krehan.
Thank you all for checking out this site.

Cancellation of a Progressive High School teacher as she comes to realize the narrative lies on The ‘Trans’ issue

This is the first time this Ottawa high school teacher has spoken out since her struggle sessions with the state educational organs began.

In essence, she was more or less a progressive. But her studies allowed her to access medical records at a level not available to the general public. She discovered two things. The people who oppose the surgical and chemical mutilation of children under the rubric of “trans-affirming-Care” were both not hateful, and not lying.

Now she has had to retain a major Canadian Civil Rights law firm to keep her teaching licence.

The full write up is at RAIR. 

The Gulag Archipelago, moral relativism and explaining why communist nations are so destructive

Occasionally in conversations with the willing about the nature of Communism, and how Western leaders are doing these things to us, and ultimately WHY they are doing these things to us, simply answering with teh word dialectics, is punishing the victim. Interestingly, that is actually not just the right answer, but why in fact these things are being done to the people of the formerly free west.

Below is a short excerpt from the Gulag Archipelago, where the reasoning of the torturers themselves is explained. By now it should appear familiar to all. Not just the sophisticated in the methods of the left, but all in the West who have observed what is being done to them with great bewilderment and horror, and shouted about as hypocrisy or corruption. It is of course neither. Corruption is a means to an ends. A way in which the temple can be torn down by destroying the systems that keep it up. But the goal, the telos, is the destruction of the temple. How is merely tactics.

The segment from the Gulag Archipelago:

It would also be incorrect to ascribe to 1937 the “discovery”
that the personal confession of an accused person was more im-
portant than any other kind of proof or facts. This concept had
already been formulated in the twenties. And 1937 was just
the year when the brilliant teaching of Vyshinsky came into its
own. Incidentally, even at that time, his teaching was transmitted
only to interrogators and prosecutors-for the sake of their
morale and steadfastness. The rest of us only learned about it
twenty years later-when it had already come into disfavor-
through subordinate clauses and minor paragraphs of newspaper
articles, which treated the subject as if it had long been widely
known to all.

It turns out that in that terrible year Andrei Yanuaryevich
(one longs to blurt out, “Jaguaryevich”) Vyshinsky, availing
himself of the most flexible dialectics (of a sort nowadays not
permitted either Soviet citizens or electronic calculators, since to
them yes is yes and no is no), pointed out in a report which
became famous in certain circles that it is never possible for
The Interrogation 101 mortal men to establish absolute truth, but relative truth only.

He then proceeded to a further step, which jurists of the last two
thousand years had not been willing to take: that the truth estab-
lished by interrogation and trial could not be absolute, but only,
so to speak, relative.

Therefore, when we sign a sentence ordering
someone to be shot we can never be absolutely certain, but only
approximately, in view of certain hypotheses, and in a certain
sense, that we are punishing a guilty person.

Thence arose the
most practical conclusion: that it was useless to seek absolute
evidence–for evidence is always relative-or unchallengeable
witnesses-for they can say different things at different times.
The proofs of guilt were relative, approximate, and the interro-
gator could find them, even when there was no evidence and no
witness, without leaving his office, “basing his conclusions not
only on his own intellect but also on his Party sensitivity,

his moral forces” (in other words, the superiority of someone who
has slept well, has been well fed, and has not been beaten up)
“and on his character” (Le., his willingness to apply cruelty!).
Of course, this formulation was much more elegant than
Latsis’ instructions. But the essence of both was the same.
In only one respect did Vyshinsky fail to be consistent and
retreat from dialectical logic: for some reason, the executioner’s
bullet which he allowed was not relative but absolute . …

Thus it was that the conclusions of advanced Soviet jurispru-
dence, proceeding in a spiral, returned to barbaric or medieval
standards. Like medieval torturers, our interrogators, prosecutors,
and judges agreed to accept the confession of the accused as the
chief proof of guilt.

However, the simple-minded Middle Ages used dramatic and picturesque methods to squeeze out the desired confessions: the
rack, the wheel, the bed of nails, impalement, hot coals, etc. In
the twentieth century, taking advantage of our more highly de-
veloped medical knowledge and extensive prison experience (and
someone seriously defended a doctoral dissertation on this
theme), people came to realize that the accumulation of such
impressive apparatus was superfluous and that, on a mass scale,
it was also cumbersome. And in addition . . .

In addition, there was evidently one other circumstance. As
always, Stalin did not pronounce that final word, and his sub-
ordinates had to guess what he wanted. Thus, like a jackal, he left
himself an escape hole, so that he could, if he wanted, beat a
retreat and write about “dizziness from success.” After all, for
the first time in human history the calculated torture of millions
was being undertaken, and, even with all his strength and power,
Stalin could not be absolutely sure of success.

In dealing with such an enormous mass of material, the effects of the experiment
might differ from those obtained from a smaller sample. An un-
foreseen explosion might take place, a slippage in a geological
fault, or even world-wide disclosure. In any case, Stalin had to
remain innocent, his sacred vestments angelically pure.
We are therefore forced to conclude that no list of tortures
and torments existed in printed form for the guidance of interro-
gators! Instead, all that was required was for every Interrogation
Department to supply the tribunal within a specified period with
a stipulated number of rabbits who had confessed everything.
And it was simply stated, orally but often, that any measures and
means employed were good, since they were being used for a
.lofty purpose; that no interrogator would be made to answer for
the death of an accused; and that the prison doctor should inter-
fere as little as possible with the course of the investigation.

So from all this it becomes clear that moral and cultural relativism was a dialectic we can all see was launched on the West to destroy our sacred beliefs and the value of ourselves as a people and a culture. We also see how doctors where made to follow state narratives on Covid, the vaxx, and now MAiD in an ends justifies the means moral relativistic framework which cedes massive amounts of power to the state which it should never, ever have.

And continues to agglomerate by the month across Western Europe and Canada.

The “Christian Nationalist” element in information warfare explained

Rep. Mike Belcher is one of the most interesting out there in the counter-revolution. We link to his Substack quite often and recommend his videos a lot.

Today he posted this little Tweet which twigged a memory of congressional hearings in February where this exact trope was used to try and undermine the testimony of Robert Spencer and others on the factual and historical dangers of Islam and its adherents to Western Civilization, and in particular, the United States.

Link to article:

Excerpt:

There are many people who want you to fear the idea that America’s founding metaphysics are Christian. They promote the dialectical political warfare operation known as “Christian Nationalism.”

The term “Christian Nationalism” is generally undefined and utilized as a “floating signifier.” This is a political warfare concept where a label with a nebulous definition is slandered and coded as evil—placed outside the Overton Window as taboo—in order to apply it to any variety of political opponents at opportune times to negate their political will. They have done the same thing with the word “racist,” where they changed the understood, reasonable definition of color-based hatreds into something only definable, and therefore only operational, by and for Leftist “experts.” The mechanism is identical: create a term sufficiently vague that it can be affixed to anyone who threatens the revolution, sufficiently terrifying that the accusation alone produces social death, and sufficiently undefined that no defense against it is possible because the goalposts are never fixed. 

Well we certainly post about these efforts on a near constant basis. In fact the definition of dialectics, well a sort of narrow operational one anyway, is posted in the Reader’s Links every day for now.

But this caught our attention because of Congressional hearings by the Sharia Free America Caucus that took place in February, where the entire effort to explain Islam as a threat doctrine was undermined by a Democrat who attempted to use the Christian Nationalist trope as a deflection from the real dangers of Islam.

She was well and properly refuted:

Trying to spin in the opposite direction to the ludicrous interpretation of ‘news’ can cause severe vertigo: Links 1 for May 7, 2026

1. Now and again, in fact several times a day, we see a story that is both a kick in the gut, and a dopamine shot to the brain. The kick in the gut is because the information is so horrible at face value, or its implications, and the dopamine shot is because it affirms the albeit Casandra like model we have of reality as it is at the moment.

Some of you may remember that we featured videos of Eric Clapton during Covid explaining how the mRNA shots messed up his hands and he thought he could never play again. He was one of the very few A list celebrities who dared to speak truth against narrative on Covid and the dangers of the mRNA shots. Even though he took it initially, at least he tried to warn others not to.

We found the original Rolling Stone article and while it appears slightly ambiguous as to the reasoning, one most certainly gets the impression that they removed him from “Guitar-God” status because he went against the shots.

To be clear, if someone likes Richard Wagner’s Music, they should listen to it and enjoy it. The fact that Hitler idolized and weaponized his music should make no difference. Even if they were contemporaries. Even if they were friends. The whole beauty of Western Civilization is the ability to not make everything political but to utilize value on merit. This is why DEI is so destructive. It is a direct intersectional line of attack on the Merit principle, which is a central pillar of Western Civilization. At the same time, performing artists should create an alter-ego for political opinion. Using a platform someone earns from great acting or musical skill gives an unfair advantage when they are voicing opinions on other matters about which they likely do not have more expertise than the common person. If their politics is interesting and valuable, the alter-ego will gain traction all on its own.

2. This seems like a very meaningful change in Canada’s foreign policy and for that matter, autonomy. Clearly Canada does not make its own foreign policy decisions, and the decisions that are made, are not based on any kind of libertarian or individualist basis.

3. The Hanta Virus issue about a cruise ship mirrors the start of Covid all to well. Hanta did not appear in the list of viruses sent to China from the Winnipeg lab, when I checked. But not being on the available list does not make it not sent to Peking. Or Wuhan as it happens.

Hanta is not human to human spread, unless Gain of Function has been done to it. So if it starts spreading that way, we have a real problem as Hanta is a haemorrhagic fever. Like Ebola. Which was in fact sent to the Wuhan lab from Winnipeg. 

There are a couple of interesting data points floating around on this issue:

During the early days of the Covid narrative attacks, there were rumours floating around about a follow up disease-attack but wth a haemorrhagic fever. We were thinking Ebola, but could as easily be a version of Hanta that goes person to person.

The following graphic was screen grabbed from Polymarket at 8:00 AM on Thursday May 7, 2026:

Live graph here. Might be interesting to watch this one.

Since I started too write this post this morning, there has been some evolution of the story:

Current situation:

  • Total cases: Around 8 cases linked to the ship (3 laboratory-confirmed hantavirus, 5 suspected).
  • Deaths: 3 passengers have died.
  • Others: One person critically ill (in South Africa), several with milder symptoms. Three patients were medically evacuated (some to the Netherlands).
  • The ship was anchored off Cape Verde but has now departed and is heading to Spain’s Canary Islands (expected arrival in a few days). Remaining passengers/crew are isolated in cabins.

Key details:

  • The strain involved is the Andes variant of hantavirus — this is notable because it’s the only hantavirus known to spread via limited human-to-human transmission (usually close contact), unlike most others which come only from rodents.
  • Initial exposure likely happened from rodents (possibly near a landfill in Argentina during a birdwatching stop), but person-to-person spread is now suspected on board.
  • Dozens of passengers (including Americans) disembarked earlier in the trip and flew home before the outbreak was identified — health authorities in multiple countries (US, UK, Switzerland, Netherlands, etc.) are doing contact tracing and monitoring them.

I had a conversation with a friend about this who minimized it because outbreaks on cruise ships are so common. Yeah I’m sure that’s true. But what is also true is the attacks on us all start with a narrative. Why then, did only the Covid outbreak on a cruise ship and now this one get public attention when outbreaks on cruise ships are dirt common and the stories are probably buried so it doesn’t hurt the stock prices of the cruise liners? Something stinks here.

Might be time to stock up on Ivermectin. Again. Maybe some tonic water.

4. Those who are concerned about the massive cuts to seniors and various ‘vulnerable’ Canadians in general should take comfort in how much fun Ukrainian officials appear to be having with the money taken from Canadians.

I don’t know this website. Or if it’s disinformation. But on the surface, the woman throwing around the cash seems to be who it is calmed she is. Daria Kochurina, the wife of the deputy head of the State Audit Service of Ukraine Dmytro Khandusenko
?????????: https://eadaily.com/en/news/2026/05/05/the-wife-of-the-deputy-head-of-the-state-audit-service-of-ukraine-scattered-150-000-in-a-dance-video

The money dance video is fun at the link, although the amounts listed are much lower as it was Ukrainian money, not USD. Even so, it was extravagant given economy of scale and Canada is being extremely generous with Ukraine while cutting funds from many Canadian cohorts.

5. The names of the concerns and organizations listed in this Rebel video prove categorically that communists do indeed have a sene of humour. When they came up with things like, “National Security Overreach” they must have been rolling on the floor laughing. Well probably not but we should be, if we weren’t so susceptible to dialectic attacks. And all the verbiage the attendees of this Chinese Communist meetup used were classic Maoist dialectics.

6. So a Nazi walks into a bar and shoots a bunch of Jewish people, a Gypsy and a crippled guy. A week later, the media says, “a lone wolf, not connected to any military organization committed this mass murder”. No worries then, Nothing needs to be done. I mean he wasn’t in the SS or anything.

FBI: Austin’s Sixth Street mass shooter acted alone

The gunman who killed three people and wounded 15 others outside an Austin bar in March was a lone actor with no ties to foreign terrorist organizations, the FBI said Thursday.

The FBI San Antonio Division released its findings on Ndiaga Diagne, 53, who opened fire outside Buford’s Backyard Beer Garden on West Sixth Street in the early morning hours of March 1 before being shot and killed by Austin Police Department officers. The attack came one day after the U.S. launched strikes against Iran.

“There is no evidence of outside direction or radicalization,” the FBI said in a statement. Instead, investigators concluded the attack stemmed from “an escalation in violent behavior in part tied to specific personal triggers and grievances related to U.S. and Israeli military actions involving Iran, culminating in a violent, impulsive attack.”

Diagne, a Senegal-born naturalized U.S. citizen, was wearing a shirt bearing an Iranian flag design and a sweatshirt reading “Property of Allah” at the time of the shooting. 

Thank you all for checking out this site.

A lot more to come by end of day if things proceed well.

A few loose threads sewing together how communist lines of action are sold or hidden by Canadian media: Links 1 for May 6, 2026

Gentle readers:

We are a couple of days behind because we have been working with a team of people who are working to undo one of the most destructive lines of Operation against the human race. The Trans-sexual dialectic. And while the intention is likely the destruction of the entire concept of male female in that Hegelian, Thesis-Counter thesis-Synthesis sense, the personal cost to its actual victims, those who get the procedures and drugs, is quite truly of Dr. Menegele proportions.

The materials, personal interviews and presentations we expect will be viewable soon. And when they are, please bookmark them and make sure to show them to anyone speaking about the trans-issue as a matter of some kind of rights, or any kind of positive. The material is stunning, and very important. It includes testimony from people like Scott Nugent, who appeared in Matt Walsh’s film, What is a Woman, and Jeff Evely, whose daughter was put through this meat grinder. (And I wish the expression was less literal than it is) and many more people who went part or all the way through this series of Frankenstein like procedures and then had to find a way to undo or reverse them at their own expense, and against a river of peer and industry pressure to maintain the illusion that it improved their lives to have transitioned.

Meanwhile, a few items about the state of the revolution in Canada.

1. Remember, the Detective Helen Grus story is a microcosm, or a rather an excellent data point for what has happened to our civilization. The replacement of Rule of Law and all that means, to a narrative based, dialectical system where the state determines what is true, and the only real crime is defying a state narrative. Especially from a place of any kind of authority. The preceding statement, for what it is worth, is my personal definition for what communism actually is, as opposed to what it’s useful idiots agitate for at yesterday’s ‘May Day’ marches across parts of Canada.

RAIR Foundation has a lot of information about the hearings of Det. Helen Grus. For those not familiar, click through and catch up if you like.

2. A couple of items on the May 1st Useful Idiots day in Canada. CTV of course, parrots the Communist party line brilliantly, framing it as requested, “Protecting Workers Rights” when of course, in Communist countries there are exactly ZERO workers rights and that lack of rights is highly taken advantage of by the state.

It is also amazing how CTV managed to hide the Communist iconography that permeates these demos and marches. That takes real effort. It should also be noted that whenever actual liberal minded people asking for constitutional rights, freedom of speech, freedom of bodily autonomy etc. etc. attempts any kind of protest, these people will make sure its as unpleasant as possible for them. Conversely, they have all their antisemitic, Anti-Israel, anti-Nation-State, anti freedom protests frequently, often several times a week and sometimes every day, and no western minded group opposes them. We believe in their freedom of speech. They do not believe in ours. It doesn’t take a lot of math to see exactly how that did, is, and will work out. Which brings us to item 3. How we win.

This one is FAR more representative. Look closely at the iconography. it is an excellent blend of every ideology which wishes to attack and destroy individualism, Western civilization and control people, even if the final outcome of that destruction is not agreed upon. We see that the anti-West communist movement has perfectly merged with the”Palestinian anti-Israel narrative attacks, and a lot of vegan iconography is also present. This stands to reason as the subtext is that the state should ban meat and force people to eat what they are told. We can see that in the form of the protestors who dress up as pigs, cows and chickens as was represented in Ottawa and Montreal. This is also in perfect harmony with Mark Carney’s stated agenda in his book, Values.

3. Rep. Mike Belcher, who has the X account, Counterspell and does some of the best material on the dialectical nature of the left, and perhaps more importantly, how we beat them, has done a 2 part video on this issue.

Part 1

Part 2. 

Both videos are on Substack which there is no way to embed here that I am aware of. Below though, is one we post often and offers context to the above. And frankly everything else. Which is how the ancient art of spell craft has become Political Warfare in the modern era. First by the Soviets, and now by everyone. Additionally, reading the definition of dialectics as we present it in the Reader’s Links every day also offers context.

4. Speaking of communism:

Sorry that wasn’t enthusiastic enough…

Speaking of communism, PLEASE watch the video below. it is the best thing on Mark Carney and his actions and intentions since Peter Foster’s article in the NP that this site posts probably once a month since it was published.

5. I do not believe this Tweet. I do not believe they will serve anything like the time given. I’d be surprised if they served any time at all.

Thank you all for checking out this site,

Trevor Loudon details the Duginist attack on the West via many of our favorite Russian and Chinese ops

Previously, we posted an interview with Trevor Loudon on Alexander Dugan, the Russian, and actually formerly dialectical engineer, now operating various lines of Operation against the West, such as MAGA Communism.

It was basically a point form interview, but an excellent introduction to the basics. If you haven’t seen it, you can watch it here.

Below is a more recent and much more detailed interview on the same subject and may I say, it is fascinating.

On the advancement of Communism, Mark Carney’s agenda BRILLIANTLY laid out in a Tweet, and a couple of words about Pit Bulls: Links 1 for May 2, 2026

1. Remember, the Detective Helen Grus story is a microcosm, or a rather an excellent data point for what has happened to our civilization. The replacement of Rule of Law and all that means, to a narrative based, dialectical system where the state determines what is true, and the only real crime is defying a state narrative. Especially from a place of any kind of authority. The preceding statement, for what it is worth, is my personal definition for what communism actually is, as opposed to what it’s useful idiots agitate for at yesterday’s ‘May Day’ marches across parts of Canada.

RAIR Foundation has a lot of information about the hearings of Det. Helen Grus. For those not familiar, click through and catch up if you like.

2. A couple of items on yesterday’s Useful Idiots day in Canada. CTV of course, parrots the Communist party line brilliantly, framing it as requested, “Protecting Workers Rights” when of course, in Communist countries there are exactly ZERO workers rights and that lack of rights is highly taken advantage of by the state.

It is also amazing how CTV managed to hide the Communist iconography that permeates these demos and marches. That takes real effort. It should also be noted that whenever actual liberal minded people asking for constitutional rights, freedom of speech, freedom of bodily autonomy etc. etc. attempts any kind of protest, these people will make sure its as unpleasant as possible for them. Conversely, they have all their antisemitic, Anti-Israel, anti-Nation-State, anti freedom protests frequently, often several times a week and sometimes every day, and no western minded group opposes them. We believe in their freedom of speech. They do not believe in ours. It doesn’t take a lot of math to see exactly how that did, is, and will work out. Which brings us to item 3. How we win.

This one is FAR more representative. Look closely at the iconography. it is an excellent blend of every ideology which wishes to attack and destroy individualism, Western civilization and control people, even if the final outcome of that destruction is not agreed upon. We see that the anti-West communist movement has perfectly merged with the”Palestinian anti-Israel narrative attacks, and a lot of vegan iconography is also present. This stands to reason as the subtext is that the state should ban meat and force people to eat what they are told. We can see that in the form of the protestors who dress up as pigs, cows and chickens as was represented in Ottawa and Montreal. This is also in perfect harmony with Mark Carney’s stated agenda in his book, Values.

3. Rep. Mike Belcher, who has the X account, Counterspell and does some of the best material on the dialectical nature of the left, and perhaps more importantly, how we beat them, has done a 2 part video on this issue.

Part 1

Part 2. 

Both videos are on Substack which there is no way to embed here that I am aware of. Below though, is one we post often and offers context to the above. And frankly everything else. Which is how the ancient art of spell craft has become Political Warfare in the modern era. First by the Soviets, and now by everyone. Additionally, reading the definition of dialectics as we present it in the Reader’s Links every day also offers context.

4. Speaking of communism:

Sorry that wasn’t enthusiastic enough…

Speaking of communism, PLEASE watch the video below. it is the best thing on Mark Carney and his actions and intentions since Peter Foster’s article in the NP that this site posts probably once a month since it was published.

5. I do not believe this Tweet. I do not believe they will serve anything like the time given. I’d be surprised if they served any time at all.

Thank you all for checking out this site,

 

A couple of items on Israel etc. and many more on the tactics of the communist revolutionaries and effects on Canada and the USA: Links post 1 for April 28, 2026

1. Victor Davis Hanson: the Immigrants who treat American magnanimity with contempt, they should be deported

2. Just a gentle reminder of actual reality. The way she frames it is accurate. We would say that Israel is a meritocracy and any discrimination which is done is on that basis. That defines civilization. People who are passed over because someone else can do it better are generally not bitter about it unless communists reframe it to harness one’s ginned up hatreds. Muslim countries are not meritocracies by any metric, although some may advance a person by thier Koranic knowledge. For example in Iran after the revolution, a janitor was made the dean of a University in Tehran because he had memorized the Koran. Also if you have serious military abilities, like in communism, you will be advanced as well. Bot communism and Islam recognize the value of merit when it comes to advancing the ideology. But the ideology does not recognize merit as core doctrine within itself.

3. In more typical communist states, anyone with any view that is remotely counter narrative, or even if a counter-narrative view could be imputed to the person in question, there would be an arrest, some form even that could be called a trial, but more an inquisition or star chamber, and punishment that would be both example, but also kept somewhat secret so it would be punitive for punishment’s sake. (Read or listen to the audiobook of the Gulag Archipelago, or watch videos of survivors of North Korea today for proofs)

Today they appear to have parsed the goals for efficiency. At least gven that Canada is a nascent communist polity.

In Canada we establish how much influence the person has first. A person who carries real influence either by credentials or position in an institution, or by number of followers or public profile will be hurt in a way using the vestigial mechanisms of a formerly free society.

So a professor of biology for example, who maintains that men and women are actually different from each other, and that has nothing to do with how they see themselves, will lose their incomes and status and perhaps even credentials. Doctors who opposed the Covid measures and especially the often deadly mRNA shots were defrocked in numbers, and the ‘trials’ afforded them by the Colleges where semi-secret and would not even allow the scientific truths or evidence to be entered on behalf of the defendant. Only that they had violated narrative policy. That was the only issue in the trials. The case of Helen Grus was the same although more complex to prosecute. But that was the effect.

This policy continues however. Many state narratives are still in full effect. And the punishments are still also policy.

Below is Grok’s answer to my question:

what is the story here please with University of Lethbridge and the arrest of Frances Widdowson”?

Grok’s answer:

Here’s the story:

What Happened On April 25, 2026, Frances Widdowson (a controversial former Mount Royal University professor) was arrested for trespassing at the University of Lethbridge in Alberta.She went to the university cafeteria to have coffee/meet with a student.
The university had previously issued a trespass notice banning her from campus (issued in February 2026 after a previous disruptive event).
Police were called, reminded her of the ban, and when she refused to leave, she was arrested and given a ticket.

She was released shortly after.Background on Frances Widdowson:

Widdowson is a vocal critic of the dominant narrative around Canada’s Indian Residential Schools, particularly claims of “mass graves” (e.g., Kamloops). She argues many of the claims are exaggerated or lack forensic evidence, and she has written and spoken extensively about what she calls the “residential school industry” and “wokeism” in academia.

She was fired from Mount Royal University in 2021 for her views.

Why the University Banned Her:

The University of Lethbridge says her presence on campus causes significant disruption, protests, and safety concerns that they can no longer manage. They issued a campus-wide alert calling her a potential “health and safety risk.

This is part of a longer pattern: Widdowson has had similar conflicts and bans at multiple Canadian universities (University of Victoria, UBC, University of Manitoba, etc.) when she tries to speak or debate on these topics.

The Bigger Context:

This incident has become a flashpoint in Canada’s ongoing debate about:Academic freedom vs. “safety”
Free speech on university campuses
The residential schools / reconciliation narrative

Supporters of Widdowson see it as heavy-handed censorship and “totalitarianism.” Critics say she is a provocateur whose presence inevitably causes chaos.

Actually what it is, is the use of activist agitators, Bolsheviks and Mensheviks, to create an atmosphere hostile to reality, or at the very least, hostile to any view which is counter to the dialectical (destructive) position of the left. Then, it can be framed as a safety issue, achieving two things at once. The preservation of the narrative on any given issue, and total control of professions and institutions across the board to maintain the narratives of the day irrespective of the actual original and stated purpose of the institutions. Universities have become amplifiers of state narratives, and the opposite of tools to teach critical thought, In fact, critical thinking has been replaced by Marxist Critical theory. The heart of leftist tactics.

For those unwilling to accept the new state of things in Canada, the tactic makes it easy to deny it. ‘after all, she had a trespass order! She wasn’t arrested for her views, but because she had a trespass order! She is guilty of a criminal matter! Do you believe in private property or not!!’

But the real issue is making her persona non grata at a university where she was a prof because of her views, under the rubric of public safety because gangs of communists caused violence in response to what she says.

There is nothing Western or organic in this process. This is dialectical from start to finish. But with stages that allow people who will not allow themselves to accept the new nature of Canada to rationalize it as nothing really changing. The same set of tactics are used against anyone who holds classical views on anything which is under immediate attack by the left. The biological sex. vs. ‘Gender” issue being an easy example of course, as well as all the covid ones, climate insanity etc.

We can be assured that more narrative attacks are on the way. Very possibly supporting Israel or the United States or Donald Trump wll become increasingly difficult. Already it is ill advised to walk a Canadian city street with a Trump hat on, and Jewish people find it difficult to be visibly Jewish. Various narratives about the Chabad, who actively oppose the building of the 3rd temple in Jerusalem as it is meant to be an act of God and not an architect and construction firm, are under attack because of Tucker Carlson’s narrative on the US military secretly working for this tiny apolitical group of charitable Jews to establish the 3rd temple. Really a whopper. But as Goebblels said,

“The essential English leadership secret does not depend on particular intelligence. Rather, it depends on a remarkably stupid thick-headedness. The English follow the principle that when one lies, one should lie big, and stick to it. They keep up their lies, even at the risk of looking ridiculous.”

Yes he projected that technique onto the British. But the concept is clearly what Tucker is relying on.

I might add that it is at the core of Dinesh D’Souza’s excellent film, Hillary’s America. For those that have not seen it, the principles in that film are every bit as valid and important today as they were when he made that film prior to the 2016 election.

4. A Casus Belli for not so much a war with China, but fighting back against China’s war against us? Or very possibly Mexican cartels? Still sorting out the chain of custody, or provinence of these issues. Likely it is intended to be difficult to know.

5. The Covid cover for what in our opinion was the release of measures tantamount to a communist revolution, must never be forgotten, and investigations into the people behind some of the more odious and deadly components of it must be brought to justice. Alex Berenson covers one of them here:

URGENT: David Morens, a top NIH aide to Dr. Anthony Fauci, has been indicted for hiding records about the origins of Covid-19

Federal prosecutors in Maryland have criminally charged David Morens, a former senior scientific advisor to Dr. Anthony Fauci at the National Institutes of Health, for hiding records about Covid-19’s origins from the public.

Morens worked with other scientists to evade Freedom of Information Act laws over public requests related to NIH’s work on coronavirus research, prosecutors said. The indictment comes almost two years after a Congressional subcommittee disclosed Morens’s key role in the scheme and his close relationship with Fauci.

The May 2024 Congressional report revealed Morens worked with Peter Daszak, a British zoologist whose EcoHealth Alliance served as a financing conduit from NIH to Chinese researchers, to dodge public requests for information.

Fauci also wanted to avoid public scrutiny and records laws and was “too smart to let colleagues send him stuff that could cause trouble,” Morens told Daszak in 2021 in an email published in that report.

During the spring of 2020, Fauci and top virologists worldwide tried to smear anyone who suggested that Covid might have started in a Chinese lab as a conspiracy theorist, despite their own private concerns that lab was in fact the source of the virus.

Continue at linked source above.

In Ontario there has been legislation passed making it not possible to file for FOIA for anything to do with Ford’s CINO government. Try and to keep that in mind when thinking about the state of politics in Canada.

The Federal government so far has not indicated it intendeds anything like this. Which is interesting. But the Ontario government new laws are drastic and sweeping.

Thank you all for reading this site and considering its views.

This next item is interesting. The only part of it I have trouble believing, is that Muslims thought that thunder meant that Allah did not approve of their rape of an infidel man. If they were slightly more religious, I think they would have taken it as encouragement.

 

 

Reader’s Links for April 28th, 2026

Each day at just after midnight Eastern, a post like this one is created for contributors and readers of this site to upload news links and video links on the issues that concern this site. Most notably, Islam and its effects on Classical Civilization, and various forms of leftism from Soviet era communism, to postmodernism and all the flavours of galloping statism and totalitarianism such as Nazism and Fascism which are increasingly snuffing out the classical liberalism which created our near, miraculous civilization the West has been building since the time of Socrates.

This document was written around the time this site was created, for those who wish to understand what this site is about. And while our understanding of the world and events has grown since then, the basic ideas remain sound and true to the purpose.

So please post all links, thoughts and ideas that you feel will benefit the readers of this site to the comments under this post each day. And thank you all for your contributions.

This is the new Samizdat. We must use it while we can.

**New intelligence suggests a specific course of action concerning use of Substack. For a variety of reasons, who owns it, and who owns the ONLY company that monetizes authors on Substack, the question for us has always been, ‘Why is Substack allowed to exist?” I believe the answer is now known to us. It collects data on you and who you are connected to. Substack does have the best writers out there for counter-narrative views, and does allow the authors to make money at it. Which is suspicious already. But the reasons were made known to us by a Cyber-security professional. The solution seems to be to use a dedicated browser, ONLY for substack. There are many good ones out there now. So downloading another browser is easy. Get the DuckduckGo go one, or Brave or one of many others and use it ONLY for substack and clear cookies after use. Like washing your plate after you eat.

For those interested, please check out https://vladtepesblog.substack.com/ as an another avenue of expression. The Substack is a different project in a sense. It is older videos that in the light of subsequent events, look different or of increased importance, Check it out now and again if you like. But use it safely.

ADDENDUM: 

This site operates more at the philosophical level of the communist/Islamic revolution which is obliterating Western Civilization. Politics, culture, law are all down stream from philosophy. Understanding the philosophy of the attack is to understand what is an attack and develop tactics, both individually and collectively against them. The attack comes entirely (so far) in the form of Dialectics. To understand dialectics, watch and read everything you can by Maj. (Ret.) Stephen Coughlin.

Here is a repost of the simplest explanation, or at least the shortest one, we have been able to think of so far (Placed here by request)

We as humans communicate mostly via conventions. In other words, we decide what a word means by what we, as a culture want it to mean, then fix the term as a convention via a dictionary

or other means so we can express what we want to each other and be understood. It’s a group process more or less but based on what we want expressions, words, concepts and taxonomy to mean.

Dialectics is the imposition of meaning on existing terms for a political outcome which is destructive to what we all consider meaning. It is a complete hijacking of Meaning.

This also applies to taxonomy. The most underrated aspect of epistemology. Of how we see ourselves. Of how we understand the world, via categories. Via labels.

Dialectical taxonomy is what forces us to change everything we think about sexuality and accept political sexuality such as the Trans-movement.

Or somehow convincing everyone that the German National Socialist Worker’s Party is somehow “far right wing”, which may be the most masterful dialectical con of the 20th century.

This deserves a proper essay. But I just want to get the thought out there.

Imposing, forcing meaning on us. Changing terms to mean what a group of tyrants what us to think they mean as opposed to what they do mean and more or less always have meant.

Making words mean something other than what we meant them to mean, then banning or criminalizing them because of their imputed meaning, even though they were good, useful terms that helped hold our culture together.

Attacking us for using perfectly good words with important meanings, then telling us what we meant by what we said, then cancelling us for it in the pre-revolutionary stage, and now in the UK outright arrest you now that the revolution is all but complete.

That is dialectics.

 

Canada is a place that needs watching: Links 1 for April 24, 2026

1. RFK Jr offers a few words on Canadian death care

2. Rural land owners react to the high speed rail scam

3. Is the actual system in effect in Canada becoming clear yet?

This should help our understanding a great deal.

 

4. AAAaaaaaaannnnnd its a muslim

5. Anyone care to make a wager on exactly what will happen of any real consequence to Carney for this?

Thank you all for checking out this site.