Sweden: Teachers criticized for Holocaust discussion

[It needs to be understood that the article below, translated from a Swedish news site, is not just another story about ‘immigrants’ denying the Holocaust. This is a story about a teacher getting in trouble for stopping an adult immigrant at a learning center who stood up and disrupted a news piece on TV about the anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz demanding that everyone agree that all Jews are liars and that this didn’t happen. This is about a teacher being reprimanded for not allowing a student to insist on a fully sharia compliant view of history irrespective of the facts of which the teacher and supervisor are fully aware. – Eeyore]

One of the biggest newspapers in Sweden (Sydsvenskan) which covers Malmö and the surrounding country brings the following choking story about how much power immigrants have attained In Sweden.

During an SFI lesson (Swedish for immigrants/asylants) last week, the students were asked to listen to the news.

One of the issues was about the anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz concentration camp:

From this Swedish Website

(with commentary and translation by Hans Erling Jensen with mush thanks!)

During an SFI lesson at the core of last week, the students listen to the news.

One was about the anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz concentration camp.

There are different opinions about what happened next.

The teacher says, that one of the student questioned the truth of holocaust, and that he explained to the student, that it was not the time and the place to discuss the student’s claim.

But the student continued to highly express his views on the Holocaust and Jews, according to the teacher. In the end, the teacher argued against the student and said that the student had to leave the classroom if he could not be quiet.

When a supervisor was required to solve the situation, the student said that he only wanted to provide the class with facts about Holocaust and the stories about concentration camps.

The day after, the teacher was called to a meeting with the school principal. The dialogue was recorded. The newspaper has a copy of this recording.

The meeting was recorded and HD has taken note of the recording.

”The student told me that he had been misunderstood and that he felt the teacher had offended him by asking him to leave the class room and called him a holocaust-denier and a nazi”, the principal says on the recording.

The teacher answered, that the student denied holocaust without any doubt!

“But the student said that he was violated”, the principal answered.

– He has not been singled out. I just told him that it’s not okay to say that the Jews were just lying.

”But the class room was not the right place for this discussion”, the principle said. “You have to be careful about what you are saying, because you have the linguistic issue, and should not violate the students!”

The conversation continues. The coordinator emphasizes that teachers must be careful to discuss, they have a linguistic advantage and must not violate students.

”Ok”, says the teacher, ”but I have played this news program for other classes with no problems at all!”

– You may also keep in mind that what we regard as history is the history we have read. When we have other students who have taken part in other history books, it is no use discussing the facts against facts.

After this meeting the teacher felt himself let down by the school board. He reckoned, that he himself had defended the values stated in the Swedish education institutions about democracy and equality of men, and for that now only being criticized.

”I was indignant during the conversation but tried to be cooperative. I am only a new teacher on the job and I did not want to be a difficult person. But thinking the whole thing through afterwards I found that they (the principal and the board) made a fatal mistake. Holocaust is an important issue”, the teacher says to the newspaper.

 

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

9 Replies to “Sweden: Teachers criticized for Holocaust discussion”

  1. Bishop accuses Turkey over Syrian Christians
    http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/bishop-accuses-turkey-over-syrian-christians-.aspx?PageID=238&NID=78846&NewsCatID=352

    However, what you won’t find in this article or in any other English language article is this: the bishop says the Red Cross gives all its aid to the Red Crescent who doesn’t distribute ANY AID to Christians! He says all the people from the Red Crescent are Muslim Brotherhood members or affiliates and they don’t give you anything if they hear you’re a Christian.

    You can find the info on the page below (French text and audio. Unfortunately, I don’t have the time to translate it.)
    http://fr.radiovaticana.va/news/2015/02/24/syrie__des_dizaines_de_chr%C3%A9tiens_captur%C3%A9s_par_letat_islamique/1125449

  2. This is just the tip of the iceberg and just the start of something that’s going to get worse. Anti-Semitism as it stands at the moment will seem like just a walk in the park in a few years’ time. Hatred of Jews will get stronger and Holocaust denial will become fashionable and acceptable. In fact, it will become politically incorrect not to deny the Holocaust.
    Apart from the grotesque Islamic Republics, Sweden is leading the way in this.

    • Once the Jew hatred goes to the point that it is politically incorrect to not deny the holocaust the death camps will start being built.

    • Yes, Softly, Holocaust denial is becoming fashionable.

      The time when civilized peoples united to cry, “Never againnever again shall be human blood be so devalued”- that time is over.

      What we’ve witnessed already has robbed us of our innocence. Now we know for a certainty; it’s on us to make it – at the very least – No more.

  3. Darul Uloom Haqqania students involved in killing of Benazir (dawn, Feb 26, 2015)
    http://www.dawn.com/news/1166084

    “An Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) in Rawalpindi was informed on Thursday that students of Darul Uloom Haqqania, Akora Khattak, were involved in the murder of former prime minister Benazir Bhutto, however, the seminary administration denied having any connection with the suspects. The hearing of Benazir murder case — headed by Justice pervez Ismail — was held at the ATC special court established inside Adiala Jail, Rawalpindi.

    FIA Peshawar Inspector Naseer Ahmed and Sub-Inspector Adnan appeared before the court and informed about the involvement of Darul Uloom Haqqania’s students in the killing of Benazir Bhutto. Both the state witnesses also presented related evidence to support their statements.

    During the hearing, Darul Uloom Haqqania’s director education Wisal Ahmed also recorded his statement. He admitted that the suspected suicide bomber Abdullah alias Saddam Nadir alias Qari Ismail and arrested suspects Rasheed alias Turabi and Faiz Muhammad had received education from the seminary but rejected the claim that Darul Uloom Haqqania holds any association with the above mentioned suspects….”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.