observant muslims in UK expose themselves

Following the broadcast of the normally islamist and paedophile enabling BBC’s excellent documentary “Inside out” on muslim paedophile rape and slavery gangs targeting Sikh girls in the UK, and some excellent missionary work being done by Bhai Mohan Singh with the victims, this has proved to be quite an eye opener and has sparked debate.

2 days ago, a Dawah group, islamhounslow produced a video response on youtube

Various EDL divisions including the Sikh and Jewish rightly proceeded to rip the response apart as islamhounslow had used the typical spin we are used to seeing, here is a selection of the comments:

Their answer is, “it is not a part of islam”, and they “don’t need to say any more”. I call taqiyya, of course they are lying

koran 33:50 – “O Prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers; and those (slaves) whom thy right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war whom Allah has assigned to thee”

Not helped by their stinking imams teaching them that “uncovered meat” (our women) have no value, granted they do this to get their own women to cover up (hijab etc) but the effect intentional or not is that muslims are taught our women can be raped.

Only yesterday I posted a story about underage egyptian girls being sold for “temporary marriages” (38,000 every day), that is child prostitution, it is allowed in islamic countries and is sanctioned by the imams who carry out the “ceremonies” (we call that paedophile pimping).

This from last week, “In Kabul, trading women like cattle” the most “islamic place” after Saudi.

Also from the unholy koran 24:33. “do not compel your slave girls to prostitution, when they desire to keep chaste, in order to seek the frail good of this world’s life; and whoever compels them, then surely after their compulsion Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.” If they compel a “slave girl” to become a prostitute, they can still go to heaven (How decent of allah).

Grooming these infidel girls to become prostitutes as these muslims do is slavery, sex slavery, unlike the classic paedophiles highlighted in the recent bbc and catholic church scandals, equally as abhorrent, but a very different crime, sanctioned by their religion and widely practiced legally in their islamic countries.

So they don’t even try to explain how it’s only muslim gangs raping our children? All he says is “if it’s true” and “it’s a problem with society” scumbag paedophile enablers doubting the facts and blaming the victims.

Not surprisingly similar comments started to build up directly on their youtube posting, so they blocked commenting, realising that they had exposed themselves, they pulled the original video response from youtube, luckily as you see here it is saved for prosperity.

18 Replies to “observant muslims in UK expose themselves”

  1. What liars. There is a Hadith in which it says that nothing can be more holy and righteous than to marry a 6-year-old girl and then groom her into becoming the perfect wife, and those two liars damn well know that. You’re not supposed to have intercourse when she’s six, but she can begin her training into just how you like other things. That’s right…

    Mohammed had a narcissistic personality disorder and was only capable of seeing things as they related to giving him his own personal pleasure. If you didn’t exist to make his life better, you didn’t exist. Muslims crawl around on their knees praying to a malignant lying psychopathic mob boss who’s been dead for 1400 years. I honestly don’t think that the Bedouin society from which Mohammed Abdallah sprang had evolved to the point that they even knew what empathy was at the time Mohammed was born. The only thing that mattered to them was what a big strong macho man wanted for himself. Gee, sound familiar?

  2. Amazing how these two wannabee or actual arabs start off with a few sentences of arabic islamic supremacists gibberish then break into woglish dialect. They’d make great material for a new Borat type character.

  3. Age of consent in Spain is 13. Vatican City 12. Think on that. It’s a multicultural world folks, so suck up your disgust. Just because they don’t adhere to the same customs and practices as we do doesn’t give us the right to criticise. We must celebrate and welcome all cultures. Not to do so makes us all bigots, and that’s the worst crime of all.

    If the local customs were to kill the first born child, would we respect that? No of course not. So why do we give any kind of credence or lip service to customs such as, women covering their entire bodies, or even their heads when men don’t have to, female genital mutilation, treating women as chattels, child rape etc. It is abuse just given the name”custom” or religious custom. We don’t still crucify people, at least not in this country, or stone people for adultery, even though we are probably all descended from people whose customs are now barbaric. the difference is some cultures are still stuck practicing these same unchanged barbaric customs. when considering practices that are now taking place in this country we should remember this, just because something is a custom is no argument whatsoever! In England centuries ago promises of marriages and marriages between children and infant girls and older men were common. Monarchs arranged marriages for children at the earliest opportunity; the marriage of Arthur then brother Henry VIII to Catherine is an example but they were all same generation. Couples were often married by proxy. It was tacitly understood sexual contact, until puberty passed for both sexes, would not occur. This also applied to older men with young girls. It’s very likely the custom was abused but history has left no indisputable evidence. Legally, paedophilia wasn’t recognised at all. The culture was upholding dynastic property creation and for kings and queens, power, diplomacy, land, kingdoms. A child or children were purely bargaining chips.
    IA
    http://www.londonschoolofislamics.org.uk

  4. @iftikhara “….Just because they don’t adhere to the same customs and practices as we do ”
    doesn’t give us the right to criticise. …”

    Who is ‘we’ ? So far you’re just speaking for yourself.

    “…We must celebrate and welcome all cultures. …”

    Why ‘must’ we – who programmed that into your brainpan?

    Not to do so makes us all bigots, and that’s the worst crime of all….”

    So have you got something against ‘bigots’ then? You don’t like what they think – so you ostracise them or something – for committing the ‘worst crime of all’? Cutting off their hands or feet – stone them or beheading them is what is done for far lesser crimes in some retarded societies.

    I don’t like people who bonk donkeys for example . They themselves might have all the justification for it in the world and make the most eloquent arguments. I think that it’s sick. So I’m the one who is ignorant and should be ‘so sucking up my disgust.’ then in your multi-culti accept-anything fantasy world I guess.

    I’m really glad you’re not a politician – or are you?

  5. If all cultures are equal then the non Moslem has the same rights as the Moslems, what would happen if non Moslems started grooming young Moslem girls to become prostitutes? People like Iffi would be scream bloody murder and trying to get the criminals executed.

  6. I went to highschool too, iftikhara, but thanks for the history lesson. You are employing a disingenuous debating technique known as the “Red Herring”, with a side-order of “non sequitur” thrown in.

    The guys in the video are saying that it is not sanctioned in the Quran for a man to marry a little girl, and the fact is, that it is. Whether Richard the Whatever bonked a 12-year-old or not has nothing to do with it, but it takes our mind off the truth for a moment, doesn’t it. The point is that these bearded characters are lying about their religion and some of us don’t like dealing in lies…

  7. Again I ask, why the Sikhs? they are not Crusaders and tghey did not engage in imperialism. and yet they are persecuted by Muslims.

    I doubt there is a leftists that will answer this to any sane person’s satisfaction.

  8. iftikhara

    Age of marriage has gnerally ctrended up to the mid to late teens for the past 200 years. It use to be lower and laws reflected the fact.

    But when I look at marriage age say for ancient Greeks and Romans I see that they were higher than in medieval Europe. Apparently they thought it was best for people to be older. so why would the Europeans have marriage at younger ages in medieval times. Because life was nasty, brutish and short. Times were unsettled. When times were settled relatively in the Mediterranean marriage ages were higher. Marriage ages also trended up in Europe when things became more settled after the black death, infighting and Crusades by Muslims ended in intensity.

    Vatican city is part of the Papacy which is very conservative. they move very slowly. Their marriageable age has no effect because i bet very few people live there who are intending to raise kids. It is mainly apartments and offices for the clergy. So your example was a red herring. but We know that you practice taqiyya and Allah will throw into the lake of fire and leave you there for eternity. Have fun.

    The Spanish might have the marriage age at 13, but I see that more as a blue law and not a cultural practice among the Spanish.

    We are not hearing of 8 and 9 year old girls being torn apart by their husbands as they try to consummate their marriage on their wedding night. That happens in Yemen and other Muslim countries and not Spain.

  9. One day IFT will no longer haunt this site. We’ll see him arrested by police for grooming infidel girls or as an expert witness defending the groomers.

  10. @ iftikhara : If the Muslim religion is so good, why are so many Muslim people demonstrating in various Middle East countries AGAINST things like Sharia Law and the Muslim Brotherhood ??

  11. Red says:

    September 11, 2013 at 1:41 pm

    One day IFT will no longer haunt this site. We’ll see him arrested by police for grooming infidel girls or as an expert witness defending the groomers.

    Rapes and sexual grooming are part and parcel of western society. Teenage pregnancy rate in Great Britain is the highest in western Europe. It is a civilised country and Yemen is a backward country because it allows young girls to get married. It is also gross hypocrisy for the police to prosecute paedophiles when the government is overseeing boy scouts being given condoms from the age 11 and girls of the same age being told it is OK to have sex if they use ‘protection’. Boys and girls at age 11 are not allowed to marry but they can have sex and produce children. Every parent is worried about his child being indoctrinated into the idea that gay and sexual promiscuity is “normal” modes of behaviour. At the same time, all parents have the right to control their children and it is their Duty to control them.

    Under the law of Islam, the punishment for rapist is “stoned to death” in public by public — no matter what religion the criminal is affiliated. Rape is considered as a serious offense in Islam warranting death to offenders, more than just “illegal sexual intercourse” commonly known as adultery.

    The thought of being a virgin on your wedding night forget it, where are our morals and values. The answer, down the toilet. These are children having sex, getting pregnant exploring with partners. Just where is society going, I’m not psychic but from what’s going on in society today the future does not look pretty.

    What’s the point of the legal age being 16 when you are being taught at school that it’s ok as long as you practice safe sex. Nothing about love, respect, serious relationships or more importantly abstinence! Oh and something needs to be done about BOYS, too! Girls can’t be the only ones responsible for resisting pressure you know. More sex education in schools = more teenage pregnancies= more abortions. One of the problems is that now in schools we are taught safe sex at an early age, and not abstinence. The message was basically that sex at a young age is fine as long as it’s practiced safely. It should be taught that at such a young age, neither protected or unprotected sex is ok. The message is simply not clear enough.

    I AM A RELIGIOUS MUSLIM. MY ADVISE TO GOVERNMENTS THROUGH OUT THE WORLD WOULD BE TO IMPLEMENT SHARIAH LAW FOR THE MUSLIMS ONLY. GET THESE GUYS BEHEADED. DON’T WASTE TIME FEEDING THEM IN JAIL. SIMILARLY, WHIP THOSE MUSLIMS WHO ARE CAUGHT IN POSSESSION OF ALCOHOL AND DRUGS. WHAT MANY NON-MUSLIMS DON’T REALISE IS THAT THE QURAN IS A LAW BOOK PERTAINING TO THE MUSLIMS. THEREFORE MUSLIMS MUST SUFFER THE BRUNT OF ISLAMIC LAW, SHOULD THEY BEHAVE LIKE ANIMALS.
    IA
    London School of Islamics Trust
    http://www.londonschoolofislamics.org.uk

  12. iftikhara..it states in your koran..it is ok to rape little girls…if its good enough for mo…its good enough for the average muslim.it is also deemed permissible by your holy men and imans…and they wouldn’t lie would they.but dont worry the cultural clash is coming..the fuse has been lit..hopefully a short one…any non muslim reading this DO NOT let your daughters become friends with muslim females..they would help their male relatives groom and rape them…

  13. @Ifti: “……Rapes and sexual grooming are part and parcel of western society.”

    Aren’t they?

    http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/sep/10/abuse-asian-girls-missed-white-victims

    (and guess who the ‘groomers’ are)

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/10061217/Imams-promote-grooming-rings-Muslim-leader-claims.html

    not very Anglo looking are they? Akhtar Dogar, Anjum Dogar, Kamar Jamil, Assad Hussain. Bottom: Mohammed Karrar, Bassam Karrar and Zeeshan Ahmed – hmmm, I’d say they derive from a non-Anglo culture. Perhaps they’re shamanist Eskimos.

    “…….Teenage pregnancy rate in Great Britain is the highest in western Europe…..”

    So? And seeing in many islamic countries very young girls get married – teenage pregnancies must be high their too right?

    http://www.therevival.co.uk/single-muslim-and-pregnant

    read up on pregnant muslim girls: http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Muslim_Statistics_-_Children

    and as for rape crimes: http://shariaunveiled.wordpress.com/2013/06/17/muslims-earn-sweden-the-title-of-rape-capital-of-the-world/

    http://themuslimissue.wordpress.com/2012/08/06/norway-90-of-all-violent-rapes-in-oslo-committed-by-muslims/

    “…MY ADVISE TO GOVERNMENTS THROUGH OUT THE WORLD WOULD BE TO IMPLEMENT SHARIAH LAW FOR THE MUSLIMS ONLY….”

    That would be great wouldn’t it? Conning Western governments to permit and promote a parallel legal system for one small section of their population – purely and simply to get muslims to behave. Making Western nations even more attractive to middle eastern fanatics – seeing that a de facto state within a state would have been set up at the expense (in more ways than one) of taxpayers.

    In fact it would only attract the fanatics – the secular and real moderate muslims would want to stay away. Which is exactly the opposite of what we need.

    ‘….WHIP THOSE MUSLIMS WHO ARE CAUGHT IN POSSESSION OF ALCOHOL AND DRUGS..”
    and what of the rights to liberty and self determination of those muslims who do not wish to follow your desires? he ones who say ‘no more’ and wake up out of the fog of the myth? The ones who might like to take a peak at the experience of an expanded awareness. Or the ones who might like to relax with a drink from time to time. In your ideal world, no doubt spelled out in another little green book of ignorance somewhere in the London School of Islamics – Muslims would be interfering in the lives of the newly non-muslim.

    Clearly , you are NOT a politician.

  14. “Rapes and sexual grooming are part and parcel of western society. Teenage pregnancy rate in Great Britain is the highest in western Europe”

    The West is being hit by islam and Communisma nd this is contributing to disintegrating the social order. A lot of what happened to the west in the 1960s were the result of the Soviets. it seems to warm your heart that the social order is decaying making it easier to replace with your social order. it warms your heart.

    Let us just assume you are successful. We are just going to go to a new round. You will not be Shia or Sunni or Wahabi enough. Be careful what you wish for.

  15. I AM A RELIGIOUS MUSLIM. MY ADVISE TO GOVERNMENTS THROUGH OUT THE WORLD WOULD BE TO IMPLEMENT SHARIAH LAW FOR THE MUSLIMS ONLY.

    So, in a court of Law, the Kufar judge swaps the bible for the koran to swear on, and the kufar Jury hands out stoning or amputation if the Mohammedan defendant is guilty?

    I am amazed at this innovative idea, but yes, yes I agree wholeheartedly with you, it would work. There would be no Musselmen in prison beasting the younger and weaker men… because they’d not exist at the tax payers expense – they’d all be dead. I like your thinking. It’s no different than those dictators who pay lip-service to Islam and rule their countries by sharia law. Rather than a Caliphate, a Dimmiphate of Muslims would live exclusively under Sharia. Your London School turns out academics of the highest caliber. Wow. Revolution here we come.

    “GET THESE GUYS BEHEADED. DON’T WASTE TIME FEEDING THEM IN JAIL. SIMILARLY, WHIP THOSE MUSLIMS WHO ARE CAUGHT IN POSSESSION OF ALCOHOL AND DRUGS.”

    I’m with you.

    “WHAT MANY NON-MUSLIMS DON’T REALISE IS THAT THE QURAN IS A LAW BOOK PERTAINING TO THE MUSLIMS. THEREFORE MUSLIMS MUST SUFFER THE BRUNT OF ISLAMIC LAW, SHOULD THEY BEHAVE LIKE ANIMALS.”

    And that’s it exactly. If they don’t behave like civilized people and love their neighbor, (those not of their religion) as themselves, but like animals of ‘might is right’, and looking at non-believing women as sluts, they should suffer the full brunt of the Sharia law.

    SHOULD THEY BEHAVE LIKE ANIMALS.

    You are the man: If Muslims should behave like animals. You must be given the keys of Tehran and paraded before the Imams as the example of True Islam to spread your message that the kufar apply the Rule of Islam in trials of Muslims who flout Mohammad’s Laws.

    Thank you.

    You know, It’s true: You can train a labrador, but have to brutalize a rottweiler to submit, to then, superficially at least, behave decently to all people.

    If they knew the local policewoman would beat their women with a stick for showing a wisp hair, or a man whispering sweet sexual advances in the street to a Black female or a Muslim playing music on their car stereo, then we’d have a better society. You have found the solution to the ‘Muslim Problem’.

    Do you think the Communists offer the same solution? To dig a long ditch for all communist-socialists who flout Stalin’s Law? That all the Socialist politicians involved in child abuse be slaughtered overnight? Just taken away by a special police unit? Your solution is just so sweet.

    Please, will your school issue a fatwa on this. Something like: all Diversities are under the law of the Civilized Man and will be judged according to their judgement of others. Matter of faith will be settled by matter of faith. Matter of conscience will be settled by matters of conscience. The former will live where ‘the truth is no defense’ the second will live by ‘the truth is your defense’.

    The more I go into your solution Imam iftikhara of the London School of Islamics Trust, the more I see clarity.

    I look forward to your further expansion on the subject and your method to get Western Governments to implement it.

    You have made my day. Make it so.

  16. iftikhara, every time i post, you end up hijacking it with your drivel, drawing people away from the subject at hand (these 2 smug lying apologists). do it again, i promise i will rip you a new one, be warned, I don’t play fair.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*