Swedish parliamentarian, Swedish SD Member of the Riksdag, Richard Jomshof speaks on Islam and its consequences to Sweden and Europe

Please read the story details at RAIR Foundation

At last we have a measured, calm and lucid member of a European Parliament that speaks about Islam in the most plain and accurate language, and in a way not easily triggering to the leftist dialectical engineers. In other words, the agents of repressive tolerance and other weaponized language tactics of the left as they have been deployed on us for the last 100 years. This is a VERY good interview. Please watch it and spread it and hopefully we can find a way to support him. If Sweden is to have a chance, this would be the guy who could create it for them. Sweden has its own energy, like Canada. So there is no need for them to be at the behest of oil producing muslim countries.

About Eeyore

Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger's catholic

6 Replies to “Swedish parliamentarian, Swedish SD Member of the Riksdag, Richard Jomshof speaks on Islam and its consequences to Sweden and Europe”

  1. My only concern is that he uses the weasel word “Islamism” that leads nowhere.

  2. “Democratizing Islam,” as he seems to favor, is a fool’s errand: we in the US found that out when GWBush thrust that canard forth in order to allay our natural fears and misgivings about inviting oil (Islam) to mix with water (the West) — and how convenient was that?

    Only a blind man or a deceiver or a an ignoramus could attempt/force such a disastrous scheme on his own people. Me thinks that this otherwise sane Jomshof has much to learn — I recommend Stephen Coughlin’s Catastrophic Failure; at least digesting this tome would be a step in the right direction.

    And don’t say the dog ate my homework! You, Mr. Jomshof, as yet, have much to learn.

    • You feel qualified to give him homework?

      Stephen Coughlin LEARNED from observing the plight of infiltrated countries and people like this statesman. The Islamic texts, the double-talk at the UN, all related to the reality of convivencia.

      We can still afford to call a spade a bloody shovel, but that’s a privilege rapidly eroding. The percentage of Moslems is still below a critical threshold in North America. That’s no longer the case in much of Europe.

      We’ve been thrashing it out for years, not everyone has been deaf-dumb-blind. Check out El Ingles at GoV:
      https://gatesofvienna.net/authors/el-ingles/

  3. The Sweden Democrats are becoming mainstream and they are way more soft and timid than before, Jomshof chooses his words very carefully.
    Fun fact: he used to be a teacher but was sacked because of his views on immigration in general and islam in particular, so now he is a member of parliament instead and I call that getting even.
    As long as the SD let Jomshof speak his mind the party have at least some function as a safety-valve while also blocking radical parties like the AfS from growing, the swedish PC politicians and media knows this very well but would of course never say so.

      • Islamism.

        20% of the population of Israel is Moslem. Plus they’re BFF with Azerbaijan, a country that’s always had a significant Jewish minority and has better relations with their cousin than with their brother and neighbor, Iran. Shia.

        Now the UAE and Bahrain are doing big business with Israel under the auspices of the Abraham Accords. Tourism is huge, young people connect _yugely_ online. (Arabic has been a required subject in Israeli schools for several years. As a security measure.)

        So the Hebrew equivalent of Islamism – or radical Islamist terrorism is the way to go.

        Egypt parses the same expression to condemn the MB. Crown Prince MbS has to tread carefully, but he’s beginning to make similar distinctions.