Tracking the Chinese ship cutting cables and doing damage over the past couple of days – Sailed from Russia with Russian captain

Posted on by

A little earlier:

Most recently:

And of course, this:

New system fires U.S. missiles into Russia; Putin alters doctrine

By Mike Glenn THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Ukraine fired American-supplied missiles into Russian territory on the 1,000th day of its war against its invaders, officials said Tuesday, as Russian President Vladimir Putin formally lowered the threshold for his country’s use of nuclear weapons.

Days earlier, the Biden administration reportedly signed off on a policy change allowing Ukraine to strike targets deep inside Russian territory with the U.S.-supplied Army Tactical Missile System, or ATACMS.

The Kremlin said Tuesday that its air defense troops had shot down five Ukrainian missiles and

damaged a sixth, using their S-400 and Pantsir air defense missile systems. Fragments from the damaged ATACMS missile caused a “fire that was quickly extinguished” at a military facility in the target area.

Ukraine had yet to confirm that it launched the attack inside Russian territory using the ATACMS, but the Ukrainian General Staff in Kyiv said in a statement that an attack had taken out a major ammunition arsenal near the Russian city of Krachev.

“The destruction of ammunition depots will continue for the army of the Russian occupiers in order to stop the armed aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine,” the statement said.

Mr. Putin has said the use of American-supplied missiles to strike Russian targets could dramatically escalate the conflict between Ukraine and Russia and could draw NATO into the fight.

The Russian doctrine says a nuclear response would be justified in the face of “aggression by any non-nuclear state, but with the participation or support of a nuclear country.” That scenario closely mirrors Ukraine’s situation, given the heavy support it has received from the U.S., Britain and France, all nuclear powers.

Mr. Putin would remain the “ultimate authority” on whether to launch a nuclear attack, the Kremlin said.

The Reuters news agency, citing a document posted on the official Russian government website, said the doctrine also notes that “a nuclear response from Russia is possible in the event of a critical threat to its sovereignty, even with conventional weapons; in the event of an attack on Belarus as a member of the Union State; [or] in the event of a massive launch of military aircraft, cruise missiles, drones, other aircraft and their crossing the Russian border.”

Russia also published a propaganda video about how many nukes it would take and where to land them to end Western European civilization.

Is this the new Covid?

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

15 Replies to “Tracking the Chinese ship cutting cables and doing damage over the past couple of days – Sailed from Russia with Russian captain”

  2. They don’t need multiple missiles into Britain. One EMP over central Europe and one over North America and the game is over. The US EMP report said that 90% of the US population would be dead one year after an EMP strike. Why would the Russians deal with the chance of radiation blowing back to them when they can basically kill everyone with one weapon? BTW, I believe the old Soviet first strike for a nuclear war also includes EMP burst to attempt to take out any defences with poor or no shielding.

  4. September 12, 2024 18:55
    Answer to a media question
    Following his address to the plenary session of the United Cultures Forum, Vladimir Putin answered a question from a media representative.

    September 12, 2024 18:55
    Question: Over the past few days, we have been hearing statements at a very high level in the UK and the United States that the Kiev regime will be allowed to strike targets deep inside Russia using Western long-range weapons. Apparently, this decision is either about to be made, or has already been made, as far as we can see. This is actually quite extraordinary. Could you comment on what is going on?
    […]
    President of Russia Vladimir Putin:
    The fact is that – I have mentioned this, and any expert, both in our country and in the West, will confirm this – the Ukrainian army is not capable of using cutting-edge high-precision long-range systems supplied by the West. They cannot do that. These weapons are impossible to employ without intelligence data from satellites which Ukraine does not have. This can only be done using the European Union’s satellites, or US satellites – in general, NATO satellites. This is the first point.

    The second point – perhaps the most important, the key point even – is that only NATO military personnel can assign flight missions to these missile systems. Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this.

    Therefore, it is not a question of allowing the Ukrainian regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not. It is about deciding whether NATO countries become directly involved in the military conflict or not.

    If this decision is made, it will mean nothing short of direct involvement – it will mean that NATO countries, the United States, and European countries are parties to the war in Ukraine. This will mean their direct involvement in the conflict, and it will clearly change the very essence, the very nature of the conflict dramatically.

    This will mean that NATO countries – the United States and European countries – are at war with Russia. And if this is the case, then, bearing in mind the change in the essence of the conflict, we will make appropriate decisions in response to the threats that will be posed to us.

    http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/75092

  5. September 12, 2024 18:55
    Answer to a media question
    Following his address to the plenary session of the United Cultures Forum, Vladimir Putin answered a question from a media representative.

    September 12, 2024 18:55
    Question: Over the past few days, we have been hearing statements at a very high level in the UK and the United States that the Kiev regime will be allowed to strike targets deep inside Russia using Western long-range weapons. Apparently, this decision is either about to be made, or has already been made, as far as we can see. This is actually quite extraordinary. Could you comment on what is going on?
    […]
    President of Russia Vladimir Putin:
    The fact is that – I have mentioned this, and any expert, both in our country and in the West, will confirm this – the Ukrainian army is not capable of using cutting-edge high-precision long-range systems supplied by the West. They cannot do that. These weapons are impossible to employ without intelligence data from satellites which Ukraine does not have. This can only be done using the European Union’s satellites, or US satellites – in general, NATO satellites. This is the first point.

    The second point – perhaps the most important, the key point even – is that only NATO military personnel can assign flight missions to these missile systems. Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this.

    Therefore, it is not a question of allowing the Ukrainian regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not. It is about deciding whether NATO countries become directly involved in the military conflict or not.

    If this decision is made, it will mean nothing short of direct involvement – it will mean that NATO countries, the United States, and European countries are parties to the war in Ukraine. This will mean their direct involvement in the conflict, and it will clearly change the very essence, the very nature of the conflict dramatically.

    This will mean that NATO countries – the United States and European countries – are at war with Russia. And if this is the case, then, bearing in mind the change in the essence of the conflict, we will make appropriate decisions in response to the threats that will be posed to us.

    http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/75092

  8. – The target of Russia’s IC ballistic attack this morning?

    .If Pivdenmash (Production Union Pivdennyi Machine-Building Plant) in Dnipro was the target of the RS-26 strike, then Ukraine may have gotten a big dent in its aerospace industries. The plant apparently manufactures rocket engines, launch vehicles, missiles and sat components, including the Neptune missile.

    https://x.com/CheburekiMan/status/1859555411608862970

  10. What?! No one is allowed to do anything against GloboHomoClownWorld. Bow before Biden/Zod.
    Not a Putin fanboy, but it’s as if the West never expects any pushback. We are fools for thinking this.

    • The treasonous West does expect pushback, they want it. They have their masters to please. Their masters are Blackrock, JP Morgan, Vanguard.

      Ukraine lost its sovereignty when Zelensky ceded agricultural – mineral resource – rebuilding rights to Blackrock. And the military industrial complex is part and parcel of Blackrock.

      There are trillions at stake and politicians/world leaders have much to gain with this conflict as Blackrock is their paymaster.