1. There is a wildly viral clip you have all seen by now with Elon Musk and a leftist propagandist from The Economist, where he schools her on one of the more common dialectical weapons used for the past few decades. That would be the one where the left calls anyone with normal, healthy views, “far Right” often with the term extremists added to it.
Elon tells her off rather well.
We have a few things to add. Firstly, in the very unlikely event that Elon rever eads this site, he should know that one never ever does an interview with enemy propaganda without filming it yourself separately, either overtly or covertly. I have to say that one of the people who really did understand this was British lawyer com jihadi, Anjem Choudary (also known as Abu Luqman). I really appreciated his videos as he was the first English jihadi leader who actually just told the truth about Islam and its intentions and beliefs. Frankly at one point I thought he was an op of some kind as he didnt use the initiate language of islam or any of the forms of deception classical fiqh recommends for such cases. But I noticed that in all his interviews he did with anyone, he had one or more cameras on tripods running in the room himself. Had Musk done that, he wouldn’t have had to say, “Leave that part in” hoping they would but knowing he had no power. Instead, he could have published it separately afterwards had they edited it out, doing vastly more good of exposing the leftist media than the way he did it.
It always annoyed me that our side just didn’t learn that simple lesson and as a consequence, we became edited into tools of enemy propaganda.
I havent seen the entire interview yet, but from the few minutes I did see, it was the same as many British and Canadian legacy journalists interviewing prominent non-leftists. In no way was it an interview, where the purpose is to get the subject to explain their views or area of expertise. What it was, from the few minutes I saw, was a series of dialectic attacks using terms that are initiate, to put it mildly, or that automatically direct the belief in the viewer, and usually also the subject the wrong way. Here is the whole interview for context. But in the now famous clip, Elon rightly straightens her out on the critical theory attack phrase of “The far right”.
Skipping around you hear a parade of these kinds of terms, And we here at Vlad Tepes view these terms as one of the enemy’s most potent weapons. IF we had the time and money, making a small dictionary to remind people of what the words used to mean, or how they are used today, or what new terms really mean in fact and effect would be a worthwhile project.
A couple of examples while we are on it. NEVER use the word God, for Allah. It immediately disarms the listener and puts them in a position where they logically should defend Islam. But a thing, real or imagined is defined by its attributes. And calling Allah God is the same as calling Superman, Donald Duck. Or Zeuss, Thor. Or Hercules, Jesus. Or Cupid, Moloch. That last one is maybe the best analogy. At least in terms of distance of attributes.
Jordan Peterson faced an identical tactician on British Channel4 in the UK around 8 years ago.
2. In New York yesterday there was an Islamic jihad attack stabbing Jewish people.
Of course, in keeping with modern trends of publishing things in such a way as to avoid informing people, we don’t know if he is a convert, or born to a Muslim family but we are led to believe there is a mental health issue with the man who stabbed two people while yelling Allah Ackbar. At times like this we really need to read people like Dr. Thomas Szasz, The Myth of Mental Illness. But then again, it is always what Western media says after a Muslim wages jihad. Or, they blame it on a target of the left. Like when a Muslim in Montreal murdered many young engineering students at a girl’s school in Montreal, they gave him an Anglo name, Mark Lepine, and claimed the problem was male hatred of women, avoiding any mention of his Algerian Muslim father and a lifetime of propaganda about the rightful role of women.
The second issue is that frankly, like calling Muslim child-sex-slave gangs in the UK, “Asian”, they have taken a belief and made it into an actual racist issue. No Japanese people were or are involved in the UK (and many more locations) forced prostitution of child girls. Or Chinese as far as we know. But LOTS of Muslims who where not Asian were most certainly involved. In this case, they characterize the Mentally ill as people ready to go off and stab people yelling Allah Ackbar. Keep in mind that in Western mental hospitals, those who have identity issues and think they are Jesus, may walk around in sandals and a bedsheet blessing people and forgiving them. Those who think they are Mohammad would try and murder entire tribes of people and write about the rivers of blood on the streets. So the problem isnt so much mental illness, as who they are trying to emulate.
“Then they surrendered, and the apostle confined them in Medina in the quarter of d. al-Harith,
a woman of B. al-Najjar. Then the apostle went out to the market of Medina (which is still its market today)
and dug trenches in it. Then he sent for them and struck off their heads in those trenches as they were brought out to him in batches.
3. At this point, posting news stories about grotesque crimes and antisocial acts by Muslim and occasionally other illegal entrants to the UK and West in general, is not where the story lies. It actually is in how the judicial and enforcement systems themselves now operate as part of a larger machine to crush the legacy peoples and cultures that created the West as it is, and are the inheritors of Classical civilization, ranging from Israel to Rome and Greece. Bringing in people very likely to commit these acts, paying them to not have to do anything purposeful like learn a trade and actually become part of Western Civilization, and then when some of them inevitably commit atrocities, the publicity around the act will inevitably make them the victim and their victims the perp, framed sometimes in the Marxist Oppressor/Oppressed narrative, but sometimes as they are victims of mental illness in a society that doesn’t care about them and their victims are privileged. Meaning white people or Jews who actually work or have families. That being of course, just a minor variation of the Marxist method.
This story fits the theme very well. But is probably the tenth one I have seen this week, and that is without looking for them.
4. More on the same theme:
5. The public must learn to distrust the MS Media if it hopes to EVER understand the simplest things taking place around them.
Woman stabbed and set on fire inside Stuttgart shopping center
Police arrested a 54-year-old German national following a two-hour manhunt, but questions remain over whether the description refers to a German-born or a naturalized suspect
A 47-year-old woman was left fighting for her life on Thursday after she was repeatedly stabbed and then set on fire inside Stuttgart’s Milaneo shopping center.
Emergency calls began reaching police shortly after the mall opened at around 10:15 a.m. The victim, reportedly an employee at one of the stores, was rushed to the hospital with life-threatening injuries and underwent emergency surgery.
According to Bild, the suspected attacker fled the scene, prompting police to evacuate and seal off the shopping center while armed officers searched the complex. A helicopter was also deployed.
Officers arrested a 54-year-old man at approximately 12:10 p.m. in Stuttgart-Heumaden, several miles from the mall. Prosecutors said the suspect and victim were, or had previously been, in a relationship.
Investigators are reviewing surveillance footage and securing evidence as they attempt to establish the motive. Authorities said there was no continuing danger to the public, and the Milaneo later reopened.
I asked Grok for an update and yeah there is substantive information if you know what you are seeing. But only if you already know enough to know what is likely the case:
According to German police and media reports (including SWR, Stuttgarter Nachrichten, and others):The suspect is a 54-year-old man described as a German national (deutscher Staatsangehöriger).
He is the husband of the 47-year-old victim (or was in a relationship with her; later reports specify he attacked his wife).
The attack happened at her workplace — a food store in the basement of the Milaneo shopping center in Stuttgart — on the morning of 23 July 2026.
He repeatedly stabbed her with a knife and then set her on fire. She suffered life-threatening injuries and required emergency surgery.
He fled, was hunted for about two hours (including with a helicopter), and was arrested after members of the public spotted him on a city tram and alerted police.
A detention order was issued; he is in custody on suspicion of attempted murder.No further personal details (birthplace, ethnicity, migration background, prior convictions, or mental-health history) have been officially released. German authorities often list naturalized citizens simply as “German nationals,” so it is not yet clear whether he was born in Germany or acquired citizenship later. Police explicitly said they are still operating under the previous disclosure rules.
No name for perp or background offered.
Thank you all for checking out this site.
I found this interview with comedian, Ben Bankas by Louder with Crowder to be quite interesting. Entertaining as well. Which is a nice combination.
This woman runs an interesting channel. She is a Mortician, and has a YouTube channel where she discusses her work and aspects of death. In a very non-offensive way actually. I am not aware if she mentions the white fibrin clots of the mRNA injected, but this one is about Jeffery Epstein and things that puzzled her about his death.
I would only add one thing.
There are only 2 reasons for a political assassination. 1. Obviously to get rid of a problem. But 2. To make sure everyone knows that it was a political assassination as a deterrent to anyone else who may be thinking of becoming a problem to the actor in question. The Clintons seem to have made their kills obvious in the same way. Like one Wikileaks whistleblower, Seth Rich, who was found killed in a DC suburb in Bloomingdale with a Gold Rolex on him, and a wallet full of cash and the official story was it was a robbery/mugging. His family hired a PI who openly stated that this was a political assassination and then the family fired him. Which I didn’t understand. Till I found out they had another son. In that context everything she says makes perfect sense.
